Geen evolutie en ecolutie zonder revolutie!

Albert Einstein:

Twee dingen zijn oneindig: het universum en de menselijke domheid. Maar van het universum ben ik niet zeker.
Posts tonen met het label F. Lockley. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label F. Lockley. Alle posts tonen

woensdag 15 november 2017

Terwijl Theresa May een krans legde op Remembrance Sunday, werden er o.a. kinderen vermoord met Britse wapens........

In Groot-Brittannië is er fiks wat ellende over het dragen van een witte 'poppy' in plaats van de 'gebruikelijke rode variant. De witte poppy is ter herdenking van alle oorlogsslachtoffers, terwijl de rode poppy er alleen is ter herdenking van militairen en geallieerde militairen, dus zelfs niet voor de Britse oorlogsslachtoffers.........

In 1933 werd de witte poppy geïntroduceerd om zoals gezegd alle oorlogsslachtoffers te herdenken en er op te wijzen dat er in een oorlog zonder onderscheid mensen worden vermoord. De witte poppy staat voorts voor het pleidooi een eind te maken aan oorlogen en te focussen op vrede....

Zoals dit blijkbaar overal hetzelfde moet gaan, zijn de rode poppydragers woedend over het steeds groeiende aantal mensen die i.p.v. een rode poppy een witte dragen, dit gaat zelfs gepaard met bedreigingen en daadwerkelijk geweld tegen de laatsten, terwijl deze mensen de rode poppy-dragers geen strobreed in de weg leggen....... Geen wonder dat het aantal witte poppy dragers in GB is gegroeid, gezien de deelname van GB aan de illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan, Irak en Libië (plus in feite Syrië)..........

Afgelopen zondag was het Remembrance Sunday (ook de zaterdag daarvoor is gereserveerd voor herdenking van gesneuvelde militairen en andere slachtoffers), waarop hare kwaadaardigheid May, de Britse premier, een krans heeft gelegd, 'uiteraard' alleen voor de militaire slachtoffers.... Tegelijkertijd werd (en wordt) er in Jemen door Saoedi-Arabië een genocide uitgevoerd met Britse pantservoertuigen, vliegend militair tuig, wapens en munitie, waaronder verboden clusterbommen........

Niet vreemd dus dat men niet zich niet wil herinneren hoeveel burgerslachtoffers er zijn gevallen in oorlogen waaraan GB deelnam......... Dit is overigens ook ingegeven door de enorme oorlogsmisdaden tijdens WOII, waar o.a. de Britten Duitse steden plat bombardeerden, met onder meer brandbommen, zelfs steden die geen militaire belang hadden.........

Het volgende artikel van Fréa Lockley werd afgelopen zondag gepubliceerd op The Canary:

It’s Remembrance Sunday. But as ‘Theresa May lays a wreath, children in Yemen could be killed with British made weapons’.

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor It’s Remembrance Sunday. But as ‘Theresa May lays a wreath, children in Yemen could be killed with British made weapons’.

NOVEMBER 12TH, 2017  FRÉA LOCKLEY

In the lead up to Remembrance Sunday, red poppies are seen everywhere. Indeed celebrities are criticised for not wearing them. But since 1933, the white poppy has also been a powerful symbol of remembrance. To remember all those who died in wars, and as a poignant reminder that war kills without discrimination. And that the way to end war is to focus on peace.
But although growing numbers of people now choose white poppies, this has led to a rise in hate crime and online attacks. Symon Hill, coordinator of the Peace Pledge Union (PPU) spoke to The Canary to address some inaccuracies spread recently by mainstream media about white poppies. And he also raised powerful questions about a government that actively engages in funding conflict.

All victims

The Women’s Co-operative Guild first gave out white poppies in 1933. Hill explained that the white poppy has three main messages:
"Firstly, to remember all victims of all wars: civilians, the armed forces and civilians of all nationalities. Secondly, to reject militarism and any attempt to glorify or to celebrate war. And thirdly, to commit to campaigning for peace" .

Increasingly, says Hill, the British Legion:
"Insist that red poppies only represent British and Allied armed forces and personnel. So this doesn’t include British civilians let alone other nationalities. And they also support the British armed forces as an institution: increasingly they use lot of militaristic and nationalistic rhetoric." 
Hill, and the growing numbers who wear white poppies, are not critical of anyone who wears a red poppy. But there is a rise in abuse towards those who choose this symbol of peace.

