Sancties van de VS zijn illegaal en zijn oorlogsmisdaden die moeten worden gestopt

De sancties die de VS eenzijdig en dus illegaal oplegt aan landen die haar niet welgevallig zijn, zijn niets anders dan grove oorlogsmisdaden waardoor zelfs mensen om het leven komen..... Even ter herinnering: in de 90er jaren van de vorige eeuw legde de VS eenzijdig sancties op aan Irak, daardoor kwamen 500.000 Irakese kinderen om het leven, ofwel die werden in feite vermoord door de VS.... De minister van buitenlandse zaken destijds (onder opperschoft Clinton) was de Democraat en oorlogsmisdadiger Madeleine Albright, toen deze psychopaat in 1996 werd geconfronteerd met dit feit en haar werd gevraagd of ze er geen spijt van had, antwoordde deze enorme hufter dat ze daar geen seconde spijt van heeft gehad en dat het e.e.a. het waard was geweest.....

Ook nu zijn kinderen en andere zwakke mensen de klos, zo zorgen de sancties tegen Iran ervoor dat belangrijke middelen tegen (kinder-) kanker niet meer te krijgen zijn, of zo duur zijn dat praktisch niemand ze kan betalen........ Wat mij betreft een misdaad tegen de menselijkheid!!  

De VS legt landen sancties op, die zoals gezegd vooral de zwakste burgers treffen ('treffen': letterlijk en figuurlijk)........ Door deze illegale sancties ontstaan er voorts tekorten op allerlei gebieden, waardoor de economie in het slop raakt, daarop geeft de VS het land de schuld, bijvoorbeeld door te wijzen op een 'lamlendig economisch beleid', of door in geval van een links geregeerd land het socialisme de schuld te geven......... (tegelijk organiseert de CIA dan demonstraties, waarbij men het liefst ook op de demonstranten laat schieten door ingehuurde scherpschutter moordenaars, om daarmee de regering van zo'n land nog meer zwart te maken....) De VS hoopt daarmee  een opstand te ontketenen in zo'n land*,  terwijl de wat beter geïnformeerden weten dat de VS de schuld is van de ellende juist door die sancties, zie Venezuela en Oekraïne, waar deze smerige vorm van terreur bij de eerste (nog) geen succes heeft, waar het bij de laatste, zoals bekend, wel is gelukt......

Gelukkig ontstaat er wereldwijd steeds meer weerstand tegen deze smerige VS terreur, (beter is dit smerige spel niet aan te duiden, sancties die intussen tegen 39 landen (!!) worden toegepast en uiteraard voelen andere landen daar ook de gevolgen van, immers bedrijven kunnen geen handel meer drijven, daar de wereld afhankelijk is van de dollar als betalingsmiddel en de VS juist de bedrijven straft die toch leveren ondanks de sancties...... Rusland is intussen klaar voor de introductie van een nieuw internationaal betalingssysteem zodat het systeem van de VS, te weten: SWIFT, uitgerangeerd kan worden.

Het volgende artikel werd eerder gepubliceerd op Nation of Change (ICH meldt onterecht dat dit PopularResistance is) en door mij overgenomen van Information Clearing House. In het artikel een petitie om actie te ondernemen tegen de terreursancties van de VS, lees en teken deze ajb en geeft het door:

The world must end the US’ illegal economic war

The indiscriminate, illegal and immoral use of sanctions is an act of war.

By Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers

January 16, 2020 "Information Clearing House" - The United States is relying more heavily on illegal unilateral coercive measures (also known as economic sanctions) in place of war or as part of its build-up to war. In fact, economic sanctions are an act of war that kills tens of thousands of people each year through financial strangulation. An economic blockade places a country under siege.

A recent example is the increase in economic measures being imposed against Iran, which many viewed as more acceptable than a military attack. In response to Iran retaliating for the assassination of General Qassem Soleimani and seven other people, Iran used ballistic missiles to strike two bases in Iraq that house U.S. troops. President Trump responded by saying he would impose more sanctions on Iran. Then he ended his comments by urging peace negotiations with Iran. The United States needs to understand there will be no negotiations with Iran until the U.S. lifts sanctions that seek to destroy the Iranian economy and turn the people against their government.

