Geen evolutie en ecolutie zonder revolutie!

Albert Einstein:

Twee dingen zijn oneindig: het universum en de menselijke domheid. Maar van het universum ben ik niet zeker.
Posts tonen met het label Sipri. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Sipri. Alle posts tonen

maandag 27 april 2020

Coronavirus 'afleiding': de VS dreigt Iran, Rusland en China, terwijl deze terreurstaat het zo door het virus getroffen Somalië bombardeert.....

De VS houdt tijdens de Coronacrisis o.a. de enorme wapenindustrie 'op de been' met miljarden aan subsidies, niet alleen dat: de VS is bezig de spanningen met Iran, China en Rusland te intensiveren...... Onbegrijpelijk die subsidies, immers de wapenindustrie is schathemelrijk, alsof het Cornonavirus deze doodsindustrie kan nekken.......... 

Vannacht maakte ARD in het nieuws van 1.00 u. bekend dat het SIPRI* heeft berkend dat de wereld vorig jaar maar liefst 1.917 miljard dollar uitgaf een wapens (in de breedste zin van het woord en het hoogste bedrag ooit), waarvan de VS 38% voor haar rekening zou hebben genomen (heb de idee dat dit een hoger percentage moet zijn)....... Met een paar procent van dat bedrag zouden we kunnen voorkomen dat mensen aan honger en te voorkomen ziekten overlijden......

Afgelopen woensdag liet Trump weten dat de VS elk Iraans marineschip zal aanvallen dat de VS marine dwarszit in de wateren voor de kust van Iran, dus op duizenden kilometers verwijdert van het vaste land van de VS.........

Ook Venezuela staat nog steeds in het vizier van terreurstaat VS dat marineschepen heeft buiten de terrirtoriale wateren van dat land..... Venezuele waar intussen meer dan 40.000 mensen zijn overleden tengevolge van de illegale sancties die de VS (met steun van Canada en de EU) dit land heeft opgelegd...... De VS heeft zelfs 4 miljard aan tegoeden van Venezuela gestolen, geld dat bedoeld was voor de aankoop van medicijnen en medische apparatuur.....

Tegelijk is de VS marine weer aanwezig in de Zuid-Chinese Zee om daar China te tergen, voorts heeft het Pentagon de vaste routes van de nucleair bewapende B-52 bommenwerpers losgelaten, zodat Rusland en China dit doomsday oorlogstuig moeilijker kunnen volgen, iets dat overigens al doet denken aan een oorlogsverklaring......

Het meest walgelijke is wel de door de VS opgevoerde bombardementen op Somalië, een land dat zwaar is getroffen door het Coronavirus...... Hoe fascistisch en schandalig kan een land bezig zijn...?? Ach ja, geen wonder als je bedenkt dat de VS feitelijk de grootste terreurentiteit op onze kleine planeet is..... 

Nog een land dat lijdt onder het buitenlandbeleid van de VS: Jemen waar de VS de genocide militair ondersteunt die de Saoedische terreurcoalitie uitvoert in dat land..... Jemen een land waarvan de bewoners sterk zijn verzwakt (door honger, cholera en difterie) en waar het Coronavirus nog heel veel slachtoffers zal maken......

De VS eist voorts van Mexico dat het haar fabrieken heropent die onderdelen maken voor de wapenindustrie in de VS..... (die fabrieken waren gesloten vanwege het Coronavirus) De zogenaamd linkse president van Mexico steunt de eis van de VS en heeft al gedreigd met inzet van de nationale garde tegen stakers die weigeren te werken......

Terwijl de psychopathische massamoordenaar en vol-idioot Trump zich afvraagt of men Coronapatienten niet zou moeten inspuiten met een desinfecterend middel, is de VS het zwaarst getroffen door het virus, intussen meer dan 50.000 doden..... De kritiek op het zwaar ondermaats reageren op het Coronanvirus door de Trump administratie, lijkt het signaal te zijn voor het Witte Huis, in te zetten op oorlogsvoering om zo het volk weer achter de gek in dat huis te krijgen.....

