Kavanaughs aanstelling bij het hooggerechtshof heeft vrouwen in de VS getraumatiseerd, zo blijkt uit onderzoek

De gesprekken die plaatsvonden voor toetreding van opperploert en smerige seksist Kavanaugh tot het hooggerechtshof van de VS, hebben de vrouwenrechten in de VS geen goed gedaan, zo zou de politie in de VS (nog) minder snel een vrouw geloven als die zich bijvoorbeeld bij de politie meldt na een aanranding of verkrachting (dat was en is al een 'kriem' in de VS..)

Uit een onafhankelijk onderzoek blijkt dat meer burgers in de VS nu geloven dat Kavanaugh onder ede heeft gelogen en dat de vrouw die hij aanrandde, dr. Christine Blasey de waarheid sprak.....

Tijdens de verhoren van Kavenaugh, die voorafgingen aan zijn aanstelling, hebben 1 op de 4 vrouwen hun trauma (seksueel geweld) herbeleefd, voor vrouwen met wortels in Latijns-Amerika was dit aantal zelfs 1 op de 3.......

Het meest lullige is wel dat Kavanaugh zich in zijn nieuwe functie ook met zaken als verkrachtingen, of achterstelling van vrouwen moet bemoeien en dat zal niet in het belang zijn van het slachtoffer (meestal vrouwen) of van vrouwen (bij achterstelling), om het nog maar zacht uit te drukken......

Schande!

Lees het volgende uitstekende, maar wel verontrustende artikel van Julia Conley, eerder gepubliceerd op Common Dreams:

Published on Tuesday, April 16, 2019 by Common Dreams

Kavanaugh's Confirmation Traumatized American Women, Study Shows—And May Have Made Them Less Safe

The Supreme Court Justice's confirmation hearings left Americans fearful for women's rights and safety and left many men less likely to believe a woman's allegations of assault

by Julia Conley, staff writer

Women and men showed support for Dr. Christine Blasey Ford on Capitol Hill as she testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September regarding her allegations that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school. (Image: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

More than six months after Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed by the U.S. Senate, a new study shows how women and men were affected by revelations that the judge had been accused of sexual assault.

The non-partisan research firm PerryUndem surveyed about 1,300 people from across the country, finding that more Americans believe Kavanaugh's accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, than did directly after the hearings—and that most believe Kavanaugh lied under oath about the alleged assault.

One in four women told the company that watching the hearings in September had caused them to re-experience past trauma. The number was larger for Latin American women, at one in three.
And 36 percent of women said they related personally to Blasey Ford's testimony, in which she described Kavanaugh forcefully holding her down on a bed at a party.

Tresa Undem@teemoneyusa

10) 1 in 4 women voters in the country re-experienced trauma or difficult feelings from the past as a result of the events, including 1 in 3 Latina women. pic.twitter.com/TQTIDYFEbG

18

6:04 PM - Apr 16, 2019

Like the 2018 midterm elections—in which Democrats took control of the U.S. House—the study debunks the prediction put forward by Republicans, including President Donald Trump, after Kavanaugh's confirmation that voters would turn against Democrats.

"Ultimately, PerryUndem concludes that the Kavanaugh hearings may actually have helped Democrats more than Republicans, noting that 'feeling unfavorably toward Justice Kavanaugh motivated people to vote for the Democratic candidate for U.S. House of Representatives—above and beyond typical factors, such as party affiliation,'" wrote Irin Carmon at The Cut.

While conservative commentators like NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch predicted the hearings would make American parents concerned about false assault accusations against their sons, the study showed that most Americans came away with new concerns for women and girls' safety.

Forty-seven percent said they were now more worried for girls and women, while only 36 percent said the hearings made them concerned for boys and men.

With 57 percent believing that Kavanaugh had lied under oath during his confirmation hearing in September—during which he was openly aggressive toward senators, contrasting with Blasey Ford's emotional but measured testimony—the judge's confirmation left many concerned that Kavanaugh would not maintain impartiality regarding Supreme Court cases concerning women's rights or sexual assault.

Around 40 percent of respondents said they worried the hearings would make sexual assault dismissed even more by the public and law enforcement than it already is—making women less likely to come forward, people less likely to believe survivors, and men more likely to think they can get away with assaulting a woman.

