Joe Biden, de nieuwe VS president heeft een 'grote' racistische geschiedenis

Jammer dat het hieronder opgenomen artikel van CounterPunch niet al voor de Democratische voorverkiezingen werd gepubliceerd, grote kans dat oorlogsmisdadiger Joe Biden dan niet door de Democratische Partij zou zijn gekozen als kandidaat voor het presidentschap Hoewel de grote opzet was om Bernie Sanders de gang naar het Witte Huis te belemmeren, daar hij te links was en wel eens werkelijke verandering had kunnen brengen (in tegenstelling tot de meer dan valse belofte van Barack Obama)........

Jack Delaney heeft een uitgebreid artikel geschreven waarin hij Joe Biden neerzet als een racist en dat al meer dan 40 jaar lang......

Zo was Biden tegen het federale schoolbusproject waarmee men de integratie van zwarte en anders gekleurde kinderen op witte scholen wilde bevorderen...... Uiteraard was dit niet de enige manier waarop Biden zich inzette om integratie van gekleurde kinderen op witte scholen te voorkomen, op alle mogelijke (politieke) manieren heeft Biden zich daartegen verzet......

Biden heeft zich onder de administratie van oorlogsmisdadiger Bill Clinton ingezet voor de 'three strikes out' wetgeving, waarmee zelfs met kleine vergrijpen, je na drie van die vergrijpen 'levenslang' gevangen kon worden gezet en uiteraard waren het vooral de gekleurden die hier in verhouding het hardst onder hebben geleden..... Zo werd het gebruik van crack (cocaïne) t.o.v. gewone cocaïne (een heel stuk duurder) veel zwaarder gestraft en je raadt het al: vooral de gekleurden gebruikten crack, daar ze altijd tot het armste deel van de VS behoorden en behoren.......

Overigens was het 'three strikes out' het gevolg van de inzet van Biden al onder de totale mafketel en oorlogsmisdadiger (en C-acteur) Ronald Reagan, de neoliberale republikeinse president in de 80er jaren van de vorige eeuw..... (die begon met het opschroeven van de VS schulden tot onaanvaardbaar grote hoogte) Het is zelfs zo dat Biden Reagan heeft gepord om hardere straffen te zetten op drugsovertredingen. Het uiteindelijke gevolg van de inzet die Biden liet zien was dat in veel staten 90% van de veroordeelden door drugsgebruik en andere drugsgerelateerde zaken gekleurd waren.......

Onder Clinton was Biden één van de hoofdverantwoordelijken voor het verhogen van straffen en hij was er trots op dat de Democraten verantwoordelijk waren voor 60 meer doodstraffen en de verhoging van straffen. Verder was de Democratische administratie van Clinton verantwoordelijk voor het aannemen van 100.000 meer politieagenten en het bouwen van 125.000 extra gevangeniscellen...... Gevolg was dat tegen het jaar 2000 de VS met 5% van de wereldbevolking, de VS een gevangenispopulatie had die 25% vertegenwoordigde van het totale aantal gevangenen over de wereld....... Gekleurden liepen 5 keer meer kans in de gevangenis te belanden dan hun witte medeburgers.........

Biden heeft zich van 1984 tot 2018 ingezet voor het snijden in de sociale bijstand, terwijl juist de gekleurde bevolking daar het meest op was aangewezen...... Voorts was Biden verantwoordelijk voor het opschroeven van schulden voor studeren en zoals je kan uittekenen, ook hier waren m.n. de gekleurden het slachtoffer van (hoewel deze schuldenlast nu zo groot is dat dezelfde schoft nu heeft beloofd daar wat aan te gaan doen, echter denk daarbij aan de beloften van Obama, die voor het grootste deel in het 'grote archief' verdwenen......)

Over Obama's beloften gesproken: ondanks een gekleurde president en een aantal gekleurden op sleutelposities, is het zijn administratie niet gelukt om de positie van gekleurden te verbeteren en ook hiervoor was Biden deels verantwoordelijk...... Sterker nog Black Lives Matter (BLM) ontstond onder de Obama/Biden administratie.....

Ook de buitenlandpolitiek van de VS onder Obama en vicepresident Biden was het 'business as usual...' De Obama/Biden administratie was verantwoordelijk voor het destabiliseren van landen als Jemen, Honduras (een door de CIA en Hillary Clinton georganiseerde coup), Syrië, Somalië en Libië (het eens rijkste land van Afrika werd 60 jaar terug in de tijd gebombardeerd en behoort nu tot de armste landen van dat continent, terwijl er nog steeds oorlog wordt gevoerd....). Intussen vervolgde deze administratie het bloedige beleid die de erfenis vormde van het Bush tijdperk: de illegale oorlogsoperaties in Afghanistan, Pakistan en Irak......

Het moorden middels drones kreeg ook al een extra duw in de rug van de Obama/Biden administratie, terwijl zo'n 90% van de vermoorde slachtoffers niet eens werden verdacht, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen....... Biden was ook voor die moorden de tweede hoofdverantwoordelijke.......

