De Bauers: bestemming onbekend. Houden zo en niet meer over lullen!

Kwam afgelopen week in het tv menu het programma 'De Bauers: bestemming onbekend' tegen...... Zou zeggen: lekker laten gaan, vooral geen cameraploeg mee en laat ze ajb wegblijven!! Graag een permanent inreisverbod! (ben normaal gesproken tegen zo'n verbod, maar wil in dit geval graag een uitzondering maken)

Gottegot 'wat lijkt me dat leuk', gedver!!

Laat ze ajb wegblijven en daarna vooral niet meer over lullen, want je weet het: geen slapende honden wakker maken.......

Heb het label 'humor' toegevoegd, daar het overduidelijk is dat e.e.a. leuk bedoeld is, wat het natuurlijk niet is, als je een dergelijk programma leuk vindt, is er iets totaal mis met je gevoel voor humor. (alleen die belachelijke foto al, bah!!)

Koenders waar blijft uw commentaar? >> VN-Vrouwenrechten Commissie met o.a. als lid....... Saoedi-Arabië!! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Dat de VN in feite een failliete club is (wat betreft haar taken) is voor dacht ik niemand nog een geheim. Om dit ten overvloede nog eens te bevestigen, werd Saoedi-Arabië in een geheime stemming voorgedragen, als lid van een nieuwe commissie die de status van de vrouw in de gaten moet houden en vrouwenrechten zal propageren.......... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Nadat deze enorme mensenrechtenschendende dictatuur werd verkozen tot voorzitter van de VN-Mensenrechtenorganisatie (UNHRC), mag dit land, dat wat betreft vrouwenrechten wereldwijd ergens onderaan bungelt, nu dus meepraten over  deze rechten in de VN-Vrouwenrechten Commissie (UNWRC)......... Benieuwd hoe groot het aantal 'VN mannen' was, die voor Saoedi-Arabië hebben gekozen.........

U had al wel begrepen, dat de wanpresterend minister van BuZa, PvdA sierdrol Koenders, doodstil is over deze uitermate schunnige keuze, zoals hij dit ook was over de keuze van de VN, Saoedi-Arabië voorzitter van de VN-Mensenrechtenorganisatie te maken....... (S-A, de dictatuur waar men zo ongeveer de grootste schurft heeft aan mensenrechten.....)

Wat een zootje mensen......

Niet getreurd: Care2 is een petitie begonnen, hier de tekst en de mogelijkheid tot tekenen. Lees de tekst en teken deze a.u.b. en geeft het door!! (onder het volgende artikel nog een opmerking over de Belgische ambassadeur bij de VN, Reynders, die 'per ongeluk' voor toelating van S-A stemde.)

Don't Allow Saudi Arabia on
UN Women's Rights Commission!

The United Nations (UN) is doing something commendable: it has decided to establish a new Commission on the Status of Women as part of its work to promote women's rights. This group will be the main global body that is "exclusively dedicated to the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women." But then something alarming happened to ruin it all. In a secret vote, members of the UN decided to elect Saudi Arabia to serve on the new women's rights panel.

Sign Julie's petition to reverse this decision and remove Saudi Arabia from the commission!

This is a country with an absolutely horrific record on women's rights, which continues to oppress women in many ways to this day. The Saudi Arabian government bans women from driving cars and arrests those who protest this law. Even more frighteningly, every woman in Saudi Arabia is required to have a male guardian who makes all critical decisions about her life for her, from birth until death

This is unacceptable. Please sign to demand the reversal of the decision to add Saudia Arabia to the UN women's rights council!

Reverse Decision to Allow Saudi Arabia on UN Women's Rights Commission!

After a secret vote was held, the UN has elected Saudi Arabia to a UN women's rights commission. Saudi Arabia is a country that an absolutely horrific record on women's rights and continues to oppress women in many ways.


The Executive Director of United Nations Watch, Hillel Neuer, may have said it best: “Electing Saudi Arabia to protect women’s rights is like making an arsonist into the town fire chief." 


Saudi Arabia bans women from driving cars and arrests those who protest the law. Women in Saudi Arabia must have a male guardian who makes all critical decisions on her behalf, from birth until death. 
Saudi Arabia, a top U.S. ally, is also on the U.N. Human Rights Council.


The UN Commission on the Status of Women says on its website that it is "exclusively dedicated to the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women." 


This is unacceptable. Please sign to demand the reversal of the decision to add Saudia Arabia to the UN women's rights council!

