Hammelburg slaat alweer de Syrische plank mis en het Turkse leger nam terroristen van IS op.......

Mensen, ik moet het eerlijk zeggen: Hammelburg was afgelopen maandagmiddag op BNR terecht fiks pissig te horen. De hobbezak maakte zich kwaad op de VS, die de Koerden hebben laten vallen, om bij Turkije in een goed blaadje te komen.

Hammelburg sprak over Turkije en de VS, die de Koerden de wacht aan hebben gezegd, te vertrekken uit Manbij, dat deze groep op IS had herovert (met de hulp van de VS!!).

Echter even later toonde Hammelburg wel begrip voor de Turken, die willen voorkomen dat de Koerden het gebied over de Turks/Syrische grens tot een autonoom Koerdisch gebied willen omvormen....... Alsof het logisch is, dat een buurland zich bemoeit met de binnenlandse aangelegenheden van het andere land........

Uiteraard weinig commentaar van de bolronde BNR 'buitenlanddeskundige' Hammelburg, op de enorme agressie waarmee Turkije Syrië is binnen gewalst..... Laat staan dat hij commentaar leverde op de Turkse bombardementen op twee Koerdische dorpen aan de Syrische kant van de grens met Turkije, dat zal wel normaal zijn.......

Bombardementen waarbij een groot aantal burgerslachtoffers zijn gevallen, o.a. een familie van 15 personen......* Al hoef je niet op te kijken, als deze feiten niet eens bekend zijn bij de 'buitenlanddeskundige' Hammelburg.......

U begrijpt natuurlijk wel, dat Hammelburg na het voorgaande, al helemaal niet sprak over de bufferzone, die Turkije, bezig is in te richten op Syrische grondgebied, een zone van 20 tot 30 kilometer breed........ Nogmaals: Turkije is illegaal aanwezig op Syrisch grondgebied >> een enorme oorlogsmisdaad!!

Volgens Hammelburg zijn door het gedoe in Syrië en het agressieve gedrag van Turkije (ook tegen Koerden in Irak), de spanningen in het zuidoostelijk deel van Turkije opgelopen, een gebied dat door Koerden wordt bewoond...... Volgens Hammelburg pleegt de PKK daarom aanslagen in dat gebied en andere delen van Turkije.

Dit is feitelijk onjuist, immers Turkije voert al jaren oorlog tegen de Koerdische bevolking in dat gebied, een gebied, een gebied waar pottenkijkers niet welkom zijn en waar Turkije het ene bloedbad na het andere aanricht......... Hé Hammelburg, wat denk je? Zou dat niet de reden zijn, dat de Koerden zich verzetten met aanslagen????

Want daar mensen, komt het gelul van Hammelburg op neer, de Koerden plegen aanslagen en de Turken gedragen zich als een normale wetshandhaver in het Koerdisch gebied...........

Hammelburg ga toch naar huis, jouw versheidsdatum is al decennia geleden verstreken en neem je zoon, die plotsklaps weer VS deskundige is (eerder o.a. Midden-Oosten deskundige), mee naar huis, kan je lekker potjes 'mens erger je nieten', en hoef je de luisteraar niet meer te ergeren met je gelul!!

Overigens heeft Rusland intussen de illegale inval van Turkije op Syrisch grondgebied veroordeeld. 'Leuk feit': bij  het innemen van de stad Jarablus en de omgeving door Turkije: Turkije heeft niet één kogel afgevuurd op de IS strijders....... Sterker nog, het Turkse commando heeft deze psychopathische terroristen gevraagd deel te nemen aan de strijd tegen de Koerden, daar was en is de inval van de Turken dan ook voor bedoeld, de Koerden verdrijven uit dit grensgebied (zoals u onder andere hierboven al kon lezen...)....

Een Turkse opperbevelhebber durfde afgelopen week plompverloren de Koerden met 'ongedierte' te vergelijken, ongedierte dat uitgeroeid dient te worden.......... Zie wat de Turkse inval betreft, ook het volgende artikel, gevonden op het blog van Stan van Houcke en geschreven door prof. Michel Chossudovsky: 'Erdogan's War Crimes - ERDOGAN, YOU ARE A WAR CRIMINAL UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. TURKEY INVADES SYRIA, KILLS CIVILIANS. THE “INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY” APPLAUDS'

Zie ook: 'Hammelburg met 'een frisse kijk' op Aleppo........ VS neemt terreur-voortouw in Syrië.....'

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden dit geldt niet voor het label 'Jarablus'.

Syrië, een scenario voor Wereld Oorlog III............

Het volgende artikel kwam ik tegen op het blog van Stan van Houcke. Het betreft een interview met Michel Chossudovsky, n.a.v. de boekpublicatie 'Towards A World War III Scenario' in 2013. Ja u leest het goed 2013, toen voorzag Chossudovsky al veel van de ellende die we nu in Syrië aan onze ogen voorbij zien trekken....... Chossudovsky spreekt in dit interview niet eens over de ellende in Oekraïne, en hoe de NAVO bezig is met een continue reeks van provocaties langs de grens met Rusland. Provocaties die als deze aan de grens met de VS waren gepasseerd, met Rusland als grote boosdoener, we allang in een gloeiendhete Derde Wereld Oorlog hadden gezeten..........

