Geen evolutie en ecolutie zonder revolutie!

Albert Einstein:

Twee dingen zijn oneindig: het universum en de menselijke domheid. Maar van het universum ben ik niet zeker.

maandag 8 januari 2018

Trump: "Ik ben een stabiele genius...." ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Nadat Trump eerder al constateerde dat hij in het bezit is van een extreem hoog IQ*, deed hij daar afgelopen week nog eens een schep bovenop met de constatering dat hij een stabiele genius is........ Hoe gek moet je zijn, als je bij elke klepscheet, zonder na te denken twitterberichten de wereld inslingert, het aandurft om een land te bedreigen met totale vernietiging en zelfs na een tv uitzending besluit een luchtmachtbasis (van Syrië) met Tomahawk raketten te beschieten...... 'Heel geniaal, ongelofelijk intelligent en bijzonder stabiel....'

Nadat het boek 'Fire and Fury' van Michale Wolff verscheen, zoals te verwachten door Trump afgedaan als onzin en roddel geleverd door Steve Bannon, liet het beest weer eens een aantal tweets los op de wereld. Daarin had hij niet alleen kritiek op Bennon en Wolff, maar moest hij 'uiteraard' zichzelf weer de nodige veren in de vieze reet steken.

Lees het volgende artikel van Tyler Durden, overgoten met tweets van Trump, eerder geplaatst op ZeroHedge en door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media:

In Bizarre Tweetstorm, Trump Defends His Sanity: ‘I Am a Very Stable Genius’

January 6, 2018 at 7:54 am
Written by Tyler Durden

(ZHE) — Since the first excerpts from Michael Wolff’s “Fire and Fury” were published on Wednesday, its numerous (in)credulity-inducing details have dominated the news cycle and most of the official press briefings since. President Donald Trump has insisted that Wolff had “zero” access, and that the book’s contents are gossip leaked by former White House Chief Strategist and Trump campaign leader Steve Bannon, whom Trump rechristened “Sloppy Steve” and slapped with a cease-and-desist.

And, as Trump tends to do, he doubled down on half-a-week’s worth of denials and repudiations in a bizarre Saturday morning tweetstorm that saw him defending his sanity and intelligence while lashing out at two of his favorite targets: Hillary Clinton and former ABC White House Correspondent Brian Ross.

Far from being mentally infirm, Trump insists that his “mental stability” has been one of his greatest assets “throughout my life,” along with the fact he’s “like, really smart.”

Furthermore, the fact that he was able to win the presidency on his first attempt, with no prior experience in politics (except for his 2000 bid for the Reform Party nomination, of course) prove that he’s not only a genius but “a very stable genius” at that. Saturday morning’s tweets essentially pick up from where Trump left off last night, when he tweeted that “Sloppy Steve” “cried when he got fired and begged for his job.”

Interposed between the fiery denunciations, Trump includes a shout out of sorts to the Washington Post, which ran a Trump-friendly headline about the African-American unemployment rate falling to 6.8%.

Michael Wolff is a total loser who made up stories in order to sell this really boring and untruthful book. He used Sloppy Steve Bannon, who cried when he got fired and begged for his job. Now Sloppy Steve has been dumped like a dog by almost everyone. Too bad! https://twitter.com/gop/status/949395088735723520 
The African American unemployment rate fell to 6.8%, the lowest rate in 45 years. I am so happy about this News! And, in the Washington Post (of all places), headline states, “Trumps first year jobs numbers were very, very good.”

Ross was suspended by ABC late last year after erroneously reporting that Michael Flynn was prepared to testify that Trump ordered him to establish contact with the Russian government during the campaign – an action that would be tantamount to conspiring with a foreign power to influence an American election. However, in reality, Flynn planned to testify that Trump senior adviser (and son-in-law) Jared Kushner asked him to meet with the Russians during the transition, a request that is not only legal, but routine.

Brian Ross, the reporter who made a fraudulent live newscast about me that drove the Stock Market down 350 points (billions of dollars), was suspended for a month but is now back at ABC NEWS in a lower capacity. He is no longer allowed to report on Trump. Should have been fired!

Trump concludes that, since Special Counsel Bob Mueller has so far failed to take him down, the Democrats and mainstream media are resorting to questioning his mental stability, hoping to convince Vice President Mike Pence and members of Trump’s cabinet to invoke the 25th amendment – something that’s been widely discussed over the past week.

