Big
Brother, ofwel deepstate, inclusief media en politiek, zorgt ervoor
dat de burgers in de VS nog het meest begaan zijn met de invasies van
de VS elders, illegale invasies, het begin van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert tegen landen waar het niets, maar dan ook helemaal niets te
zoeken heeft.
De
enorme berg leugens die de VS al heeft gebruikt om haar
grootschalige terreur te legitimeren, wordt er als het ware door de
reguliere massamedia ingestampt bij de bevolking..... Het gaat
intussen al zover dat er een 'feitenchecker'* is ingesteld, te weten
Politifact, dat is een platform waar veel VS burgers 'hun licht opsteken' over het
gaande nieuws. Wat die burgers niet weten is dat die 'feitenchecker' in feite is geïnstalleerd om de leugens in de reguliere media, van meer
gewicht te voorzien, zodat iedereen die leugens gelooft en blijft geloven......
Voor
alle leugens over de illegale VS oorlogen die de reguliere media
brachten over Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië, heeft bij mijn weten niet één
mediaorgaan een rectificatie gemaakt, alsof het de normaalste zaak is
te blijven liegen en dat over oorlogen waarin alleen deze eeuw al 2,5 miljoen mensen werden vermoord...... Het is dan ook niet vreemd dat miljoenen in
de VS en de EU nog steeds geloven dat Saddam Hoessein
massavernietigingswapens had, terwijl dat aantoonbaar niet zo
was.....
Het smerige is dat met een beetje 'geluk' deze leugens in de geschiedenisboeken worden opgenomen, waar al een fiks aantal leugens is te vinden (neem bijvoorbeeld nogmaals de leugens over de aanvallen van de VS en haar oorlogshond de NAVO op Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië....)
Het smerige is dat met een beetje 'geluk' deze leugens in de geschiedenisboeken worden opgenomen, waar al een fiks aantal leugens is te vinden (neem bijvoorbeeld nogmaals de leugens over de aanvallen van de VS en haar oorlogshond de NAVO op Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië....)
Eric
Zuesse heeft een artikel over o.a. het voorgaande geplaatst op Strategic
Culture Foundation, waarin hij uitgebreid op deze zaak ingaat. De VS
als politieagent van de wereld, i.p.v. de werkelijkheid waarin de VS
de grootste terreurentiteit op onze kleine aarde is en waar deze
vereniging van terreurstaten sinds WOII al meer dan 22,5 miljoen
mensen heeft vermoord.........
Voorts
wijst Zuesse op de VN, een orgaan dat VS president Roosevelt
(overigens ook een oorlogsmisdadiger) graag installeerde, waar hij
dit orgaan zag als een toekomstige onafhankelijke wereldmacht en niet
een door een staat als de VS geleid orgaan, dat overal waar het haar
uitkomt een oorlog begint en waar een niet volgzame houding t.o.v. de VS al voldoende is,
om als land in de gevarenzone te komen.........
Niet
voor niets ook dat Zuesse Oekraïne aanhaalt en de enorme leugens die
daarover al zijn geventileerd, waar het zeker is dat de VS ingreep
met een door de CIA georganiseerde opstand (op initiatief van Hillary Clinton, destijds minister van BuZa in de VS), die moest eindigen in de
coup tegen de democratisch gekozen regering Janoekovytsj, alleen
omdat deze regering vriendschappelijke banden had met Rusland........ (de kosten voor deze operaties in Oekraïne hebben de VS belastingbetalers maar liefst 4 miljard dollar gekost.....) Voorts kon daarmee de gaslevering van Rusland aan West-Europa worden
getorpedeerd, zodat dit deel van Europa haar gas in de VS zou gaan
kopen........
Vandaar ook dat de achterlijke boerenlul Hoekstra, VS ambassadeur in Nederland en kopstukken in de VS (waaronder Trump) een grote bek hebben tegen de EU over het door laten gaan van Nord Stream 2 (NS2), waarmee Russisch gas via een pijpleiding door de Oostzee richting Duitsland zal worden vervoerd...... Er gaan zelfs stemmen op in de VS om de EU en dan m.n. Duitsland daarvoor te straffen.......