Uiteraard een uiterst gevaarlijke situatie en het is mij dan ook een raadsel waarom de andere westerse regeringen de VS niet aan de paal nagelen voor haar gevaarlijke spel en de grootschalige terreur die dit gestolen land over delen van de wereld verspreidt....... Elk ander land dat zich zou gedragen als de VS zou allang onderwerp van internationale sancties zijn geweest.......

Het volgend artikel werd geschreven door Bill van Auken, werd eerder gepubliceerd op World Socialist Web Site en door mij overgenomen van Information Clearing House (onder het artikel kan je klikken voor een vertaling, dit neemt wel enige tijd in beslag):

Merchants of death: Multibillion-dollar bailout for arms industry amid rising COVID-19 toll
By Bill Van Auken

April 24, 2020 "Information Clearing House" - “I have instructed the United States Navy to shoot down and destroy any and all Iranian gunboats if they harass our ships at sea,” US President Donald Trump tweeted Wednesday in a startling threat that could trigger a catastrophic war throughout the Middle East and beyond.

The threat to launch a war 7,000 miles from US shores in the midst of coronavirus pandemic, whose death toll in the US is rapidly approaching 50,000, comes on the heels of Trump’s Monday night tweet announcing a suspension of all immigration into the United States, a transparent attempt to scapegoat immigrants for the ravages of the pandemic and the layoffs of tens of millions of workers.

There is in both of these actions an expression of desperation and a flailing about in the face of a national and global crisis for which the US ruling class has no viable solution. It is a crude attempt to change the subject and divert public attention from the catastrophic consequences of the criminal indifference of the government and the ruling oligarchy it represents to the lives and well-being of the vast majority of the population.

Pentagon officials reported Wednesday that they had received no prior notification of Trump’s tweet, much less any orders for a change in the rules of engagement in the Persian Gulf.

Nonetheless, the brutal and fascistic rhetoric of Trump reflects a drive to war by US imperialism that has not been tempered, but rather intensified, by the global pandemic.

Even as Trump issued his tweet, US warships were sailing toward a confrontation with China in the South China Sea. At the same time, the Pentagon was announcing a shift in its deployment of long-range, nuclear capable B-52 bombers to make their presence less predictable to Beijing and Moscow and thereby ratchet up tensions.


B-52s lined up at Andersen Air Force Base

In recent days, the US has sharply escalated its air strikes against the impoverished African nation of Somalia, even as the coronavirus pandemic threatens to ravage its population. 
Escalating war threats continue against Venezuela, and the Pentagon continues to provide support for the near-genocidal Saudi-led war against the people of Yemen.

Nowhere does this war drive find more naked expression than in the massive government bailout that is being organized for the US arms industry. With tens of millions of workers unemployed, many facing hunger, and a drive by both the Trump administration and state governors to force a premature return to work, billions upon billions of dollars are being lavished upon military contractors to sustain their guaranteed profits and the obscene fortunes generated for their major shareholders.

The Pentagon’s top weapons procurer, Undersecretary of Defense Ellen Lord, told a press conference Monday that some $3 billion has already been funneled to the arms makers in the form of early payments for existing contracts, in addition to billions more approved by Congress in the first CARES Act, which pumped trillions of dollars into the financial markets. She indicated that much more will be doled out once Congress passes another stimulus package.

Asked by a reporter how much would be need to insure Washington’s Merchants of Death from any losses due to the coronavirus pandemic, she replied, “We’re talking billions and billions on that one.” Lord added that the first priority for this aid program was the “modernization process of the nuclear triad.”

These industries are hardly the picture of the deserving poor. The fact that massive financial resources that are desperately needed to save lives and rescue millions of workers from poverty are instead being poured into their pockets is a crime.

In a conference call this week to inform Lockheed Martin shareholders of first-quarter earnings, the company’s CEO, Marilyn Hewson, boasted that the corporation’s “portfolio is broad and expanding” and its “cash generation” strong. She said the company looked forward to “supporting our warfighters’ needs.”

Indeed, Lockheed Martin pulled in $2.3 billion in cash during the single quarter and expects to top $7.6 billion—coronavirus effects notwithstanding—over the year. It has a $144 billion backlog in orders, an all-time high.