Sign Julie's petition to reverse this decision and remove Saudi Arabia from the commission!

========================

Vanmorgen in het BNR mediaoverzicht het bericht dat de Belgische ambassadeur bij de VN, Didier Reynders in de geheime stemming voor Saoedi-Arabië heeft gekozen, hij twijfelde nog en zou daarover contact hebben gehad met het thuisfront........ In eerste instantie, toen Reyners werd geconfronteerd met de uitkomst van de stemming, dat Saoedi-Arabië zou worden toegelaten tot de VN-Vrouwenrechtencommissie, zei hij verrast te zijn over die toelating....

CD&V* voorzitter Els van Hoof vond 't nodig Reynders te beschermen Zij stelde dat de diplomaat in de val van Trump was getrapt. Trump wil met die toelating van S-A aantonen, dat deze VN Vrouwenrechten Commissie ongeloofwaardig is, aldus van Hoof.... Het was van Hoof nog niet opgevallen, dat Trump uitstekende relaties heeft met S-A, zo zijn de burgers van deze dictatuur uitgesloten van de beperking op toelating tot de VS, een beperking die tot nu toe werd afgewezen door rechters (zoals één van Hawaï), terwijl de meeste terroristen waar de VS zogenaamd de pik op heeft, uit datzelfde S-A komen.......

* CD&V, de Vlaamse christendemocraten, zusterpartij van het CDA, die samen in de EVP fractie van het EU parlement zitten.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: CD&V, E. Van Hoof, Neuer, D. Reynders en UNWRC,

Gorbatsjov: de wereld maakt zich klaar voor WOIII

De ex-president van Rusland, of beter gezegd de Sovjet-Unie, Gorbatsjov, liet afgelopen januari weten, dat de wereld zich opmaakt voor oorlog. De redactie van Anti-Media zocht daar aanwijzingen voor en vond er 5, die op 1 maart jl. werden gepubliceerd:

5 Signs We’re Headed Toward a Major War

5 Signs We’re Headed Toward a Major War

(ANTIMEDIA) In January of this year, former Soviet Union leader Mikhail Gorbachev warned that the whole world is preparing for war. There are many indicators that back up Gorbachev’s assertion, but to discuss them in their entirety would take a dissertation or two. Instead, we have put together a list of the five most obvious signs of impending war currently being overlooked by the media. As a result of these oversights, the public is also missing them.

1. Travel Ban

The Trump administration’s travel ban, which targeted seven majority-Muslim nations, makes little sense in the context of fighting international terrorism. A Department of Homeland Security report already found no evidence of any extra threat posed by the nations on the travel ban. 

Conversely, a Saudi official has admitted Saudi Arabia’s longstanding practice of supporting terrorism as a political tool, yet Saudi Arabia managed to escape the list. So did Turkey, a country that has extensively aided ISIS fighters; Qatar, which has spent immense amounts of money arming fanatical jihadists; the United Arab Emirates (where the majority of the funding for the 9/11 attacks passed through), and the list goes on.

Instead, the travel ban was purely political. With help from the anti-Trump media establishment, the ban worked wonders separating the American public between those who oppose Trump’s every move and those who support him wholeheartedly in his quest to “make America great again.” But little attention was paid to the reality of the ban.

Six of the seven countries on Trump’s travel ban were featured in a memo that was adopted shortly after 9/11 that detailed how the U.S. was going to topple the governments of seven countries, as exposed by four-star General Wesley Clark. The countries featured on Clark’s list were Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Iran.

Any accusations that Clark’s list is a conspiracy theory are completely debunked by the events of the last two decades. Iraq was invaded in 2003, and the U.S. has been backing warlords in Somalia and bombing the country for some time now. The Pentagon is reportedly considering expanding U.S. involvement in the African nation. Israel was eager to take out Lebanon in 2006 but failed to do so, though Israel warned just last year that the next encounter with Lebanon will be “ferocious” and “terrible.” U.S. troops are on the ground in Sudan. Libya was destroyed in 2011, which paved the way for the transfer of weapons and fighters into Syria, a country bound to Iran by a mutual defense agreement.

In the context of Trump’s travel ban, Lebanon is replaced by Yemen, the latest addition to the playbook amid fears that an insurgency within Yemen could place an Iranian-aligned government on Saudi Arabia’s border.

Including Iran in the travel ban — despite the fact Iran is not currently embroiled in a major civil conflict of its own, is not currently bombing any other countries, and is one of the major partners in the fight against ISIS — demonstrates something more sinister at play than mere concerns regarding international terrorism.

