Velen zien in het instorten van WTC 7 volkomen terecht, dat de VS regering een grote leugenactie op touw zette, waarmee het volk van de VS en de rest van de wereld werd besodemieterd.......
Leugens die hebben geleid tot de moord door de VS op meer dan 1,5 miljoen mensen in Afghanistan en Irak........ Leugens die de VS en daarmee het militair-industrieel complex daar in de kaart hebben gespeeld, immers men had een nieuwe vijand nodig en middels die nieuwe vijand 'Al Qaida' kon de VS meerdere landen aanvallen en wist men van meet af aan, dat uiteindelijk de VS en Rusland weer als aartsvijanden tegenover elkaar zouden komen te staan.......
Lees het volgende artikel en zie de video's:
Why Did World Trade Center Building 7 Fall? New Study Claims Gov’t Story Is False
September
11, 2017 at 6:41 am
Written
by Derrick
Broze
A
two-year study has determined the collapse of World Trade Center 7 on
September 11, 2001 could not have been caused by office fires. This
undermines a critical component of the “official story,” but in
the age of President Trump will the painstaking investigation make a
difference?
(MPN) —
Last Wednesday, Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey of the University of
Alaska Fairbanks presented the findings and conclusion of his team’s
two-year engineering study evaluating whether fire caused the
collapse of World Trade Center 7 on September 11, 2001.
Many
“9/11 Truth” researchers focus on the mysterious collapse of
World Trade Center 7 (WTC7) as the smoking gun evidence that
Americans were lied to about the attacks. WTC7 was not hit by a
plane, yet it collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2001. According to
the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the collapse was
caused by office fires leading to thermal expansion of the building’s
supportive columns and girders.
Dr.
Hulsey’s presentation, “A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse
of World Trade Center 7, September 2017 Progress Report”, detailed
how his team eliminated fire as the cause of the collapse of the
47-story building. Hulsey explained that NIST’s report on the
collapse found fires on floors 7 through 9, 11 through 14, 19, 22,
29, and 30. However, there is no evidence of fire below floor 7,
Hulsey said.
Watch
Hulsey’s presentation below:
“You
have to ask yourself lots of questions … Where is the
combustibility in this building? … Did WTC7 collapse because of
fires?” Hulsey asked during his presentation. “Our study shows
that it did not collapse because of fires.” This revelation matches
what Hulsey told MintPress News in September 2016, when his team’s
preliminary finding was “that fire did not produce the failure at
this particular building,” adding “additional calculations are
further substantiating the finding.”
Dr.
Hulsey and his team developed an AutoCAD drawing that they then used
to create a virtual geography of the building. The research team
first partnered with the non-profit Architects
and Engineers for 9/11 Truth in
May of 2015 to study of the collapse of WTC7. They did not release
their final report in April 2017 as originally planned, but Hulsey
said a draft report of the study will be released in October or
November 2017 and will be open for public comment for a six-week
period. “I am still examining the progressive collapse. We thought
we would be complete by the time announced but it is taking longer
than I expected,” Hulsey told MintPress. “I simply am not going
to release it until I am sure we are totally correct.”
A
final report will be published in early 2018 and submitted to
peer-reviewed journals. “It is my plan to provide the opportunity
for public and technical input, a form of review and peer review,”
Dr. Hulsey stated. “I will have it reviewed during this time frame.
Once we have gone through that preliminary review; I will submit the
findings to peer-reviewed journals for publication.”
The Bobby McIlvaine Act
Today,
on the 16th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Architects
& Engineers for 9/11 Truth,
the organization funding Hulsey’s study, held a press conference
discussing the conclusions of the study and the introduction of the
“Bobby McIlvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act.” The Bobby
McIlvaine Act is draft legislation that would impanel a select
committee in either chamber of Congress to reinvestigate the
destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on September 11,
2001. The act is named after Bobby
McIlvaine,
who was tragically killed at the age of 26 while entering the North
Tower of the World Trade Center.
Richard
Gage, the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, spoke
today about the Bobby McIlvaine Act at the National Press Club in
Washington. “The Bobby McIlvaine Act will, for the first time, put
in Congress’ hands the resolution which will cause an investigation
of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers’ destruction,” Gage
told Mint Press. “We are putting Congress on notice and hopefully
this act will be successfully legislated into law.”