As Carmon wrote, Republican men's responses to PerryUndem's survey may support that.

"There was a Kavanaugh effect à la Trump's fulminating—it just mainly existed among Republican men," Carmon wrote. "PerryUndem's data suggests that the Kavanaugh hearing made Republican men more sexist and less likely to believe women who say they were assaulted. In a 2017 survey the group conducted focusing on #MeToo, 80 percent of Republican men said they were now more likely to believe women making accusations. After Kavanaugh, that number has sunk by 21 points."

Rachel Joy Larris

✔@RachelLarris

Kavanaugh helped Democrats at the ballot box, but among Republican men the hearing made them more sexist and less likely to believe women who say they were assaulted. (@irin always has the best news for women ) https://buff.ly/2GbzZZy 

11

11:15 PM - Apr 16, 2019

How Kavanaugh Changed American Men and Women

Republicans predicted that the hearings would backfire on Democrats. Here’s what the data actually says.

thecut.com

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
======================================
Zie ook:
'Rechters die het opnemen voor verkrachters dienen te worden afgezet'

'Kavanaugh: dus een vrouwvijandige smeerlap word aangewezen als opperrechter door een andere vrouwvijandige schoft.........' (het woord opperrechter in deze kop klopt niet, Kavanaugh is lid van het hooggerechtshof, waar een ander de functie van opperrechter bekleedt, e.e.a. doet verder niets af aan de strekking)

'Bovenklasse ontloopt elke verantwoording, waar de onderlaag zoveel mogelijk verantwoordelijk wordt gehouden voor elke misstap' (in het artikel van Caitlin Johnstone dat is opgenomen in dat bericht, wordt over Kavanaugh gesproken)

'Brett Kavanaugh heeft lak aan internationaal recht en mensenrechten, dus ook aan seksueel geweld tegen vrouwen.......' In dit bericht vooral aandacht op de andere foute kanten van psychopaat Kavanaugh.

Rechters die het opnemen voor verkrachters dienen te worden afgezet

Regelmatig hoor je vooral in het buitenland dat rechters verkrachters beschermen en hen weg laten komen met belachelijk lage straffen, of zelfs zonder straf..... De Franse 'rechtspraak' is op dit gebied een 'mooi voorbeeld......' (dit verandert overigens als de dader moslim is en het tegengestelde als de dader uit een 'beter gesitueerd' gezin stamt...)

Echter ook in de VS kan men er wat van, neem het geval Kavanaugh.

Mensen heb geen zin om de smerige misdaden tegen vrouwen te herhalen die in het hieronder opgenomen artikel van het Care2 team aan bod komen.....

Lees de tekst van Lauren Longo, zoals weergegeven bij de petitie en geeft het door, het is 2018 en het seksuele geweld tegen vrouwen (en mannen) moet eindelijk afgelopen zijn!!

5 Judges Whose Sexual Assault Rulings Land Them in The Hall Of Shame

• By: Lauren Longo
• December 18, 2018

• About Lauren
• Follow Lauren at @llongo510

There are a lot of decent, fair judges out there, but there are a lot of terrible ones too, especially when it comes to sexual assault cases. Far too often, judges are making headlines for giving rapists shockingly lenient sentences or blaming victims for their own assaults. Around the world, judges are letting rapists off the hook and treating victims with horrible disrespect.

A Mexican judge cleared a man of rape because he didn’t orgasm during the assault. In Italy, a judge acquitted a man of sexual assault because the victim didn’t “betray emotion” during the assault. In several cases, judges have dismissed cases because they believed the young victims looked or acted older than they were or that their bodies were “well-developed.”

There were a lot of contenders for worst judges on sexual assault cases, but these are five whose actions should land them in the Hall of Shame.

1. JUDGE RALPH STROTHER

Just last week, Texas Judge Ralph Strother allowed accused rapist and 23-year-old former frat boy Jacob Walter Anderson to plead no contest to the lesser charge of unlawful restraint.

Anderson was accused of repeatedly raping his then 19-year-old victim his fraternity threw in 2016. He then left her outside, unconscious, face-down in her own vomit. Despite this, Anderson was offered a plea deal which judge Strother then accepted, ignoring pleas from the victim.

