Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat 'Russiagaters gelijk hebben......'

Caitlin Johnstone heeft op 27 november jl. een sarcastisch, uiterst humoristisch artikel geschreven, het gaat om gesprekken tussen Trump en Putin, waarin Trump van Putin instructies krijgt wat te doen.

Lezen mensen en geeft het door, een betere manier om te laten zien hoe absurd het hele Russiagate verhaal is, kan m.i. niet gevonden worden, het Russiagate verhaal is van A tot Z is gelogen!

Genieten mensen:

AUTHOR: CAITLIN JOHNSTONE NOVEMBER 27, 2018

Leaked Transcript Proves Russiagaters Have Been Right All Along

A transcript of exchanges between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin has been leaked to National News Conglomerate by an anonymous source within the Kremlin. We here at NNC have confirmed the authenticity of this document using the same rigorous verification process we’ve been using to authenticate the evidence for all our other reporting on Russia’s involvement in the 2016 US elections over the last two years. These verification methods include hunches, gut intuitions, and an introspective assessment of the way our feelings feel. The following exchanges revealed in this transcript provide the clearest evidence yet that the President of the United States has been in collusion with the Russian government for years.

This introduction has been authored by the editorial board of the National News Conglomerate. Obey.

~

11/9/2016

Trump: I have done as you commanded, my dominant and all-powerful lord. I have conspired with your hackers to steal the election, and now I’m going to be president! I want to thank you for not releasing that video footage of those Russian prostitutes I hired to urinate on a bed the Obamas once slept in. If that had come out it would have offended and alienated a lot of people, which is something I never normally do.

Putin: Yes that is an old KGB tactic called kompromat, a word which only extremely intelligent people know about. Keep this line of communication open. As long as you do as I command, your pee pee tape will remain secret.

Trump: One thing I’m curious about though my lord, if you don’t mind my asking. If you already had an army of hackers targeting Democratic Party emails, why did you need my help? Couldn’t you just have hacked the emails and published them on your own? Why did you need me to interact with them at all?

Putin: Moral support, mainly. We don’t need to get into specifics.

Trump: Oh okay.

~

1/20/2017

Trump: I’m in! Whew! I was really worried that leaked dossier would be the end of me! What are my instructions, my lord?

Putin: Begin introducing racism and division to the United States. America has never experienced these things before, and it will shock and disorient them. With the US divided against itself, your nation will be far too weak to stand against my plans of total world domination.

Trump: That’s a really tall order! America has always been a harmonious place where everyone gets along up until today. I’ll try my best though. Anything else?

Putin: Yes, make them distrust your nation’s large media outlets and convince them that the US intelligence community is often dishonest.

Trump: That will be really hard because those institutions have always been trusted for their unparalleled integrity. But your wish is my command, oh lord.

~

4/7/2017

Putin: Bomb a Syrian airbase.

Trump: What? Really? Aren’t they, like, your allies?

Putin: Exactly. This will throw inquisitive minds off the scent. We can’t have them finding out about that pee tape.

Trump: Are you sure? Some people are saying that chemical attack looks like it could have been perpetrated by the many terrorist factions in Syria and not the government.

Putin: Who cares? Have you seen how relentless they’ve been in exposing us?? Have you never watched Rachel Maddow? That woman is a psychic bloodhound, masterfully sniffing out the truth at every turn! We can’t afford to take chances. Do as I say.

Trump: Yes sir.

Putin: And see if you can arrest that WikiLeaks guy.

~

5/14/17

Trump: Hey do you want me to do anything about Montenegro’s addition to NATO?

Putin: No. NATO expansion is good.

Trump: Uhhh okay.

~

6/28/17

Trump: Who do you want tapped for Ukraine envoy?

Putin: Kurt Volker.

Trump: Volker? He hates you! He’s like the biggest Russia hawk ever.

Putin: We still need to throw the Russiagaters off the scent. We’re playing 3-D chess here. This is high-level disinformation, or dezinformatsiya as very smart people call it. I want as many Russia hawks in your administration as possible.

Trump: 3-D chess? Alright. I guess you know what you’re doing.

~

8/30/17

Putin: Shut down the Russian consulate in San Francisco and throw out a bunch of diplomats. That will confuse the hell out of them.

~

11/21/17

Putin: Now approve the sale of arms to Ukraine. Not even Obama would do that. This will throw them off the trail for sure.

~

1/1/18

Putin: Happy new year. Force RT and Sputnik to register as foreign agents.

~

1/29/18

Putin: Make sure your Nuclear Posture Review greatly escalates its aggressive posture toward Russia.

~

2/14/18

Putin: Happy Valentine’s Day. Don’t worry about those Russians your guys killed in Syria.

~

2/19/18

Putin: Send a fleet of war ships to the Black Sea.

~

3/25/18

Putin: Better expel a few dozen diplomats over the Skripal thing.