The sanctions on Iran have been in place since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which made that country independent of the United States. Iran is not the only country being sanctioned by the United States. Samuel Moncada, the Venezuelan ambassador to the United Nations, speaking to the summit of the Non-Aligned Movement of 120 nations on October 26, 2019, denounced the imposition of sanctions by the U.S., as “economic terrorism which affects a third of humanity with more than 8,000 measures in 39 countries.”

It is time to end U.S. economic warfare and repeal these unilateral coercive measures, which violate international law.

Sanctions are war. From havaar.org.

Sanctions are a weapon of war

The United States uses sanctions against countries that resist the U.S.’ agenda. U.S. sanctions are designed to kill by destroying an economy through denial of access to finance, causing hyperinflation and shortages and blocking basic necessities such as food and medicine. For example, sanctions are expected to cause the death of tens of thousands of Iranians by creating a severe shortage of critical medicines and medical equipment everywhere in Iran.

Muhammad Sahimi writes that in a “letter published by The Lancet, the prestigious medical journal, three doctors working in Tehran’s MAHAK Pediatric Cancer Treatment and Research Center warned that, ‘Re-establishment of sanctions, scarcity of drugs due to the reluctance of pharmaceutical companies to deal with Iran, and a tremendous increase in oncology drug prices [due to the plummeting value of the Iranian rial by 50–70%], will inevitably lead to a decrease in survival of children with cancer.’”

Diabetes, multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and asthma affect over ten million Iranians who will find essential medicines impossible to get or available only at high prices. The U.S. claims that food and medicines are excluded from sanctions but in practice, they are not because pharmaceutical companies fear sanctions being applied to them over some technical violation and Iran cannot pay for essentials when banks can’t do business with it. European nations failed to persuade the Trump administration to ensure that essential medicine and food were available to Iranians.

In Venezuela, due to the sanctions, 180,000 medical operations have been canceled and 823,000 chronically ill patients are awaiting medicines. The Center for Economic and Policy 
Research found sanctions have deprived Venezuela of “billions of dollars of foreign exchange needed to pay for essential and life-saving imports,” contributing to 40,000 total deaths in 2017 and 2018. More than 300,000 Venezuelans are at risk due to a lack of access to medicine or treatment. Economists warn U.S. sanctions could cause famine in Venezuela. Sanctions also cause shortages of parts and equipment needed for electricity generation, water systems, and transportation as well as preventing participation in the global financial market. Sanctions, which are illegal under the UN, OAS and US law, have caused mass protests in Venezuela against the U.S. 

Sanctions against Iran and Venezuela could be a prelude to military attack, i.e. the US weakening a nation economically before attacking it. This is what happened in Iraq. Under pressure from the United States, on Aug. 2, 1990, the UN Security Council passed sanctions that required countries to stop trading or carrying out financial transactions with Iraq. President George H.W. Bush said the UN sanctions would not be lifted “as long as Saddam Hussein is in power.” The U.S. continued to pressure the increasingly skeptical Security Council members into compliance even though hundreds of thousands of children were dying. In 1996, then-U.S. Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright was asked about the death of as many as 500,000 children due to lack of medicine and malnutrition exacerbated by the sanctions, and she brutally replied, “[The] price is worth it.” Sanctions were also used against Libya and Syria before the U.S. attacked them.

This is consistent with the U.S. ‘way of war’ described by Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz in “An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States,” which describes frontier counterinsurgency premised on annihilation including the destruction of food, housing, and resources as well as ruthless militarism. The U.S. has waged a long-term economic war against Cuba (sanctions in place since 1960), North Korea (first sanctions in the 1950s, tightened in the 1980s), Zimbabwe (2003) and Iran (1979) 

Sanctions hurt civilians, especially the most vulnerable—babies, children, the elderly and chronically ill—not governments. Their intent is to shrink the economy and cause chronic shortages and hyperinflation while ensuring a lack of access to finance to pay for essentials. The U.S. then blames the targeted government claiming that corruption or socialism is the problem in an effort to turn the people against their government. This often backfires as people instead rally around the government, quiet their calls for democracy and work to develop a resistance economy.