Following
the press conference, Mr. Gage and Bob McIlvaine, Bobby McIlvaine’s
father, began the process of distributing informational packets
related to the Bobby McIlvaine Act to every member of Congress. The
next stage in their campaign will involve attempting to organize a
bipartisan group of sponsors to introduce the resolution by September
11, 2018. Mr. McIlvaine has been independently investigating the 9/11
attacks since his son’s death and calling attention to what he says
are discrepancies in the government’s narrative of the events of
that day. McIlvaine has been an outspoken leader in the so-called
“9/11 Truth” movement, advocating for a new investigation since
the release of the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004.
The
9/11 Truth movement includes victims, their families, and experts in
a range of fields who are skeptical of the government’s official
line on 9/11. Some of the groups include Architects
& Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters
for 9/11 Truth & Unity, Pilots
for 9/11 Truth, 9/11
Families United for Justice Against Terrorism, Scholars
for 9/11 Truth & Justice,
and other local activist groups and individuals from around the
globe. It’s a loose-knit movement without an official position, and
the opinions, theories and ideas held among its members sometimes
conflict with one another. However, those working within the broader
movement are bound by the belief that the official narrative promoted
by the U.S. government is full of holes.
9/11 Truth in the Donald Trump era
The
election of Donald Trump brought fear and paranoia to some of the
American population, and hope and elation to another segment of the
nation. Elements of the 9/11 Truth movement believed Trump might
support their cause for a new investigation. Although Trump
never officially discussed his interest in a new investigation into
the events of September 11, 2001, he did make vague references to the
“secret papers” and to the Saudi government’s possible role in
funding the 9/11 attacks. During a campaign event Trump called
out former president George W. Bush for
the Iraq war and referenced “very secret” papers involving the
Saudi government and 9/11, elaborating:
“It wasn’t the Iraqis that knocked down the World Trade Center; we went after Iraq, we decimated the country. Iran’s taking over, okay. But it wasn’t the Iraqis, you will find out who really knocked down the World Trade Center, ‘cause they have papers in there that are very secret, you may find it’s the Saudis, okay? But you will find out.”
The
“secret papers” Trump referred to are the now-declassified
28-pages of the “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community
Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11,
2001.” Although the
final report amounts
to over 800 pages, the 28 pages were classified by former President
George W. Bush shortly after the report was released in 2002. The
papers detail the story of Saudi nationals suspected of being Saudi
intelligence agents involved in the terror attacks. In July 2016,
after nearly 15 years of secrecy and resistance from the Bush and
Obama administrations, the report was released to the public and the
family members of the victims of the 9/11 terror attacks.
While
campaigning for the presidency, Trump also gave an interview on Fox
News’ “Fox
& Friends,”
stating that the release of the pages would be “very profound”
and relate to Saudi Arabia’s role in the 9/11 attacks.
“That’s very serious stuff,” Trump said. “It’s sort of nice to know who your friends are and perhaps who your enemies are. You’re going to see some very revealing things released in those papers.”
Trump
also flirted with the 9/11 Truth movement when he criticized former
President Obama for his veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of
Terrorism Act, or JASTA, which unanimously passed the House and the
Senate in 2016 after a hard-fought battle by the families of the
victims of 9/11. The law, passed over Obama’s veto, has now opened
the door for lawsuits from the victims of 9/11 and their families
against Saudi Arabia to inspect the Kingdom’s possible role in
9/11. Trump called Obama’s veto “shameful” and “one of
the low points of his presidency.”
It
is these comments that caused some “9/11 truthers” — including
some family members of 9/11 victims — to believe a Donald Trump
presidency might lead to a new investigation into the terror attacks.
The 9/11 Families and Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism
— the organization largely responsible for pushing JASTA — sent
a letter to President Trump asking
him to clarify his position on Saudi Arabia and its role in the
terror attacks of September 11, 2001. “This letter is inspired by
news reports that today you met with Saudi Deputy Crown Prince
Mohammed bin Salman al Saud,” reads the letter from Terry Strada, a
widow and the national chair for the 9/11 Families & Survivors.