~

4/5/18

Putin: Sanction a bunch of Russian oligarchs.

~

4/10/18

Putin: Bomb Syria.

Trump: What?? Again?

Putin: Yes.

Trump: What the hell, man? Why’d you even recruit me if you’re just going to have me do everything all the Russia hawks want?

Putin: Well, you know how I told you we were playing 3-D chess against the Russiagate investigation?

Trump: Yeah?

Putin: Well that wasn’t enough. Now we’re playing 4-D chess.

Trump: Fine, whatever, I don’t care. Just don’t release my pee tape.

~

7/17/18

Trump: Oh man. They’re really making a major fuss about that summit. What should I do?

Putin: Play it cool. Don’t let them know about our secret diabolical plot.

Trump: Right. Remind me what that was again?

Putin: Make Jim Acosta feel really, really sad.

~

9/2/18

Putin: Have you arrested Julian Assange yet?

Trump: Working on it.

~

10/20/18

Putin: I like John Bolton’s idea. Pull out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

~

11/25/18

Putin: Make sure your administration loudly and aggressively backs Ukraine in our Kerch Strait spat.

Trump: OMFG this is getting too weird. Are you just trolling me? What the hell is this?

Trump: Hello?

Trump: Are you there?

Trump: Answer me!

Putin: 5-D chess.

Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, buying my new book Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone, or my previous book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

=================================
Zie ook:
'Democraten deden zich voor als Russen in false flag operatie om Roy Moore (Republikein) zwart te maken tijdens verkiezing.....'

'Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van 'fake news' bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort 'nieuws''

'Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen'

'BBC: Rusland 'misbruikt humor' om Russiagate te ontkrachten..... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega's voor zot uitgemaakt'

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange......'

'WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen.......'

''Banden van Trump met Rusland' gebaseerd op FBI operatie om VS 'burger' (CIA) in Iran vrij te krijgen......'

'Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!'

'New York Times 'bewijzen' voor Russiagate vallen door de mand......'

'Facebook gebruikte 'fake news' beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden'

'Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax'

'Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks....!!!!'

'De Israëlische manipulatie van de VS presidentsverkiezingen, gaat veel verder dan wat men Rusland in de schoenen schuift.....'

'FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web........'

''Russiagate' een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC...........'

''Russiagate' een verhaal van a t/m z westers 'fake news.....''

'Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen'

'Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering' (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er 'metersdikke' dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikiLeaks)

'FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information'

'Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election'

'Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd'

''Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd' door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich......... AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!'

''Russiagate': Intel-raport over Russische bemoeienis met verkiezingen opgebouwd met leugens en is politiek gemotiveerd, aldus Matlock, voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou'

'Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt'

'CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8.....'

'WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia'

'Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid........ Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!'

'CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'VS 'democratie' aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!'

'Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election'

'Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media'

'Russische 'hacks' door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence'

'Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen........'

'Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht............' (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende twee artikelen: 'Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie' en 'Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary')

'Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte'

'Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

'Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), 'Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws.....' Oei!!'

'RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links......'

'Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt.......'

'Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat'

''Russiagate' een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten.......'

'VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein.....'

'De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers.........'
=========================================

En terzijde:
'Trump (Republikeinen) wint de midterm verkiezingen, alsook de Democraten, het verschil voor mensen elders in de wereld, die onder VS terreur moeten leven, is nul komma nada.......'

'The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media'

'The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq'

'Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt 'TV ankers' propaganda op te lezen (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van 'lokaal nieuws')'

'Ex-CIA agent legt uit hoe de VS schaduwregering en deep state werken, ofwel de machinaties achter de schermen......'

'New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!'

'Noord-Koreaans 'bedrog met nucleaire deal' is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times'

''Fake News' misbruikt door dictaturen en de reguliere (massa-) media'

'Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert'

Kim Putters (SCP): Iedereen deelt in de lusten....... (behalve het grootste deel van de maatschappelijke onderlaag)

Om ten overvloede nog eens te bewijzen dat het SCP een waardeloze club is, stelde PvdA bedrieger Kim Putters, de grofgraaier van het SCP, dat iedereen in Nederland deelt in de lusten (door de huidige gunstige economische situatie)......

Vandaar ook dat Putters stelde geen Gele Hesjes van betekenis te verwachten in Nederland...... Het was de wereldvreemde Putters nog niet opgevallen dat je mensen in Nederland amper nog de straat op krijgt, zelfs niet als ze jaar in jaar uit worden voorgelogen en uitgekleed door Rutte, de premier van misdadigerspartij VVD.......