Wat betreft vluchtelingen uit Latijns-Amerika (o.a. door de coup van 2009 in Honduras) heeft de Obama administratie meer dan 2,5 miljoen vluchtelingen gedeporteerd en werd er geen onderzoek gedaan naar massagraven met vluchtelingen uit dat deel van de 3 Amerika's.......

Tijdens zijn verkiezingscampagne heeft Biden herhaaldelijk gelogen dat hij Nelson Mandela ontmoette in Zuid-Afrika en dat hij daarvoor werd gearresteerd..... Terwijl hij zoals eerder gemeld ronduit een racist was en eigenlijk nog is (en dan ben je m.i. niets anders dat een fascist)..... Deze fascist ging zelfs zover om het volk voor te houden dat wanneer ze een probleem hadden om op hem te stemmen, deze kiezers niet zwart waren, waarvoor hij later dan wel zijn excuus aanbood.......

Met Biden zal er niets ten goede veranderen voor de gekleurde bevolking van de VS en ook het imperialistische buitenlandbeleid van de VS zal niet veranderen, sterker nog: de kans is groot dat de VS weer nieuwe oorlogen zal aangaan, zeker als je in gedachten neemt dat Biden al heeft gesteld dat dit beleid onder Trump slap was als het gaat om de landen Iran en Venezuela....... Ook de agressieve buitenlandpolitiek t.a.v. China zal niet veranderen, zo heeft Bidens vicepresident Kamala Harris laten weten....... Door de sancties van Trump alleen al tegen Venezuela, zijn meer dan 50.000 mensen om het leven gekomen, als je dat slap vindt kan er maar één stap straffer zijn: weer een (illegale) oorlog....... (overigens ook in Iran moeten grote aantallen mensen, inclusief veel kinderen, zijn overleden als gevolg van de illegale VS sancties......)

December 6, 2020

Jim Crow Joe

Biden’s Record On Race

by Jack Delaney

Photograph Source: Chuck Kennedy – CC BY 2.0

It was the days of purple haze and the post-civil rights movement that President-elect Joe Biden cemented his political legacy, yet he was rarely on the right side of history. The era was marked by assassinations of political leaders, spurred a coalition opposing the Vietnam war, and produced police violence carried out on demonstrators. The unrest set the stage for Richard Nixon and advisor Lee Atwater’s southern strategy.

Nixon’s ‘68 campaign strategy relied on polished racist dog whistles and rhetoric promising law and order, which delivered the southern vote along with the White House. With a political realignment — where segregationist southern Democrats found refuge within the GOP — political newcomer, Joe Biden found opportunity.

Delaware’s Dixiecrat

Before the 1972 elections, then a city government official, Biden launched a bid for the U.S. Senate. In his campaign against Delaware’s Republican incumbent, J. Caleb Boggs, Biden set himself apart from his opponent and supported the integration of schools through federally mandated busing. Yet in a few years following his first Senatorial win, he would reverse his stance and sharpen his words.

After a deciding vote that nixed a 1974 anti-busing amendment, the freshman Senator faced backlash and pressure from constituents. Biden’s vote against the ‘74 amendment would stand as his sole exception of supporting school desegregation through federally mandated busing. After his controversial vote, constituent outrage ensued. Parents began to heckle the Senator at a town hall meeting and he would promptly change his position to match his base’s sentiments.

Through 1972 until the end of federally mandated busing, Biden would join staunch segregationists — Senators Strom Thurmond, James O. Eastland, Herman E. Talmadge, and others — backing bills that would prevent the federal government from enforcing school integration.

After the 1975 white anti-busing riots in Boston, Biden joined with former Dixiecrat — North Carolina Republican Jesse Helms — to introduce an anti-busing amendment a year later. The proposal’s aim was to handcuff the enforcement of school desegregation by limiting the federal government from collecting data on integration. As reported by NPR, Biden later said in a 1975 interview he supported a Constitutional amendment to end the busing mandate.

In support of Helms’s amendment, Biden would rise on the Senate floor stating, “I have become convinced that busing is a bankrupt concept.” Helms’s measure failed but Biden introduced a similar and more bipartisan amendment that barred funding for local governments assigning teachers to schools based on race. Later that year, Biden issued a statement on busing in an interview, calling the policy, “[an] asinine concept, the utility of which has never been proven to me.”

The New York Times notes that Biden proposed a 1976 measure that would block the Department of Justice (DOJ) from treating busing as a form of desegregation. A year later the Senator cosponsored an amendment that limited federal funding from busing oversight while leading legislation that would limit court-ordered busing enforcement.

A year later, in 1977, Biden remarked that some federal desegregation policies would “cause his children to grow up in a racialized jungle.” Biden continued with rhetoric that echoed Congress’s segregationists, haranguing against “forced busing” and arguing for states’ rights.

By 1982, Biden joined former Dixiecrats to vote for a DOJ appropriations amendment that included a section labeled “the toughest anti-busing rider ever approved by either chamber of Congress.” He then voted in favor of an amendment that granted DOJ the ability “to remove or reduce the requirement of busing in existing court decrees or judgments.”

A 1991 Supreme Court decision would lead to a series of cases that would ultimately end federally mandated busing. Almost 30 years later, a 2019 report released by Penn State and UCLA showed that classrooms are overly segregated today.