2. Trump’s anti-Iran rhetoric

The Obama administration, having successfully taken out Libya in 2011, was tasked with finishing the job in Syria and toppling the Assad regime. Overwhelming support for Syrian rebels battling the Syrian government was replaced by urgent calls to intervene directly in 2013, but Obama failed to gain international and public support for airstrikes on the Syrian government. Russia diplomatically put its hand up to offer a different proposal altogether, also warning that “[they] have [their] plans” should the American military decide to strike Syria as Obama intended. Any speculation that the real focus of the Syrian war was aimed at Iran was proven to be not just mere conjecture; Obama immediately thereafter warned Iran that just because the U.S. did not attack Syria did not mean the U.S. wouldn’t still strike Iran over its alleged nuclear program.

The Russian military intervened overtly in Syria in 2015, which only further foiled Washington’s plans for regime change in the country, as admitted by former Secretary of State John Kerry in a leaked audio recording.

As such, the Trump administration has appeared to move the focus away from Syria and directly back to Iran, in line George W. Bush’s approach when he was in office.

Trump has assembled a team that is “obsessed with Iran” and has accused Iran of being the biggest state sponsor of terrorism. Theresa May, the prime minister of the United Kingdom, also stated that pushing back on “Iran’s aggressive efforts” to increase its “arc of influence from Tehran through to the Mediterranean” was a “priority.” Trump was likely thrilled by these statements, as May successfully secured 100 percent support for NATO from Trump the next day.

Following an Iranian missile launch, the Trump administration officially put “Iran on notice.” The U.S. government wanted to make sure the Iranians “understood we are not going to sit by and not act on their actions.”

Just this past month, Trump warned in a tweet that Iran was “playing with fire,” and he vowed he would not be anywhere near as “kind” as his predecessor was to Iran. This is important because Trump has accused Iran of breaching its obligations under the nuclear agreement, though the nuclear agreement does not prohibit non-nuclear tests.

The nuclear deal reached in 2015 was viewed as one of Obama’s greatest diplomatic achievements, but in reality, it was doomed to fail right from the start. In the same way Libya was coaxed out of rapidly advancing its weapons programs before being bombed back into the Middle Ages in 2011, it may be the case that this diplomatic approach to Iran was always a smokescreen to give the United States more ‘reasoned’ leverage when attempting to convince the international arena that a strike on Iran was justified.

As outlined in the book “Which Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran”:

“For those who favor regime change or a military attack on Iran (either by the United States or Israel), there is a strong argument to be made for trying this option first. Inciting regime change in Iran would be greatly assisted by convincing the Iranian people that their government is so ideologically blinkered that it refuses to do what is best for the people and instead clings to a policy that could only bring ruin on the country. The ideal scenario in this case would be that the United States and the international community present a package of positive inducements so enticing that the Iranian citizenry would support the deal, only to have the regime reject it. In a similar vein, any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context – both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer – one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down.” [emphasis added]

By claiming that through its missile tests Iran is violating a deal that Trump never supported to begin with, he can lay the groundwork for an all-out confrontation with Iran that could garner support from the international community, as well as the misinformed American public.

3. Iran dumps dollar

Currency is a major driving factor behind the wars of our generation. Iraq reportedly gave up the U.S. dollar in 2000 for the euro and netted a “handsome profit” for doing so. The U.S. military invaded in 2003 and immediately switched oil sales in Iraq from the euro back to the dollar. Iraq was also under heavy U.S. sanctions that spanned the course of at least a decade prior to the invasion.

Comparatively, in response to Trump’s anti-Iran rhetoric and the travel ban, Iran officially dumped the U.S. dollar. Iran has also been on the receiving end of sanctions since the Bush administration, and Trump has slapped fresh sanctions on Iran over the missile tests.

In the lead up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, our television sets were rife with an unprecedented amount of disinformation regarding Iraq’s nuclear program and the threat it posed to the world. Conversely, Israel has been crying wolf over Iran’s nuclear program for at least two decades, yet no actual evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program has been produced.

The Trump administration also accused Iran of attacking a U.S. navy vessel – an attack that never took place.

Make no mistake. The Trump administration is laying the groundwork for a war with Iran by sowing the anti-Iranian seeds necessary to take the American public into another dangerous war in the Middle East.