Asked whether she had any qualms about political fallout over completing a $1 billion stock buyback in the midst of the crisis, she replied, “We’re very different, I think, than those who have experienced a very significant impact to their demands.” Hewson announced that the company had set aside a grand total of $10 million for COVID-19-related relief and assistance.

The “very different” character of these companies was also noted in a financial column published in the New York Times for the benefit of its well-heeled readers, titled “Opportunity in the Military-Industrial Complex.”

Pointing to the projected $741 billion Pentagon budget for the coming year, the Times counsels: “That combination of federal dollars and corporate heft may represent an opportunity for investors who don’t mind profiting from warfare. A modest bet on a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund that buys military contractors and aerospace companies may help buffer the deep recession brought on by the coronavirus.”

In short, one can reap substantial wealth from—and amid—mass death.

One of the principal concerns expressed by Undersecretary of Defense Lord as she spelled out plans for the multibillion-dollar bailout of the arms industry was the disruption of supply chains, particularly those originating in the maquiladora sweatshops just across the US border in Mexico. She also mentioned problems in India.

Thousands of Mexican workers have struck and protested against the deadly conditions inside these plants, conditions that are being prepared for workers throughout the planet as back-to-work orders are shoved through. At a plant in Ciudad Juárez owned by Michigan-based Lear Corporation, 16 workers have died from COIVD-19, while area hospitals are overflowing with victims of the virus.

The Pentagon and US Ambassador to Mexico Christopher Landau have intervened with the Mexican government, demanding that the maquiladora workers be forced back into the plants as “essential” to US imperialism’s war machine, just like their counterparts in the US. 
Lockheed relies on low-paid Mexican workers in Chihuahua, Mexico to produce electrical wiring for the US military’s Black Hawk and S-92 helicopters and F-16 fighter jets, while Boeing gets parts from a plant run by PCC Aerostructures in Monterrey. General Electric, Honeywell and other military contractors also profit off the labor of Mexican workers across the border.

Transmitting the dictates of the Pentagon in the language of contempt for human life that characterizes all of the policies of the Trump administration and the US ruling class, Ambassador Landau launched a Twitter campaign demanding that Mexican workers go back into the maquiladoras for the greater good of US imperialism. He enjoys the full collaboration of Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, promoted by the pseudo-left as a “progressive” and even “socialist,” who has prepared the country’s National Guard for deployment against strikers.

Warning that workers’ jobs are tied to supply chains linking them to US arms manufacturers, Ambassador Landau said, “if we do not coordinate our response, these chains can evaporate.”

He added, “There are risks everywhere, but we don't all stay at home for fear we are going to get in a car accident. The destruction of the economy is also a health threat.”
These are the same reactionary, antiscientific and misanthropic arguments being made in the US and internationally in an attempt to force workers back into the factories and workplaces with the certainty that many will fall sick and die.

Workers in the arms industry in the US, like their counterparts in Mexico, have also struck and protested over being forced to work as part of the “critical infrastructure” of US imperialism. Workers at the Bath Iron Works in Maine and the BAE Systems shipyard in Norfolk, Virginia, both run by General Dynamics, have struck over the failure of the employers to provide them with protection against infection and death. Similarly, workers at the GE Aviation plant in Lynn, Massachusetts, which produces engines for US Marine helicopters, picketed the plant over the lack of protective measures or any guarantee for workers who fall victim to COVID-19.

This resistance of the working class across national boundaries is directly opposed to the rabid nationalism and reaction that characterizes the response of the ruling classes, not only in the US, but in Europe and internationally, to the intensification of the capitalist crisis triggered by the coronavirus pandemic. To defend their profit interests, they will condemn millions to sickness and death, even as they prepare for world war and fascist dictatorship. 
The only alternative is for the international working class to put an end to the profit system and rebuild society on socialist foundations.

Copyright © 1998-2020 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserved - "Source"

US corporate takeover

Today, the U.S is living through a power grab by lobbyists and moneyed interests in government - the way Russia did after the Soviet collapse of the 1990s.


Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.
===============================
* Beste bezoeker bij plaatsing vergeten SIPRI als bron te noemen, hier een link naar een uitgebreid schrijven over de militaire uitgaven in 2019. 