New Jim Crow Joe

From the early 1980s up until present day, racialized mass incarceration took hold — sponsored by the war on drugs, heightened sentencing, and through the empowerment of prosecutors and law enforcement. The New Jim Crow author Michelle Alexander writes, “Ninety percent of those admitted to prison for drug offenses in many states were black or Latino, yet the mass incarceration of communities of color was explained in race-neutral terms, an adaptation to the needs and demands of the current political climate. The New Jim Crow was born.”

Biden’s role in the genesis of the New Jim Crow began during the Reagan years. As reported by The Intercept, Biden lobbied the Reagan administration to beef up law enforcement and adopt harsher sentences. While courting Reagan, the Senator reached across the aisle to find common ground with an old friend.

Biden teamed up with Strom Thurmond to introduce the Comprehensive Control Act of 1984. The bill expanded penalties for marijuana production and trafficking, permitted punitive legal strategies, and included a civil asset forfeiture clause. By 1986 and 1988 he would support and partly author two Anti-Drug Abuse Acts that imposed stricter sentencing on crack compared to powder cocaine and bolstered prison sentences for drug offenders.

During Biden’s first bid for the White House, a 1987 Philadelphia Inquirer piece reports that he gloated about receiving an award from Alabama’s former segregationist governor George Wallace in 1973. Shortly thereafter, Biden delivered a stump speech in Alabama, stating, “we [Delawareans] were on the south’s side in the Civil War.” Continuing on the campaign trail, he further remarked that he participated as a civil rights activist in the 60s, yet the claim was unfounded.

After the Reagan-era, a 1991 peak in national crime escalated calls for law and order and was followed by a media frenzy. In the ‘92 Presidential campaign, Bill Clinton rebranded the Democratic Party as tough on crime, which paid off and delivered the White House. Shortly after the Clinton victory, Biden introduced The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, also known as the ‘94 crime bill.

Biden was a substantial contributor to the legislation and shepherded it through, rising on the Senate floor boasting that the liberal wing of the Democratic Party was responsible for 60 new death penalties, 70 enhanced penalties, 100,000 more cops, and 125,000 new prison cells. The Senator continued the next year, standing in support of the bill, “We have predators on our streets who are beyond the pale….We have no other choice but to take them out of society.”

The bill passed and was signed into law by Clinton, imposing mandatory minimum sentences, the “three strikes you’re out rule”, and increased federal spending for newly militarized law enforcement and prisons nationwide.

As the policies took shape, the war on drugs and mass incarceration exploded, delivering the U.S. the world’s largest prison population. No secret — by the 2000s, with only 5 percent of the globe’s population, the U.S. had 25 percent of the world’s prison population. Data from the U.S. Census shows that black people are five times more likely to face incarceration than white people, while a study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine showed police murders skew excessively towards people of color.

Late Senate and Obama Years

Towards the twilight of Biden’s Senate career, he pursued neoliberal economic reforms and championed financial deregulations. For over 40 years — from 1984 until 2018 — Biden would support proposed freezes and cuts to Social Security spending, while people of color are disproportionately served by Social Security income benefits.

He continued with deregulation through the ‘90s and ‘00s. In 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was introduced and proposed to eliminate Great Depression-era financial regulations formed through the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. The sweeping deregulatory bill paved the way and further incentivized finance capital to pursue predatory lending, redlining, and fiscal trickery which disproportionately disadvantaged people of color. Biden supported and voted for the bill.

Following the erasure of Glass-Steagall, the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA), known as the bankruptcy bill, was introduced. Through BAPCPA’s time in the legislative process, Biden would offer three amendments that hallowed existing statutes. The law would unequally impact people of color, and down the road, exacerbated the student debt crisis, impacting people of color at more costly levels.

During the Obama-Biden years, videos and reports of police murders of black people would surface. Ferguson and Baltimore became centers of the uprisings that ensued in 2014 and 2015, respectively, and were precursors to the current Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. Yet the two-term administration didn’t deliver the change that was promised in the ‘08 campaign.

Abroad it was also business as usual for the Obama-Biden White House. The foreign policy apparatus during the administration actively destabilized regions, causing crises in Yemen, Honduras, Syria, Somalia, and Libya, while continuing W. Bush-era operations in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq.

The drone program would also surge under Biden’s White House years. Since the drone warfare-era, the administration amassed the highest number of civilian drone strike casualties. As reported by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, at least 380 to 801 civilians in the Middle East and Africa were killed by drone strikes during Obama and Biden’s tenure.

For Latin Americans, the White House also managed one of the largest deportation efforts in U.S. history, while mass graves of Latin American migrants went unchecked by the administration. Over two and half million migrants were deported and the infrastructure was left for Trump to inherit and bolster.

A May 2020 CNN interview with Harvard professor, Dr. Cornel West, succinctly summed up the Obama-Biden years. “The system cannot reform itself. We’ve tried black faces in high places. Too often our black politicians, professional class, middle class become too accommodated to the capitalist economy.” West continued, “The Black Lives Matter movement emerged under a black President, a black Attorney General, and a black Homeland Security, and they couldn’t deliver.”