Voorts is het Putters niet opgevallen dat in Nederland rond de vier miljoen mensen tegen, op, of onder de armoedegrens moeten leven, veelal het gevolg van regeringsbeleid gevoerd door de drie Rutte kabinetten of het laatste CDA/PvdA Balkenende kabinet....... Deze mensen leven allen in armoede en waar velen van hen al jaren letterlijk geen cent extra kunnen missen, worden ze jaarlijks opgeschrikt door huurverhogingen, waarvoor ze ondanks de huurtoeslag toch hele euro's meer moeten betalen..... Hetzelfde geldt voor de zorgpolis en komend jaar worden ze extra gepakt met een verhoging van de lage btw naar 9%, zodat zelfs hun basisbehoeften vele euro's duurder worden.......

Gisteren nog werd bekendgemaakt dat we het komende jaar tot honderden euro's extra moeten betalen voor de energielevering........ Waar de huurders uit de onderlaag voor een heel groot deel in niet geïsoleerde huizen wonen (maar in verhouding tot het inkomen wel de hoofdprijs betalen aan huur), waardoor zij aan gas al veel meer kwijt zijn dan de beter gesitueerde Nederlanders....*

Waarschijnlijk ziet Putters meer betalen als een lust, immers als hij een loonsverhoging krijgt, is die niet beperkt tot een paar procent, of enkele euro's, maar tot honderden euro's extra...... Ofwel met zijn loonsverhogingen kan hij elke verhoging in prijs dekken en dan houdt hij nog geld over......

Hoe is het mogelijk dat een flapdrol als Putters het SCP mag leiden, een orgaan zo blijkt na enig onderzoek, dat zelden gelijk heeft met haar publicaties, niet zo raar als je de wereldvreemdheid van Putters in ogenschouw neemt en dan ziet dat het SCP bijvoorbeeld aan statusscores doet, daarmee berekent het SCP de score van de sociale status van een wijk in vergelijking met andere wijken in Nederland.......

Het gaat bij de sociale status van een wijk niet om het aanzien of de populariteit van een wijk, maar om alle kenmerken van de bewoners in een wijk, dus opleiding, inkomen en positie op de arbeidsmarkt. Een hoge score geeft aan dat de status hoog is en een lage dat deze laag is..... ha! ha! ha! Héél verrassend! (overgenomen van de SCP site)

Het voorgaande terwijl het opperhoofd van het SCP denkt dat iedere Nederlander in de lusten deelt...... Dat zegt genoeg over de 'kwaliteit' van SCP onderzoeken....... Tijd dat Putters zelf eens onderzoek doet in achterstandswijken waar de mensen op hun tandvlees lopen........

Weg met het geldverslindende SCP, puur en alleen een lobbyorgaan voor de zittende regeringen en de huidige inhumane neoliberale status quo!

* Zie: 'Hans André de la Porte (VVE) vindt de OZB een groot onrecht: huurders moeten ook betalen' (waarin veel aandacht voor de financiële en andere negatieve gevolgen van het huren, zoals dit werd [en wordt] bekokstoofd door de kabinetten Balkenende en Rutte)

En zie: '40.000 daklozen: Leger des Heils luidt de noodklok' (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

Zie ook de berichtgeving over de Gele Hesjes (Gilets Jaunes), waar deze demonstranten al evenzo het slachtoffer zijn van het inhumane neoliberalisme:
'Gilets Jaunes (Gele Hesjes) protest 'bestreden' met grof politiegeweld'

'Gilets Jaunes (Gele Hesjes) 'vallen tv zender aan' voor het verspreiden van fake news'

'Gilets Jaunes (Gele Hesjes) protesten: weer laten de reguliere westerse media berichtgeving achterwege........'

'Gilets Jaunes (Gele Hesjes) voor vijfde week op straat, de pers ontkent'

'Frankrijk, vierde weekeinde met protesten, man verliest hand door granaat van politie'

'Gele Hesjes (Gilets Jaunes) protest: Franse politie martelt jongeren geplaatst in executie stijl en taxichauffeur wil de scalp van Macron'

'Volkskrant leest Franse 'Gele Hesjes' ('Gilets Jaunes') demonstranten een zeer vooringenomen les'

BBC Media Action: een smerige propaganda organisatie, mede door Nederland betaald

In het hieronder opgenomen artikel van UK Column aandacht voor BBC 'goede doelen' organisatie, genaamd BBC Media Action. Volgens deze organisatie is het doel mensen over de wereld te informeren, te verbinden en sterker te maken. Mooie woorden van een organisatie doe wordt gesteund door de BBC, de Britse overheid, de EU, het ministerie van buitenlandse zaken van de VS (ofwel het ministerie van terreuruitoefening), de VN en de Nederlandse overheid......

De schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel, Brian Gerrish vraagt zich af of BBC Media Action onze steun en geld verdient, of dat het een gevaarlijke, subversieve organisatie is. Hij stelt dat het laatste het geval is. 

BBC Media Action liegt om te beginnen met de stelling dat het onafhankelijk is, terwijl het is opgezet door de BBC, is gehuisvest in een BBC kantoor, mede is betaald met een fikse BBC subsidie, worden BBC pensioengelden gebruikt voor haar werk, de leden van de organisatie zijn door de BBC geselecteerd..... Het hoofd van de BBC World Service Group, Peter Horrocks, is voorzitter van de raad van bestuur..... 