Vandaar ook dat de achterlijke boerenlul Hoekstra, VS ambassadeur in Nederland en kopstukken in de VS (waaronder Trump) een grote bek hebben tegen de EU over het door laten gaan van Nord Stream 2 (NS2), waarmee Russisch gas via een pijpleiding door de Oostzee richting Duitsland zal worden vervoerd...... Er gaan zelfs stemmen op in de VS om de EU en dan m.n. Duitsland daarvoor te straffen.......
Pete Hoekstra, VS ambassadeur in Nederland, met zijn typische 'intelligente blik'
Dan dien ik nog op te merken, dat de titel de lading niet dekt,, immers ook wij worden dagelijks voorgelogen en dat over dezelfde grootschalige westerse terreur in gebieden als het Midden-Oosten, dit o.l.v. de VS, terreur die door de reguliere media, ook in ons land, wordt voorgesteld alsof we daar liefdewerk doen.......
Zuesse merkt verder op dat het militair-industrieel complex oorlogen nodig heeft (oké, een open deur), ofwel de VS heeft vijanden nodig zodat de winsten van de wapenindustrie, inclusief die voor rollend, varend en vliegend oorlogstuig, kunnen blijven groeien....... Uiteraard is het dan nodig dat het volk achter deze illegale oorlogen van de VS staat en daar ligt 'een mooie taak' voor de 'onafhankelijke' reguliere massamedia, die hun werk uitermate grondig doen: het hersenspoelen van de VS burgers en hen opzetten tegen de 'vijanden' van de VS, die zogenaamd een gevaar vormen voor de staatsveiligheid van de VS........ (of men stelt gewoon dat een bepaald land zoals eerder Irak [en Noord-Korea] de wil en de middelen heeft om de VS direct aan te vallen; te belachelijk voor woorden, zoals je begrijpt)
Lees het
artikel van Zuesse en geeft het door, tijd dat men ontwaakt uit de
consucoma en de hersenspoelstand van de reguliere media!
How Big Brother Grips Americans’ Minds to Support Invasions
On
November 29th, Gallup headlined “Democrats
Lead Surge in Belief U.S. Should Be World Leader” and
reported that “Three-fourths (75%) of Americans today think the
United States has ‘a special responsibility to be the leading
nation in world affairs,’ up from 66% in 2010. The surge is driven
by Democrats, whose belief in this idea has increased from 61% eight
years ago to 81% now.” This finding comes even after the lie-based
and catastrophic U.S. invasions of Iraq in 2003, and of Libya in 2011
(and of so many others, such as Afghanistan, where the U.S. and
Sauds created
the Taliban in 1979).
Americans — now even increasingly — want ‘their’ (which
is actually
America's billionaires’)
Government to be virtually the world’s government, policing the
world. They want this nation’s Government to be determining what
international laws will be enforced around the world, and to be
enforcing them. Most Americans don’t want the United Nations to
have power over the U.S. (its billionaires’)
Government, but instead want the U.S. Government (its billionaires)
to have power over the United Nations (which didn’t authorize any
of those evil, lie-based, U.S. invasions).
Not
only would doing this bankrupt all constructive domestic functions
(health, education, infrastructure, etc.) of the U.S. federal
Government, but it would also increase the global carnage, as if the
U.S. Government hasn’t already been doing enough of that, for
decades now.
The
leadership for this supremacist craving comes straight from America’s
top, not from the masses that are being sampled by the Gallup
organization, who only reflect it — they are duped by their
leaders. Here is how U.S. President Barack Obama (a Nobel Peace Prize
winner in 2009, for nothing
at all but
his ‘kindly’
but insincere verbiage when
he had been a candidate) stated this widespread delusional American
belief in American global moral supremacy, when addressing the
graduating class at West Point Military Academy, on 28 May 2014:
The
United States is and remains the one indispensable
nation. [Every
other nation is therefore ‘dispensable’; we therefore now have
“Amerika, Amerika über alles, über alles in der Welt”.] That
has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the
century to come. … America must always lead on the world stage.