On The Campaign Trail

Biden didn’t launch his campaign with much backing from the Democratic base, bundlers, or much of a vision. The core of Biden’s messaging appealed to white suburbanites, offering nothing more than a return to normalcy and an alternative to Trump. Top Democrats, much like the base and donors, were also initially skeptical of Biden’s path to victory.

According to Politico, Biden’s former running mate Barack Obama allegedly remarked, “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to fuck things up.” Obama then supposedly told one Democratic candidate in Iowa, “And you know who really doesn’t have it? Joe Biden.”

Before Biden was thrusted into the Democratic front runner spotlight, the former Vice President clashed with future running mate, Kamala Harris, regarding his record on busing during the debates. While Vice President-elect Harris has her own controversial record on criminal justice, the Biden camp deflected and muddied the waters.

During the campaign, Biden would falsely and repeatedly claim that he was arrested after meeting with Nelson Mandela while protesting apartheid in South Africa. He would also state in an interview, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black,” which he later apologized for.

Peculiar phrases and malarkey aside, it didn’t matter for the Biden coalition. The centrist candidates dropped out and consolidated to crush an insurgent Bernie Sanders challenge, delivering Biden key wins and the nomination.

Surrounding his primary victory were potentially the largest uprisings and movement in U.S. history. Following the police murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, mass rebellions stormed nationwide — continuing ever since. The majority of Americans support the BLM movement and the rebellions against U.S. institutions.

With popular support behind BLM, Biden didn’t seize the moment like during the post-civil rights political realignment. Nonetheless, the black vote turned out to deliver him the White House. With that said, recent indications show a Biden administration will take the black vote and the energy around BLM for granted.

Following the police murder of Walter Wallace Jr. — a young black man experiencing a mental health episode in Philadelphia — the then Presidential nominee condemned the uprisings. Biden would then appear for remarks on the campaign trail to address the hopelessly frustrated crowds, “There is no excuse whatsoever for the looting and the violence. None whatsoever.” The campaign also issued a written statement in response, adding in a qualifying “but at the same.”

The President-elect previously denounced demonstrators in Portland, Oregon and elsewhere. Prior to issuing statements, Biden has also called for police to “shoot ‘em in the leg” and doubled down on that remark during a town hall when asked about police de-escalation techniques.

The Biden transition team was also considering former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel for a top cabinet slot but walked his appointment back after criticism. In 2014, Emanuel attempted to cover up the police killing of black Chicagoan, Laquan McDonald, along with gutting the city’s social infrastructure for vulnerable communities.

Biden’s “Tranquilizing Drug Of Gradualism”

Two years before Malcolm X was assassinated, he delivered a speech skewering white liberals, “The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political “football game” that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.”

Martin Luther King Jr. would share similar sentiments on white centrists in his letter from the Birmingham jailhouse, writing, “I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice.”

The warnings issued by X and King ring true today.

Opposing full school integration and using rhetorical pitches reminiscent of Atwater’s southern strategy gave Biden the political capital he needed to rise through the ranks and develop bipartisan favor. The racist war on drugs, mass incarceration, rampant disenfranchisement, the prison industrial complex, exploited labor, and militarized police forces didn’t magically appear.

Austerity and financial deregulation further empowered conservatives and incentivized debt profiteers to prey on vulnerable people. The continuation of endless wars and coup d’états, building a mass deportation system, and failing to leverage power to yield change had someone behind those policies and inactions.

The policy failures that have perpetuated a white supremacist society weren’t just lazily passed and implemented — they were championed and safe-guarded. Biden’s career has been built on working for white supremacy.

While securing the election by placating voters of color and appealing to comfortable white suburbanites — like his strategy in the early throes of his career — has proven he will not build long-overdue and necessary systematic justice. Rather than championing a popular and righteous cause, he has countlessly gone out of his way to support and pay homage to white supremacist notions and institutions, twisting his record to the public. Though Biden’s record and words are clear, “nothing will fundamentally change.”

Like Biden, the U.S. has yet to repent for its past and present. For any significant change to occur in the Biden years and beyond, it will take a sustained mass movement constantly agitating institutions. During the Biden years and throughout Democratic strongholds, there will still be brutality, police murders, and white supremacy. The only possible way for meaningful change to occur — not symbolic victories — is for all decent people to continuously take to the streets and, by any means necessary, demand justice and freedom.

As put by Martin Luther King Jr., “this is no time to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism.”

Jack Delaney is a former policy analyst. He worked on issues relating to health care, disability, and labor policy, and is a member of the National Writers Union.

=================================

Zie ook: 'Nepnieuws en nep media? Hoe de VS echte journalistiek het zwijgen oplegt..........'

Hersencontrole middels elektromagnetische frequentie: geen sprookje of complottheorie

Via een Twitterbericht van Joost van der Zwan werd ik gewezen op een uitgebreid artikel over de controle op hersenen middels meerdere technieken, waaronder elektromagnetische frequentie, schrijver is Soleilmavis Liu, zelf slachtoffer van wat je het best als geestelijke marteling kan zien (een marteling die ook een groot aantal fysieke klachten opwekken.....)