US-NATOGround War on Syria: Prelude to a World War III Scenario? Prof.Michel Chossudovsky

The following interview with Professor Chossudovsky was published in September 2013

Michel Chossudovsky, renowned Canadian professor and award-winning author, argues [2013] that a US plan for military intervention in Syria could result in escalation and the integration of  “four distinct war theaters”– Afghanistan-Pakistan, Iraq, Palestine and Libya– setting the stage for “a World War III scenario.”

“An attack on Syria would lead to the integration of these separate war theaters, eventually leading towards a broader Middle East-Central Asian war,” the professor writes in an opinion piece for Global Research.

Chossudovsky says that the United States is fueling “civil wars” in multiple countries namely Yemen, Somalia, Egypt, Mali and Niger through sponsoring al-Qaeda affiliated groups, essentially preparing the ground for US military intervention often in the form of counter-terrorism operations.

“Public opinion is largely unaware of the grave implications of these war plans which could potentially lead humanity into a World War III scenario,” he warns.

The Obama administration has claimed the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was behind a recent deadly chemical weapons attack in the suburbs of Damascus, even though there is no evidence linking the attack to the government forces. The White House is gearing up for military strikes on Syrian targets.

Click image to order Chossudovsky’s book directly from Global Research (Helaas beste lezer, dit werkt niet, maar wel de link in de zojuist getoonde link).

Citing an August 2012 Los Angeles Times report, Chossudovsky says preparations for “a false flag chemical weapons attack” in Syria began more than a year ago when the Pentagon dispatched “small teams of special operations troops” to the Arab country to destroy its alleged weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

“These initial US sponsored WMD special team operations had established the likely scenario of a staged false flag chemical weapons attack.”

US, NATO and Israeli military planners have laid the groundwork for a “humanitarian” military involvement in Syria for years, Chossudovsky says [in 2013].

He asserts that the US and its regional allies, namely Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, have been sponsoring and arming the militant groups in Syria, some of which have been responsible for gruesome terrorist attacks against the civilian population, as “mass civilian casualty events” play a central role in US military doctrine.

“Civilian casualties are triggered with a view to drumming up public support for war on humanitarian grounds.”

“MI6, CIA and Mossad operatives as well as Western Special Forces had integrated rebel forces from the very outset. The high profile terrorist attacks were coordinated by highly trained military contractors and intelligence operatives,” the professor adds.

Another “integral” component of US military agenda, according to Chossudovsky, is “escalation.”

“Were a US-NATO military operation to be launched against Syria, the broader Middle East Central Asian region extending from North Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border with China would be engulfed in the turmoil of an extended regional war.”

Israel and Turkey would also cooperate with the US in both the air campaign and the deployment of ground forces, Chossudovsky argues.

A US-led military attack against Syria, the professor warns [in 2013], will have serious repercussions in other parts of the world especially South East Asia and the Far East where the US is countering China and Russia as part of its “pivot to Asia” strategy.

Order Chossudovsky’s book directly from Global Research

Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War

Michel Chossudovsky $10.25

Save 36%

also available in pdf

The original source of this article is Press TV

Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Press TV, 2016

Klik voor meer bericten n.a.v. het voorgaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt.

MH17 en (nog) meer feitenmateriaal over de toedracht betreffende het neerhalen van deze vlucht.........

Hier een artikel dat ik op de site van Stan van Houcke tegenkwam, dit artikel van Prof Michel Chossudovsky, werd voor het laatst geplaatst op Global Research 29 juli jl. Lees en zie hoe u besodemieterd bent en wordt, wat betreft de ramp met vlucht MH17 (let wel, ik moet u 'waarschuwen' voor 'cookies', waar u mee te maken krijgt):

“Support MH17 Truth”: OSCE* Monitors Identify “Shrapnel and Machine Gun-Like Holes” indicating Shelling. No Evidence of a Missile Attack. Shot Down by a Military Aircraft

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky

Global Research, July 29, 2015

Global Research 31 July 2014

Region: Russia and FSU

Theme: US NATO War Agenda

In-depth Report: UKRAINE REPORT

Su-25 aircraft
This article was first published by GR on September 9, 2014. In the context of the July 29, 2015 United Nations Security Council Resolution vetoed by Russia, it should be emphasized that the evidence confirms that MH17 was not brought down by a surface to air missile.
The West accuses Russia and the Donbass (Donetsk) separatists of having brought down the plane with a Buk missile. IT’S A LIE. 
The evidence available in September 2014 –including a BBC report which the BBC decided to suppress– refutes the official story. The alleged role of Russia in bringing down the plane was used as a justification to implement the economic sanctions regime against Moscow. 
Michel Chossudovsky, July 29, 2015 
*     *     *
According to the report of German pilot and airlines expert Peter Haisenko, the MH17 Boeing 777 was not brought down by a missile.
What he observed from the available photos were perforations of the cockpit: 