This
had certainly not been the objective of U.S. President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he set up the U.N. just before his
death in 1945; he instead wanted the U.N. to evolve into a democratic
government of the world, with elected representatives of each and
every one of the world’s governments — to evolve into
becoming the
global international republic —
regardless of whether or not the U.S. Government approves or
disapproves of another nation’s government. The idea on which the
U.N. was founded was not to involve the U.S. Government in the
internal affairs of other nations, not to be the judge jury and
executioner of other governments that it doesn’t like, nor to
dictate what other nations should or should not do within the given
nation’s boundaries. FDR intended that there instead be
democratically represented, at the U.N., each and every nation, and
each and every people within that global government, where each of
these national governments is (hopefully but not necessarily) a
democracy. FDR
was just as opposed to dictatorship internationally, as he was
opposed to dictatorship nationally,
and he recognized that inevitably some governments will disapprove of
other governments, but he was deeply committed to the view that a
need exists for laws and law-enforcement between nations,
on an international level, and not only within the
individual nations, and that each nation is sacrosanct on its own
internal laws. He respected national sovereignty, and opposed
international empire. (This was his basic disagreement with Winston
Churchill, then, and with American leaders such as Obama and Trump
now.) Unlike President Obama (and evidently unlike the vast majority
of today’s Americans) FDR didn’t want this international
government to be an American function, but instead an entirely
separate international governmental function, in which there is no
international dictatorship whatsoever — not American, and not by
any other country. He knew that this
is the only stable basis for international peace, and for avoiding a
world-annihilating World War III.
Barack
Obama rejected FDR’s vision, and advocated for the United
States as being (and even as if it already had been for a century)
virtually the government over the entire world, which “must always
lead on the world stage.” Adolf Hitler had had that very same
international vision for his own country, Germany, “the
Thousand-Year Reich,” but he lost World War II; and, then, when FDR
died, Hitler’s vision increasingly took over iHoen America, so
that ideologically, FDR
actually lost WW II, when Harry S. Truman took over the White House
and increasingly thereafter, until today, when the
U.S. commits more invasions of foreign countries than do all other
nations in the world combined.
Americans (apparently, as shown in this and other polls) like this,
and want more of it. Nobody
else does. For
example, nobody (except the U.S. and Saudi and Israeli aristocracies
and their supporters worldwide, which are very few people) supports
the U.S. regime’s reinstitution of sanctions against Iran, which
the U.S. regime is imposing as the global dictator. America’s
economic sanctions are like spitting into the face of FDR, who had
opposed such imperialistic fascism in the more overtly military form
when Hitler’s regime was imposing it. It’s also spitting at the
U.N.
This
latest Gallup finding displays an increase, but nothing that’s at
all anomalous as compared to the decades-long reality of
imperialistic U.S. culture. For
decades now, Gallup’s polling has shown that the most respected of
all institutions by the American people is the nation’s military —
more than the church, more than the Presidency, more than the U.S.
Supreme Court, more than the press, more than the schools, more than
anything. America is invasion-nation. This is true even
after the
2003 invasion of Iraq on the basis of blatant
lies,
which destroyed Iraq
— a nation that had never invaded nor even threatened to invade the
United States. The American people are, resolutely, bloodthirsty for
conquest, even after having been fooled into
that evil invasion,
and subsequent decades-long military occupation in Iraq, and
after subsequent conquests
or attempted conquests, in Libya, Syria,
Yemen, and elsewhere — all destroying nations that had never
invaded nor even threatened America. Why? How did this mass-insanity,
of evil, come to be?
How
is this aggressive nationalism even possible, in
America’s ‘democracy’? It’s actually
no democracy at all,
and the public are being constantly fooled to think that it is a
democracy, and this deception is essential in order for the public to
tolerate this Government, and to tolerate the media that lie for it.
This widespread deceit requires constant
cooperation of the ‘news’-media —
and these are the same ‘news’-media that hid
from the public, in 2002, that the U.S. Government was outright lying
about “WMD in Iraq.”
The
public simply do not learn. That’s a tragic fact. Largely, this
fact results from reality being hidden by the ‘news’-media; but,
even now, long after the fake ‘news’ in 2002, about the U.S.
regime’s having possessed secret and conclusive evidence of
“Saddam’s WMD,” the published ‘history’ about that invasion
still does not acknowledge the public’s having been lied-to at that
time, by its Government, and by the ‘news’-media. So,
the public live, and culturally swim, in an
ongoing river of lies,
both as its being ‘news’, and subsequently as its having been
‘history’. This is why the public do not learn: they are being
constantly deceived. And they (as Gallup’s polls
prove) tolerate being constantly deceived. The public do not
rebel against it. They don’t reject either the politicians, or the
‘news’-media. They don’t demand that the American public
control the American Government and that America’s billionaires
lose that control — especially over the ‘news’-media.
