In de VS was het nog gekker, daar sprak men bagatelliserend over de grote vernielingen die werden aangericht na de wedstrijd, vernielingen aangericht door de supporters van de winnende club..... CNN sprak over pure poëzie op de politiescanner........
Als er weer een gekleurde onterecht wordt doodgeschoten door de politie in de VS (dat is altijd onterecht, 'maar goed....') en de gekleurde VS bewoners gaan de straat op, durft men zelfs van terreur te spreken als deze demonstranten een weg of een kruispunt blokkeren..... Voor dat laatste is in een paar staten al wetgeving aangenomen, die automobilisten vrijwaart van strafvervolging als ze op dat moment iemand doodrijden.........
Het is als met de schietpartijen in de VS waarbij veel mensen worden verwond of vermoord (iets dat met een paar slachtoffers bijna dagelijks gebeurt), je keer op keer te horen krijgt dat het niet om terrorisme gaat....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Uiteraard is het vermoorden van mensen de ultieme vorm van terreur!!
Acht jaar Obama hebben totaal geen verbetering gebracht voor de gekleurden in de VS, zij behoren nog steeds tot een minderheid waarvan men vindt dat die wel uitgedund mag worden middels moord of gevangenneming.....
Lees het volgende relaas van Nick Bernabe, zoals geplaatst op Anti-Media:
America: Your Hypocrisy on Philadelphia’s Super Bowl Riot Is F*cking Outrageous
February
5, 2018 at 1:03 pm
Written
by Nick
Bernabe
(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) —
We’ve
all seen those comments
when all-too-familiar fatal police shootings in America trigger
protests that lead to riots. “Those
Black Lives Matter thugs are destroying their own neighborhoods,”
people
shout on social media. “BLM
ARE TERRORISTS!”
“Black
on black crime” suddenly becomes a topic of expertise for Facebook
commentators. Never mind the epidemic of police killing over
a thousand Americans
every year, with black males facing
the highest per-capita
execution-by-police rates of any group.
Media
commentators are quick
to condemn the
riots as misplaced anger that simply destroys the rioters’ own
communities. Focus shifts away from the peaceful protests against
police killings, instead devoting a bulk of their coverage on the
merits (or lack thereof) of rioting, watering down what
causes them.
The media fails to make any mention of the fact that many political
riots begin as regular protests and become
riots after heavy-handed police tactics provoke a
response from the attendees.
If
you’re fighting for your right to not be killed by the government,
riots are apparently an act of terror, according
to many Americans.
Fighting for your freedom, these commentators often say, are cowardly
acts of vandalism and looting, punishable by the utmost severity.
Blocking a street is punishable by death, some Facebook commenters
say.
Many politicians agree with that sentiment, and running over
protesters may soon
be legal in
some states.
But
when Americans riot over sports games, which is actually much more
common than
anti-police brutality rioting, those same commentators are nowhere to
be found.
“Somehow,
it seems there’s a line drawn in the sand where destruction of
property because of a sports victory is OK and acceptable in America.
However, if you have people who are fighting for their most basic
human right, the right to live, they will be condemned,” Black
Lives Matter New York President Hawk Newsome told Newsweek. “You
can riot if you’re white and your team wins, but if you’re black
and being killed, you can’t speak out… I wish they wouldn’t
riot, but I can’t condemn them and neither can anyone else,
especially not the media, especially not politicians when they
condone people who are just drunk and destroying property because
their team won.
"A guy in a four-wheeler just ran over a cop."
"We need more shields and riot gear."
"Some kids just flipped over an SUV and set it on fire."
"We got a couple hundred people on this light pole."
But football players kneeling is disprespectful. #phillypolicescanner
"We need more shields and riot gear."
"Some kids just flipped over an SUV and set it on fire."
"We got a couple hundred people on this light pole."
But football players kneeling is disprespectful. #phillypolicescanner
All
too often, sporting events cause riots, but they are met with
different coverage by the media, and the outrage against rioting on
social media seems to be missing in action. Sports riots are simply
alcohol-fueled celebrations that became rowdy. It’s just boys being
boys. It’s just happy people showing their joy.
On
Sunday, a local ABC affiliate described the rioting
as “rowdy” “celebrations” as a car was flipped over.
Keeping
with this theme, Fox
News’ coverage of
the Philadelphia Eagles riot was not critical at all. “Flipping
a car and celebrating in the streets. That’s some way to celebrate,
huh?” the Fox anchor
said.
CNN’s
top story on the Philadelphia riot called the chaos an act of “pure
poetry.”
“As
was expected, the city of Philadelphia reacted to their well-earned
Super Bowl win with brotherly grace and aplomb,” CNN reported this
morning. “LOL,
you see it’s a funny joke because frankly it’s a miracle that
place is still standing.”
Is
it possible that Americans and the mainstream media don’t actually
oppose rioting as a principle, but rather, grant their approval based
on who is rioting and for what reason? It certainly appears that way.
As
if to highlight my point, the arrest counts are in from the Super
Bowl. In Minneapolis, 17 Black Lives Matter activists were
arrested for
peacefully protesting the big game. In Philadelphia, three
peoplewere
arrested after lighting the city on fire.
The
message is clear: Don’t stand up for your rights because if you’re
black and protest in a way we disagree with (or
protest at all),
you’re a traitor who should be run over in the street. But if you
light your city on fire after winning the Super Bowl, it’s all just
innocent fun, right? There’s no other way to say this: The
hypocrisy over the Super Bowl riot — from the media and the
public in general — is fucking outrageous.
PS: er mist één video die ik niet over kan nemen, om deze te zien klik op de volgen de link (die ook in de tekst hierboven terug is te vinden): Fox News’ coverage.
Zie ook: 'Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA 'veteranen', alsof die media nog niet genoeg 'fake news' ofwel leugens brengen........' (klik ook op de links in dat bericht, links over de macht van de media en het 'fake news' dat door deze media wordt gebracht)