De eerste natie die een dergelijke techniek ontwikkelde was nazi-Duitsland, waar men proeven deed op concentratiekampgevangenen uit Sachsenhausen. Doel was het fabriceren van een 'wonderpil' genaamd D-IX, genoemd naar het experiment met diezelfde aanduiding...... De werking van deze 'worderpil' was gebaseerd op die van cocaïne en moest de prestaties van frontsoldaten verbeteren......* Na WOII gelastte VS president Truman dat de verantwoordelijke wetenschappers niet in handen van de Sovjet-Unie mochten vallen en haalde deze wetenschappers naar de VS waar ze werkten aan Project Paperclip..... Deze uiterst misdadige wetenschappers waren verantwoordelijk voor een groot aantal doden en ontliepen zo berechting voor hun vreselijke oorlogsmisdaden en misdaden tegen de menselijkheid......

Intussen kan men middels elektromagnetische frequentie, hersenimplantaten en op andere manieren mensen manipuleren en zelfs voorspellen wat slachtoffers zullen doen, ofwel men kan als het ware de hersenen lezen en sturen........

Ik heb een deel van de tekst overgenomen, waaraan o.a. het deel met een groot aantal fysieke klachten ontbreekt, dit zijn er 44 in totaal, klachten die men middels manipulatie kan veroorzaken, je moet dan denken aan plotselinge hoofdpijn, misselijkheid, slapeloosheid, of juist het veroorzaken van slaperigheid, extreme vermoeidheid, dan wel manipulatie van het geheugen, verder het veroorzaken van pijnen in diverse delen van het lichaam, tot zelfs het ontwikkelen van kankers….....**

Ik moet eerlijk zeggen dat ik eerder al eens over deze zaken had gehoord, maar ze nooit serieus heb genomen, echter na het lezen van het artikel zijn me de schellen bij wijze van spreken van de ogen gevallen........

Zoals hiervoor al gemeld over de nazi's die e.e.a. in gang hebben gezet, zal het je duidelijk zijn dat vooral het militaire apparaat en geheime diensten zeer geïnteresseerd zijn in deze technieken en daar geld en menskracht voor inzetten......

Hoe ziek en gewetenloos kan de wetenschap zijn en hoe ongelofelijk gewelddadig kan de mens in het algemeen zijn....... Als dit op grote schaal zal worden ingezet had zelfs George Orwell hier niet van kunnen dromen in z'n ergste nachtmerrie.......

Ongelooflijk en onverdraaglijk..........

Mind Control with Electromagnetic Frequency

Gepubliceerd op June 7, 2016

Soleilmavis Liu   Follow

Sponsor and Activist of Peacepink: World

Soleimavis Liu presented this paper at the recent E-Leader conference held by Fudan University and Chinese American Scholars Association in Shanghai, January 5-7, 2015.

Recent years, the words “mind control abuse and torture” and “target individual” appears frequently online. Thousands of people in groups or individually cries attention to the abuses and tortures with electromagnetic mind control technologies through internet and all other channels. The scale of the ongoing crimes is large, and hidden. People are asking for the worldwide attention and an international investigation of enormous human rights violations that are silently taking place worldwide at this moment.

Abstract:

One of the twenty-first century’s greatest violations of human rights is the proliferation of mind control technologies and their accompanying abuse and torture. Thousands of innocent victims across the globe have become activists for their freedom. 

Electromagnetic mind control technologies are weapons which use electromagnetic waves to hijack a person’s brain and nervous system and subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making. This article is a brief introduction to mind control technologies, the grave situation of hidden mind control abuses and tortures, and victims, including Soleilmavis Liu, whose work is to expose mind control technologies and their torturous abuses, and to urge governments worldwide to investigate and halt these egregious violations of human rights. 

Keywords: Mind control technology; voice-to-skull; victim, Human Rights; Torture; Abuse

Introduction

Thousands of people in groups or individually cries attention to the abuses and tortures with electromagnetic mind control technologies through internet and all other channels. The scale of the ongoing crimes is large, and hidden. People are asking for the worldwide attention and an international investigation of enormous human rights violations that are silently taking place worldwide at this moment. 

This article will briefly introduce mind control technologies, current data of mind control victims, Soleilmavis’ case summary, and their work to expose mind control abuse and torture. Soleilmavis’ case summary and her work will hopefully bring more public awareness to the secret crimes of mind control abuses and tortures. 

Brief introduction of mind control technologies

Mind control technologies are weapons which use electronic microchip implants, nanotechnologies, microwaves and/or electromagnetic waves to subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system. The development of these methods and technologies has a long history. 