Honesty
is no longer an operative American value, if it ever was. That’s
how, and why, Big Brother (the operation by the
international-corporate billionaires) grips Americans’ minds to
support foreign Invasions. Americans support liars, and it all comes
from the top; it’s directed from the top. It is bipartisan, from
both Democratic Party billionaires and Republican Party
billionaires. National
politicians will lose their seats if they disobey.
A
good example, of this Big-Brother operation, is America’s
Politifact, the online site which is at America’s crossover where
‘news’ and ‘history’ meet one-another. It’s controlled by
billionaires such
as the
one who founded Craigslist.
Millions of Americans go to Politifact in order to determine what is
true and what is false that is being widely published about current
events. The present writer sometimes links to their articles, where I
have independently verified that there are no misrepresentations in
an article. But, like the ‘news’-media that it judges, Politifact
is also a propaganda-agency for the
(U.S.-Saud-Israeli) Deep State,
and so it deceives on the most critically important international
matters. An example of this occurred right after the
U.S. regime had overthrown in February 2014 in a bloody coup the
democratically elected Government of Ukraine, and replaced it by a
rabidly anti-Russian racist fascist or nazi Government on Russia’s
doorstep, a regime that was selected by the rabidly anti-Russian (but
lying that it wasn’t) Obama regime.
This Politifact article was dated 31 March 2014, right after over 90%
of Crimeans had just voted in a referendum, to rejoin Russia, and to
depart from Ukraine, which the Soviet dictator had transferred them
to, separating them from Russia, in 1954. (None of that history of
the matter was even mentioned by Politifact.) The Politifact article
was titled “Viral
meme says United States has 'invaded' 22 countries in the past 20
years”,
and it was designed to deceive readers into believing that “Russia’s
recent annexation of Crimea” reflected the real instance of
“invasion” that Americans should be outraged against — to
deflect away from America’s recent history as being the world’s
actual invasion-nation. This propaganda-article said nothing at all
about either Crimea or Ukraine except in its opening line: “A
Facebook meme argues that Americans are pretty two-faced when it
comes to Russia’s recent annexation of Crimea.” It then proceeded
to document that the exact number of American invasions during the
prior 20 years wasn’t 22, and so Politifact declared the allegation
“false” (as if the exact number were really the entire issue or
even the main one, and as if America’s scandalous recent history of
invasions were not).
So,
it’s on account of such drowning-in-propaganda, that the U.S.
public not only respect what U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower
derogatorily called the “military-industrial complex,” but
respect it above even the U.S. Presidency itself, and above all other
U.S. institutions (as Gallup’s constant polling demonstrates to be
the case).
Here’s
the reality: The same group of no more than a thousand super-wealthy
Americans control both the United States Government and the
weapons-manufacturing firms (such as Lockheed Martin), which are
the only
corporations whose only customers are the U.S. Government and its
chosen allied governments.
So, these few people actually control the U.S. Government’s foreign
relations, and foreign policies. They create and control their own
markets. This is the most politically active group of America’s
super-rich, because they own America’s international corporations
and because their business as owners of the military ones is military
policy and also diplomatic policy, including the conjoining of both
of those at the CIA and NSA, including the many coups that they (via
their Government) engineer. They also control
all of the nation’s major news-media, which report international
affairs in such a manner as to determine which foreign governments
will be perceived by the mass of Americans to constitute the nation’s
‘enemies’ and therefore to be suitable targets for the U.S.
military and CIA to invade and conquer or otherwise “regime-change” —
such as have been the lands of North Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq,
Libya, Syria, Iran, North Korea, Yemen, Venezuela, etc., at various
times. The
weapons-manufacturers won’t have any markets, at all, if there are
no ‘enemy’ nations that are deemed by the public to be suitable
targets for their weapons. ‘Enemy'
nations, and not only ‘allies’ (or ‘allied’ nations), are
necessary, in order for the military business to produce the most
profits. Overwhelmingly, if not totally, the chosen ‘enemies’ are
nations that have never
invaded nor even threatened to invade the United States;
and, so, in order to keep this Government-funded business (the
war-profiteering and associated international natural-resources
extractions businesses)
growing and thriving, what’s essential is continuing control over
the nation’s ‘news’-media. As Walter Lippmann wrote in
1921, “the
manufacture of consent” is
an essential part of this entire operation. It happens via the media.
