Corona-angst: psychologische oorlogsvoering tegen de bevolking

Als 'de oorlog' tegen drugs en terreur, zoals eind 40er en begin 50er jaren van de vorige eeuw de de oorlog van McCarthy tegen het communisme, kan de opgeklopte angst voor het Coronavirus worden gezien als een psychologische oorlogsvoering...... Oorlogsvoering die wordt gebruikt door de zittende president of premier om daar politiek voordeel mee te behalen........

Het volk wordt met een berg leugens voorgehouden dat de zittende regering het beste met hen voorheeft en dat de gezaaide angst voor een bepaalde zaak (veelal zonder meer op basis van leugens) werkelijk een bedreiging vormt voor iedere burger..... Neem de angst voor moslim terreur, de kans dat je daardoor wordt getroffen is vele malen kleiner dan dat je op straat wordt doodgereden...... Door het volk zo te manipuleren dat het grootste deel de leugens gelooft, kan men vervolgens extra bevoegdheden geven aan geheime diensten en kan men de burgerrechten inperken, dit met de simpele dooddoener dat men e.e.a. doet om de burgers juist te beschermen.......

Niet alleen de geheime diensten profiteren van dergelijke opgeklopte hysterie (waarbij ze ook nog eens een groot aantal fouten maken, maar dat terzijde), ook de politie en in geval van moslim radicalisme zelfs het leger, krijgen meer bevoegdheden en geld....... Je snapt wel dat daarbij ook de wapenindustrie garen spint, zoals ook oliemaatschappijen profiteren als de VS weer eens een illegale oorlog start (oorlog 'gelegitimeerd' met leugens)

Ook de Coronacrisis kan gezien worden als een soort oorlog, een oorlog tegen het virus waarbij men alles uit kast trekt om de burgerrechten af te breken..... Er wordt gezegd dat maatregelen e.d. in het belang zijn van de volksgezondheid, echter dat is maar zeer de vraag, neem het lange thuiszitten van velen zoals ouderen, waardoor hun weerstand achteruitkachelt en ze veel meer bevattelijk zijn voor bijvoorbeeld een griepvirus of.... COVID-19!!! Om nog maar te zwijgen over de psychologische gezondheid van deze ouderen...... 

Uiteraard is de grootste winstmaker in deze de steenrijke farmaceutische maffia, die godbetert ook nog eens gigantische kapitalen krijgt toegestopt als men maar probeert een vaccin te produceren, terwijl de grote farmaceuten vanaf dag één al bezig waren met het ontwikkelen van een vaccin, immers de eerste die met een werkend vaccin komt is spekkoper...... Bij de top van die bedrijven moet men zich kapot hebben gelachen bij het ontvangen van miljarden aan overheidsgeld (belastinggeld...) voor de ontwikkeling van een vaccin, waar men allang mee bezig was.......

Intussen is zo ongeveer alles wel uit de kast getrokken om de mensen bang te maken en te houden en goochelt men zelfs met cijfers, die later vaak niet blijken te kloppen..... Neem Nederland, hoeveel doden zijn er de eerste maanden echt overleden aan het Coronavirus, dit daar er destijds amper testen voorhanden waren, maar men in de media en politiek blindelings de cijfers met grote aantallen patiënten overnam, nogmaals: terwijl er amper of geen testmateriaal beschikbaar was...... Het is dan ook vrijwel zeker dat een groot aantal doden als Coronapatiënt werden meegeteld, terwijl ze alleen één of een paar van de symptomen hadden, die ook bij een normale griep voorkomen, zoals koorts, last van luchtwegen, bijholtes en hoofdpijn (waar de laatste 2 bijna onoverkomelijk aan elkaar zijn verbonden)

Kevin Ryan, die het hieronder opgenomen artikel schreef voor The Guardian gaat dieper in op e.e.a. waarbij hij ook wijst op de smerige rol die Bill Gates speelt, ook de Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie (WHO) krijgt onder uit de kan en uiteraard blijft de rol van de farmaceuten niet onbesproken. 

Jammer dat Ryan niet wijst op het feit dat men bij de grote farmaceuten het vaccineren tegen Corona niet ziet als iets eenmaligs, maar als een jaarlijks terugkerende operatie die als de griep kan worden bestreden met een injectie (die als met het griepvirus regelmatig niet of slecht zal werken...).... Als dat inderdaad gaat gebeuren zal men een Coronapaspoort nodig hebben om 'mee te mogen doen in de maatschappij....'