1. Nazi Wonder Drug

Nazi researchers used concentration camp inmates to test a cocaine-based “wonder drug” they hoped would enhance the performance of German troops. Hamburg-based criminologist Wolf Kemper believed that D-IX pills were Hitler’s last secret development. The so-called Experiment D-IX started in November of the year 1944 in Sachsenhausen concentration camp. The results of all those tests inspired their initiators to supply D-IX drug to the entire Nazi Army. However, they failed to launch the mass production of the substance. The allies’ victories at both fronts in winter and spring of in 1945 resulted in the collapse of the Nazi regime. The absurd dream of the wonder drug was crushed. [1] 

According to the “Want to Know” information site, “After the end of World War II, German scientists were held in a variety of detainment camps by the allies. In 1946, President Truman authorized Project Paperclip to exploit German scientists for American research, and to deny these intellectual resources to the Soviet Union.” Some reports bluntly pointed out that they were “ardent Nazis.” They were considered so vital to the “Cold War” effort that they would be brought into the US and Canada. Some of these experts had participated in murderous medical experiments on human subjects at concentration camps. A 1999 report to the Senate and the House said “between 1945 and 1955; 765 scientists, engineers, and technicians were brought to the US under Paperclip and similar programs.” (Bluebird Report) 

1. Mk-ultra, America’s Central Intelligence Agency mind control project.

The Central Intelligence Agency’s Fact Book states the NSC (National Security Council) and the CIA were established under the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947. In December 1947, the NSC held its first meeting. James Forrestal, the Secretary of Defense, pushed for the CIA to begin a “secret war” against the Soviets. Forrestal’s initiative led to the execution of psychological warfare operations (psy-ops) in Europe. CIA personnel were not opposed to working with Nazi doctors who had proven to be proficient in breaking the mind and rebuilding it. In some cases, military bases were used to hide these covert activities. It was decided that the communist threat was an issue that took priority over constitutional rights. 

One of the areas to be investigated by the CIA was Mind Control. The CIA’s human behavior control program was chiefly motivated by perceived Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean use of mind control techniques. Under the protection of “national security,” many other branches of the government also took part in the study of this area. The CIA originated its first program in 1950 under the name BLUEBIRD, which in 1951, after Canada and Britain had been included, was changed to ARTICHOKE. MK-Ultra officially began in 1953. Technically it was closed in 1964, but some of its programs remained active under MKSEARCH well into the seventies. In 1973, tipped off about forthcoming investigations, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of any MK-Ultra records. (MC 10, 17) 

There is an overwhelming body of evidence that confirms the existence of MK-Ultra. More than 250 people who claim they were the victims of “brainwashing” by America’s Central Intelligence Agency were set to win a multimillion dollar legal battle for compensation. Nine already had each received $67,000 (£33,500) compensation from the spy agency, which had admitted to setting up an operation codenamed MK-Ultra during the Cold War. [Mike Parker, CIA’s Bourne Identity Plot (Mkultra), Express.co.uk, July 8, 2007] [2] 

1. Implantable electronic chip mind control

Many researchers, using nanotechnologies had developed implantable electronic chips that established new nerve connections in parts of the brain that controlled movement or even altered emotion and thought. Researchers at the University of Washington (UW) had been working on an implantable electronic chip that might help establish new nerve connections in the part of the brain that controlled movement. Their study, to be published in the November 2, 2006, edition of Nature, showed such a device could induce brain changes in monkeys lasting more than a week (Leila Gray, Tiny Electronic Chip, Interacting with the Brain, Modifies Pathways for Controlling Movement, University of Washington News, October 24, 2006). [3] 

On March 18, 2008, the Central Intelligence Agency responded in writing to a Larson Media Freedom of Information Act request. The document disclosed that the CIA’s use of biomedical intellectual property developed at the Alfred Mann Foundation, Second Sight LLC, Advanced Bionics, and under Naval Space Warfare (SPAWAR) contract #N6600106C8005, was “currently and properly classified pursuant to an executive order in the interest of national security,” and applied to the CIA Director’s “statutory obligation to protect from disclosure, intelligence sources and methods.” The technology, developed under the DARPA programs of Tony Tether, Col. Geoffrey Ling and N.I.H programs of William Heetderks, had been protected as a Defense “Special Access Program1” (SAP), which was the official terminology for a “black project.” The research had resulted in implantable devices that were millimeter and sub-millimeter in size, could be surreptitiously implanted (and had been fabricated in a manner that the devices could not be detected or localized by clinical medical or radiology techniques), and provided a shocking amount of surveillance capability regarding a subject’s activities, which might include visual and auditory biofeedback data.

Additionally, the devices were capable of delivering testosterone or any other biological agent. 

1. Voice to Skull Technologies

Artificial microwave voice-to-skull transmission was successfully demonstrated by researcher Dr. Joseph Sharp in 1973, announced at a seminar at the University of Utah in 1974, and in the journal “American Psychologist” in the March 1975 issue, the article was titled “Microwaves and Behavior” by Dr. Don Justesen (1975). [4] 

In 2002, the US Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a device: “a nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device, which broadcast sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device, which can transmit ultrasound (above human hearing) into the skull of mammals.” NOTE: The sound modulation might be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of voice-to-skull uses was an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports. [5] 

1. Mind reading technologies

A team of world-leading neuroscientists has developed a powerful technique that allowed them to look deep inside a person’s brain, and to read their intentions before they act. 

The research broke controversial new ground in scientists’ ability to probe people’s minds and eavesdrop on their thoughts, ethically to be condemned in its technology and applications. 

“Using the scanner, we could look around the brain for this information and read out something that from the outside, there is no way you possibly could tell is in there. It is like shining a torch around, looking for writing on a wall,” said John Dylan Haynes at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Germany in 2007, who led the study with colleagues at University College London and Oxford University. 