Even Germany’s Nazis needed to do that. Any modern capitalist
dictatorship (otherwise called “fascism”) does. The U.S. regime,
being a capitalist dictatorship, certainly does. Physically, Hitler
lost, but his ideology won, he won even as nazism (racist fascism)
instead of merely as fascism, and this racism is shown because the
U.S. regime is rabidly racist anti-Russian (not
merely anti-communist),
and has been so for at least a century. (Maybe it’s what Obama
actually had secretly in mind when he said “That has been true for
the century passed and it will be true for the century to come.”
And Trump is no less a liar than Obama, and he continues this aim of
ultimately conquering Russia.) They say they’re only against
Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin, but Putin shows in all polls of
Russians, even in non-Russian polls, to be far more favorably viewed
by Russians than either Barack Obama or Donald Trump are viewed by
Americans. This is why regime-change-in-Russia is increasingly
becoming dominated by U.S. economic sanctions and military, and less
dominated by CIA and other coup-organizers. The actual dictatorship
is in America, and it requires participation by its
‘news’-media. Demonizing
‘the enemy’ is
therefore crucial. It is crucial preparation for any invasion.
The
United States Government spends at
least as much money on its military as do all of the other
governments in the world combined. Its
‘news’-media (that is to say, the media that are owned by, and
that are advertised in by, the corporations that are controlled by,
the same small group of billionaires — America’s billionaires —
who fund the political campaigns of both the Democratic Party’s and
the Republican Party’s nominees for the U.S. Congress and the
Presidency) may be partisan for one or the other of the nation’s
two political Parties, but they all are unitedly partisan for the
international corporations, such as Lockheed Martin, that America’s
billionaires control, and that sell only to the U.S. Government and
to the foreign governments that are allied with the U.S. Government.
They also are partisan for the U.S.-based oil and gas and mining
international corporations, which need to extract at the lowest costs
possible, no matter how much the given extractee-nation’s public
might suffer from the deal. “Three-fourths (75%) of Americans today
think the United States has ‘a special responsibility to be the
leading nation in world affairs,’” and the actual beneficiaries
of this mass-insanity are the owners of those U.S.-based
international corporations, the military and extraction giants.
Anthony
Cordesman, at the Center for Strategic and International Studies,
headlined on 15 August 2016, “U.S.
Wars in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen: What Are The Endstates?” and
he said, “Once again, the United States does not seem to be
learning from its past. The real test of victory is never tactical
success or even ending a war on favorable military terms, it is what
comes next.” But he ignored the main reason why these invasions had
occurred. America’s weapons-manufacturers won’t have any markets,
at all, if there are no ‘enemy’ nations that are deemed by the
American public to be suitable targets for their weapons. Cordesman
is there calculating success and failure on the basis of the myths
(such as that the U.S. Government cares about those “Endstates”),
not of the realities (that it craves targets). The realities focus
upon the desires of the owners and executives of the
weapons-manufacturers and the extraction-firms, for ongoing and
increased profits and executive bonuses, and not on the
needs of America’s soldiers nor on the national security of the
American people. Least of all, do they focus upon the needs — such
as the welfare, freedom, or democracy — of the Iraqi people, or of
the Syrian people, or of the Libyan people, or of the Yemenite
people. It’s all just lies, PR. Those invasions served their actual
main functions when they were occurring. “The Endstates” there
are almost irrelevant to those real purposes, the purposes
for which the invasions were, and are, actually being done.
Here’s
an ideal example of this mass mind-control: On 19 November 2017, Josh
Rogin at the Washington
Post headlined “The
U.S. must prepare for Iran’s next move in Syria” and
reported that:
A task force of senior former U.S. diplomatic and military officials has come up with suggestions for how Trump could prevent Iran from taking over what’s left of liberated Syria and fulfill his own promise to contain Iranian influence in the region.
“Most urgently... the United States must impose real obstacles to Tehran’s pursuit of total victory by the Assad regime in Syria,” the report by the Jewish Institute for National Security of America states. “Time is of the essence.”
