Eerste politierobot een feit.........

Dat autofabrikanten het nergens nauw mee nemen, zal nog voor niemand een verrassing zijn, echter het kan nog sterker: Ford (VS) heeft een zelflerende politierobot gefabriceerd....... Deze eerste politierobot is nu nog een zelfrijdende politieauto, die autonoom beslissingen neemt op gedrag van automobilisten in het verkeer....... De robotauto zou andere voertuigen op afstand stil kunnen zetten, dat betekent dat het elektronische systeem van afstand kan worden geblokkeerd (dat meldt Jake Anderson, de schrijver van het volgende artikel niet, maar is een al langer bekende technologie)........ Deze robot kan groeien in de functie, daar deze ook zelflerend is.......

Op zeker dat de politie in de VS deze auto in gebruik zal nemen en niet voor de gebieden waar veel gekleurden wonen, of ze moeten deze robot precies zo instrueren als de 'gewone agenten.......' Zo instrueren dat deze robot gekleurden als potentiële misdadigers zal zien, dus etnisch zal profileren en als het even kan gekleurden doodschieten, ofwel standrechtelijk executeren en dat alleen vanwege hun huidskleur......

Ford heeft de eerste stap gemaakt naar een geautomatiseerde nieuwe wereld robotorde, waarmee de gevaarlijk stap is gezet naar andere zelflerende robots, lopende robots voor politie en leger, die al helemaal niet zullen twijfelen of ze iemand wel dan niet zullen vermoorden..... Overigens is men ook al bezig met het ontwerpen van een drone die zelfstandig beslist of doelwitten uitgeschakeld 'moeten worden...' (let wel: dat is eigenlijk een zware misdaad!) De controle op die standrechtelijke executies, onder Obama tot vol wasdom gekomen, stelde al niets voor, zoals zojuist gezegd: met robots zal dit moorden nog grotere vormen aannemen, waar onderzoek zelfs wel eens onmogelijk gemaakt kan worden............ Immers wie moet je de schuld nog geven na een schietincident, bijvoorbeeld in een Midden-Oosten gebied, de fabrikant??? (ach, als men nu een onderzoek instelt naar een moordpartij in bijvoorbeeld Irak, komen de VS daders er voor 99% vanaf met een vrijspraak......)

De VS is in feite al een politiestaat, met dergelijke robots kan zo'n dictatuur pas echt vervolmaakt worden....... Op weg naar een wereld die zelfs George Orwell niet kon voorzien.......... (al weet ik zeker dat meerdere sciencefiction schrijvers hier wel over hebben verhaald, ben helaas al mijn scifi boeken kwijtgeraakt door een kwaadaardig persoon in mijn verleden......

Patent Filed for Self-Driving Police Car That Can Take Over Your Vehicle. Let That Sink In

January 31, 2018 at 9:46 am

Written by Jake Anderson

(ANTIMEDIA) — Millions of jobs are at risk of being outsourced to automated artificial intelligence or robotic applications in the next decade. These jobs range from baristas and supermarket clerks to lawyers and hedge fund managers. Now, a new patent application by automaker Ford suggests law enforcement agents, too, could soon be replaced by artificially intelligent autonomous police cars equipped with state of the art cameras, wireless communication sensors, and surveillance technology.

The automated cop car would be designed to seek out especially crafty hiding places, detect driving infractions, wirelessly interface with potentially (automated) lawbreaking vehicles, and even remotely issue citations. According to Techcrunch, Ford’s patent filing suggests that the new machine learning algorithm would not only be capable of determining whether the infraction constitutes a ticket or a warning but would also be able to manually take control of the vehicle if necessary, although it is not entirely clear what the patent envisions in the way of manual takeovers. The AI black-and-white would also have instantaneous access to any databases necessary to adjudicate suspects and offenders.

“While autonomous vehicles can and will be programmed to obey traffic laws,” the patent filing states, “a human driver can override that programming to control and operate the vehicle at any time. When a vehicle is under the control of a human driver there is a possibility of violation of traffic laws. Thus, there will still be a need to police traffic.”

Vaughn Highfield of Alphr imagined how this might play out on the road:

“In practice, Ford’s car would establish a direct wireless connection with a speeding car and then send a message to its dashboard indicating that it’s going too fast and has been spotted. The vehicle would then reply to Ford’s police car informing it of if it was in autonomous mode or being driven by a human.”

A ticket may then be issued to the license of the human driver.