4. Syria

While Trump appeared at first to have heralded a new approach to the Syrian conflict, namely that Assad should be left alone and the real focus of American foreign policy should be on defeating ISIS, the Trump administration is stepping up its Syria operation behind the curtains. Trump is reportedly planning to send troops to Syria, and he is not the only external power doing so. Iran’s regional arch-rival Saudi Arabia, which has incessantly accused Tehran of backing rebels in neighboring Yemen without producing any real evidence, is also reportedly sending troops into Syria.

Iranian-backed regime troops will not look favorably on any foreign invading force, particularly Saudi troops. Saudi Arabia has already made it clear that it intends to liberate areas of Syria from ISIS and will be on the ground to ensure that “liberated areas [do] not fall under the control of Hizballah, Iran or the regime.”

How far will they go to ensure this? Not to mention, how can one country go into another and say that they want to ensure that the land does not fall back into the hands of the people governing that country?

5. Military drills and military alliances

The United States and the United Kingdom have already begun military drills that simulate a potential conflict with Iran. As reported by Russian-state owned news site RT, Iran has staged a “massive” military drill of its own, spanning 2 million square kilometers.

This preparation for war can be seen across the globe. Russia is also holding military drills as NATO troops and tanks encroach upon its border. Iran is seeking even closer military relations with Russia and North Korea. The Baltic states that border Russia are running drills, too, supposedly out of fear that the Kremlin will invade. Russia’s longstanding ally, China, is also currently running drills for its own geostrategic purposes.

Germany is reportedly seeking to increase its troop numbers to 200,000 troops even though such a move may put its neighbors on edge. The Philippines, having decided to give the political middle finger to the United States and instead forge closer relations with Russia and China, welcomed Russian warships to its shores in January of this year.

Looking at these military drills and alliances in the context of the above developments paints a very grim picture for where humanity is headed.

***

War with Iran: too unthinkable?

The only rational criticism pundits have given regarding Anti-Media’s previous warnings of war is that because a war with Iran would be so unthinkable, the Trump administration would never be so reckless as to pursue it. Critics who hold such a view always neglect two very important points: firstly, the United States under the Obama administration was vehemently opposed to the Assad regime in Syria. The previous U.S. administration resorted to directly targeting Syrian troops in the middle of what was supposed to be a peace process, all with full knowledge that the Assad regime is bound to Iran by a mutual defense agreement. Secondly, America’s Middle Eastern power, Israel, has also attacked Syria multiple times since 2011, targeting Iranian military personnel and their proxies.

Those who think a war with Iran is unthinkable cannot answer the question: what if Iran were to respond directly?

Think of it like the current to and fro between Floyd Mayweather and UFC champion Conor McGregor. The two sides talk tough and attempt to provoke each other to set the mood for the current conflict. Plenty of speculation occurs about whether one side is bluffing and whether or not the fight could possibly occur in the near future. There is even the idea that such a fight would be so disastrous for one of the sides (or both) that there is nothing to gain from pursuing it.

But all it takes is one wrong move; one reckless, cowardly, ill-advised decision from either side and the entire Middle Eastern powder keg could explode.

Trump ordered a raid on Yemen that even war hawk Barack Obama disapproved of because it was deemed too risky, and the raid was an instant failure that killed multiple civilians. This is the same president who turns down dinners because he cannot face the torment of the liberal media and instead forms his opinions from Fox News before taking to Twitter.

It is not unreasonable to expect the worst.

Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

========================

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

White Helmets oorlogsporno geweerd van Oscarceremonie

Het volgende bericht over de 'White Helmets' vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke. Zoals hier al vaker betoogd: deze 'White Helmets' is een organisatie, die de 'gematigde rebellen' (lees: psychopathische moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen) steunt en een uitermate smerig propagandaspel speelt.

Dit geteisem wordt in woord gesteund door de reguliere westerse (massa-) media en politici, waarbij de laatsten de 'White Helmets' ook financieel steunen........ Zo steunen o.a. Nederland, Denemarken, de VS en Groot-Brittannië deze terroristische organisatie, die werd opgezet door een Britse ex-legerofficier..........

Een documentaire over de White Helmets is genomineerd voor een Oscar, echter door de wil van 'Het Beest' (Trump) is het onzeker of de maker van de documentaire en de leider van de 'White Helmets' aanwezig kunnen zijn, bij de uitreiking van de Oscars.