The
underlying presumption there was that the U.S. regime has legitimate
authorization to be occupying the parts of Syria it has invaded and
now occupies, and that Iran does not. But the reality is that the
U.S. regime is occupying Syria instead of assisting Syria’s
Government to defeat the U.S.-Saud-Israeli invasion to overthrow and
replace Syria’s Government, by stooges
who will be selected by the Saud family who own Saudi Arabia,
and the reality is that Iran’s forces there are invitees who are
instead assisting Syria’s Government against the
Saudi-Israeli-American invasion. In other words: this WP article
is basically all lies. Furthermore, the Jewish Institute for National
Security of America is a
front-organization for
the fascist
regime that rules Israel,
and the WP hid that fact, too, so its cited ‘expert’
was a mere PR agency for Israel’s aristocracy. So, this is
Deep-State propaganda, parading as ‘news’.
Americans
actually pay their private good money to subscribe to (subsidize)
such bad public ‘news’papers as that. The billionaire who happens
to own that particular ‘news’paper (the WP), Jeff Bezos, had
founded and leads Amazon, which receives almost all of its profits
from Amazon Web Services (AWS), the cloud-computing division, which
supplies the U.S. ‘Defense’ Department, CIA, and NSA. For
example, “without
AWS and Prime, Amazon lost $2 billion in the 1st quarter of FY18. …
These losses come from Amazon’s retail business. About 60% of
Amazon’s revenue comes from retail and that’s where Amazon is
losing money.” Amazon is profitable because of what it sells mainly
to the Government, but also to other large U.S. international
corporations, and they all want to conquer Syria. None opposes that
evil goal. Although Bezos doesn’t like the Sauds, he has actually
been (at least until the Khashoggi matter) one of their main U.S.
media champions for the Sauds to take over Syria. It’s all just a
fool-the-public game. It works, it succeeds, and that’s what
Gallup’s polls are demonstrating. The public never learns. It’s a
fact, which has been proven in many different ways.
This
reality extends also to other nations, allies of the U.S.
aristocracy, and not only to the U.S. regime itself. For example, on
27 November 2018, a whistleblowing former UK Ambassador, Craig
Murray, who is a personal friend of Julian Assange, headlined“Assange
Never Met Manafort. Luke Harding and the Guardian Publish
Still More Blatant MI6 Lies”,
and he proved that Britain’s Guardian had
lied with total, and totally undocumented (and probably even totally
non-credible), fabrications, alleging that Julian Assange of
WikiLeaks had secretly met (in 2013, 2015, and 2016) with Paul
Manafort of the Trump campaign. The UK, of course, is a vassal-nation
of the U.S. aristocracy, and the Guardian is
run by Democratic Party propagandists (paid indirectly by Democratic
Party and conservative Tony-Blair-wing Labour Party billionaires)
and therefore fabricates in order to assist those Parties’ efforts
to impeach Trump and to dislodge Jeremy Corbyn from the Labour
Party’s leadership. However, each of America’s two political
parties (like the UK’s aristocracy itself) represents America’s
aristocracy, which, like Britain’s aristocracy, is united in
its determination
to eliminate Assange —
they are as determined to do that to him, just as Saudi Crown Prince
Mohammed bin Salman al-Saud was determined to eliminate Jamal
Khashoggi. ‘Democracy’? This? It is Big Brother.
Only
if the population boycott lying individuals and organizations, is
democracy even possible to exist in a nation. Democracy can’t
possibly exist more than truth does. In political matters, deceit is
always treachery; and its practitioners, whenever the evidence for it
is overwhelming and irrefutable, should experience whatever the
standard penalty is for treachery. Only in a land such as that, can
democracy possibly exist. Elsewhere, it simply can’t.
The only basis for democracy, is truth. Deceit is for
dictators, not for democrats. And deceit reigns, in the U.S. and in
its allied countries. Is this really tolerable? Americans, at least,
tolerate it.
When
Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the far-right Rupert
Murdoch’s Wall
Street Journal editorialized
against Obama on 10 October 2009, by saying that “What
this suggests to us — and to the Norwegians — is the end of what
has been called ‘American exceptionalism’.” Little
did anyone then know that after winning re-election upon the
basis of such war-mongering lies from Obama, as that “America
remains the one indispensable nation”,
Obama in February 2014 would go so far as to perpetrate a bloody
coup overthrowing
the democratically elected Government of one “dispensable”
nation, Ukraine; and, then, on 28 May of 2014, Obama would be
telling America’s
future generals,
that “The United States is and remains the one indispensable
nation” and that Obama would, in that speech, explicitly malign
Ukraine’s neighbor Russia. He did it, in this speech, which
implicitly called all
nations except the U.S. “dispensable.”