Stop Sanctions destroying lives from BrightonAndHoveNews.org.

The movement to end sanctions

In recent years, a movement has been building to end the use of illegal economic coercive measures. The movement includes governments coming together in forums like the Non-Aligned Movement, made up of countries that represent 55 percent of the global population, as well as UN member-states calling for international law and the UN Charter to be upheld and social movements organizing to educate about the impact of sanctions and demand an end to their use. This June, the Non-Aligned Movement called for the end of sanctions against Venezuela.

Popular Resistance is working with groups around the world on the Global Appeal for Peace, an initiative to create a worldwide network of people and organizations that will work together to oppose the lawless actions of the United States, and any country that acts similarly. A high priority is opposing the imposition of unilateral coercive economic measures that violate the charter of the United Nations. The UN and its International Court of Justice have been ineffective in holding the U.S. accountable for its actions. No one country or one movement has the power alone to hold the United States accountable, but together we can make a difference. Join this campaign here.

With 39 countries targeted with sanctions, and other countries impacted because they cannot trade with those countries, nations are challenging the U.S.’ dollar domination. Countries are seeking to conduct trade without the dollar and are no longer treating the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency while also avoiding Wall Street. The de-dollarization of the global economy is a boomerang effect that is hastening due to the abuse of sanctions and will seriously weaken the U.S. economy.

Foreign Minister Zarif, who describes sanctions as “economic terrorism,” warned that “the excessive use of economic power by the United States, and the excessive use of the dollar as a weapon in U.S. economic terrorism against other countries, will backfire.”  As the blowback continues to grow, the negative impact on the U.S. economy may force the U.S. to stop using sanctions. The end of dollar domination will add to the demise of the failing U.S. empire.


End the Deadly Sanctions banner on the Venezuelan Embassy in Washington, D.C. From the Embassy Defense Collective.

Time to end the use of illegal economic sanctions

The combination of countries acting against U.S. sanctions, and people’s movements pressuring the U.S. government has the potential to end the abuse of sanctions. The EU has moved to blunt the impact of the sanctions against Iran by creating an alternative to the U.S.-controlled SWIFT system for trade. This is spurring the end of the dollar as the reserve currency. Some officials in the EU have called for retaliatory sanctions against the U.S.
Trump left a small opening for potential diplomacy with Iran that could lead to the end of sanctions against that country. Trump bragged about the U.S. being the number one oil and gas producer, taking credit for an Obama climate crime, and therefore no longer needing to spend hundreds of millions a year to have troops in the Middle East. He concluded with a message to the “people and leaders of Iran” that the U.S. was “ready to have peace with all those who seek it.” He said the U.S. wanted Iran to have a “great and prosperous future with other countries of the world.”

That future is only possible if the U.S. moves to end the sanctions against Iran. Iranians have learned the U.S. cannot be trusted. Iran lived up to the requirements of the Iran nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, but Trump did not when he withdrew from it and re-instated draconian sanctions lifted by Obama. Trump added even move sanctions. This also angered European allies who had negotiated the agreement and were put in the position of being subservient to the U.S. or going against it. To regain Iran’s trust, the U.S. needs to make a good-faith gesture of ending punitive economic measures.

North Korea, which has been sanctioned by the U.S. longer than any other country, had a similar experience after they reached an agreement with the United States in 1994 under the Clinton administration.  The George W. Bush administration wanted to put in place a national missile defense system but the agreement with North Korea blocked that. John Bolton and Dick Cheney falsely accused North Korea of violating the agreement, increased sanctions against it and claimed it was part of the Axis of Evil, along with Iran, and Iraq. 

North Korea, like Iran, learned they cannot trust the United States. Sanctions are causing thousands of deaths in North Korea. Now, China and Russia are allied with North Korea and are urging relief from the U.S. sanctions. Russia and China have also ignored U.S. sanctions against Venezuela and continue to do business with it.

