Koenders geeft alleen reisadvies voor vliegveld Sharm-el-Sheikh.........

De totaal belachelijke, pedante PvdA kwast Koenders, gaf afgelopen vrijdag een negatief reisadvies uit. Dit n.a.v. de waarschijnlijke bomaanslag, waarmee de Russische vakantievlucht 9268 verongelukte in de Sinaï woestijn. Je zou dus verwachten, dat hij voor dat hele gebied rond Sharm-el-Sheikh een reisverbod zou instellen, zeker omdat de moslim extremisten in dat gebied behoorlijk van zich doen spreken (al ver voor de vliegramp).

Nee, Koenders vaardigde een negatief reisadvies uit voor het vliegveld van Sharm-el-Sheikh........ Het is dat 't zo triest is mensen, anders zou je je daadwerkelijk doodlachen...... Dus als u naar Sharm-el-Sheikh wilt, moet u naar een ander Egyptisch vliegveld reizen en vandaar de bus nemen, dwars door het gebied waar de moslim extremisten actief zijn..........

Zie ook: 'Wie haalde het A321 toestel met vluchtnummer 9268 neer in de Sinaï woestijn?'

       en: Van Bommel vindt Egypte een fijn vakantieland......... AUW!!!'

Voor meer berichten over/met vliegramp S, Egypte, Sharm-el-Sheikh, ISIS, jihadstrijders, moslims en/of Koenders, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Wie haalde het A321 toestel met vluchtnummer 9268 neer in de Sinaï woestijn?

Hier een scherpe analyse van Justin Raimondo, over vlucht 9268, die vorige week neerkwam in de Sinaï woestijn. De speculaties, de politieke bemoeienis, de gevolgen en een mogelijke 'verantwoordelijke' passeren de revue. Onder dit artikel kan u klikken voor een vertaling, al neemt het 'downloaden' wel wat tijd in beslag:

Who Downed Metrojet Flight 9268?
Was it ISIS – or somebody else?By Justin Raimondo

November 06, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "Antiwar" - First they said the downing of Russian Metrojet Flight 9268 was most likely due to Russia’s “notorious” regional airlines, which supposedly are rickety and unreliable. The Egyptian government denied that terrorism is even a possibility, with Egyptian despot Abdel Fatah al-Sisi proclaiming:
“When there is propaganda that it crashed because of Isis, this is one way to damage the stability and security of Egypt and the image of Egypt. Believe me, the situation in Sinai – especially in this limited area – is under our full control.”
However, it soon came out that the person in charge of Sharm el-Sheikh airport, where the Russia plane had landed before taking off again, had been “replaced” – oh, but not because of anything to do with the downing of the Russian passenger plane! As the Egyptian authorities put it:
“Adel Mahgoub, chairman of the state company that runs Egypt’s civilian airports, says airport chief Abdel-Wahab Ali has been ‘promoted’ to become his assistant. He said the move late Wednesday had nothing to do with media skepticism surrounding the airport’s security. Mahgoub said Ali is being replaced by Emad el-Balasi, a pilot.”
Laughable, albeit in a sinister way, and yet more evidence that something wasn’t quite right: after all, everyone knows the Egyptian government does not have the Sinai, over which the plane disintegrated in mid air, under its “full control.” ISIS, which claimed responsibility for the crash hours after it occurred, is all over that peninsula.

Still, the denials poured in, mostly from US government officials such as Director of National Intelligence James “Liar-liar-pants-on-fire” Clapper, who said ISIS involvement was “unlikely.” Then they told us it couldn’t have been ISIS because they supposedly don’t have surface-to-air missiles that can reach the height attained by the downed plane. Yet that wasn’t very convincing either, because a) How do they know what ISIS has in its arsenal?, and b) couldn’t ISIS or some other group have smuggled a bomb on board?
The better part of a week after the crash, we have this:

“Days after authorities dismissed claims that ISIS brought down a Russian passenger jet, a U.S. intelligence analysis now suggests that the terror group or its affiliates planted a bomb on the plane.

“British Foreign Minister Philip Hammond said his government believes there is a ‘significant possibility’ that an explosive device caused the crash. And a Middle East source briefed on intelligence matters also said it appears likely someone placed a bomb aboard the aircraft.”
According to numerous news reports, intercepts of “internal communications” of the Islamic State/ISIS group provided evidence that it wasn’t an accident but a terrorist act. Those intercepts must have been available to US and UK government sources early on, yet these same officials said they had no “direct evidence,” as Clapper put it, of terrorist involvement. Why is that? And furthermore: why the general unwillingness of Western governments and media to jump to their usual conclusion when any air disaster occurs,
and attribute it to terrorism?
The answer is simple: they didn’t want to arouse any sympathy for the Russians. Russia, as we all know, is The Enemy – considered even worse, in some circles, than the jihadists.  Indeed, there’s a whole section of opinion-makers devoted to the idea that  we must help Islamist crazies in Syria, including al-Qaeda’s affiliate, known as al-Nusra, precisely in order to stop the Evil Putin from extending Russian influence into the region.