He had carefully planned and orchestrated Americans’ hostility
toward Russia. His successor, Trump, lied saying that he wanted to
reverse Obama’s policies on this, and Trump promptly, once becoming
elected, increased and expanded those policies. Whatever a
deceitfully war-mongering country like this might be, it’s
certainly no democracy. Because democracy cannot be built upon a
ceaseless string of lies.
===============================* Ik wist niet, dit artikel schrijvend, dat er een organisatie bestaat met de naam 'Feitenchecker', waar men kan vinden of (nieuws-) berichten echt zijn of zijn opgemaakt met 'fake news' (nepnieuws)....... Je snapt het al, een organisatie die vooral de leugens van de reguliere media als waarheid bestempelt en terecht commentaar op die leugens als 'fake' neerzet..... Hier het adres: De Feitenchecker (@DeFeitenchecker) Twitter.
Zie ook:
'Geen rectificaties voor meer dan 2 jaar brengen van fake news over het kwaadaardig sprookje Russiagate'
'Britse militaire geheime dienst bedient zich van moddergooien en andere manipulaties om Europese en VS politiek te manipuleren, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten'
'Bedrijf dat voor 'Russische bots' waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots'
''Fake news': alternatieve media en bloggers in het westen zouden onzin brengen, echter niet als dit soort groepen wat roepen in landen die het westen niet welgevallig zijn'
'De VS heeft Syrië volgepropt met 'jihadisten' en wapens'
'Democraten deden zich voor als Russen in false flag operatie om Roy Moore (Republikein) zwart te maken tijdens verkiezing.....'
'Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van 'fake news' bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort 'nieuws''
''Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen'
'BBC: Rusland 'misbruikt humor' om Russiagate te ontkrachten..... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'
'Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat 'Russiagaters gelijk hebben......''
'Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega's voor zot uitgemaakt'
The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange......'
'WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen.......'
''Banden van Trump met Rusland' gebaseerd op FBI operatie om VS 'burger' (CIA) in Iran vrij te krijgen......'
'Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!'
'New York Times 'bewijzen' voor Russiagate vallen door de mand......'
'Facebook gebruikte 'fake news' beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden'
'Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax'
'Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks....!!!!'
'De Israëlische manipulatie van de VS presidentsverkiezingen, gaat veel verder dan wat men Rusland in de schoenen schuift.....'
'FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web........'
''Russiagate' een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC...........'
''Russiagate' een verhaal van a t/m z westers 'fake news.....''
'Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen'
'Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering' (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er 'metersdikke' dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikiLeaks)
'FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information'
'Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election'
'Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd'
''Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd' door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich......... AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!'
''Russiagate': Intel-raport over Russische bemoeienis met verkiezingen opgebouwd met leugens en is politiek gemotiveerd, aldus Matlock, voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou'
'Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt'
'CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8.....'
'WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia'
'Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid........ Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!'
'CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'
'VS 'democratie' aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!'
'Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election'
'Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media'
'Russische 'hacks' door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence'
'Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'
'Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen........'
'Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht............' (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende twee artikelen: 'Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie' en 'Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary')
'Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte'
'Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'
'Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), 'Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws.....' Oei!!'
'RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links......'
'Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt.......'
'Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat'
''Russiagate' een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten.......'
'VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein.....'
'De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers.........'
=========================================
En terzijde:
'Facebook gebruikte 'fake news' beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden'
'Trump (Republikeinen) wint de midterm verkiezingen, alsook de Democraten, het verschil voor mensen elders in de wereld, die onder VS terreur moeten leven, is nul komma nada.......'
'The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media'
'The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq'
'Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt 'TV ankers' propaganda op te lezen (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van 'lokaal nieuws')'
'Ex-CIA agent legt uit hoe de VS schaduwregering en deep state werken, ofwel de machinaties achter de schermen......'
'New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!'
'Noord-Koreaans 'bedrog met nucleaire deal' is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times'
''Fake News' misbruikt door dictaturen en de reguliere (massa-) media'
'Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert'