Zie ook:
'EU 'vraagt burgers mee te denken' over oplossingen aangaande Coronacrisis' (en zie de links in  dat bericht naar andere artikelen over het Coronavirus)

'The Liar Tweets Tonight! (Vote Him Away!)' (humor)

woensdag 18 september 2019

Houthi aanval op Saoedische raffinaderijen: een grote blunder van de VS

De premature beschuldiging van de VS (al binnen 2 uur) dat Iran achter de aanslagen op de Saoedische raffinaderijen zit, heeft alles te maken met de schaamte van de VS dat al haar peperdure wapensystemen, zoals Patriot-raketten en de beste radartechnologie, geleverd aan Saoedi-Arabië, geen antwoord zijn op aanvallen met drones........ Waaraan toegevoegd moet worden dat deze drones van een legermacht zijn (de Houthi rebellen) die zich qua materiaal niet kan meten met Saoedi-Arabië laat staan met de VS...... Kortom de VS staat flink voor paal! (en de wapenindustrie van de VS is bepaald niet blij, dat kan ik je verzekeren!)

De claim van de VS dat Iran, of sjiitische krachten in Irak achter de aanslagen zitten, kloppen niet met de 'geografische kant' waar de olie-installaties werden getroffen: de westelijke kant, waardoor Iran en Irak afvallen als landen van waaruit de aanslagen werden gepleegd.

Het meest frappante aan de aanslagen op de 2 raffinaderijen is wel dat de eerste drone de Patriotraketinstallatie heeft vernield, een installatie die de boel moest bewaken, waarna de rest van de drones ongestoord kon doorvliegen.....

Vergeet wat betreft deze schaamte van de VS niet dat de petrodollar, ofwel de dollar als munt waarin de prijs van olie wordt weergegeven, vooral is te danken aan Saoedi-Arabië, de grootste olieleverancier ter wereld..... De VS wil dat ten koste van alles zo houden, immers als de dollar niet langer de munt is waarin olieprijzen worden weergegeven, is de lust van andere landen om dollars te verzamelen verdwenen en zal de VS eindelijk met haar enorme schuld worden geconfronteerd, waarbij het land zelfs deels of geheel failliet zou kunnen gaan........

Nogmaals: wat een schande dat de aanval met drones tegen de spuugrijke en dictatoriaal geregeerde terreurstaat Saoedi-Arabië zoveel aandacht trekt, terwijl men niet lult over de genocide die dezelfde terreurstaat uitvoert in buurland Jemen.......

Het volgende artikel werd geschreven door Finian Cunningham en verscheen eerder op RT, ik nam het over van Information Clearing House:

US defense failure… Why Washington has to blame Iran over Saudi attacks

By Finian Cunningham

US defense failure… Why Washington has to blame Iran over Saudi attacks
Smoke billows from an Aramco oil facility in Abqaiq © AFP

September 15, 2019 "Information Clearing House" -   The devastating blitz on Saudi Arabia’s oil industry has led to a flurry of accusations from US officials blaming Iran. The reason for the finger-pointing is simple: Washington’s spectacular failure to protect its Saudi ally.

The Trump administration needs to scapegoat Iran for the latest military assault on Saudi Arabia because to acknowledge that the Houthi rebels mounted such an audacious assault on the oil kingdom’s heartland would be an admission of American inadequacy.

Saudi Arabia has spent billions of dollars in recent years purchasing US Patriot missile defense systems and supposedly cutting-edge radar technology from the Pentagon. If the Yemeni rebels can fly combat drones up to 1,000 kilometers into Saudi territory and knock out the linchpin production sites in the kingdom’s oil industry, then that should be a matter of huge embarrassment for US “protectors.”

American defense of Saudi Arabia is germane to their historical relationship. Saudi oil exports nominated in dollars for trade – the biggest on the planet – are vital for maintaining the petrodollar global market, which is in turn crucial for American economic power. In return, the US is obligated to be a protector of the Saudi monarchy, which comes with the lucrative added benefit of selling the kingdom weapons worth billions of dollars every year.