Ryan wijst verder op de geheime diensten die een rol spelen in de Coronacrisis en die uiteraard hun bol uitgaan bij de zware inperking van burgerrechten in heel veel landen en waar censuur tegenwordig al een normaal verschijnsel is in westerse 'democratieën', wordt ook daar met de Coronacrisis weer een stap extra gezet........  

Het volgende is een lang artikel (dat ik overnam van Information Clearing House), maar het is meer dan de moeite van het lezen waard en zal bij velen de ogen openen, mensen die zich nog weinig hebben verdiept in de materie, zo wordt nog eens gewezen op het feit dat de geheime diensten van de VS al op de hoogte waren van dit virus, voordat China de wereld waarschuwde in de eerste week van afgelopen januari...... 

Onder het artikel kan je kiezen voor een 'Dutch vertaling' al neemt dat wel enige tijd in beslag.

 Is the Coronavirus Scare a Psychological Operation?

By Kevin Ryan

June 12, 2020 "Information Clearing House" -  Governments have used psychological warfare throughout history to manipulate public opinion, gain political advantage, and generate profits. Western governments have engaged in such tactics in the war on terrorism as well as in its predecessor, the war on communism.

In both cases, state-sponsored terrorism and propaganda were used to distort the public’s perception of the threats, leading to increased governmental control of society and huge financial benefits for corporations.

It appears that the same kinds of effects are being seen as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Many of the features and outcomes seen in the war on terrorism and the war on communism are evident in this new “war on death.”

Therefore, it’s reasonable to wonder if the extreme response to COVID-19, and its associated virus SARS-COV-2, could be another psychological operation against the public.

Considering facts about the disease and the disproportionate response emphasizes the possibility.

If COVID-19 has been co-opted for manipulation of the public, through hyping the threat and pushing exploitive solutions, who is behind it and who benefits?

Let’s first review what features and outcomes the “coronavirus scare’ shares in common with the “red scare” that drove the perceived threat of communism and the “Muslim scare” behind the perceived threat of terrorism. Here are a dozen characteristics that these perceived threats share.

1. Fear-based and globally directed
2. Media saturation with bias toward fear
3. Data manipulation and propaganda
4. Censorship of opposing views
5. Intelligence agency control of information
6. Preceded by exercises mimicking the threat
7. Series of claims made that are later proven false
8. Response threatens democracy
9. Large increase in wealth and power for a few; increase in social inequality
10. Increased government control of the public and reduced individual freedoms
11. Response kills far more than the original threat
12. Evidence for manufactured events (see below)
    

There are also differences between the COVID-19 pandemic response and the “wars” on communism and terrorism. One difference is that, for the virus, agencies dedicated to public health have taken the lead. Although the central characters that hyped the communism threat and the terrorism threat were sometimes the same people, they tended to represent military, diplomatic, or intelligence agencies.

The primary actors driving the coronavirus lockdowns and associated control mechanisms are political leaders. However, the directives being acted upon come from the World Health Organization (WHO), an agency of the United Nations ostensibly responsible for international public health.

Others controlling the coronavirus scare are national health agencies, most notably the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS).

Are these agencies acting solely in the interest of public health?

The WHO

The common impression is that the entire matter began in reaction to events in China but even that is not clear. For example, the virus is said to have originated in the city of Wuhan and the first, limited, lockdown occurred in that area from January to March.

China has since said that it warned the WHO about the virus during the first week of January. However, it is known that U.S. intelligence agencies were aware of the potential outbreak even before that, in November 2019. A Chinese spokesman later suggested that the U.S. military might have brought the virus to Wuhan during the military games held there in October.

The first instance of an entire country being locked down for the coronavirus was in Italy.

This occurred on March 9^th based on advice from the Italian government’s coronavirus adviser Walter Ricciardi, who said, “The situation risks going out of control and these measures are necessary to keep the spread at bay.”

Ricciardi, a WHO committee member, later admitted that Italy had inflated the death counts from the virus, stating:

“The way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus.”

Many have noted the inordinate influence of billionaire Bill Gates on the activities and direction of the WHO. As of 2017, this influence was seen as troubling, with health advocates fearing that:

because the Gates Foundation’s money comes from investments in big business, it could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to undermine WHO’s role in setting standards and shaping health policies.”

Gates has been called a ruthless schemer by his Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen and Allen is not alone in that assessment.