Some tech and science blogs took a glass half full approach to the news, pointing out that automating routine police tasks, such as speeding tickets, may free up human police officers to focus more of their attention on law enforcement tasks that are not so easily interpreted by an algorithm. The overriding sentiment, however, seems to be one of caution, as technologists imagine a world where humans are policed by artificially intelligent automated law enforcers.

Unsurprisingly, Ford Global Technologies CEO Jim Hackett is optimistic about what he describes as a game-changing technology that will transform cities and communities for the better. During a speech at a Las Vegas conference last month, he pontificated about the utopian future humans can expect in the ‘city of tomorrow’:

“The car and the system will be talking to each other. And changing one piece of the system necessarily changes the whole.

“A car obviously is going to learn to drive itself, but the city transportations grid will mutate around what the cars need.

“What we want is the depiction of the city of tomorrow that demonstrates the benefits of introducing these smart vehicles in a smart world for civic life.

“It’s not about the city getting smarter, but about humans having a better day.”

Stephen Edelstein, a writer for The Drive, however, voiced more concern regarding the ethics of automated law enforcement. “The potential pitfalls of machines conducting police work have us feeling especially skeptical about this one.”

While Ford’s patent doesn’t ensure the technology will come to pass, it seems exceedingly likely that the country’s law enforcement agencies and military will soon be embracing the most cutting-edge technologies, which begs the question:

Do AI police cars make you more or less concerned about the future? Let us know in the comments below, which will be moderated by a human editor. (als je dat wilt, even hieronder op 'Anti-Media' klikken, 

Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

Malcolm Turnbull (premier Australië) verzekerd het volk dat er geen arbeidsplaatsen verloren gaan, door vertrek autofabrikant............

Het is de megalomane klootzak Turnbull nu helemaal is de fascistische* bol geslagen, deze hufter reageerde op de aankondiging van een derde autofabrikant, Holden, de fabriek in Australië te sluiten........

BBC World Service meldde dit vanmorgen en liet de reactie van Turnbull horen, zoals deze het volk in feite toesprak. Volgens de enorme leugenaar Turnbull zal deze sluiting geen banen kosten en zal het de industriële activiteit in Australië niet aantasten, dat geldt wat hem betreft ook voor de eerdere sluiting van twee van deze fabrieken, t.w. die van Ford en Toyota......... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uiteraard zal ook deze sluiting een groot aantal arbeidsplekken kosten, ofwel een groot aantal mensen extra zal op de keien staan....... Voorts zijn er dan nog de toeleveranciers die veelal gebonden zijn aan een dergelijke fabriek, die werkloos zullen worden........ Zo'n 50.000 mensen verliezen hun baan, als de laatste autofabriek is gesloten........ Een aantal waarin de zojuist genoemde banen buiten die fabrieken, die van toeleveranciers e.d., niet eens zijn meegerekend......

Dient nog wel opgemerkt te worden dat deze fabrieken werden gesloten, daar de Australische regering besloot niet langer subsidies te verstrekken aan deze fabrieken.............

* Zogenaamd van een liberale partij, de Liberal Party. Echter als je ziet hoe Turnbull omgaat met vluchtelingen, kan je niet anders concluderen dan dat hij een fascist is...... Iets waaraan meer liberale partijen zich schuldig maken.......

WOII >> geallieerden waren wel op de hoogte van de nazi-Duitse doodskampen!!! Collaboratie van de VS en GB met de nazi's.......

Op 5 mei ontving ik een artikel van Information Clearing House (ICH) over de rol van de VS en GB tijdens WOII en dan m.n. de wetenschap bij de geallieerden over de doodskampen van nazi-Duitsland......

Na decennialange weigering, heeft de VN eindelijk het archief vrijgegeven van een oorlogsmisdaden commissie die de Europese archieven over de holocaust door de nazi's tijdens WOII onderzocht. Londen en Washington hebben het vrijgeven van dit archief jarenlang proberen tegen te houden.

Niet zo vreemd als je bedenkt dat uit de vrijgegeven documenten blijkt dat er een geheime band bestond tussen de regeringen van de VS en Groot-Brittannië met de leiders van nazi-Duitsland........

Uit de documenten blijkt verder dat de geallieerden al ver voor het eind van WOII op de hoogte waren van de nazi-vernietigingskampen, iets dat men na die oorlog altijd ontkende......

Voorts werpen de documenten meer licht op de weigering van de geallieerden een front in het westen te openen, zodat de Russen enigszins konden worden ontzet. Niet zo vreemd, daar men de 'communisten' weliswaar zag als partner in de strijd tegen de nazi's, maar men een bijna even grondige afkeer had van de zogenaamd communistische Sovjet Unie.......