In 2011, neuroscientists at the University of California Berkeley put electrodes inside the skulls of brain surgery patients to monitor information from their temporal lobe, which was involved in the processing of speech and images. As the patient listened to someone speaking, a computer program analysed how the brain processed and reproduced the words they had heard. 

The scientists believed the technique could also be used to read and report what they were thinking of saying next. 

In the journal Plos Biology, they wrote that it took attempts at mind reading to “a whole new level.” 

Harvard’s Buckner won the Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds in 2011. Researchers had shown a capability to read a subject’s mind by remotely measuring their brain activity. This technique could even extract information from individuals, who were unaware of themselves. [6] 

Those mind reading technologies use EEC with decoding of neurological signals remotely with or without an implant through satellite or through TV Mobile transmission towers. The following data was from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab, “The sensitivity of our deep-space tracking antennas located around the world is truly amazing. The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts (1 part in 10 quadrillion). A modern-day electronic digital watch operates at a power level 20 billion times greater than this feeble level.” 

Scientists believed the weak radio emission of a cubic centimeter of brain matter was within the detectable limits of the satellite. It was technically possible for a satellite to detect your thoughts, emotions and perceptions, and pass that information to a computer for interpretation. [7] 

1. Patents of Mind Control Technologies

Many patents had indicated the existence of mind control technologies, such as:

USP # 6,729,337 (May 4, 2004), Sony owned a patent “Sony Brain Waves Manipulation By Ultrasound” for an “ultrasound array” that supposedly stimulated your brain waves to simulate sensory experiences causing its users to experience smells, tastes and even touch without external stimuli.

USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002), Nervous System Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors. 

1. More evidence to prove the existence of mind control technologies.

There is sufficient evidence to prove the existence of mind control technologies. I will only give a few as example. 

Microwave Irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, review of its history and studies to determine whether or not related health defects were experienced by employees assigned in the period, 1953-1977, prepared at the request of Howard W. Cannon, chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, published in 1979 by U.S. Government Printing Office in Washington, disclose that since 1952, the Soviet government began directing microwave beams at the U.S. embassy in Moscow. 

A study funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, has perfected the art of using electrical signals to manipulate the color of a squid’s iridescent skin over the entire color spectrum. The Marine Biological Laboratory in Massachusetts carried out the research.[8] If they could manipulate animals, they could manipulate humans too. 

A former KGB officer has divulged secrets of special mind control techniques that security services in developed nations used during and after the Cold War, a Russian government daily said in December 2006. 

General Boris Ratnikov, who served in the KGB department for Moscow and the Moscow Region, told Rossiiskaya Gazeta that people in power had resorted to various methods of manipulating individuals’ thoughts since ancient times and that it was hardly surprising that secret services adopted the practice when it acquired a scientific foundation in the twentieth century. 

In the mid-eighties, about fifty research institutes in the Soviet Union studied remote mind control techniques backed by substantial government funding, but all such research efforts were halted with the demise of the Soviet empire in the early nineties. 

Ratnikov, who subsequently served as deputy head and then senior consultant at the Federal Guard Service from 1991 to 1997, said his department was in charge of safeguarding top officials in post-Soviet Russia against any external influence on their sub-conscious.

The general stated emphatically that he and his colleagues had never manipulated the minds of the then president, Boris Yeltsin, or of economic reformer Yegor Gaidar, but claimed to have used mind-reading to save Russia’s first president and the country from a war with China. 

Yeltsin had planned to visit Japan in 1992, but Ratnikov’s department detected attempts to “program” the president’s mind, to make him give the Kuril Islands back to Japan. The move would have led to demands from China that it regains its disputed territories from Russia as well, a conflict that could have sparked a war between the two neighbors. Yeltsin, therefore, was forced to cancel the trip.

 Another of the general’s revelations is that senior officials in Western Europe and the United States unwittingly provided information to his department, which was able to read their minds thanks to Soviet-era scientific achievements. 

In the early nineties, Ratnikov and his colleagues “scanned” the mind of new U.S. Ambassador Robert Strauss to see that the embassy building contained equipment to exert psychotronic influence on Moscow residents but, according to the general, it had been deactivated. [9] 

Research into electromagnetic spectrums weapons had been secretly carried out in the US and Russia since the fifties. Plans to introduce the super-weapons were announced quietly in March 2012 by Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, fulfilling a little-noticed election campaign pledge by president-elect Putin. Mr. Serdyukov said, “The development of weaponry based on new physics principles - Direct Energy weapons, Geophysical weapons, Wave-energy weapons, Genetic weapons, Psychotronic weapons, and so on - is part of the state arms procurement programme for 2011-2020.”[10] 

There was no doubt that, notwithstanding that governments still covered-up the development and research of mind control technologies, the government owned advanced technologies, which could read mankind thoughts remotely and subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system with electromagnetic frequencies. 