On December 17, the Senate passed a Sanctions Bill that put in place sanctions against corporations working with Russia to develop gas pipelines to Europe. The action is naked U.S. imperialism seeking to prevent Russia from being the main natural gas exporter (NS2) to the EU market and to replace it with more expensive U.S.-produced gas, a move to save the financially-underwater U.S. fracking industry. Russia, Germany, and others have defiantly told Washington its weaponizing of economic sanctions will not halt the gas pipeline construction. 

The indiscriminate, illegal and immoral use of sanctions is an act of war. Unless they are authorized by the United Nations, unilateral coercive measures are illegal. A critical objective of the peace and justice movement in the United States, working with allies around the world, must be to end this terrorist economic warfare. The U.S. economy currently depends on financial hegemony and war. The slow, steady collapse of the dollarized economy means the 2020s will be the decade U.S. domination comes to an end. The U.S. must learn to be a cooperative member of the global community or risk this isolation and retaliation.

Kevin Zeese is an American political activist who has been a leader in the drug policy reform and peace movements and in efforts to ensure a voter verified paper audit trail. Margaret Flowers, M.D., is a Maryland pediatrician seeking the Green Party nomination for the US Senate. She is co-director of PopularResistance.org and a board adviser to Physicians for a National Health Program and is on the Leadership Council of the Maryland Health Care Is a Human Right campaign.

This article was originally published by "PopularResistance" -

==================================
* Tegelijk stoken zoals gezegd CIA agenten het vuurtje op en bewapenen in veel gevallen een aantal scherpschutter moordenaars, zodat deze slachtoffers maken onder de demonstranten, vervolgens wordt de schuld daarvoor in de schoenen van de onwelgevallige regering geschoven..... Iets dergelijks wordt een 'false flag operatie' genoemd, de VS gebruikte dit o.a. in Oekraïne en Syrië, waar deze terreuroperatie in het laatste land mislukte.

Zie ook:
'Moordenaar van Soleimani komt om bij neerhalen van VS spionage vliegtuig in Afghanistan' 

'KLM vliegt weer over oorlogsgebied Iran - Irak, terwijl andere maatschappijen waaronder Air France het gebied mijden' (en zie de links in dat bericht anders, dan de hier getoonde)

'Soleimani moord: VS pleegde een daad van oorlog' 

'Rampvlucht TWA 800 vs. PS752'

'Trudeau (premier Canada): de VS is verantwoordelijk voor de vliegramp in Iran'

Voor meer berichten over sancties of andere zaken uit dit bericht, klik op de betreffende links, die je direct onder dit bericht terug kan vinden. 

Venezuela: VS ministerie van BuZa publiceert per ongeluk een lijst met sadistische terreurdaden tegen het Venezolaanse volk

Toch altijd weer leuk als de VS op haar eigen duivelse gevorkte staart gaat staan en daarmee ten overvloede nog eens aantoont dat we hier met een terreurentiteit te maken hebben van gigantische proporties, die niets maar dan ook helemaal niets uit de weg gaat om haar smerige doelen te bereiken.....

Zo dook er enige tijd geleden een folder van de CIA op waarin staat te lezen hoe je als oppositie je land naar de knoppen kan helpen om zo het volk tot opstand te dwingen tegen het land van keuze, in dit geval was dat land Nicaragua.......*

The Grayzone wist de hand te leggen op een lijst met gevolgen van ingrijpen in Venezuela, door het VS ministerie van BuZa op de site gezet en daarna weer verwijderd, niet voor niets verwijderd, immers het gaat hier om dezelfde soort informatie die je op WikiLeaks kan vinden en waarvoor Julian Assange wordt vervolgd......

Duidelijk is dat de VS zich ziet als organisator van de niet eindigende couppoging in Venezuela, waar de VS de voor de Venezolanen tot dan onbekende fascist Guaidó als interim-president heeft geparachuteerd, waarbij men de leugen lanceerde dat Guaidó de oppositieleider is van Venezuela..... (terwijl hij de voorzitter is van een kleine, onbeduidende partij...)