Ook nog eens aandacht voor de goede banden van VS multinationals met nazi-Duitsland, waar deze bedrijven fiks hadden geïnvesteerd in o.a. IG Farben, de fabrikant van Zyklon B, het gas waarmee de joden werden vermoord. Firma's als Ford, IBM (niet genoemd in het artikel), ITT (speelde later een rol in de smerige CIA staatsgreep tegen het Chileense bewind van Allende op 11 september 1973), GM en Du Pont investeerden zwaar in Duitse bedrijven als het hiervoor genoemde IG Farben (waar ook nazi-prins Bernhard, voor werkte, Bernhard, de zelf gedroomde Nederlandse stadhouder van Hitler...), Krupp Stahl en Daimler........

Verder kan u lezen over de inspanningen van de geallieerden na WOII, om nazi's Duitsland uit te smokkelen.

De schrijver ziet terecht een overeenkomst met de huidige tijd, waarin Rusland wordt gedemoniseerd, terwijl de NAVO agressief aan haar grens staat.....

Lezen mensen! U kunt desgewenst onder het ICH artikel klikken voor een 'Dutch vertaling':

The Deep History of US, Britain’s Never-Ending Cold War On Russia

By Finian Cunningham

May 04, 2017 "Information Clearing House" - After decades of delaying, the United Nations finally released archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust. The source of those archives on Nazi war crimes were Western governments, including those in exile at the time of the war, such as the Belgian, Polish and Czechoslovakian. The time period covered is 1943-1949. Washington and London had long sought to halt the release. Why?

Notably, the landmark publication of the files last month was given scant Western media coverage. Surprisingly, perhaps, because the story that can be gleaned from the documents tells of a hidden history of the Second World War, namely the systematic collusion between the American and British governments and the Nazi Third Reich.

As a report in Deutsche Welle remarked on the released archives: «The files make clear that [Western] Allied forces knew more about the Nazi concentration camp system before the end of the war than has generally been thought».

This revelation points to more than just «knowledge» among the Western allies of Nazi-era crimes; it points more damningly to state collusion. This would also explain why Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

There has long been a controversial debate among Western nations about why the US and Britain in particular did not do more to bomb the Nazi infrastructure of death camps and railroads. Washington and London have often made the claim that they did know the full extent of the horror being perpetrated by the Nazis until the very end of the war when extermination centers such as at Auschwitz and Treblinka were liberated – by the Soviet Red Army, it should be noted too.

However, what the latest release of UN Holocaust files shows is that Washington and London were indeed well aware of the Nazi Final Solution in which millions of European Jews and Slavic people were being systematically worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers. So the question again is: why did the US and Britain not direct more of their aerial bombing campaign to destroy the Nazi infrastructure?

One possible answer is that these Western allies had a callous disregard for the Nazi victims. Washington and London establishments were themselves accused of harboring antisemitic prejudices, as can be seen from the scandals when both these governments spurned thousands of European Jewish refugees during the Second World War, in effect sending many of them to their deaths under the Nazi regime.

Not excluding the above factor of Western racist insouciance, there is a second more disturbing factor. That the Western governments, or at least powerful sections, were loath to hamper the Nazi war effort against the Soviet Union. Notwithstanding that the Soviet Union was a nominal «ally» of the West for the defeat of Nazi Germany.

This perspective harks to a radically different conception of the Second World War in contrast to that narrated in official Western versions. In this alternative historical account, the rise of the Nazi Third Reich was deliberately fomented by American and British rulers as a bulwark in Europe against the spread of communism. Adolf Hitler’s rabid anti-Semitism was matched only by his detest of Marxism and the Slavic people of the Soviet Union. In the Nazi ideology, they were all «Untermenschen» (subhumans) to be exterminated in a «Final Solution».

So, when Nazi Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and carrying out its Final Solution from June 1941 until late 1944, little wonder then that the US and Britain showed a curious reluctance to commit their military forces fully to open up a Western Front. The Western allies were evidently content to see the Nazi war machine doing what it was originally intended to do: to destroy the primary enemy to Western capitalism as represented by the Soviet Union. This is not to say that all American and British political leaders shared or were even aware of this tacit strategic vision. Leaders like President Franklin Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill appeared to be genuinely committed to defeating Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, their individual views must be set against a background of systematic collusion between powerful Western corporate interests and Nazi Germany.