‘Maximum lies’: Iran rejects US’ claim it attacked Saudi oil facilities, warns it’s ready for war
Smoke is seen following a fire at an Aramco factory in Abqaiq, Saudi Arabia, September 14, 2019. © Reuters / Stringer

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Saudi Arabia has the world’s third biggest military budget, behind the US and China. With an annual spend of around $68 billion, it is the world’s number one in terms of percentage of gross domestic product (8.8 per cent). Most of the Saudi arms are sourced from the US, with Patriot missile systems in particular being a recent big-ticket item.

Yet for all that financial largesse and the finest American military technology, the oil kingdom just witnessed a potentially crippling wave of air assaults on its vital oil industry. Saudi oil production at its mammoth refinery complex at Abqaiq, 205 miles (330 kms) east of the capital Riyadh, was down 50 per cent after it was engulfed by flames following air strikes. One of the Saudi’s biggest oilfields, at Khurais, also in the Eastern Province, was also partially closed.

There are credible reports that the damage is much more serious than the Saudi officials are 
conceding. These key industrial sites may take weeks to repair.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo got it half right when he claimed, “Iran launched an unprecedented attack on the world’s energy supply”.

Yes, it is unprecedented. But Pompeo and other US officials have most likely got it wrong about blaming Iran.

Some Trump administration officials told US media that “cruise missiles” were responsible for the giant fireballs seen over the Saudi oil facilities. One was quoted anonymously as saying: “There’s no doubt that Iran is responsible for this… there’s no escaping it. There is no other candidate.”
In a hurried effort to substantiate accusations against Iran, satellite images were released which show what appears to be the aftermath of the air strike on the Abqaiq refinery complex. US officials claim the location of the explosions indicate the weapons originated not from Yemen to the south, but from either Iran or Iraq. 

Even the normally dutiful New York Times expressed doubt about that claim, commenting in its report: “The satellite photographs released on Sunday did not appear as clear cut as officials suggested, with some appearing to show damage on the western side of facilities, not from the direction of Iran or Iraq.”

The accusations made by Pompeo and others are assertions in place of substantiated claims.
It is noteworthy that President Donald Trump refrained from openly blaming Iran by name, merely hinting at the possibility. If Pompeo is so adamant in fingering Iran, why didn’t Trump? Also, the president made a telling remark when he said he was “waiting for verification” from Saudi Arabia “as to who they believe was the cause of the attack.” Again, if US officials are explicitly accusing Iran then why is Trump saying he wants “verification” from the Saudis?

For its part, Iran has flatly dismissed the allegations that it had any involvement, saying that statements by Pompeo were “blind” and tantamount to setting up a conflict.
Iraq’s Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi also rejected claims that his country’s territory might have been used by pro-Iranian Shia militants to launch the air strikes.

The Houthi rebels in Yemen have issued unambiguous statements claiming responsibility for the air raids on the Saudi oil installations. They were specific that the weapons were drones, not missiles, adding with details that 10 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) were deployed.

Notably too, most US media reported initially that the attacks were by drones flown from Yemen. Associated Press reported a level of sophistication in the attacks whereby drones were used first to disable the US Patriot radar systems before other UAVs proceeded to execute the air strikes. 
It therefore seems that US officials are attempting to switch the story by blaming Iran. It is reckless scapegoating because the logical consequence could elicit a military attack against Iran, in which event Tehran has warned it is ready for war.

The rationale for blaming Iran is that the Yemeni rebels (which Iran supports politically) are just not capable of using drones with such dramatic success against the Saudi oil industry. The culprit must be Iran, so the rationale goes. This is a follow-on from alleged sabotage by Iran against oil tankers in the Persian Gulf earlier this summer.

However, a timeline shows that the Houthis are more than capable of launching ever-more powerful ballistic missiles and deeper penetrating drones into Saudi territory. The rebels have been using drones from the beginning of the war which the US-backed Saudi-UAE coalition launched on the southern Arabian country in March 2015.

Over the past four years, the Houthi aerial firepower has gradually improved. Earlier, the Saudis, with American defense systems, were able to intercept drones and missiles from Yemen. But over the last year, the rebels have increased their success rate for hitting targets in the Saudi interior, including the capital Riyadh.