Abuse

Hill told The Canary, “We’ve seen a sharp rise in abuse towards white poppy wearers this year.” And he went on to say, “We’ve seen a rise in sexist and homophobic content saying only ‘real men’ wear red poppies.” Hill explained:
"I’ve been involved in lots of campaigns and peace issues. And I’ve never experienced the level of abuse that you get if you criticise red poppies… it’s as if some of the armed forces most enthusiastic supporters can’t cope with hearing any other points of view."
"I think that it’s very dangerous to suggest that we should only remember the British dead and and imply that non British lives are less valuable, especially in a context where hate crime and racism and xenophobia are on the rise".

And it seems that some of this has emerged from inaccuracies and bias spread by the mainstream media. Hill said:
"We’ve also seen The Daily Mail (and others) spread inaccurate information about white poppies. Bel Mooney said that children will be given a white poppy instead of the red poppy. This isn’t true. In some schools white poppies are sold alongside red ones. And those schools run lessons and assemblies where they help young people to explore and think about arguments for and against red and white poppies. And they’re right because this is what education should be about. It’s the very opposite of ‘indoctrinating children’ as Richard Kemp [in The Sunday Telegraphaccused us of."

Peace in our time?

Speaking about white poppies in 2017, Hill is openly critical of Conservative government policies:
"We have a government who will be talking about Remembrance this weekend while running one of the largest military budgets in the world. They’re putting billions of pounds into the renewal of trident nuclear weapons. We’ve just seen the resignation of Priti Patel over breaking the ministerial code. But what she was allegedly doing was talking to Israeli ministers about diverting aid money to fund military operations".

And as The Canary has reported, this government’s sale of arms to Saudi Arabia has devastating consequences. Hill said:
"And perhaps worst of all we’ve got a British government selling weapons to Saudi Arabia. Those weapons are targeting – not just accidentally killing – but targeting civilians in Yemen. Children in Yemen could be killed with British made weapons at literally the same time that Theresa May lays a wreath at the Cenotaph on Sunday. A wreath that supposedly commemorates victims of war."

Not in my name


But one of the reasons many people choose white poppies, is a growing mistrust in military operations conducted by the British government. As Hill explained:
"After the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003, a large number of the British population didn’t support actions British troops were engaged in.  But since then the establishment has talked increasingly about ‘support for the armed forces’. So we’ve had Armed Forces Day in 2009 and the doubling of cadet forces in schools since 2016".

But as Hill points out, this stands in direct contradiction to the way those returning from military conflict are treated:
"Actually those who make these arguments show very little respect for the veterans who are dumped on the street and live in poverty after war. But they encourage uncritical applause for the armed forces. And we’ve seen that become a much bigger thing in the last decade and the growth in the British Legion’s militaristic rhetoric is part of that wider picture".

An alternative?


Hill acknowledges that the British Legion, “do some good charitable work for British veterans”. And he is clear that, “we certainly wouldn’t discourage anyone from donating to charities that help those affected by war”. But he highlights some of the bigger issues veterans face in Britain:
"Militarism recruits people with lies to the armed forces, sends them to fight and then dumps them into poverty when they when they get back. But that’s how militarism has always worked around the world and throughout history. We have 7000 ex armed forces personnel living homeless in Britain" .
I’d have more respect for certain military charities if they were to speak out against cuts to the welfare state, disability services and the lack of investment in affordable housing. Why should British veterans rely on people rattling tins in the streets?

So for many of us, Remembrance Sunday is an opportunity to reflect on the true cost of wars: past, present and future. And as more people wear white poppies, the message is clear: end wars now.
Get Involved
At 12pm on Sunday 12 November, The Peace Pledge Union will hold an “Alternative Remembrance Sunday Ceremony” in Tavistock Square, London.
– But wearing a white poppy, wherever you are, is a powerful commitment to peace.
Featured image via Peace Pledge Union.Become a Canary member to support fearless independent journalism
Support The Canary with a monthly donation

Spread the word:

=============================

PS: behoorlijk gestoord trouwens die herdenking, als je ziet dat de poppy van alles met het gedicht 'In Flanders Fields' (van dichter en legerarts John McCray), dus de Eerste Wereldoorlog te maken heeft... WOI was in feite een smerige handelsoorlog, waarin jongens werden gedwongen de loopgraven uit te gaan, om een paar meter grond te veroveren, waarbij deze jongens vrijwel zeker wisten te worden vermoord...... Om ze toch 'te overtuigen' liepen er doodseskaders achter deze jongens, om ze bij 'lafheid' ter plekke dood te schieten (in feite in opdracht van de Britse regering......)........ En dan godverdomme nog kransen durven te leggen, terwijl geen Britse regering ook maar één woord van excuus heeft uitgesproken voor deze vreselijke barbaarse oorlog, waarin men willens en wetens miljoenen de dood instuurde.......

woensdag 20 september 2017

Trump dreigt Noord-Korea volledig te vernietigen, mocht de VN niet optreden tegen dat land........