Een verslag van Vanessa Beeley:

White Helmet ‘War Porn’ Stars Banned from Oscars Ceremony

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 BY VANESSA BEELEY 2 COMMENTS

21st Century Wire says…

An unexpected silver lining to the cloud of Trump’s visa ban, came to light a few days ago when it was announced that the White Helmet representatives would not be permitted entry into the US, under the new legislation that will be enforced for the next ninety days. The multi million dollar, NATO and Gulf state funded, pseudo humanitarian, Nusra Front aka Al Qaeda “civil defence” group, has, yet again, been thwarted, in its quest for red carpet honour and recognition.

The following is a report from RT:

Two members of the controversial White Helmets organization that operates in Syria have been barred from attending the Academy Awards, the producer of a documentary featuring the NGO said. The film has been nominated for an Oscar.

White Helmets leader Raed Saleh and cinematographer Khaled Khateeb, both Syrian, were invited to the 2017 Academy Awards by Joanna Natasegara, the producer of a short documentary about the organization available on Netflix. The documentary film ‘The White Helmets’ has been nominated for an Oscar, along with four other contestants.

Natasegara expressed her outrage over the new development in a statement:

“They’ve been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize,” she said. “These people are the bravest humanitarians on the planet, and the idea that they could not be able to come with us and enjoy that success is just abhorrent.”

The travel ban for seven predominantly Muslim countries imposed by US President Donald Trump last week also affected acclaimed Iranian filmmaker Asghar Farhadi, whose film The Salesman is nominated in the Foreign Language category, and Syrian woman Hala Kamil, the subject of Watani: My Homeland, another nomination for the short documentary award.

This is not the first time Saleh has been banned from entering the United States. In April 2016, he had to return to Istanbul after discovering that his visa had been cancelled by the US. This prevented him from receiving an award in Washington at a gala party supported by White Helmets sponsor USAID.

The White Helmets, who also call themselves the Syrian Civil Defense, have been touted as a non-political aid organization focused on saving lives in war-torn Syria. The Oscar-nominated documentary depicts them in line with that narrative.

Critics say it is a foreign-funded propaganda vehicle closely aligned with Islamist militant groups opposing the Syrian government. Members of the group have been accused of stealing vehicles, rescue equipment, and its very name from the government-run Syrian Civil Defense, an organization with a decades-long record of rescue operations in Syria.

The following is a film produced by Steve Ezzedine of Hands Off Syria, Sydney exposing the Netflix documentary as a propaganda vehicle for this Al Qaeda support group:

SEE: http://21stcenturywire.com/2017/02/03/white-helmet-war-porn-stars-banned-from-oscars-ceremony/

***

LINKS & MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE WHITE HELMETS:

Original investigative report: 
The REAL Syria Civil Defence Exposes Fake White Helmets as Terrorist-Linked Imposters

White Helmets: ‘A Pseudo NGO’CrossTalk: ‘White Helmets, Really?’ with Vanessa Beeley, Eva Bartlett & Patrick Henningsen

Report by Patrick HenningsenAN INTRODUCTION: Smart Power & The Human Rights Industrial Complex

Open Letter by Vanessa BeeleyWhite Helmets Campaign for War NOT Peace – Retract RLA & Nobel Peace Prize Nominations

Staged Rescue Videos(VIDEO) White Helmets: Miraculous ‘Rag Doll Rescue’

Mainstream Media: Fake News
CNN’s Claim That ‘White Helmets Center in Damascus’ Was Hit by a Barrel Bomb

White Helmets and Mayday Rescue:
The Syrian Civil Defence: Wikipedia

21st Century Wire compilation of key information on the White Helmets:
Who are the Syria White Helmets?

21st Century Wire article on the White Helmets:  
Syria’s White Helmets: War by Way of Deception ~ the “Moderate” Executioners

Cory Morningstar report:
Investigation into the funding sources of the White Helmets, Avaaz, Purpose, The Syria Campaign

Report by Scott Ritter:The ‘White Helmets’ and the Inherent Contradiction of America’s Syria Policy

Open letter to Canada’s NDP Leader on Nobel Prize:Letter to NDP from Prof. John Ryan protesting White Helmet nomination for RLA and Nobel Peace Prize

White Helmets: Bogus Claims:
‘We Saved 60,000’ – Bogus Claim by Syria’s White Helmets Raises Even More Questions

READ MORE SYRIA NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Syria Files

SUPPORT 21WIRE and its work by Subscribing and becoming a Member @ 21WIRE.TV 

=================

Zie ook: 'White Helmets terreurgroep wordt vandaag met open armen ontvangen in Tweede Kamer.....' (zie ook de andere 'White Helmets links' in dat bericht)

        en: 'Nederland financiert terrorisme in Syrië........'