Voorts wordt er opgeschept over de zaken die Guaidó, de totaal lamme en illegale 'interim-president' van Venezuela, al voor elkaar heeft gekregen...... Onzinnige zaken, waar in werkelijkheid het Venezolaanse volk onder regie van de VS wordt bestolen van haar tegoeden in het buitenland en waar men trots vertelt dat de oliewinning met een enorm aantal vaten is gedaald, daar Venezuela van terreurentiteit VS geen olie mag verkopen....... Met deze zaken begaat de VS een zware overtreding van artikel 33 van het Verdrag van Genève......

De olievoorraad van Venezuela zou de op één na grootste ter aarde zijn, deze olievoorraad is dan ook de belangrijkste reden voor de VS om haar marionet Guaidó op de plaats van Maduro te willen zetten..... (voorts heeft Venezuela grote voorraden Coltan, een belangrijke grondstof voor smartphones....) Guaidó heeft al beloofd dat wanneer hij president zal zijn, de Venezolaanse olie voor de VS oliemaffia zal worden gereserveerd.....** (waarin hij het woord 'maffia' uiteraard niet noemde)

De VS is er zelfs trots op dat het de economie van Venezuela naar de kloten heeft geholpen, waarmee deze vereniging van terreurstaten nog eens fijntjes aangeeft waarom het economisch zo slecht gaat in Venezuela >> de terreursancties van de VS...... Weet je wat de reguliere media ons al jaren laten geloven? Maduro heeft de economie om zeep geholpen, je weet wel van die media die keer op keer de bek open hebben over fake news (nepnieuws) en manipulatie..... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Beste bezoeker, weet niet of je al meerdere berichten van mij over Venezuela hebt gelezen, die je wellicht ziet als overdreven, lees het volgende artikel van Anya Parampil, eerder gepubliceerd op The Grayzone en laat je ogen openen (en zegt het voort, er moet een eind komen aan het lijden van het Venezolaanse volk door de grootschalige terreur van de VS, met hulp van o.a. de EU en dus zogenaamd namens ons allen......):

US State Department publishes, then deletes sadistic Venezuela hit list boasting of economic ruin

The Grayzone has obtained a list of “key outcomes” on Venezuela deleted out of apparent embarrassment by the State Department. It boasts of wrecking the nation’s economy, destabilizing its military, and puppeteering its political opposition.

By Anya Parampil

On April 24, six days before self-proclaimed Venezuelan “interim president” Juan Guaido’s attempt to violently overthrow Venezuela’s democratically elected government alongside a handful of military defectors, the U.S. State Department published a fact sheet that boasted of Washington’s central role in the ongoing coup attempt. After realizing the incriminating nature of its error, the State Department quickly acted to remove the page.

The Grayzone has obtained a full copy of the expunged report. The deleted page puts to bed any claims of Guaido’s independence from Washington, as the State Department emphasizes the fact that he “announced his interim presidency… in January” at the the top of a section dedicated to breaking down “key outcomes” of U.S. efforts with regard to Venezuela.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Kimberly Breier recently took to Twitter to claim that “since he became acting president, Juan Guaido has given tangible results to the people of Venezuela.” Her tweet was accompanied with an infographic detailing alleged accomplishments of the powerless coup administration based on data compiled by the legally defunct National Assembly, the only governing body actually controlled by Guaido.

But the Venezuela fact sheet posted and then deleted days earlier by the State Department told a dramatically different story.

Read the entire expunged fact sheet here [PDF] and at the end of this article.

The State Department’s economic hit list

Entitled “U.S. Actions on Venezuela,” the document boasted that U.S. policy had effectively prevented the Venezuelan government from participating in the international market and has led to the freezing of its overseas assets. It read like a sadistic celebration of Washington’s retribution against the Venezuelan population as a whole, the kind of collective punishment which is illegal according to Article 33 of the Geneva Conventions.

The State Department gloated in the deleted fact sheet that its policy had ensured that the Maduro government “cannot rely on the U.S. financial system” to conduct business, noting “key outcomes” of U.S. actions include the fact that “roughly $3.2 billion of Venezuela’s overseas are frozen.” It went on to boast that “Venezuela’s oil production fell to 736,000 barrels per day in March… substantially reducing” government revenue.