Zoals de regelmatige bezoeker van dit en vele andere blogs of/en van alternatieve nieuwspagina's op de sociale media weten, is dat de BBC allesbehalve als onafhankelijk kan worden aangeduid, het laat de oren hangen naar de zittende regering, niet zo vreemd als je ziet dat ze voor het jaarlijkse budget afhankelijk zijn van die regering...... Bovendien laten de andere financiers geen twijfel over: BBC Media Action is allesbehalve onafhankelijk.......

Erger nog: BBC Media Action voedt onrust met haar programma's en dat in een groot aantal landen, uiteraard onrust veelal gebaseerd op leugens en halve waarheden...... Het is duidelijk dat men de westerse samenleving als 'mooi voorbeeld' neerzet, zonder over alle negatieve ellende te spreken, die de BBC bijvoorbeeld in GB verzwijgt dan wel toeschrijft aan mensen als Jeremy Corbyn..... Mensen als Labour voorzitter Corbyn tegen wie de BBC een hele campagne heeft gevoerd, daar zowel de Tories als de top van Labour niets met hem te maken willen hebben en als de dood waren dat hij de laatst gehouden landelijke verkiezingen zou winnen........

Over die manipulatie van verkiezingen is met géén woord van kritiek gesproken door de Britse reguliere (massa-) media, terwijl deze media dag in dag uit negatief nieuws over Corbyn brachten (tja, je gaat je eigen valse berichtgeving natuurlijk niet bekritiseren....)

Met de programma's van Media Action wil men de bevolking in arme landen leren hoe te reageren op corruptie van politici en ambtenaren, dezelfde BBC die niet kan onderzoeken hoe het zit met pedofiele presentatoren als Jimmy Saville en financiële fraude binnen de eigen organisatie........

Kortom, de BBC brengt onversneden propaganda tegen regimes als dat in Syrië en Kenia, waar uiteraard niet het welbevinden van bewoners wordt gepromoot, maar verandering van regering wordt gepropageerd..... En dat door een zogenaamde onafhankelijke zendgemachtigde, die de illegale oorlogen als die tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië van A tot Z steunde en nog steunt......

Zelfs over de genocide in Jemen wordt keihard gelogen, zoals ik vanmorgen weer hoorde op BBC World Service radio, waar de presentator een New York Times correspondent wilde verleiden te zeggen dat Iran een uiterst foute rol speelt in Iran, terwijl daar zelfs niet één Iraanse militair is te vinden...... Het viel me mee dat deze correspondent daar niet één keer op reageerde (wellicht later meer daarover)

Voorts bemoeit BBC Madia Action zich met Oekraïne, waar NB bepaalde journalisten het werk onmogelijk wordt gemaakt (ook middels bedreigingen door neonazi's) en waar zelfs mediaorganen zijn gesloten door de neonazi-junta, die de VS daar parachuteerde...... Ook de Britse regering wil dat Rusland De Krim 'teruggeeft' aan die junta in Kiev en 'zich terugtrekt uit Oost-Oekraïne', beide zaken die volkomen vals worden voorgesteld door de de Britse regering en de BBC..... Niet vreemd dus dat Media Action achter deze junta staat, sterker nog: de BBC heeft al ver voor de door de VS georganiseerde opstand in Oekraïne lopen stoken tegen de democratisch gekozen regering Janoekovytsj......

Gerrish betoogt dan ook dat BBC Media Action moet worden ontmantelt, voor het ook in Europa nog meer schade aanricht, zoals het in Oekraïne heeft gedaan!

Moet je nagaan, wij betalen via de belasting mee aan deze smerige organisatie.....

Lees het volgende artikel en verbaas je net als ik deed over deze uitermate smerige propaganda organisatie met de naam BBC Media Action:

BBC Media Action: Subversion From Broadcasting House To Kazakhstan

by 

BRIAN GERRISH

 | Tuesday, 1st July 2014

”Our mission is to inform, connect and empower people around the world.” These are mighty words from BBC Media Action, a charitable offshoot of the BBC funded to £29.5m in 2012 - most of it from the British Government, EU, US State Department, UN and Dutch government. Most of the British public and indeed most of the BBC’s licence payers will have never heard of BBC Media Action let alone understand what this BBC charity really is.

An innocent BBC charity deserving our support and money, or a dangerous subversive organisation? We overwhelmingly think the latter.

The Media Action mission statement says much and nothing at the same time. Much in that they are to inform, connect and empower people worldwide, nothing in that the precise meaning of these words is unclear. Just what is BBC Media Action really doing and why?

BBC Media Action funding.