Strother has been lenient toward rapists in at least two other cases. Earlier this year, Strother sentenced a rapist to 30 days of jail but said he could leave on the weekends. Another time, he allowed a rapist to avoid jail time altogether, if he payed for his victim’s counseling.

A Care2 petition is calling for Strother’s resignation.

2. JUDGE PAUL MEYERS

A Canadian teenager sexually assaulted a girl in a bathroom stall, injuring her so severely she was rushed to the hospital in critical condition. The perpetrator was also convicted of sexually assaulting another girl just a few months earlier. Judge Paul Meyers sentenced him to two weeks behind bars, saying that the teen already faced “social ramifications” and will not be able to graduate with his peers.

A Care2 petition is demanding Meyers’ resignation.

3. JUDGE AARON PERSKY

Who could forget Judge Aaron Persky, who let convicted rapist Brock Turner serve only three months in jail? 
A jury found Turner guilty of three felony sexual assault charges, and as a result the prosecution recommended a sentence of six years in prison, stating Turner posed a “continued threat to the community.” Instead, Judge Persky sentenced him to only six months in county jail because “a prison sentence would have a severe impact on him.” Perksy has since been removed from the bench following a recall vote.

4. JUDGE BRETT KAVANAUGH

In this case, the Hall of Shame nominee is both the judge and the predator.

As Kavanaugh was nominated for the Supreme Court, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford came forward with allegations of sexual misconduct. Ford claimed Kavanaugh assaulted her when they were teenagers. Following this news, several other women came forward with allegations against Kavanaugh. Despite decent people (and many others) all agreeing that Ford was credible, Kavanaugh was still confirmed as a Supreme Court justice.

5. JUDGE ROBIN CAMP

Last year Canadian judge Robin Camp submitted his resignation because of a 2014 case in which he asked a 19-year-old rape victim, “Why couldn’t you just keep your knees together?” He also later told her “sex and pain sometimes go together.” When the victim told the court that the assault occurred in a bathroom sink, the judge asked her why she hadn’t put her “bottom down into the basin so he couldn’t penetrate you.”

Photo Credit: Getty Images

============================
Zie ook:
'Kavanaugh: dus een vrouwvijandige smeerlap word aangewezen als opperrechter door een andere vrouwvijandige schoft.........' (het woord opperrechter in deze kop klopt niet, Kavanaugh is lid van het hooggerechtshof, waar een ander de functie van opperrechter bekleedt, e.e.a. doet verder niets af aan de strekking)

'Bovenklasse ontloopt elke verantwoording, waar de onderlaag zoveel mogelijk verantwoordelijk wordt gehouden voor elke misstap' (in het artikel van Caitlin Johnstone dat is opgenomen in dat bericht, wordt over Kavanaugh gesproken)

'Brett Kavanaugh heeft lak aan internationaal recht en mensenrechten, dus ook aan seksueel geweld tegen vrouwen.......' In dit bericht vooral aandacht op de andere foute kanten van psychopaat Kavanaugh.

Facebook spuugzat? Hier een alternatief: Minds

Heb je genoeg van Facebook, het VS lobbyplatform voor neoliberaal beleid, verdediger van fake news (nepnieuws) dat de reguliere westerse (massa-) media brengen en dat de waarheid 'iets te vaak' censureert? Er is een alternatief, met de naam Minds.

Steeds meer Facebook accounts, die echt nieuws brengen, zijn van Facebook gedonderd..... Effect: velen kunnen via hun Facebook account media als Policing the Police, Anti-Media en anderen niet meer volgen, daar Facebook ze heeft weggecensureerd........

Geen nood er is een alternatief, zoals gezegd met de naam 'Minds'. Je behoeft geen keus te maken, immers je kan je Facebook account uiteraard behouden.

Het kost je ongeveer 5 minuten om je aan te melden, waarna je dan wel je account moet aanmaken met achtergrond, eventuele foto's enz, echter dat behoeft geen uren te kosten, je kan zelfs overwegen de aankleding van je Facebook account mee te nemen, zeker als je van Facebook af wilt.