“If I were the State Department I wouldn’t brag about causing a cut in oil production to 763,000 barrels per day — which is a 36 percent drop, in just the two months of February and March this year,” Mark Weisbrot, Co-Director at the Center For Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), told The Grayzone. “This means even more premature deaths than the tens of thousands that resulted from sanctions last year.”  

Weisbrot recently co-authored a bracing report which found that 40,000 Venezuelans died between 2017 and 2018 as a direct result of U.S. sanctions. The State Department patted itself on the back for announcing its preparedness “to provide an additional $20 million in initial humanitarian assistance” to Venezuela, however, the CEPR report concluded that Trump Administration sanctions implemented in August 2017 resulted in “a loss of $6 billion in oil revenue over the ensuing year” alone.

While the State Department praised the opposition for “providing medical and hygiene attention to over 6,000” Venezuelans, those numbers dwarf in comparison to the 300,000 people CEPR “estimated to be at risk because of lack of access to medicines or treatment… [including] 80,000 people with HIV who have not had antiretroviral treatment since 2017, 16,000 people who need dialysis, 16,000 people with cancer, and 4 million with diabetes and hypertension.”

In other words, the supposed “Venezuela Crisis Response Assistance” touted by the State Department is not even a band-aid over the gaping wound that US unilateral coercive measures have inflicted on the country.

In Weisbrot’s view, the “policy” and “outcomes” promoted by the State Department in the disappeared document will merely lead to “more cuts in imports of medicine, food, medical equipment, and inputs necessary to maintain water, health, and sanitation infrastructure.”

Having denied the Venezuelan government the ability to provide for its own population, the U.S. has essentially promised that thousands more deaths will occur.

The State Department did not respond to The Grayzone’s request for a comment on the fact sheet it deleted.

“A list of confessions”

In a recent interview with The Grayzone, Venezuela’s ambassador to the United Nations Samuel Moncada characterized the deleted State Department fact sheet as “a list of confessions.”

“Imagine if any other country says… it’s proud of saying that we are destroying the economy of our neighbor; we are proud that we destroyed the political system of our neighbor; we are proud that they are suffering. They are saying we are waging war against Venezuela,” Moncada emphasized.

The ambassador went on to accuse the U.S. of engaging in “bullying” rather than international diplomacy.

The State Department’s own fact sheet appears to support this accusation, as it asserts “diplomatic pressure resulted in fewer markets for Venezuelan gold.” The document further highlighted U.S. actions that have supposedly led “more than 1,000 members of the military [to recognize] Juan Guaido as interim President” and defect to Colombia, as well as stranding “an estimated 25 crude oil tankers with 12 million barrels” off Venezuela’s coast.

“They [say] it’s our ‘key’ achievements,” Moncada commented. “They are saying that they are causing trouble in our military and inducing a military coup, [which] so far they haven’t achieved, but they are working towards.”

“If any other person says that themselves,” the ambassador concluded, “and you take that confession to court, they would be in prison.”

The State Department’s fact sheet even frames recent decisions by the Organization of American States, Lima Group, Inter-American Development Bank, and European Union to either recognize or support Guaido’s shadow administration as a U.S. achievement, highlighting Washington’s outsized influence within each of these supposedly international governing bodies. The decision to mention the E.U. and Lima Group is particularly noteworthy considering the United States is not a member of either organization.

“They are so far out of any normal parameters of decency, morality, legality, reason, that really they are dangerous,” Moncada said of the Trump administration. “They are a real threat to international peace, and they are a real threat to my people.” 

US Department of State Deleted Venezuela Hit List by Max Blumenthal on Scribd

(Om  de documenten te kunnen lezen, zie het origineel) 

Anya Parampil

Anya Parampil is a Washington, DC based journalist. She previously hosted a daily progressive afternoon news program called In Question on RT America. She has produced and reported several documentaries, including on the ground reports from the Korean peninsula and Palestine.

=================================

*  Hier de link naar een PDF met een CIA sabotage handleiding.