In May this year, Houthi drones hit Saudi Arabia’s crucial east-west pipeline. Then in August, drones and ballistic missiles were reported to have struck the Shaybah oil field near the border with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as well as the Dammam exporting complex in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province. 

The Yemenis claim they are taking the war to Saudi Arabia and the UAE after years of relentless air strikes on their homeland which have resulted in nearly 90,000 dead. A recent UN report censured the US, Britain and France for possible complicity in war crimes through their military support for the Saudi coalition.

There must be trepidation among the monarchs in Saudi Arabia and the UAE that the rebels from war-torn and starving Yemen are now coming after them with drones that could demolish their oil economies. What’s more, the much-vaunted American protector is not able to deliver on its strategic bargain, despite billions of dollars of Pentagon weaponry. That’s why Washington has to find an excuse by casting Iran as the villain.

Finian Cunningham has written extensively on international affairs, with articles published in several languages. He is a Master’s graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a career in newspaper journalism. He is also a musician and songwriter. For nearly 20 years, he worked as an editor and writer in major news media organisations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent.


This article was originally published by "RT"
=======================================
Patriot-raketten vernietigen met een drone..... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Zie ook:
'Jemen: de laatste ziekenhuizen moeten sluiten >> alle brandstof is op.....'



´Saoediërs bombarderen Jemen na aanbod Houthi's tot wapenstilstand´

'Duitsland, Frankrijk en Groot-Brittannië: Iran is de dader, er is geen andere plausibele verklaring voor de aanval op Saoedische olie-installaties'

'Iran dreigt met volledige oorlog bij vergeldingsaanval voor aanslag op Saoedische olie-installaties'

'Iran klaar voor oorlog tegen de VS'

'‘Maximum lies’: Iran rejects US’ claim it attacked Saudi oil facilities, warns it’s ready for war'




















US Continues to Escalate Tensions, Raising Fear of Imminent War With Iran

US Might Send 10,000 More Troops to Middle East





Yemen Be Damned, Pompeo Doubles Down on US Support for Saudi Arabia

dinsdag 2 juli 2019

Bernie Sanders (democratische presidentskandidaat) valt de VS oorlogsmachine aan

The Canary bracht afgelopen vrijdag een artikel van Bryan Wall waarin deze het tweede debat van de democratische presidentskandidaten beschrijft. Met name de aanval van kandidaat Bernie Sanders op de oorlogsmachine van de VS trok zijn aandacht, hoewel het bekend is dat Sanders om het zacht te zeggen, geen voorstander is van het uiterst agressieve VS buitenlandbeleid, beter gezegd 'terreurbeleid.......'

Het steekt Sanders vooral dat een enorme groep VS burgers in armoede moet leven, waarvan ruim 50 miljoen zelfs afhankelijk is van voedselbonnen....... Uiteraard is ook de toegang van arme groepen tot de gezondheidszorg een speerpunt voor Sanders, waar de grote onderlaag nog steeds geen of slechte toegang tot gezondheidszorg heeft......

De VS geeft nu meer dan 700 miljard dollar uit aan oorlogsvoering, althans volgens het SIPRI, echter er wordt nog veel meer uitgegeven aan oorlogsvoering, daar er bijvoorbeeld geen budgetten voor geheime oorlogsvoering (o.l.v. de CIA) bekend worden gemaakt, noch de kosten voor het opzetten van opstanden (om tot een coup te leiden van VS niet welgevallige landen), noch de kosten voor geheime cyberaanvallen (ofwel cyberterreur), noch die voor economische oorlogsvoering die bijvoorbeeld in Venezuela al tot 40.000 doden heeft geleid......*

Sanders houdt het oorlogsbudget overigens op 1,5 triljard dollar, wat in onze weergave van die getalsaanduiding dik meer dan 1 biljoen dollar is...... Terwijl de VS tegelijkertijd amper iets doet tegen de klimaatverandering, is oorlogsvoering ook nog eens een enorme aanjager is van de klimaatverandering........