In a broader sense, the reluctance to acknowledge that this was indeed a terrorist act is rooted in a refusal to acknowledge the commonality of interests that exists between Putin’s Russia and the West. The downing of the Metrojet is just the latest atrocity carried out by the head-choppers against the Russian people: this includes not only the Beslan school massacre, in which over 700 children were taken hostage by Chechen Islamists, but also the five apartment bombings that took place in 1999. The real extent of Western hostility to Russia, and the unwillingness to realize that Russia has been a major terrorist target, is underscored by the shameful propaganda pushed by the late Alexander Litvinenko, and endorsed by Sen. John McCain, which claims that the bombings were an “inside job” carried out by the Russian FSB – a version of “trutherism” that, if uttered in the US in relation to the 9/11 attacks, is routinely (and rightly) dismissed as sheer crankery. But where the Russians are concerned it’s not only allowable, it’s the default. A particularly egregious example is Russophobic hack Michael D. Weiss, who, days before the downing of the Russian passenger plane, solemnly informed us that Putin was “sending jihadists to join ISIS.” Boy oh boy, talk about ingratitude!

This downright creepy unwillingness to express any sympathy or sense of solidarity with the Russian people ought to clue us in to something we knew all along: that the whole “war on terrorism” gambit is as phony as a three-dollar bill. If US government officials were actually concerned about the threat of terrorist violence directed at innocent civilians, they would partner up with Russia in a joint effort to eradicate the threat: that this isn’t happening in Syria, or anywhere else, is all too evident. Not to mention our canoodling with “moderate” Chechen terrorists, openly encouraging them to carry on their war with Putin’s Russia. Our “war on terrorism” is simply a pretext for spying on the American people, and most of the rest of the world, and cementing the power of the State on the home front, not to mention fattening up an already grotesquely obese “defense” budget.

With the belated admission that the downing of the Russian passenger jet was an act of terrorism, we are beginning to hear that this a tremendous blow to Putin’s prestige at home – something no one would dare utter about Obama’s or Cameron’s “prestige” if the Metrojet had been an American or British passenger plane. They say it’s “blowback” due to Russia’s actions in Syria, with the clear implication that it’s deserved. And yet, according to US officials and the usual suspects, the Russians aren’t hitting ISIS so much as they’re smiting the “moderate” Islamist head-choppers – the “Syrian rebels,” as they’re known — who are being funded, armed, and encouraged by the West.

If that’s true, then what kind of blowback are we talking about – and from which direction is it coming? Given this, isn’t it entirely possible that Metrojet Flight 9268 was downed by US-aided –and-supported “moderates,” who moderately decided to get back at Putin?

Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of Antiwar.com, and a senior fellow at the Randolph Bourne Institute. He is a contributing editor at The American Conservative, and writes a monthly column for Chronicles. He is the author of Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement [Center for Libertarian Studies, 1993; Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2000], and An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard [Prometheus Books, 2000].

Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.

Zie ook: 'Koenders geeft alleen reisadvies voor vliegveld Sharm-el-Sheikh.....'

       en: 'Van Bommel vindt Egypte een fijn vakantieland......... AUW!!!'

Voor meer berichten over/met vliegramp S, Sharm-el-Sheikh, Rusland, Putin, Tsjetsjenië, Cameron, Philip Hammond, ISIS en/of Abdul Fatah al-Sisi, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Excuus voor de layout, die ik niet juist kreeg.

Bert van Slooten (Radio1 NOS) kan wel lachen om een vliegramp........

Weer 's niet te filmen mensen, gistermiddag was Radio1 Journaal presentator Bert van Slooten in gesprek met een correspondent over het vliegveld Sharm-el-Sheikh, dit n.a.v. de vreselijke vliegramp daar vorige week zaterdag, met een Russisch passagierstoestel. Het vliegveld schijnt moeilijk te beveiligen te zijn..... Van Slooten is zo'n flapdrol die denkt wel leuk te kunnen zijn en probeert zo vaak mogelijk snaakse opmerkingen (jaren 50 'lol') te maken. Zo ook bij dit onderwerp...... Gelukkig zag de correspondent het 'leuke' van 'de grap' niet in en lachte dus niet. Daarom begon deze enorme idioot zelf maar te lachen om z'n 'grap.......'

Kan die klootzak, die n.b. dik betaald wordt met belastinggeld, nu eindelijk eens een trap onder z'n reet krijgen, richting straat wel te verstaan!!!! Jezus wat een hufter!!!

Voor meer berichten met/over van Slooten, Radio1, humor en/of publieke omroep, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.