BBC Media Action Lies From The Start

As with the political charity Common Purpose, BBC Media Action quickly seeks to justify its actions as benevolent - we are a charity and therefore we must be good. Let’s look at the lies. Claiming to be legally, financially and operationally independent of the BBC, Media Action was actually funded by the BBC to the tune of £840,000 in 2012, and uses BBC pension funds and BBC Office space. The majority of the 15 BBC Media Action Board Members are nominated by the BBC, and Peter Horrocks Director of the BBC World Service Group, is Chair of Trustees. He is independent of course, as he directs 2,500 journalists and support staff embedded in 113 countries. A vast propaganda machine and some.

Media Action builds on the ‘fundamental’ values of the BBC and claims that accuracy, trust and reliability are amongst these - the 500 victims of BBC paedophile Jimmy Savile suggest otherwise. A cheap shot? Stay with us as we unpick this pernicious subversive BBC organisation.

According to Media Action they operate 100 researchers providing data, evaluation and insight in 24 countries. They ’surveyed’ 60,000 people in 11 countries in Africa, Asia and the Middle East to ‘inform our health, governance and resilience projects.’ The immediate question is what projects and what are they for? At this point we highlight that Media Action boasts its part in projects funded by the Department for International Development. So is this the BBC or the government at work?

Consider then that BBC Media Action is also funded by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office as part of the Arab Partnership Peace Fund (APPF) formed as a result of the Arab Spring unrest. Media Action is used here to improve ‘opportunities for political, social and economic participation.’ We ask again - a charity or the British government at work?

Media Action’s self praise continues - “Our work is valued by the development community and by media organisations contributing to development and better standards of governance in developing countries.” So the BBC which specialises in politically biased news, dark drama, foul language, violence, pro EU reporting, skewed docudramas and explicit sex, is supposedly the appropriate source vehicle to tell other societies how to govern themselves. The arrogance might be amusing if it were not for much deeper and dirtier layers of their work. 

‘Governance and Rights’ BBC Media Action Style

At this stage we will say it is just a coincidence that BBC Media Action is active in unstable countries worldwide.  Media Action specialises in ‘governance and rights’ and operates in the Middle East, former Soviet Union and Europe. It sustained and expanded Radio Al Mirbad’s programming in Iraq funded by the US Department of State. Not bad for a charity.

In Afghanistan they established an ‘independent’ Afghan organisation staffed by former BBC Media Action employees. In Asia and Cambodia Media Action has pumped out Loy9 videos and boasts of capturing 100,000 views in 8 weeks in a country of under 15 million people. Significant views in poor countries unable to defend against western politically correct culture and BBC ‘propaganda’. Unfair? Then let’s ask why Media Action is integrating with BBC World Service and BBC Global News. Is the BBC’s own brand of news essential for nations to govern themselves. How did Asia manage without the BBC over the last thousand years?

Following the money quickly reveals more of BBC Media Action’s real identity. Enter two subsidiary companies - The Marshall Plan of the Mind Trust (not trading) and BBC World Service Trust. We will focus on the Marshal Plan of the Mind later, but before doing so, let’s take a look at BBC Media Action’s staff. CEO Caroline Nursey is an ex Director Oxfam and former teacher. 

 

Communications and branding Director Kirsty Cockburn is ex BBC, Sightsavers and the Overseas Development Institute (SODI), where she learned that compelling story-telling is at the heart of the complex world of international development. James Dean is Director of Policy and Learning, having spent 20 years at Panos, Earthscan and International Institute for Environment and Development. The pattern is clear - charity academics and quasi government organisations, with no practical life experience, but a supreme confidence they can change the world using media and education. Media and education with the BBC’s own values and agendas of course.

Take Kenya. Sema Kenya is a BBC Media Action and TV programme which provides a ‘constructive’ platform for Kenyans to challenge their politicians and public officials. Yes, the BBC which cannot properly investigate paedophiles or financial fraud in its own organisation is helping Kenyans learn how to challenge the corrupt political elite. Yes really.

New BBC Mindsets For Kenya 

The plot thickens when we examine Sema Kenya and BBC Media Action’s role around the Kenyan Westgate shopping Mall massacre. Semya Kenya programmers report they were uncertain as to how to report events around the Mall massacre. They state “our outgoing Country Director Judy Houstan, her replacement Andrew Ilves who has recently joined from the BBC Somali Service and Africa Editor Solomon Mugera coolly steered the [Sema Kenya] team towards a new mindset.” Mr Ilves was head of BBC World Service responsible for radio and online output in Afghanistan, Iran, Tajikstan and the border areas of Pakistan. He is also Head of Development for BBC Global News  - the private BBC company with £90million in sales. BBC Media Action is independent of course.

It could not be clearer that the BBC is directing the mindset of Kenyan reporting. To what aim?