 The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. (Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile” Global Research, July 30, 2014)

        [click image right to enlarge]
Based on detailed analysis Peter Haisenko reached  the conclusion that the MH17 was not downed by a missile attack:

This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion. The destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material

The OSCE Mission
It is worth noting that the initial statements by OSCE observers (July 31) broadly confirm the findings of Peter Haisenko:

Monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe reported that shrapnel-like holes were found in two separate pieces of the fuselage of the ill-fated Malaysia Airlines aircraft that was believed to have been downed by a missile in eastern Ukraine.
Michael Bociurkiw of the OSCE group of monitors at his daily briefing described part of the plane’s fuselage dotted with “shrapnel-like, almost machine gun-like holes.” He said the damage was inspected by Malaysian aviation-security officials .(Wall Street Journal, July 31, 2014)

The monitoring OSCE team has not found evidence of a missile fired from the ground as conveyed by official White House statements. As we recall, the US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power stated –pointing a finger at Russia– that the Malaysian MH17 plane was “likely downed by a surface-to-air missile operated from a separatist-held location”:

The team of international investigators with the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are uncertain if the missile used was fired from the ground as US military experts have previously suggested, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported. (Malay Mail online, emphasis added)

The initial OSCE findings tend to dispel the claim that a BUK missile system brought down the plane.
Evidently, inasmuch as the perforations are attributable to shelling, a shelling operation conducted from the ground could not have brought down an aircraft traveling above 30,000 feet.
Ukraine Su-25 military aircraft within proximity of MH17
         
Peter Haisenko’s study is corroborated by the Russian Ministry of Defense which pointed to a Ukrainian Su-25 jet in the flight corridor of the MH17, within proximity of the plane.
Ironically, the presence of a military aircraft is also confirmed by a BBC  report conducted at the crash site on July 23.

All the eyewitnesses  interviewed by the BBC confirmed the presence of a Ukrainian military aircraft flying within proximity of Malaysian Airlines MH17 at the time that it was shot down: 

Eyewitness #1: There were two explosions in the air. And this is how it broke apart. And [the fragments] blew apart like this, to the sides. And when …
Eyewitness #2: … And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it. Everybody saw it.
Eyewitness #1: Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.
Eyewitness #3: There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. They came from the sky. Then this plane made a sharp turn-around like this. It changed its trajectory and headed in that direction [indicating the direction with her hands].
BBC Report below

(hier stond de link naar een door de BBC verwijderde video)


The original BBC Video Report published by BBC Russian Service on July 23, 2014 has since been removed from the BBC archive.
In a bitter irony, The BBC is censoring its own news productions.
This is the BBC Report, still available on Youtube

Media Spin
The media has reported that a surface to air missile was indeed fired and exploded before reaching its target.  It was not the missile that brought down the plane, it was the shrapnel resulting from the missile explosion (prior to reaching the plane) which punctured the plane and then led to a loss of pressure.
According to Ukraine’s National security spokesman Andriy Lysenko in a contradictory statement, the MH17 aircraft “suffered massive explosive decompression after being hit by a shrapnel missile.”  (See IBT, Australia)
In an utterly absurd report, the BBC quoting the official Ukraine statement  says that:

The downed Malaysia Airlines jet in eastern Ukraine suffered an explosive loss of pressure after it was punctured by shrapnel from a missile.

They say the information came from the plane’s flight data recorders, which are being analysed by British experts.
However, it remains unclear who fired a missile, with pro-Russia rebels and Ukraine blaming each other.
Many of the 298 people killed on board flight MH17 were from the Netherlands.
Dutch investigators leading the inquiry into the crash have refused to comment on the Ukrainian claims.

       

“Machine Gun Like Holes”
The shrapnel marks should be distinguished from the small entry and exit holes “most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile” fired from a military aircraft. These holes could not have been caused by a missile explosion as hinted by the MSM.
While the MSN is saying that the “shrapnel like holes” can be caused by a missile (see BBC report above), the OSCE has confirmed the existence of what it describes as “machine gun like holes”, without however acknowledging that these cannot be caused by a missile.
In this regard, the GSh-302 firing gun operated by an Su-25 is able to fire 3000 rpm which explains the numerous entry and exit holes.
According to the findings of Peter Haisenko:

If we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s cockpit segment (op cit)

The accusations directed against Russia including the sanctions regime imposed by Washington are based on a lie.
The evidence does not support the official US narrative to the effect that the MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile system operated by the DPR militia.
What next? More media disinformation, more lies?
See:
Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile” By Peter Haisenko, July 30, 2014

Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2015
==============================
Zie ook:
'MH17 proces hervat, de uitkomst is al klaar: de verdachten zijn schuldig' (en zie de links in dat bericht)

Voor meer berichten over feiten en leugens aangaande rampvlucht MH17, klik op het label vliegramp en/of MH17, onder dit bericht.

---