Strada’s letter continues:
“As you know, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a defendant in our lawsuit because of the involvement of its agents in supporting the 9/11 hijackers, and for support that flowed to al-Qaeda through institutions the Kingdom established and funded to spread a radical form of Islam that lies at the root of both al-Qaeda and, more recently, ISIS. Despite mounting evidence, the Saudis have refused to accept accountability for their actions and the injury they have caused across the globe.”
Since
becoming president, Donald Trump has shown little interest in
carrying his “you may find it’s the Saudis” campaign rhetoric
any further. Instead, he has signed an arms deals worth more than
$100 billion with the Saudi Kingdom and has continued to offer
support for their bombing campaign in Yemen. Trump has not taken any
steps towards calling for an investigation into the 9/11 attacks or
Saudi Arabia’s possible role. He has remained silent on the
controversial topic. The upcoming release of Dr. Hulsey’s study on
the collapse of World Trade Center 7 may force Trump to publicly
address the situation.
Terry
Strada, whose husband Tom Strada died in the twin towers, is
skeptical of the importance of Dr. Hulsey’s study. “It doesn’t
matter to me what happened to Building 7. I know what happened to the
Twin Towers and I know how my husband was murdered. I know who worked
with al-Qaeda. That’s all I care about,” Mrs. Strada explained to
MintPress News via phone. “It’s a very separate incident. I don’t
see how anything that happened to Building 7 has to do with the Twin
Towers.”
Despite
her skepticism towards the study, Strada is still calling on
President Trump to address the concerns of the 9/11 families:
“We would like to see some action. We would like to sit down and meet with him, have him hear our side. We know he hears it from the Saudi’s all the time. We want our chance.”
Hier nogmaals de link naar het originele bericht, waar u nog een video kan vinden, die ik niet over kan nemen.
Zie ook het uitstekende artikel van prof Michel Chossudovsky, eerder geplaatst op Global Research en later door Stan van Houcke overgenomen: 'Who Is Osama Bin Laden?' (o.a. hoe is het mogelijk dat de VS een paar uur na de aanslagen van 911 wist dat Osama Bin Laden en 'zijn Al Qaida' verantwoordelijk waren voor de aanslagen???)
==========================
Hierna de Brasscheck video's.
Zie ook: 9/11 Wiring the buildings COULD IT BE DONE IN A WEEKEND? (zie naast de onderstaande video, ook de tekst onder deze video, op Brasscheck TV
en: 9/11 First the explosion and then the “planes” VIDEO SPECIAL EFFECTS AFTER THE FACT:
en: The biggest maritime evacuation in history took place on September 11, 2001 in Manhattan.
It
was handled by a spontaneous fleet of hundreds of boat owners, large
and small, who rushed to help people in need without any concern for
their own safety.
I
bet you NEVER heard about these unpaid first responders before -
because it doesn't fit the "government is god" narrative.
Unreported, unrecorded history IF IT’S NOT WEARING A GOVERNMENT UNIFORM, IT DIDN’T HAPPEN:
en: People
who design, engineer, build and demolish buildings for a living
agree...
The
Twin Towers and WTC 7 came down as the result of controlled
demolition.
Architects
and engineers lay out the case – and their expert analysis has been
completely censored by the US news media.
Architects and engineers: “It was a controlled demolition” THE FRAUD THAT LED TO WAR:
'9/11 forum geblokkeerd, de waarheid mag niet gezegd worden........'
'9/11: de leugens over smeltend staal van de Twin Towers'
'9/11 getuigen totaal genegeerd door media (en overheid)'
'9/11 Israël nogmaals aangewezen als hulp- bij het neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC'
'9/11: Al Qaida tjokvol agenten van Saoedi-Arabië, VS, Israël en Egypte'
'9/11 voorafgegaan door CIA visa fraude.....'
'9/11: Palestijnen hebben niet gejuicht voor de aanslagen op de Twin Towers'
'9/11 eerst de explosie waarna de 'vliegtuigen' de Twin Towers raken'
'9/11: professor stelt dat WTC-gebouwen gecontroleerd zijn gesloopt, de bewijzen daarvoor zijn overweldigend'
'Pearl Harbor (7 december 1941) en de aanslagen van 9/11 hebben veel overeenkomsten.........'
'911 samenzweringstheorie wint nog meer aan geloofwaardigheid......'
'911, de beurs en geschiedvervalsing.......'
'9/11, WikiLeaks, Prism en 'complottheorieën''
'911, een 'leuk' feit'