In Serbia BBC Media Action has been funded by the EU to oversee the EU Media Fund and has been working with local film makers on docudramas to tackle human trafficking. At first glance this sounds benign, but lets consider what is being produced is not truth and fact, but ‘docudrama’ to drive Serbian mindsets where the BBC thinks they should go. As in UK the BBC’s truth is usually contaminated with misleading fiction. 

In Palestine, according to BBC Media Action, the multiplatform debate show  ‘Aswat Min Filesteen’ (Voices from Palestine), meets a growing need in the Palestinian Territories for trustworthy programming covering local issues. The quarterly TV show  is produced by BBC Media Action in partnership with Palestinian Public Broadcasting Corporation and is co-hosted by BBC Arabic’s Nur Zorgui and PBC’s Huda Kadoumi. Aside from the oxymoron of the BBC and ‘trustworthy’ programming, how many people in UK realise that the BBC is creating its own news in Palestine.

BBC Destabilising Syria 

BBC Media Action has also been meddling in Syria. Cruising on the post Arab Spring climate in Syria Media Action has been at work to undermine the authority and control of the Assad government, assisting people in Syria and those dispersed overseas to challenge their national government and stating that “given the sensitive and restrictive media environment, much of the work that is carried out is either under the radar or focused on less contentious development themes..” This devious action must surely be considered subversion within a Nation State. BBC Media Action admit that both the UN and the EU have been funding ‘fifth column’ media activities in Syria.

BBC Media Action is so arrogant and sure of itself that they even tell us what they are doing. Juliette Harkin, former BBC Media Action Project Manager and an expert on Syria states..”we [BBC Media Action] worked in 2004 with individuals within the [Syrian] ministry who wanted change and tried to get them to be the drivers of that. All media development work that has been done within Syria has, in my opinion, been predicated upon this idea that there can be change from within - you have an authoritarian regime and you find who the reformers are within that [regime] and work with them” 

In their own words Media Action is a trojan horse which works against governments of independent nation states - who are they to decide which regimes are acceptable and which not? Did the BBC create chemical weapons reports to suit UK, US and EU political agendas to oust President Assad? Many think so.

BBC fingers in the Ukrainian pie

As we have watched the tragedy of the unfolding violence and destabilisation in Ukraine, we should not be surprised to see BBC Media Action at work. In 2003 BBC Media Action set up Top Media in Odessa - a media support project to offer legal advice and training. Tony Hewson Senior Trainer BBC Media Action is married to a Ukrainian wife. He publicly states that he has watched Ukrainian TV channels to see how some of the journalists he had worked with were coping. Did he help train these ‘independent’ reporters? Hewson boasts …”Back in the current crisis, Andriy Kulykov, another trainer we worked with, a former BBC journalist and now one of Ukraine’s leading talk-show presenters, has also been at the heart of events. He took a brave step of broadcasting his programme Svoboda Slova (Freedom of Speech) not in Ukrainian, but in Russian – an attempt to reach out to all sides. He has also used his BBC journalism training and experience as a trainer with Media Action, to maintain balance during his on air interviewing..” BBC balance? Does that mean challenging and undermining the established government? Did Freedom of Speech pacify a volatile Ukrainian society or inflame it? 

A ‘David’ posted a comment on Mr Hewson’s section of the BBC Media Action website on 19th March 2014 - 10:44. He remarked…“The next question is how free are journalists in the Ukraine now. Is the ‘new government’ of Kiev oligarchs allowing press freedom and non-partisan reports? The BBC could certainly do with some lessons on the ‘non-partisan’ bit. The reports on the Ukraine and Crimea are extremely unbalanced!” David seems to also sense a BBC rat. 

BBC Marshall Plan of the Mind

If we are lifting numerous BBC Media Action lids at this stage, how can we really show the dangerous power of BBC subversive propaganda? We return to the BBC ‘charity’ Marshall Plan of the Mind Trust, also known as BBC MPM. Incorporated 11 September 1992 (removed 29 April 2002), the Trust alleged it was for education, training, the general public, mankind and providing services. Kari Blackburn, Director of International Operations for the BBC World Service Trust was appointed editor of the MPM in 1992. The establishment claimed she committed suicide by drowning in 1997.

Currently serving BBC Media Action trustee Michael C McCulloch formerly worked with the UK Delegation to UNESCO in the 1970s attempting to ‘discourage the Soviet Union from restricting press freedom.’ He also acted as Private Secretary to Tim Raison the then Minister for Overseas Development, and much later he served on the Board of the European Board of Reconstruction and Development. He drew on this UNESCO experience when appointed to launch the Know How Fund for the Soviet Union..the British Government’s programme of support for economic and political reform. McCulloch states..”one of my first tasks was to expand funding for the BBC Marshall Plan of the Mind (MPM), devised by former BBC World Service Director John Tusa with support from Baroness Chalker. MPM focused on the twin tracks of helping to develop independent media and of using media to help people in the region understand and make choices about the changes suddenly unleashed all around them. Creative, exciting, fast-moving and fun—working with MPM was all of these—who had heard of an aid programme supporting soap operas before that?!” 