Het is psychopaat Trump geheel en al in de bol geslagen, dat bleek toen hij gisteren een toespraak hield voor de algemene vergadering van de VN (UNGA). Hoorde e.e.a. gistermiddag op BBC World Service. Trump stelde onder meer dat de VS Noord-Korea volledig zal vernietigen als de VN niet optreedt tegen dat land...... Met andere woorden: Trump heeft China en Rusland gemaand serieus werk te maken van de belachelijke eisen, die de grootste terreur entiteit op aarde, de VS zelf, heeft gesteld aan Noord-Korea en de VN, zoals o.a verwoord door hare kwaadaardigheid Nikki Haley........

Trump gebruikte woorden al 'evil' en 'rogue states' sprekend over bijvoorbeeld Noord-Korea en Iran.... Voorts vertelde het beest zijn gehoor fijntjes dat de VS geschiedenis laat zien, dat het 'altijd probeert' niet haar levenswijze op te dringen aan andere landen........ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Nee, inderdaad dat doet de VS niet, men stelt gewoon haar eigen belang, zoals oliewinning, ver boven de soevereiniteit van andere landen........ Waarbij de VS dan wel als excuus aanvoert dat men democratie wil brengen, daarbij wijzend op zichzelf, alsof je nog van een functionerende democratie kan spreken in de VS.......

Opvallend overigens: alle negatieve zaken die Trump durfde op te sommen, zijn één op één toe te schrijven aan de VS........ Zo noemde hij terreur en het op gang brengen van enorme vluchtelingenstromen........ Een illegale oorlog tegen een land beginnen, is een grootschalige daad van terreur, grotere terreur is bijna niet te bedenken....... Met die terreur, waarbij enorme aantallen mensen (veel kinderen en vrouwen) zijn vermoord, zoals in Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en nu weer Syrië (waar de VS al vanaf 2006 bezig was met de voorbereiding van een opstand, die in een coup tegen Assad moest eindigen) heeft de VS inderdaad miljoenen mensen op de vlucht gejaagd.......

Iran moet stoppen met dood en vernietiging brengen in de regio, Iran is een moorddadig regime, zo lepelde Trump de woorden op, die Netanyahu in zijn 'oortje' fluisterde.........

Iran en Noord-Korea zijn deze eeuw en de vorige niet één oorlog begonnen, het aantal illegale oorlogen dat de VS sinds 1945 is begonnen ligt minstens boven de 17....... Sinds die tijd heeft de VS 'maar liefst' 22 miljoen mensen vermoord in illegale oorlogen, geheime militaire CIA missies (dit terreurorgaan wil nu ook een eigen drone-programma in Afghanistan), georganiseerde opstanden en staatsgrepen........

Hier een artikel over de toespraak van het beest, geschreven door Fréa Lockley, dat theCanary vandaag bracht:

The Canary

The most horrifying truth about Trump’s UN speech was revealed by what he chose not to say [VIDEO]





SEPTEMBER 20TH, 2017  FRÉA LOCKLEY

US President Donald Trump gave his first speech to the UN General Assembly (UNGA) on 19 September 2017. He made frequent references to ‘world peace’, and was critical of many countries and regimes around the world. But it was what he didn’t say, and the countries that he didn’t attack, that was most revealing – and worrying.

The ‘strongest military ever’

Trump bragged that the US “will be spending almost $700bn on our military and defence”; and that “our military will soon be the strongest it has ever been”. He also praised America’s supposed history of not trying to “impose our way of life on others”. And he claimed the US is “guided by outcomes, not ideologies”.
The UNGA is assembled from all 193 members. And it is the only UN organ where each member nation has a vote. Speaking to representatives from these countries, Trump mentioned ‘sovereignty’ (a state’s authority to govern itself) on numerous occasions. But as he continued, it became increasingly clear that he was not referring to all UN member states.
Trump spoke, for example, of “small regimes” that the “righteous” needed to “confront”. And the list of US ‘enemies’ began to flow. And despite his references to respecting the sovereignty of other nations, he went on to make threats and call for regime changes around the world.