Now that Russian collusion, after one year of intense study, has proven to be a total hoax on the American public, the Democrats and their lapdogs, the Fake News Mainstream Media, are taking out the old Ronald Reagan playbook and screaming mental stability and intelligence.....
....Actually, throughout my life, my two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart. Crooked Hillary Clinton also played these cards very hard and, as everyone knows, went down in flames. I went from VERY successful businessman, to top T.V. Star.....
....to President of the United States (on my first try). I think that would qualify as not smart, but genius....and a very stable genius at that!

Trump sued Wolff’s publisher, Henry Holt & Co., to block the book’s publication, which only inspired the publisher to move its release date to yesterday in the interest of furthering the public discourse cashing in on the hype.

Some of the book’s claims – like the idea that Trump wouldn’t know who former House Speaker John Boehner was despite tweeting about him several times – have been disputed by Wolff’s fellow journalists. Also, many of Wolff’s peers have criticized him for cynically criticizing his fellow journalists during several television appearances as a way to ingratiate himself with the Trump inner circle.

* * *
Naturally, and not surprisingly, this morning’s twitter outburst has inspired a flurry of responses on twitter, with users riffing off Trump’s “very stable genius” line.

Almost every working political journalist in the US tweeted some variation of this:

Calling yourself “a very stable genius” seems like evidence of neither.

As more details from the book hit the web, it will surely continue to dominate the news cycle into next week if not beyond, and if history is any guide, expect Trump – unable to find closure – to accelerate his angry tweets in the coming days, while digging an even deeper hole for his critics.

By Tyler Durden / Republished with permission / Zero Hedge / Report a typo
====================================

* Zie: 'Donald Trumps IQ.......... OEI!!'

Zie ook: 'Trump gaat journalisten aanpakken die laster en smaad verkondigen, dezelfde handelswijze die dictator Erdogan van de islamitische staat Turkije hanteert.....'

       en: 'G.E.N.I.U.S. Trump en de werkelijke reden voor het afzeggen van zijn bezoek aan Groot-Brittannië.......'

The CanaryJohn Shafthauer
Trump cancels UK visit after discovering that Teletubbies aren’t real
0m 17s1m 49s



Hier de link naar het origineel op The Canary (met tekst):  'Trump cancels UK visit after discovering Teletubbies aren't real' ('Off the Perch')

zondag 7 januari 2018

Oorlog moet eindelijk echt vervolgd worden als de enorm smerige misdaad die het is!

Naar aanleiding van het besluit dat het Internationaal Strafhof (ICC) nam, oorlog als misdaad te vervolgen, ontving ik een petitie van World Beyond War (WBW) via Action Network. Hierin worden alle problemen opgenoemd, waarmee het ICC te maken zal krijgen, neem de VS, dit 'land' erkent het ICC niet, maar begint wel de ene illegale oorlog na de andere.......

Toch ziet World Beyond War mogelijkheden om de VS aan te klagen. Zo zou het ICC nu bezig zijn met onderzoek naar oorlogsmisdaden door de VS gepleegd in Afghanistan*, dit daar Afghanistan in tegenstelling tot de VS wel lid is van het ICC. Echter alleen de door de VS verrichtte oorlogsmisdaden kunnen dan vervolgd worden en niet het beginnen van die illegale oorlog (de ultieme oorlogsmisdaad). Vreemd dat het ICC niet de andere NAVO landen, die deelnamen/nemen aan die oorlog, onderzoekt op oorlogsmisdaden, daar ook dat 'geen misselijk' aantal misdaden is...... Wat betreft het beginnen van oorlogen, heeft het ICC lullig genoeg besloten, alleen oorlogen te vervolgen die werden aangegaan na 17 juli 2018......

Aan de belachelijke precieze datum (dus waarom niet vanaf 1 januari 2018), kan je al zien dat dit een groot discussiepunt is geweest, waarbij de deelnemers hoogstwaarschijnlijk onder druk zijn gezet door de VS. De VS die waarschijnlijk nog wel een oorlog (of meer) wil beginnen voor die datum......

Maar laten we blij zijn dat oorlogen, en oorlogsmisdaden begaan door de VS, eindelijk vervolgd zullen gaan worden door het ICC!

Mensen, lees ajb het volgende en zet je handtekening onder de petitie aan de regeringen op onze aarde, zich achter het ICC te scharen en eindelijk oorlog echt tot een misdaad te verklaren. Dit om zo de weg richting waarlijke vervolging door het ICC open te stellen en daarmee de hoop te koesteren dat dit toekomstige oorlogen kan voorkomen.