As early as 1998, scientists had warned that the control and manipulation of a human brain was a terrifying possibility. Lieutenant Colonel Timothy L. Thomas, US Army (ret), published an article in the military journal Parameters which likened the mind to a new battlefield. He quoted a Russian army major in relation to weapons that affected the mind, “It is completely clear that the state, which is first to create such weapons, will achieve incomparable superiority.” Thomas expressed concern about “information dominance,” though he stopped short of the moral implications. (Timothy L. Thomas, The Mind Has No Firewall, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92) [11] 

Mr. Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton raised high concerns of human rights violations implemented with electromagnetic spectrums weapons in the article “US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights.” (Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights, December 2006) [12] 

Carole Smith, a British psychoanalyst, in recent years has been openly critical of government use of intrusive technology on non-consenting citizens, in the article “Diagnosis Psychosis in Light of Mind Invasive Technology - On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology.” 

The European Parliament A4-0005/1999 Paragraph 27 called for a worldwide ban on weapons that might enable “any form” of the “manipulation of human beings.” [13] 

USA Representative Dennis Kucinich introduced bill H.R. 2977 (2001), which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. 

H.R. 2977 (2001) preserved the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and required the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons. 

In this bill, the terms “weapon” and “weapons system” included a device capable of the following: “directing a source of energy, including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultralow frequency (ULF) energy radiation, against that object,” “through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations.” 

The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) formally listed a special category of psychotronic (psycho = “mind” & tronic= “electronic”) mind control and other electromagnetic resonance weapons in their 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament. [14] 

Voor het vervolg zie het origineel. (en begin dan bij het volgen de 'hoofdstuk' met de kop: Reported stories about people who claimed that they were mind control victims

References:

[1] Nazi Wonder Drug, http://www.amphetamines.com/nazidrug.html, 9/11/2002, accessed August 19, 2013

[2] Mike Parker, CIA'S BOURNE IDENTITY PLOT (Mkultra), Express.co.uk, July 8, 2007,

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/12781/CIA   accessed August 19, 2013

[3] Leila Gray, Tiny electronic chip, interacting with the brain, modifies pathways for controlling movement, University of Washington News, October 24, 2006

http://www.washington.edu/news/archive/27624   accessed August 19, 2013

[4] Dr. Don Justesen, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975, http://www.randomcollection.info/ampsychv2s.pdf accessed August 19, 2013

[5] Voice-to-skulldevices http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.html   accessed August 19, 2013

[6] Harvard’s Buckner wins Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds, February 24, 2011,

http://blogs.wickedlocal.com/goodage/2011/02/24/harvards-buckner-wins-alzheimers-award-for-reading-our-minds/#axzz1U2ENzowU     accessed August 19, 2013

[7] Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts

http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/satellite-surveillance accessed August 19, 2013

[8] T. J. Wardill, P. T. Gonzalez-Bellido, R. J. Crook, R. T. Hanlon. Neural control of tuneable skin iridescence in squid. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012; DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1374

[9] Ex-agent reveals KGB Mind Control techniques – paper 22/12/2006

http://www.en.rian.ru/russia/20061222/57596889.html accessed August 19, 2013

[10] Christopher Leake and Will Stewart, Putin targets foes with 'zombie' gun which attack victims' central nervous system Could be used against Russia's enemies and perhaps its own dissidents, March 31, 2012

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2123415/Putin-targets-foes-zombie-gun-attack-victims-central-nervous-system.html   accessed August 19, 2013

[11] Timothy L. Thomas, The Mind Has No Firewall, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92.

[12] Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights, December 2006,

http://www.earthpulse.com/epulseuploads/articles/MindControlHumanRights.pdf?/ accessed August 19, 2013

[13] Environment, security and foreign affairs, A4-0005/1999, The European Parliament

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN#Contentd14937e476 accessed August 19, 2013

[14] 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament in Geneva,

A Joint Initiative of: Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva

United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research

Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, IUHEI

http://www.unidir.ch/pdf/activites/pdf2-act201.pdf accessed August 19, 2013

[15] An anonymous Survey for Mind Control Victims (result on 19 Dec 2009)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Peacepink/message/2569

(voor de tekst bij nummer 15 van de 'noten' of referentiepunten, zie de rest van de tekst, en volg daarbij de aanwijzingen zoals aangegeven voor de 'References' [dus boven de hier direct voor weergegeven 'noten'])

=========================================

*  Tijdens WOI was Nederland zo ongeveer de grootste producent van cocaïne t.b.v. frontsoldaten van zowel Groot-Brittannie, Frankrijk, Rusland en andere landen en de Duitse en Oostenrijkse troepen aan de andere kant...... Ook toen werd cocaïne gebruikt om de prestaties van frontsoldaten te verbeteren. Ofwel Nederland was oorlogswinstmaker en verdiende flink aan beide partijen, de fabriek die de cocaïne produceerde stond in Amsterdam.......  

** Vandaar ook dat je altijd moet oppassen met magnetrons, ga er nooit te dichtbij staan en al helemaal niet met je hoofd, hoe ouder de magnetron hoe gevaarlijker deze is......

Met het label 'TMS', direct onder dit bericht, wordt bedoeld: transcranial magnetic stimulation. Het label 'E.F. hersencontrole' staat voor Elektromagnetische Frequentie hersencontrole. Helaas is de ruimte voor labels beperkt, bij deze mijn excuus voor de ontbrekende, heb m.i. de belangrijkste opgenomen.