Despite engaging in a costly “public charm offensive,” Gates is seen by many as a predatory and monopolistic opportunist hiding behind a false front of philanthropy. With regard to the coronavirus scare and Gates’ stated goal of vaccinating the entire world population, however, people should be most concerned that he has worked diligently on mechanisms of population control.

Of course, no one person controls the world yet so who is supposed to be running WHO, apart from Bill Gates? The face of the WHO is Dr. Tedros Adhanom*, the director-general of the organization. Tedros has a poor history of ethics in leadership, with many accusations having been made against him including that he covered-up epidemics in the past.

Alarms about Tedros began to go off immediately after his appointment in 2017, when he named Robert Mugabe, the former dictator of Zimbabwe, as a goodwill ambassador to the WHO. Mugabe’s rule over Zimbabwe was dominated by “murder, bloodshed, torture, persecution of political opponents, intimidation and vote-rigging on a grand scale.” This appointment indicated that Tedros’ judgment of goodwill was dubious at best.

A letter from a group of American doctors that same year described why Tedros has become known as “Dr. Cover Up.”
They wrote:

“Your silence about what is clearly a massive cholera epidemic in Sudan daily becomes more reprehensible. The inevitable history that will be written of this cholera epidemic will surely cast you in an unforgiving light.”

They added that Tedros was “fully complicit in the terrible suffering and dying that continues to spread in East Africa.”

Problems at WHO didn’t start with Tedros, however.

After the H1N1 pandemic of 2009, evidence came to light that the WHO had exaggerated the danger and had spread fear and confusion rather than helpful information. It was later learned that “Italy, Germany, France and the U.K. made secret agreements with pharmaceutical companies” that “obliged the countries to buy vaccinations only if the WHO raised the pandemic to a level 6.”

The WHO then proceeded to change its guidelines for defining a pandemic in order to accommodate those contracts, thereby increasing the public’s fear despite the fact that the pandemic never became a serious threat.

Although WHO has been praised for its work to reduce some illnesses like polio, it has also been found that drugs and vaccines recommended by WHO have been “found to be harmful and without significant clinical effect.”

A comprehensive view suggests that the WHO is more of a corporate interest agency than an organization committed to preserving public health. That’s not surprising due to the fact that 80% of WHO’s funding comes from “voluntary contributions” provided by private donors including pharmaceutical companies and industry groups like Bill Gates’ Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI).

Since the worldwide response to COVID-19 has been directed and coordinated by an organization that works on behalf of multi-national corporations that stand to benefit, the idea that the coronavirus scare could be a psychological operation seems plausible.

The CDC

In the US, the CDC is also heavily influenced by corporate and political interests. This became clear when, in 2016, a group of senior scientists within the CDC filed an ethics complaint against the agency making that exact claim. They wrote:

It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests.”

The scientists noted that, in order to pursue political objectives, “definitions were changed and data cooked” at CDC, even to the point of misrepresenting data to Congress.

Like the WHO, the CDC has a history of pushing harmful vaccines. An example was covered in a 60 Minutes episode exposing the harm done by the Swine Flu vaccine in 1976 and CDC’s urging that all Americans be injected with that harmful vaccine. The report revealed that the illness was hyped based on very questionable data and the vaccine caused neurological damage.

The current Director of CDC is retired US Army doctor Robert Redfield, who is known for having led the Pentagon’s disastrous response to HIV-AIDS in the 1980s.

A devout catholic, Redfield saw AIDS as the product of an immoral society. For many years, he championed a much-hyped remedy that was discredited in tests. That debacle led to his removal from the job in 1994.”

Public health reporter Laurie Garrett remarked:

“Redfield is about the worst person you could think of to be heading the CDC at this time. He lets his prejudices interfere with the science, which you cannot afford during a pandemic.”

The CDC is an agency within the department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Alex Azar, a lawyer and former pharmaceutical company executive, was appointed as Secretary of DHHS in 2017. Azar has deep connections to the pharmaceutical industry and is known for having engaged in price gouging with his former employer.

Azar is also known for leading the DHHS response to the anthrax scare of 2001, the first known bioterrorism attack on the United States. The anthrax attacks were targeted against members of Congress and the media that were dissenting voices in the national discussion about the Patriot Act, the oppressive legislation introduced immediately after the 9/11 attacks.

Although Muslims were first blamed through highly questionable evidence, it was ultimately found that the weaponized anthrax came from U.S. military laboratories.