War is a crime. The International Criminal Court has just announced that it will finally treat it as a crime, sort-of, kind-of. But how can war’s status as a crime effectively deter the world’s leading war-maker from threatening and launching more wars, large and small? How can laws against war actually be put to use? How can the ICC’s announcement be made into something more than a pretense?

The Kellogg-Briand Pact made war a crime in 1928, and various atrocities became criminal charges at Nuremberg and Tokyo because they were constituent parts of that larger crime. The United Nations Charter maintained war as a crime, but limited it to “aggressive” war, and gave immunity to any wars launched with U.N. approval.

The International Court of Justice** (ICJ) could try the United States for attacking a country if (1) that country brought a case, and (2) the United States agreed to the process, and (3) the United States chose not to block any judgment by using its veto power at the U.N. Security Council. Desirable future reforms obviously include urging all U.N. members to accept the compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ, and eliminating the veto. But what can be done now?

The International Criminal Court (ICC) can try individuals for various “war crimes,” but has thus far tried only Africans, though for some time now it has claimed to be “investigating” U.S. crimes in Afghanistan. Although the U.S. is not a member of the ICC, Afghanistan is. Desirable future reforms obviously include urging all nations, including the United States, to join the ICC. But what can be done now?

The ICC has finally announced that it will prosecute individuals (such as the U.S. president and secretary of “defense”) for the crime of “aggression,” which is to say: war. But such wars must be launched after July 17, 2018. And those who can be prosecuted for war will be only citizens of those nations that have both joined the ICC and ratified the amendment adding jurisdiction over “aggression.” Desirable future reforms obviously include urging all nations, including the United States, to ratify the amendment on “aggression.” But what can be done now?

The only way around these restrictions, is for the U.N. Security Council to refer a case to the ICC. If that happens, then the ICC can prosecute anyone in the world for the crime of war.
This means that for the force of law to have any chance of deterring the U.S. government from threatening and launching wars, we need to persuade one or more of the fifteen nations on the U.N. Security Council to make clear that they will raise the matter for a vote. Five of those fifteen have veto power, and one of those five is the United States.

So, we also need nations of the world to proclaim that when the Security Council fails to refer the case, they will bring the matter before the U.N. General Assembly though a “Uniting for Peace” procedure in emergency session to override the veto. This is what was just done in December 2017 to overwhelmingly pass a resolution that the U.S. had vetoed, a resolution condemning the U.S. naming Jerusalem the capital of Israel.

Not only do we need to jump through each of these hoops (a commitment to a Security Council vote, and a commitment to override the veto in the General Assembly) but we need to make evident beforehand that we will be certain or likely to do so.

Therefore, World Beyond War is launching a global petition to the national governments of the world asking for their public commitment to refer any war launched by any nation to the ICC with or without the Security Council. Click here to add your name.

After all, it is not only U.S. wars that should be prosecuted as crimes, but all wars. And, in fact, it may prove necessary to prosecute junior partners of the United States in its “coalition” wars prior to prosecuting the ring leader. The problem is not one of lack of evidence, of course, but of political will. The U.K., France, Canada, Australia, or some other co-conspirator may be brought by global and internal pressure (and the ability to circumvent the U.N. Security Council) to submit to the rule of law prior to the United States doing so.

A key detail is this: how much organized murder and violent destruction constitutes a war? Is a drone strike a war? Is base expansion and a few home raids a war? How many bombs make a war? The answer should be any use of military force. But in the end, this question will be answered by public pressure. If we can inform people of it and persuade the nations of the world to refer it to trial, then it will be a war, and therefore a crime.



*   Zie: 'VS wordt eindelijk aangeklaagd voor oorlogsmisdaden bij Internationaal Strafhof (ICC)'

** The International Court of Justice (ICJ), ofwel het Internationaal Hof van Justitie, gezeteld in het Haagse Vredespaleis. 

Zie ook: 'Jemen 'kerstweek bombardementen': meer dan 100 vermoorde burgers, de daders >> de Saoedische coalitie o.l.v. de VS.........' (zie ook het grote aantal links onder dat bericht)


        en: 'VS luchtaanval >> 13 burgerdoden en weer kijkt de wereld weg........'

Mensen dat was het voor deze dag, morgen meer berichten; maak er een mooie dag van!