        en: 'White Helmets >> terreurorganisatie, opgezet door Brits ex-officier en o.a. betaald door Nederland............'

        en: 'Aleppo, getuigenissen uit het bevrijde oostelijk deel van die stad'

        en: 'Avaaz haalt 1 miljoen op voor terreurorganisatie Witte Helmen.... ha! ha! ha! Nu nog een inzameling voor ISIS!!!' (zie en klik ook op de links, in dat bericht!)

        en: 'Oost-Aleppo: de leugens van de reguliere media, Rutte 2, de Tweede Kamer en 'deskundigen' doorgeprikt middels een VN missie!!'

        en: 'Palmyra (Syrië) heroverd door IS troepen uit Irak >> verzwegen smeerlapperij........'

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Ezzedine, Khateeb, Natasgara, Oscarceremonie en R. Saleh.

Asscher: de VS is 'the land of the free......' ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Gistermiddag, tijdens de demonstratie op het Haagse Malieveld tegen Trumps inreisverbod voor moslims, sprak ook de hypocriete PvdA volksverlakker Asscher.

Waar is Asscher als Israël de Palestijnen steeds verder terugdringt op een krimpend stuk West Bank en hen de toegang ontzegt op hun eigen (landbouw-) grond, of weigert Palestijnen toegang te geven tot Israël, waar die Palestijnen bij de stichting van deze apartheidsstaat, met veel geweld werden verdreven uit hun land? Waar is Asscher als Israël de zoveelste slachting onder Palestijnen aanricht in de Gazastrook??

Waar was Asscher toen Obama ook een moslim inreisverbod gebood in 2011, 2015 en 2016???

Asscher noemde in z'n hypocriete toespraak de VS 'the land of the free.......' ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

De vrijheid van de VS overheid en geheime diensten, om de vrijheid van de burgers in dat gestolen land in hoog tempo af te breken en hen onderdeel te maken van continue screening via computerinbraak en het afluisteren van de telefoon. Kortom de vrijheid om de privacy van de burgers tot de grond toe af te breken.......

De vrijheid om werknemers uit te buiten, zodat veel van deze VS arbeiders zelfs aan 2 banen niet genoeg hebben om rond te kunnen komen.......

De vrijheid om mensen (en hele gezinnen) op straat te donderen, zonder voor vervangende huisvesting te zorgen..........

De vrijheid om zoveel mogelijk te voorkomen, dat de grote kansarme groep in de VS gaat stemmen...... (in de VS zijn bijvoorbeeld meer dan 50 miljoen burgers afhankelijk van voedselbonnen......)

De vrijheid om bij verdenking van terrorisme mensen (ook VS burgers) voor onbepaalde tijd vast te zetten, zonder enige vorm van proces, een door Obama getekende wet!!

De vrijheid om mensen te verbieden nog langer te demonstreren tegen overheidsmaatregelen. In een paar staten mogen automobilisten demonstranten op de snelweg omver rijden, waarna deze automobilisten niet vervolgd zullen worden.......

De vrijheid van de overheid om haat- en angst te zaaien tegen/voor minderheden als moslims........

De vrijheid om hele gebieden onleefbaar te maken middels schalie-olie- en schaliegaswinning...... Hetzelfde geldt overigens voor zeeën, neem de Golf van Mexico........

De vrijheid om steenkool tegen dumpprijzen af te zetten op de wereld markt en kolencentrales te bouwen in ontwikkelingslanden en daarmee de klimaatverandering nog verder aan te jagen......

De vrijheid om (particuliere) gevangenissen vol te proppen met gekleurde mensen........

De vrijheid om wapens te leveren aan 'gematigde rebellen' (lees: psychopathische moordenaars en verkrachters) en iedereen die maar wapens wil kopen (zolang een dictatuur pro VS is, kan deze rekenen op wapens uit en training van de VS....)....

De vrijheid om verdachten waar dan ook te ontvoeren en zonder proces te gijzelen, dan wel standrechtelijk te laten executeren middels drones of 'een gewone moord', bijvoorbeeld middels een ongeluk.......

De vrijheid van de VS overheid, om schijt te hebben aan mensenrechten........

Om over alle andere vrijheden die de VS zichzelf in het buitenland heeft toegeëigend, nog maar te zwijgen, neem de illegale oorlogen die de VS heeft gevoerd en voert, of de vele door de VS opgezette opstanden en staatsgrepen..........

De VS 'the land of the free' ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Asscher? ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.