As American author David Talbot documented in his book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA and the Rise of America’s Secret Government (2015), there were massive financial links between Wall Street and the Third Reich, going back several years before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Allen Dulles, who worked for the Wall Street law firm Sullivan and Cromwell and who later headed up the American Central Intelligence Agency, was a key player in the linkage between US capital and German industry. American industrial giants, such as Ford, GM, ITT and Du Pont were invested heavily in German industrial counterparts like IG Farben (manufacturer of Zyklon B, the poisonous gas used in the Holocaust), Krupp Steel and Daimler. American capital, as well as British, was thus integrated into the Nazi war machine and the latter’s dependence on the system of slave labor as provided by the Final Solution.

This would explain why the Western allies did so little to disrupt the Nazi infrastructure with their undoubted formidable aerial bombing capacity. Far more damning than mere inertia or indifference owing to racist prejudice towards the Nazi victims, what emerges is that the Americans and British capitalist elite were invested in the Third Reich. Mainly for the purpose of eliminating the Soviet Union and any kind of genuinely socialist global movement. Bombing Nazi infrastructure would have been tantamount to deleting Western assets.

To this end, as the war was drawing to a close and the Soviet Union looked poised to roll up the Third Reich singlehandedly, the Americans and British belatedly stepped up their war efforts from western and southern Europe. The goal was one of salvaging Western assets remaining in the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles, the director of the-soon-to-be-formed American Central Intelligence Agency, extricated top Nazis and their gold looted from Europe in secret surrender deals known as Operation Sunrise. Britain’s military intelligence MI6 was also involved in the clandestine American effort to salvage Nazi assets via ratlines. The bad faith on display to the Soviet «allies» heralded the chill of the ensuing Cold War that immediately followed the Second World War.

Significant and damning testimony of what was going down was given recently in a BBC interview by Ben Ferencz, the most senior surviving US prosecutor from the Nuremberg trials. At age 98, Ferencz was still able to lucidly recall how scores of Nazi war criminals were let off the hook by the American and British authorities. Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy». Patton’s candid expression of deeper animosity towards the Soviet Union than towards Nazi Germany was consistent with how the US and British ruling class had been colluding with Hitler’s Third Reich in a geo-strategic war against the Soviet Union and worker-led socialist movements arising across Europe and America.

In other words, the Cold War which the US and Britain embarked on after 1945 was but a continuation of hostile policy towards Moscow that was already underway well before the Second World War erupted in 1939 in the form of a build up of Nazi Germany. For various reasons, it became expedient for the Western powers to liquidate the Nazi war machine, along with the Soviet Union. But as can be seen, the Western assets residing in the Nazi machine were recycled into American and British Cold War posture against the Soviet Union. It is a truly damning legacy that American and British military intelligence agencies were consolidated and financed by Nazi crimes.

The recent release of UN Holocaust files – in spite of American and British prevarication over many years – add more evidence to the historical analysis that these Western powers were deeply complicit in the monumental crimes of the Nazi Third Reich. They knew about these crimes because they had helped facilitate them. And the complicity stemmed from Western hostility towards Russia as a perceived geopolitical rival.

This is not a mere historical academic exercise. Western complicity with Nazi Germany also finds a corollary in the present-day ongoing hostility from Washington, Britain and their NATO allies towards Moscow. The relentless build up of NATO offensive forces around Russia’s borders, the endless Russophobia in Western propagandistic news media, the economic blockade in the form of sanctions based on tenuous claims, are all deeply rooted in history.

The West’s Cold War towards Moscow preceded the Second World War, continued after the defeat of Nazi Germany and persists to this day regardless of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists. Why? Because Russia is a perceived rival to Anglo-American capitalist hegemony, as is China or any other emerging power that undermines that desired unipolar hegemony.

American-British collusion with Nazi Germany finds its modern-day manifestation in NATO collusion with the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine and jihadist terror groups dispatched in proxy wars against Russian interests in Syria and elsewhere. The players may change over time, but the root pathology is American-British capitalism and its hegemonic addiction.

The never-ending Cold War will only end when Anglo-American capitalism is finally defeated and replaced by a genuinely more democratic system.

This article was first published by SCF -

Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.

==================

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Ferencz en D. Talbot. Heb ook het label 'Bayer' toegevoegd, de gentech gifmenger maakte tijdens WOII gebruik van concentratiekampgevangenen voor medicijnproeven. Gegarandeerd dat ook in dat bedrijf 'westers kapitaal' werd geïnvesteerd......