This was no joke by McCulloch. By 1995 BBC MPM was facilitating a ‘British-style social realist soap opera’, Crossroads to Kazakhstan. According to Ruth Mandel who critically analysed this initiative, the “making of Crossroads was informed by the assumption that the medium of television is an appropriate tool to further the logical and inevitable transition to a capitalist free-market economy, transforming the national imagination in the process.”  Mandel further indicated…”Cross roads was conceived as an elaboration of a BBC MPM Radio soap opera in Russia based on an Archers format, and was funded through Know How Funds, supported by the government’s Overseas Development Administration and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. It was produced by the private London based production company Portobello Media.” 

BBC Media Action British Government’s Know How Fund Propaganda Machine

Mandel’s excellent analysis ultimately lays the British government’s BBC propaganda machine bare. “In discussion, one Know How Fund official admitted that the assistance came loaded with “”unashamedly political objectives.”” He described the project to support changes we want; the transition to a market economy will be better for them, and for us, for politics trade etc. There are real political objectives rather than simply humanitarian assistance.” Against this background, the work of BBC Media Action in Kazakhstan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Serbia, Palestine, Kenya, Syria, Ukraine and elsewhere becomes crystal clear. Political manoeuvering and propaganda disguised as ‘media assistance.’ 

'

Mandel states..”Crossroads mentally ‘reframed’ Kazakhstan with issues such as privatisation, banking, entrepreneurship, marketing reform…and ideological messages , issues of ethnic pluralism and technology transfer…and British American Tobacco (BAT), Wrigley’s gum and Smirnoff Vodka all benefited from product placement.” 

John Tusa Chairman BBC MPM stated June 14 1996…”BBC MPM is an educational, charitable trust…to transfer skills and knowledge of democratic principles and market economies via national radio and television to assist the transition process. It is the most significant project dedicated to mass knowledge transfer within the former Soviet Union.”

In typical BBC style John Tulsa spun the true subversive political objectives as ‘assistance in transition i.e. help for vulnerable people.” The reality is that the BBC Marshall Plan of the Mind was the opposite. A vast, dangerous and subversive media propaganda exercise to break up and reframe nation states into a new British and BBC designed model, whether they wanted it or not. BBC Media Action is the spawn of that BBC MPM. Masquerading as a charity, BBC Media Action is nothing of the sort. It is a hard at work reframing and destabilising the national mind of vulnerable nation states. BBC Media Action should be exposed and disbanded as soon as possible. Left at work, it is capable of inflaming major conflict in Europe - just observe the fruits of BBC Media Action in Ukraine.

=========================================
Zie wat betreft de anti-Corbyn campagne die wordt geleid door de BCC ook:
'Jeremy Corbyn (Labour en oppositie leider GB) veegt de vloer aan met vertrekkende 'centrum' Labour fractieleden'

'BBC presentator maakt per ongeluk promotie voor het socialisme'

'The Mail on Sunday en Sky News schieten levensgrote antisemitische bok bij het belasteren van Corbyn'

'BBC wijst meer en meer naar Corbyn als medeschuldige voor de Brexit'

'Simon Wiesenthal Center: antisemitische top tien 2018 >> o.a. moorden toegestaan voor Joden'

'Britse justitie gaat 'hate crimes' van Labour onderzoeken'

'Jeremy Corbyn wordt gedemoniseerd als antisemiet.......'

Het label 'BAT' direct onder dit bericht staat voor British American Tobacco.

Nikki Haley wordt in de VN vervangen door een blonde versie van Nikki Haley

Caitlin Johnstone plaatste gisteren een artikel over de keus van de Trump administratie voor VS ambassadeur bij de VN Veiligheidsraad, nu oorlogshitser, pathologische leugenaar en psychopaat Nikki Haley.

De keus is gevallen op Heather Nauert, voormalig Fox presentator en huidig woordvoerder van het VS ministerie van buitenlandse zaken. Een neoliberale ploert die niet onderdoet voor haat- en angstzaaier Haley, zoals ze bij Fox en in haar functie als buitenlandse zaken woordvoerder al voldoende heeft laten zien.

Ongelofelijk, de reacties op het vertrek van Haley, als betrof het een groot bewindspersoon, i.p.v. een oorlogshoer, die ziel en zaligheid heeft verkocht aan de duivel genaamd militair-industrieel complex, een duivel die zoveel mogelijk oorlog en ellende wil zien op de wereld, een duivel aan wie de VS jaarlijks honderden miljarden dollars belastinggeld offert...........

Johnstone gaat o.a. in op de kritiek als zou Nauert elke ervaring missen om te fungeren als ambassadeur bij de VN, waar Johnsone betoogt dat Nauert niet onderdoet voor leugenaar en oorlogshitser Haley.