Azar was instrumental in defining the National Biodefense Strategy in 2018, working closely with John Bolton, Trump’s National Security Advisor. Bolton, a neocon and member of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), has a long history of pushing authoritarian policies and war.

In the US the person most visibly in charge of the COVID-19 response is Anthony Fauci, who is the long-time director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Like Redfield, Dr. Fauci is a Catholic and has said that values he learned in his Jesuit education continue to guide him.

After weeks of Fauci having led the coronavirus response in the US, it was learned that his NIAID had funded “gain of function” research at the Wuhan laboratory where the SARS-COV-2 virus is suspected of having originated.

Fauci’s response to questions about that inexplicable coincidence was simply to denounce “conspiracy theories” rather than addressing the questions directly, much as others did when questioned about 9/11 foreknowledge.

Whether SARS-COV-2 was genetically engineered in a laboratory, like the NIAID-funded Wuhan lab, is a subject that has become of interest to many scientists. 

The Wuhan laboratory is not the only place the US supports work like this, however, as the Pentagon funds such labs in 25 countries across the world. Located in places such as Eastern Europe, the Middle East, South East Asia, and Africa, these labs isolate and manipulate viruses like the bat coronaviruses from which SARS-COV-2 originated. This bat-research program is further coordinated by a group called EcoHealth Alliance (EHA).

The manipulation of viruses for gain of function at US funded labs is, like the origin of the weaponized anthrax at US labs, evidence that bioterrorism and pandemics can be manufactured events. This is another way in which the coronavirus scare could reflect the war on terrorism and war on communism, both of which were driven by manufactured terrorist events.

It is remarkable that Fauci funded work to manipulate coronaviruses then became the voice of the coronavirus pandemic response while also working closely with Bill Gates’ GAVI initiative. Fauci has boasted that NIAID and GAVI work together to push vaccines with “outright collaboration between us in setting the standard of what is needed.”

This makes it easier to see that a new pattern of hyped pandemics resulting in increased population control and global vaccinations is not only possible but would be a very lucrative business model.

The NHS and Corporate Nations

By now it’s well known that the initial projections for deaths due to COVID-19 were massively overestimated and one academic paper was responsible for the panic. The lead author of that paper, Neil Ferguson of Imperial College, has since resigned in disgrace from his government advisory position. Much like the US government’s explanation for destruction of the World Trade Center buildings, his estimates were based on computer models that cannot be shared with the public.

As in the US, UK intelligence agencies have taken a leading role in managing the coronavirus scare. The terrorism expert who is expected to be the next chief of MI6 was selected to lead a new “biosecurity centre” to evaluate the coronavirus threat and “enable rapid intervention.”

Additionally, the UK intelligence agency known as Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ) was granted powers over the NHS’s computer systems. GCHQ is known for engaging in illegal activities related to population control mechanisms such as mass surveillance.

Totalitarian outcomes are further enabled with billionaire Peter Thiel’s CIA-initiated company Palantir managing the databases used by both the CDC and UK’s NHS that drive COVID-19 decision making.

For perspective, in 2009, Thiel said, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible,” providing another clue that public health and awareness are not the main priorities behind the coronavirus scare.

The data behind the COVID-19 pandemic was never reliable, with test kits being inaccurate, government policies inflating the death counts, and the media focusing solely on fear-based predictions that are repeatedly proven false.

Recently, scientists and government leaders from other countries, including Russia, Germany and Denmark, have begun speaking out about how the coronavirus threat has been exaggerated.

The outcomes of the coronavirus scare have included huge windfalls for billionaires, financial institutions, and corporations. Legislation being passed in response to COVID-19 is largely beneficial to corporate interests. The outcomes for everyone else have been fear, unemployment, poverty, loss of freedoms, grave risks to democracy, and death.

How this is possible is related to the fact that governments, and the nations they represent, are no longer what they were. In many ways, corporations have replaced governments as the drivers of public policy and, as with Peter Thiel’s Palantir, the public’s interest is not their concern. Meanwhile, over two dozen companies have become larger and more powerful than many national governments.

As a result, governments are now false fronts for corporations and the decisions they make, for example to lockdown citizens and remake their economies, are driven by profit-based strategies indifferent to public interests.

In summary, the features and outcomes of the coronavirus scare reflect those of previous psychological operations including the war on terrorism and its predecessor, the war on communism.