Laat je niet gek maken met verhalen dat Minds bomvol fascistische/racistische propaganda staat, dat is niet zo, bovendien wordt er gewerkt aan een manier dat soort berichten te weren, aldus de oprichter Bill Ottoman. (en nee dat is niet de censuur in de normale betekenis van het woord, daar fascisten eenmaal aan de macht, lak hebben aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting [en democratie], bovendien propageren fascisten regelmatig geweld en dat op basis van een enorm aantal leugens en het smerig zaaien van haat en angst)

Hier het verhaal van Eleanor Goldfield, waarin ze e.e.a. uitgebreid toelicht en aangeeft dat Facebook al veel eerder bezig was met censuur, zo zijn er al een ongelofelijk aantal accounts van Palestijnen verwijderd, daar ze kritiek hebben op Israël en nee dat mogen Palestijnse mensen niet van Facebook, zelfs niet als één of meerdere familieleden van hen is/zijn vermoord door het Israëlische leger! Aan het eind van het artikel zie je ook een link naar LBRY blockchain, waar je o.a. berichten van Anti-Media kan vinden, vind LBRY zelf overigens nogal een propvolle, drukke site, zie zelf maar:

Sick of Facebook? Read This

zijn er la een ongelofelijk aantal accounts van Palestijnen verwijderd, daar ze kritiek hebben op 

November 27, 2018 at 10:11 am

Written by Eleanor Goldfield

(EG Opinion) — “I didn’t realize you were still doing your show!”

“Why can’t I see your posts anymore?”

“I’ve had to re-follow you several times on Facebook.”

These are but a few of the various comments and complaints about my Facebook page that I’ve fielded the past two years. With growing regularity and intensity, the cheery blue “F” has fucked over radical journalists like me, emboldened by the Russiagate and fake news narratives that brand any dissident or alternative media as our generation’s folk devils. While recent crackdowns have been far more pointed and Orwellian than before, censorship and Facebook go way back.

In 2012, The Guardian reported on Facebook’s arbitrary and ridiculous nudity and violence guidelines which allow images of crushed limbs but – dear god spare us the image of a woman breastfeeding. Still, people stayed – and Facebook grew. In 2014, Facebook admitted to mind control games via positive or negative emotional content tests on unknowing and unwilling platform users. Still, people stayed – and Facebook grew. Following the 2016 election, Facebook responded to the Harpie shrieks from the corporate Democrats by setting up a so-called “fake news” task force to weed out those dastardly commies (or socialists or anarchists or leftists or libertarians or dissidents or…). And since then, I’ve watched my reach on Facebook drain like water in a bathtub – hard to notice at first and then a spastic swirl while people bicker about how to plug the drain.

And still, we stayed – and the censorship tightened. Roughly a year ago, my show Act Out! reported on both the censorship we were experiencing but also the cramped filter bubbling that Facebook employs in order to keep the undesirables out of everyone’s news feed. Still, I stayed – and the censorship tightened. 2017 into 2018 saw more and more activist organizers, particularly black and brown, thrown into Facebook jail for questioning systemic violence and demanding better. In August, puss bag ass hat in a human suit Alex Jones was banned from Facebook – YouTube, Apple and Twitter followed suit shortly thereafter. Some folks celebrated. Some others of us skipped the party because we could feel what was coming.

On October 11th of this year, Facebook purged more than 800 pages including The Anti-Media, Police the Police, Free Thought Project and many other social justice and alternative media pages. Their explanation rested on the painfully flimsy foundation of “inauthentic behavior.” Meanwhile, their fake-news checking team is stacked with the likes of the Atlantic Council and the Weekly Standard, neocon junk organizations that peddle such drivel as “The Character Assassination of Brett Kavanaugh.” Soon after, on the Monday before the Midterm elections, Facebook blocked another 115 accounts citing once again, “inauthentic behavior.” Then, in mid November, a massive New York Times piece chronicled Facebook’s long road to not only save its image amid rising authoritarian behavior, but “to discredit activist protesters, in part by linking them to the liberal financier George Soros.” (I consistently find myself waiting for those Soros and Putin checks in the mail that just never appear.)