Vergeet verder niet dat de VS jaarlijks miljoenen kwijtraakt door de enorme bosbranden, waarbij vorig jaar zelfs een stadje bijna geheel werd weggevaagd...... Om over de vele miljarden schade door orkanen maar te zwijgen, beiden weergerelateerde rampen die één op één te danken zijn aan de klimaatverandering, ofwel: hoe dom en/of gevaarlijk moet je zijn om dan nog klimaatscepticus te spelen, zoals Trump en andere fascisten/neoliberalen (2 kanten van dezelfde medaille), zoals Bolsonaro in Brazilië dat doen......

Het volgende artikel is geschreven door Bryan Wall en werd gepubliceerd op The Canary:

Bernie Sanders takes aim at the US war machine in second Democratic debate

28th June 2019

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Bernie Sanders takes aim at the US war machine in second Democratic debate

Bernie Sanders took aim at both the US war machine and climate catastrophe during the second Democratic Party debate on 28 June. Sanders insisted that, instead of spending obscene amounts of money on weapons, tackling climate catastrophe should be a key priority.

He also attacked the levels of poverty and inequality that exist in the US. And he argued that people must stand up and be counted if they want things to change.

War and climate

Sanders slammed both US militarism and Washington’s lack of action on climate breakdown. He insisted that “instead of spending a trillion and a half dollars on weapons of destruction”, the real enemy is climate catastrophe. Calling it the “common enemy”, he went on to declare that the goal should be to:
transform the world’s energy system away from fossil fuel to energy efficiency and sustainable energy”.

The world’s future, he said, “rests on us doing that”:

(de video bij dit bericht kan ik niet overnemen, zie daarvoor het origineel, de tekst is overigens opgenomen in dit artikel)
Embedded video
End the forever wars.

Take on the military industrial complex.

Save the planet.

Sanders also laid out his history of anti-war activism. Unlike his fellow presidential hopeful Joe Biden, Sanders voted against the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He also revealed that he pushed to end US support of Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen:

(ook bij dit Twitterbericht een korte video die ik niet over kan nemen, hierin een uitgebreider commentaar op de oorlog in Jemen, zie daarvoor weer het origineel)

I helped lead the opposition to the Iraq War. Joe Biden voted for it. When we talk about foreign policy there is a very clear difference in this election.

Not stopping there, Sanders also proclaimed his opposition to a war with Iran. He asserted:
I will do everything I can to prevent a war with Iran which would be far worse than the disastrous war with Iraq”.

Change

Sanders went on to state that many people watching the debate probably believe that nothing changes in the US and wonder:
How come, for the last 45 years, wages have been stagnant for the middle class? How come we have the highest rate of childhood poverty? How come 45 million people still have student debt? How come three people own more wealth than the bottom half of America?”

His answer was that:
nothing will change unless we have the guts to take on Wall Street, the insurance industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the military-industrial complex, and the fossil-fuel industry”.

And if this doesn’t happen, he argued, the “rich will get richer” while everyone else struggles:


We must have the guts to take on:

-Wall Street
-The insurance industry
-The pharmaceutical industry
-The military-industrial complex
-The fossil fuel industry

If we can take them on, we will finally be able to create real change.


4,613 people are talking about this

The bigger picture

As journalist and climate activist Naomi Klein pointed out, tackling climate breakdown “is not a solo climate policy”. It means taking on the wider issues which affect society:

1. Lots of these candidates claim they support a but their performance in tells a very different story. GND is not a solo climate policy - it's a plan to transform the economy and its underlying values to wage war on climate breakdown + poverty/injustice

And as one commentator replied, supporting climate action and opposing war are very much two sides of the same coin:


1. Lots of these candidates claim they support a but their performance in tells a very different story. GND is not a solo climate policy - it's a plan to transform the economy and its underlying values to wage war on climate breakdown + poverty/injustice

Climate Action Must Vehemently Oppose War

The military’s final destructive act is of planetary scale.
medium.com




Bernie Sanders showed during the debate that he understands this holistic approach. From his criticism of US militarism to his understanding of inequality in the US, he is head and shoulders above the likes of Biden.

If change is going to happen, Sanders becoming president would be a strong step in the right direction.

Featured image via Twitter – Screenshot
====================================
* Zie: 'Reuters houdt rapport tegen over 40.000 Venezolaanse doden door VS sancties'