Lees het deels humoristisch relaas van Johnstone:

Nikki Haley To Be Replaced By Blonde Version Of Nikki Haley

AUTHOR: CAITLIN JOHNSTONE

DECEMBER 7, 2018

When UN Ambassador Nikki Haley announced her upcoming resignation from the position, establishment loyalists spent the day awash with grief that the Trump administration was losing one of its remaining moderate Republican voices.

“Nikki Haley, ambassador to the United Nations, has resigned, leaving the administration with one less moderate Republican voice,” tweeted the New York Times, without defining what specifically is “moderate” about relentlessly pushing for war and starvation sanctions at every opportunity and adamantly defending the slaughter of unarmed Palestinian protesters with sniper fire.

“Too bad Nikki Haley has resigned,” tweeted law professor turned deranged Russia conspiracy theorist Laurence Tribe. “She was one of the last members of Trumplandia with even a smidgen of decency.”

Well I’ve got some good news for those who lamented the loss of a virulent psychopathic war whore as UN ambassador, and bad news for any anti-interventionist Trump voters who’ve been secretly hoping this administration would use Haley’s vacancy to move in a less hawkish direction: you’re getting another one just like her. According to multiple sources, Trump has confirmed early rumors and selected State Department Spokeswoman and former Fox News pundit Heather Nauert as Haley’s replacement.

HuffPost

✔@HuffPost

BREAKING: Former Fox News host Heather Nauert has been picked to replace outgoing U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley. http://huffp.st/HwpAHte

Trump To Appoint Heather Nauert As U.S. Ambassador To United Nations

The former Fox News host is Trump's pick to replace Nikki Haley.

Ever since rumors emerged of Nauert’s selection for the job last month, the dominant criticisms have been that she lacks “experience” and “qualifications” for the job of US Ambassador to the United Nations. These criticisms have picked up ever since these early rumors were confirmed, and they are illegitimate for two reasons. The first is that a position as Fox News propagandist is very much the sort of experience an American needs to be a UN Ambassador, especially for this administration. The second is that all the job requires is a willingness to sell one’s soul for the promotion of US war agendas, and to occasionally help kick Palestinian human rights further into the gutter than they already are. No experience is required for this, and these are things we already know Nauert could do in her sleep.

As State Department Spokeswoman, Nauert’s messaging has already been moving in lockstep with that of Haley anyway. She speaks about Syria as though it is the property of the United States, routinely warning the Syrian government not to re-take its own land from the western-backed terrorist factions that nearly overran the nation. She regularly promotes the unrest in Iran that the Trump administration has been deliberately attempting to foment with starvation sanctions and CIA covert ops, and helps sell the absolute lie that Iran is “the leading state sponsor of terrorism”. She promotes anti-Venezuela narratives, anti-Russia narratives, anti-North Korea narratives, anti-Houthi narratives, and anti-Palestinian narratives. She’s been at this job since April of last year, and her talking points have consistently mirrored Haley’s.

Nauert is perfectly qualified for the job of UN Ambassador, because all that job requires is being a sociopathic war pig. She’s already been doing that.

Anderson Cooper 360°

✔@AC360

"In terms of what we normally look for at the United Nations, her resume is very thin."@David_Gergen reacts to reports that the President is expected to name Heather Nauert his new ambassador to the UN.

"This is a risky move for Trump," adds @jrpsaki.https://cnn.it/2UlfIah 

618

3:41 AM - Dec 7, 2018

All this fuss about Nauert’s “experience” highlights perfectly why Trump’s ostensible opposition has been almost entirely worthless: they don’t focus on any of the evil foreign policy decisions that this administration is actually advancing, because they don’t actually oppose those decisions. They aren’t concerned that Nauert will promote senseless, psychotic acts of military mass murder, they are concerned that she lacks the necessary qualifications to promote it skillfully and professionally. On this matter, as with all matters, Trump’s self-proclaimed “resistance” is perfectly comfortable with the blood-spattered face of world-dominating imperialism. They just want it to go back to smiling and saying things politely.

The problem with most of the opposition to Trump is that they’re not interested in waking up, they’re interested in removing an annoying wrinkle in their bedsheets so that they can go back to sleep. They don’t care about the monstrous acts of violence that are inflicted upon human beings on the other side of the globe in their name, so they focus on irrelevant nonsense like whether or not Heather Nauert is qualified to read from the same imperialist script that was read by Haley, Samantha Power and Susan Rice.

Those who care about reality don’t care about who’s reading from that script. It is the script itself they seek to burn.

______________

Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, buying my new book Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone, or my previous book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Liked it? Take a second to support Caitlin Johnstone on Patreon!

========================================
In het Twitterbericht van Anderson Cooper (@AC360) is een video te zien die ik niet kan overnemen, hier de link naar het origineel.

Voor meer berichten met Haley en/of Nauert, klik op het betreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.