What this all proves is what was already clear two years ago: Facebook is afraid of dissenting voices – and they have the power to drain the social media presence of this rising tide of leftist ire. We can’t plug this drain. The drain (and the entire bathtub) is in the hands of a private corporation that has intertwined itself with the government in a perverse partnership based on silencing dissent and streamlining a Stepford-like online experience. Russia’s bad, nipples are hidden, Santa is white, go back to sleep. Put simply, if we are interested in uncovering truth, building networks, fighting for justice and freedom, we have to make a shift.

I understand why people stay – I understand why I stayed. More than a quarter of humanity uses Facebook; it’s been deemed too big to delete. People go there for connection – to see kids growing, to see what people are cooking, to reassure themselves that an ex’s new partner is ugly. People go there to build their brands. I’ve personally built followings for two bands, several organizations and one TV show on the platform. But I can no longer get through. I, and journalists like me, can not break through that aforementioned perverse partnership.

It follows that the “news” people get on Facebook, a main source for news, will never be the news from the front lines of our fights. It will never be the news from the most marginalized and oppressed folks. It will never be the news that hits straight at the heart of this crooked, corrupt system. It will be sanitized, whitewashed, twisted propaganda that serves and protects the owners of corporate media – the very same corporations that depend on our oppression, distraction and apathy. It will be infotainment and whatever makes you feel good about you. Because that means you’ll keep coming back. And as you go back, you’ll expose yourself entirely to the blue and white algorithm. Indeed, outside of Orwellian censorship, Facebook also excels at spying on us.

Already back in 2008, alternative media reported on the surveillance power of Facebook. Ten years later and after his historic NSA leaks, Edward Snowden reminded us that “Facebook is a surveillance company rebranded as ‘social media.’” It seems a hyperbolic visual but the dystopian picture of a constantly surveilled human being scrolling through banal content curated by a state-sponsored corporation is very real.

Since the October purge, calls from the left regarding alternatives have been loud but splintered.

Many suggest that we go back to the days of analog organizing – phone calls, knocking on doors, in-person meetings. As an organizer, I was unaware that we had ever stopped doing that. Truly, face-to-face organizing remains the most effective tool for us social beings. At the same time, to cast off the advancements of technological networking would be to walk away from an internet designed to be a place of collaboration and sharing. We shouldn’t and don’t have to do that.

What we need is an open source, non-surveillance platform. And right now, that platform is Minds. Before you ask, I’m not being paid to write that. My relationship with Minds consists of my account there and an interview with Minds co-founder Bill Ottman on my show.

Fashioned as an alternative to the closed and creepy Facebook behemoth, Minds advertises itself as “an open source and decentralized social network for Internet freedom.” Minds prides itself on being hands-off with regards to any content that falls in line with what’s permitted by law, which has elicited critiques from some on the left who say Minds is a safe haven for fascists and right-wing extremists. Yet, Ottman has himself stated openly that he wants ideas on content moderation and ways to make Minds a better place for social network users as well as radical content creators.

What a few fellow journos and I are calling #MindsShift is an important step in not only moving away from our gagged existence on Facebook, but in building a social network that can serve up the real news folks are now aching for. To be clear, we aren’t advocating that you delete your Facebook account – unless you want to. For many, Facebook is still an important tool and our goal is to add to the outreach toolkit, not suppress it.

We have set January 1st, 2019 as the ultimate date for this #MindsShift. Several outlets with a combined reach of millions of users will be making the move – and asking their readerships/viewerships to move with them. Along with fellow journalists, I am working with Minds to brainstorm new user-friendly functions and ways to make this #MindsShift a loud and powerful move. We ask that you, the reader, add to the conversation by joining the #MindsShift and spreading the word to your friends and family. (Join Minds via this link) We have created the #MindsShift open group on Minds.com so that you can join and offer up suggestions and ideas to make this platform a new home for radical and progressive media.

Now is the time to defend the remnants of the Information Revolution. In the streets and online, we need to hear and uplift voices for radical and progressive change. Take off the corporate gag, close the social media surveillance blinds, and shift.

By Eleanor Goldfield / Republished with permission / Art Killing Apathy / Report a typo

This post is published to LBRY blockchain at lbry://@AntiMedia/facebook-censorship.

Try LBRY to experience content freedom, earn crypto, and support The Anti-Media!