** Zie: 'VS couppleger in Venezuela belooft VS Venezolaanse olie als hij de macht heeft overgenomen'

Zie ook:
'Venezuela: partij van Guaidó corrupt, zelfs al voor deze enige regeringsverantwoordelijkheid draagt'

'Reuters houdt rapport tegen over 40.000 Venezolaanse doden door VS sancties'


'Venezuela: overleg in Noorwegen eindigde met telefoongesprek tussen Guaidó en Pence'

'Guaidó wil 4 miljoen Venezolaanse paspoorten om o.a. een grote achterban voor hem te vormen'

'Venezolaanse ambassade Washington gewelddadig ontruimd'

'Venezuela: Edwin Koopmans (o.a. 'deskundige' van VPRO) met anti-Maduro propaganda'

'Tirannie op de straten van Washington, een vergelijking met de start van nazi-Duitsland'

'Venezuela: vicepresident van de VS, Mike Pence, belooft militairen extra's als ze overlopen naar kamp Guaidó'

'Venezolaanse ambassade in Washington belaagd, er mag zelfs geen voedsel worden gebracht....'

'Venezuela: VS zal desnoods militair geweld gebruiken om een vreedzame overgang van regime te bewerkstelligen...... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'Venezuela: ultieme couppoging van Guaidó mislukt' (zie ook de andere links in dat bericht, anders dan de al hier weergegeven links)

'Trump vermoordde al 40.000 Venezolaanse burgers'

'VS dreigt Rusland, China en Iran met geweld vanwege hulp aan Venezolaanse volk.......'

'The Monroe Doctrine is Back, and as the Latest US Attack on Cuba Shows, Its Purpose is to Serve the Neoliberal Order' (een artikel van CounterPunch)

'Venezuela: in geheime zitting in Washington is gesproken over een militaire inval'

'VS legt nog meer sancties op aan de bevolking van Venezuela, Cuba en Nicaragua'

'Venezuela is nog lang niet verslagen door de VS'

'Venezolaanse regering treft nieuwe regeling voor hulpgoederen van het Rode Kruis, 'onafhankelijk NOS' brengt alweer fake news'

'Venezuela: onafhankelijke journalisten ontmaskeren leugens over dit land bij presentatie voor de VN'

'Venezuela: 15 doden door sabotage elektriciteitsnet'

'Venezuela: bijt de VS in haar eigen staart?'

'Venezuela: het VS volk wordt weer een oorlog in gelogen, zoals eerder in Irak, Libië en Syrië'

'Venezuela Aid Live >> Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) terecht tegen benefietconcert'

'Venezuela: humanitaire hulp stunt van de VS ingegeven om de kruistocht tegen Maduro een versnelling te geven'

'Jill Stein (US Green Party): de VS maakt zich druk over armoede in Venezuela terwijl de armen thuis kunnen doodvallen....'

'Venezuela: Abrams vindt een meerderheid in de VN Veiligheidsraad genoeg voor een gedwongen regeringswisseling'

'Venezuela: 4 belangrijke zaken aangaande humanitaire hulp waarover de reguliere media niet berichten'

'Venezuela zou humanitaire hulp weigeren, het echte verhaal ziet er 'iets anders' uit' (180 graden anders, wel te verstaan)

'Venezuela: VS bedrijf dat wapens smokkelde is gelinkt aan CIA 'Black Site' centra'

'Congreslid Ilhan Omar fileert het monster Elliot Abrams, de speciale gezant van de VS voor Venezuela'

'BBC World Service radio >> fake news and other lies about Venezuela' (bericht van dit blog)

'Joel Voordewind (CU 2de Kamer) bakt de 'Venezolaanse vluchtelingencrisis' op Curaçao wel erg bruin en van Ojik (GL 2de Kamer) schiet een Venezolaanse bok'

'Venezolaanse verandering van regime bekokstoofd door VS en massamedia'

'Guaidó is een ordinaire couppleger van de VS, e.e.a. gaat volledig in tegen de Venezolaanse constitutie'

'Venezuela >> regime change: 'de 12 stappen methode' die de VS gebruikt'

'Venezuela >> VS economische oorlogsvoering met gebruikmaking van o.a. IMF en Wereldbank'