Total destruction’

As The Canary has reported, tensions between the US and North Korea have been rising. And Trump’s latest rhetoric will do little to ease diplomatic relations. Not least because he said:
The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea.
While the issue of sanctions for North Korea is far from simple, and there was no mention of the billions of dollars the US will make selling weapons to South Korea, the threat of ‘total destruction’ is unlikely to help anyone.

Hypocrisy

The US President then turned his attentions to Iran, calling it a “murderous regime” which “masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy”.
As The Canary has reported, Trump has been ramping up tensions with Iran since he came to power:
But not because of democracy or human rights. Instead, his hostility is largely because Iran’s regional enemies, Saudi Arabia and Israel, are US allies; because there’s a barely reported conflict occurring over oil pipelines in the Middle East; and because Iran does not bend easily to America’s will.

Although both Iran and Saudi Arabia have equally poor human rights records, for example, Trump made no criticism at all of Saudi Arabia. In fact, he claimed that Iran had “fuel[ed] Yemen’s civil war”, while completely ignoring Saudi Arabia’s key role – and alleged war crimes – in the Yemeni conflict.
Nor did Trump mention the ongoing atrocities committed by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. So it comes as no surprise that, since Trump’s speech, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said:
In over 30 years in my experience with the UN, I never heard a bolder or more courageous speech.

Trump also criticised Iran for ‘restricting internet access’, ‘shooting unarmed student protesters’, and ‘imprisoning political reformers’. But there was no mention of US allies like Turkey which have reportedlycommitted the same abuses.

Guided by outcomes, not ideologies? Really?

Trump then got ideological. He first targeted Cuba, calling it a “destabilizing regime”; even though Cuba has recently helped Colombia to end its decades-long civil war.
He also called Venezuela’s democratically elected government a “socialist dictatorship”, saying its people were “starving”. But while trying to score political points over Venezuela – an oil-rich nation which the US has long sought to manipulate by pushing large amounts of money into opposition hands, Trump essentially ignored the widespread famine across Africa that is also deeply rooted in political issues; a crisis that now threatens over 20 million people and which Oxfam has called the “largest hunger emergency in the world”.
Trump then went on to say:
"From the Soviet Union to Cuba to Venezuela, wherever true socialism or communism has been adopted, it has delivered anguish and devastation and failure".

Apart from his inaccurate comparison of socialism and ‘communism’, Trump also failed to mention China; a nominally communist country which some forecast will overtake the US as the world’s biggest economy in the coming years. Perhaps Trump’s silence had something to do with his recent trade deal with Beijing?

A dangerous rant, not a speech…

Trump’s UN rant about the countries he didn’t like wasn’t surprising. But it was what he didn’t say that was most revealing – and dangerous. For example, there was no mention of:
  • The alleged ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Burma (Myanmar), which has forced 400,000 refugees to flee the country in recent weeks.
  • The fact that US authorities have reportedly killed around 100 civilians a month so far in 2017.
  • The alleged war crimes in Yemen of the Saudi Arabian dictatorship (a Western ally heavily linked to terrorism).
  • The alleged war crimes in both Turkey and Syria of the increasingly authoritarian Turkish regime of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (and its alleged links to terrorism).
  • The fact that US ally Honduras (where US officials allegedly helped to install a pro-US regime through a 2009 coup) has one of the highest murder rates in the world.
  • The dismal human rights record of Western ally Mexico, including the forced ‘disappearance’ of 43 student teachers in 2014; the murder of thousands of women every year; frequent accusations of rigged elections [Spanish]; and being one the most difficult and dangerous places in the world to be a journalist.
Essentially, Trump revealed in his speech a belief in the sovereignty of countries that are US allies; and a belief in regime change in countries that are not US allies. He also showed that he is perfectly happy to exploit human rights abuses for his own political benefit, as long as it’s not America’s friends committing those abuses. It was not a speech about peace or human rights. It was Trump laying out his hypocritically aggressive politics for the whole world to see.

Get Involved!
– Read more Global stories from The Canary. And follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more independent international coverage.
Featured image via Facebook
Become a Canary member to support fearless independent journalism
=================================
Vanmiddag heeft opperhufter Haley (VS ambassadeur bij de VN) de wereld laten weten, dat Trump niet uit is op de vernietiging  van Noord-Korea....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!









       en:  'Korea, Afghanistan and the Never Ending War Trap' (met ook daaronder een mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

      en: '
De VS en haar 'zachte diplomatie' t.a.v. Noord-Korea.....'