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us

=================================
Nog een tip van mij: als je een account opent op Minds, gooi dan niet al je personalia te grabbel, zoals velen deden op Facebook, misbruik en inbraak zijn weliswaar veel moeilijker, maar de kans bestaat uiteraard dat dit wel kan gebeuren.

Zie ook:
'Two More Spiegel Employees Out After Fake News Scandal Expands' Ofwel: het zoveelste 'gevalletje fake news', gebracht door de reguliere massamedia........

'Google manipuleerde VS presidentsverkiezingen van 2016 en censureert niet alleen linkse/alternatieve sociale media'

'Facebook gebruikte 'fake news' beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden'

'Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert'

'Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen'

'Bolsonaro, de fascistische nieuwe president van Brazilië, werd volgens Avaaz en fake news brengers als de NYT gekozen door manipulatie via WhatsApp'

'Facebooks zuivering van de alternatieve (nieuws) media staat nog in de kinderschoenen'

'Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax' (Russiagate, de enorme leugen op basis waaraan we de huidige censuurgolf te danken hebben......)

'The US military’s vision for state censorship'

'Israël en VS werken samen in tegenwerken van critici op beleid t.a.v. Palestijnen'

'Facebook censureert de waarheid over Columbus en de verovering van de Amerika's.......'

'Facebook censuur gestuurd door het westers militair-industrieel complex en de NAVO in het bijzonder..........'

'Why the Coordinated Alternative Media Purge Should Terrify Everyone' (Tyler Durden op Zero Hedge)

'First They Came for Alex Jones — We Told You We Were Next — We Were' (Matt Agorist op The Free Thought Project)

'CNN, de grote brenger van 'fake news!!!''

'Facebook en Twitter verwijderen nu volledige accounts.........'

'Facebook (en Twitter) onderdrukt meningsvorming door het verwijderen van (echt) onafhankelijke media'

'Wie het nieuws controleert, controleert de wereld......'

'Facebook en Twitter verwijderen de eerlijke journalistiek en oprechte opinie >> censuur.....'

Facebook verlaat 'tranding news' voor 'brekend nieuws' van 80 reguliere mediaorganen, ofwel nog meer 'fake news.....''

'Facebook komt met nieuwsshows van betrouwbare media als CNN en Fox News.... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'Censuur op het internet met vliegende start in de VS, 'het land van het vrije woord....''

'Facebook en NAVO werken samen in censuur op niet welgevallig nieuws......'

'Facebook helpt Saoedi-Arabië: doodstraf door onthoofding van vrouw die het waagde kritiek te uiten.....'

'Aanval op alternatieve media 'succesvol': meer en meer sites worden van het net geweerd.........'

'ThinkProgress eiste censuur van Facebook en werd inderdaad gecensureerd.... ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'VS staatscensuur op Facebook (ook in de EU)'

'Facebook stelt perstituee van New York Times aan als censuur-agent...... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'Het echte Facebook schandaal: manipulatie van de gebruikers en gratis diensten voor eertijds presidentskandidaat Obama.......'

'Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook doneerde aan de politici die hem in de VS aan de tand voelden >> in het EU parlement maakte hij gebruik van megalomane EU politici.....'

'Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren.... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'Media Too Busy Defending John McCain to Report the News That Actually Affects You' Onder andere aandacht voor PRISM.

'Westerse massa misleiding in aanloop naar WOIII......'

'VS gebruikt sociale media om 'fake comment' te verspreiden en de bevolking te hersenspoelen met leugens, ofwel 'fake news....''

'Eis een nee tegen censuur op het internet!' 

'Facebook e.a. hebben lak aan AVG (GDPR), misbruik persoonsgegevens gaat gewoon door.......'

'Jeremy Corbyn wordt gedemoniseerd als antisemiet.......'

'VS gebruikt sociale media om 'fake comment' te verspreiden en de bevolking te hersenspoelen met leugens, ofwel 'fake news....''

'Facebook: verrijking van oliemaatschappijen en andere grote bedrijven, plus wereldwijde corruptie.......'

'Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

Facebook Purges Independent Media for “Political Disinformation”

Facebook Blocks Links to Free Speech Competitor ‘Minds’