The people and agencies driving the coronavirus scare have a history of unethical behaviors, including hyping pandemics to push vaccines, and appear to seek long-term profits through implementation of a highly controlled society. Therefore, the response to COVID-19, if not the virus itself, can be seen as a psychological operation used to drive those outcomes.

- "Source" -

Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.
===================================
* De volledige naam van deze man: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Zie ook:
'Remdesivir, het middel tegen Ebola en ook tegen COVID-19 opgekocht door de Trump administratie: een zware misdaad' 

'Ausweis bitte! COVI-PASS 'noodzakelijk' bij aantonen 'immuniteit' voor Coronavirus'

'Spanje, Italië en anderen: EU 'solidariteit' i.v.m. de Coronacrisis alleen als het land zich tot de nek in de schulden wil steken: 'DASLIEF' of.....'

'Kabinet en regeringspartijen hebben geen behoefte om zorgverleners vanwege hun inzet op de Coronacrisis structureel meer te waarderen' 

'KLM krijgt 3,4 milard euro voor vliegtuigoverlast, terwijl zorgmedewerkers kunnen barsten, een applausje vindt men in Rutte 3 voldoende' (en zie de links in dat bericht over de politieke leugens aangaande Schiphol, KLM en Lelystad Airport)

'Pandemieën zijn het resultaat van natuurvernietiging, een waarschuwing van de VN, de WHO en het WWF'

'Corona-angst: psychologische oorlogsvoering tegen de bevolking'

''Mondkapjes per 1 juni verplicht in openbaar vervoer, 'daar het Coronavirus zich op die datum zal richten op dat vervoer'' 

'Nederland chanteert alweer Antilliaanse eilanden: nu voor hulp bij Coronacrisis' 

'Coronasterfte verreweg het grootst onder ouderen met chronische kwalen: tijd voor een echte intelligente lockdown' 

'Rinke van den Brink (NOS redacteur gezondheidszorg) over EU reactie op Coronavirus en loflied op Rutte en RIVM....' Een volkomen ten onrecht loflied (zie ook de links in dat bericht) 

'Zeg nee tegen de Corona spoedwet!' (een bericht met daaraan verbonden een petitie tegen die 'nood-spoedwet', lees en teken deze petitie ajb!)

'Rutte 3 wil ongrondwettelijke noodmaatregelen legitimeren met spoedwet' 

'Duitse Verfassungsschutz vor Verschwörungstheorien waarschuwt geheel hypocriet voor Corona samenzweringstheorieën'  

'Anti-racisme demonstratie in Amsterdam reden voor hysterische ophef' (en de schreeuw om maatregelen die het recht op demonstreren moet uitrangeren....) 

The Science of Fear: How The Elitists Use it to Control Us & How to Break Free

'Transport nucleair afval via Amsterdam naar uitermate gevaarlijke opslag' (met aandacht voor de aantasting van burgerrechten tijdens de Coronacrisis, zo mochten in Duitsland maar 35 mensen protesteren tegen dit transport....)

'Coronavirus: we worden behandeld als een kind met een tere ziel dat niet te veel mag weten'

'Coronavirus: vluchtelingen zonder verblijfsvergunning blijven opgesloten ondanks grote kans op besmetting'  

'Privacy en vrijheid van meningsuiting slachtoffer van het Coronavirus: neem de verplichte volg-app'

'Trump vraagt om absolute macht tijdens de Coronacrisis' 
 
'Coronacrisis: de grootste internationale oefening ooit van politie, geheime diensten en de landstrijdkrachten' 

'Wereldbevolking moet afhankelijk worden gemaakt van vaccins in combinatie met een 'vaccinatiepaspoort'' (zie ook de video's in dat bericht, waarvan de hieronder getoonde er één is)

Forced vaccinations for all. And that means you. A triumph for authoritarians (een video uit 2018, zeker zien mensen!):

'Politie schiet 13 jarige jongen dood bij handhaven avondklok i.v.m. Coronavirus'

'Viktor Orbán misbruikt Coronacrisis om het Hongaarse parlement en daarmee de democratie buitenspel te zetten'

'Ton Wilthagen (universiteit Tilburg) wil dat de verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer worden uitgesteld'

En terzijde: 'Senator Rick Scott (vriend van Trump) wil sancties voor landen die i.v.m. het Coronavirus medische hulp krijgen van Cuba'

Voor nog veel meer berichten over het Coronavirus, klik op het betreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.