De show
van Stephen Colbert is een propaganda orgaan voor de rechtse
democraten en is dat in feite al heel lang. Daarmee staat Colbert ook achter de
illegale oorlogen die onder de democratische 'vredesduif' Obama werden aangegaan, dit onder regie van zijn rechterhand destijds Hillary Clinton
(minister van BuZa), een oorlogsmisdadiger van formaat.....
Colbert
had onlangs de democraat Tulsi Gabbard in zijn show en in
tegenstelling tot de omgang met andere politici van de Democratische Partij,
was dit geen gesprek met opgeklopte 'humor'.
Colbert
probeerde Gabbard zelfs in het kamp te duwen van fascist David Duke
(voormalig Ku Klux Klan top), en dat van rechtse rotzakken als Steve Bannon en Matt
Gaetz......
Wat
betreft de illegale oorlogen van de VS, liet Colbert ten overvloede in zijn gesprek
met Gabbard blijken dat hij die volledig steunt, ondanks het enorme
aantal doden en landen die in puin achterblijven als de VS klaar is
met haar grootschalige terreur tegen in feite de bevolking van de
landen die het illegaal aanvalt.....
Ook de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen het bewind van Assad kwam ter sprake, waar Gabbard Colbert fijntjes liet weten dat de CIA in 2011 de 'opstand' tegen Assad heeft georganiseerd en geregisseerd en dat de oorlog van de VS in dat land niet gericht was tegen IS, maar tegen het bewind van Assad, waar ze ook de wapenleveringen aan terreurgroepen als IS en militaire training door de VS aan die terreurgroepen noemde.....
Jammer dat ze Assad wel een dictator noemt, terwijl hij met grote meerderheid democratisch tot president werd verkozen in 2014, een verkiezing die door internationale waarnemers als eerlijk en goed werd beoordeeld......
Vergeet voorts niet dat onder Assad alle geloven hand in hand naast elkaar leefden, een zaak die door handelingen van de VS bijna de nek werd omgedraaid.... Gelukkig leven de teruggekeerde vluchtelingen, in de gebieden die door het reguliere Syrische leger worden gecontroleerd, weer vreedzaam naast elkaar, ongeacht het geloof dat men aanhangt......
Helaas
voor Colbert, maar hij is geen partij voor Gabbard die hem flink bij
de lurven had >> lezen en zien mensen!!
|
Hawaii
Congresswoman and Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi
Gabbard recently
appeared on The
Late Show with Stephen Colbert,
where instead of the light, jokey banter about politics and who she
is as a person that Democratic presidential candidates normally
encounter on late night comedy programs, the show's host solemnly ran
down a list of textbook beltway smears against Gabbard and made her
defend them in front of his audience.
Normally
when a Democratic Party-aligned politician appears on such a show,
you can expect jokes about how stupid Trump is and how badly they're
going to beat the Republicans, how they're going to help ordinary
Americans, and maybe some friendly back-and-forth about where they
grew up or something. Colbert had no time to waste on such things,
however, because this was not an interview with a normal Democratic
Party-aligned politician: this was a politician who has been loudly
and consistently criticizing US foreign policy.
After
briefly asking his guest who she is and why she's running for
president, Colbert jumped
right into it by
immediately bringing up Syria and Assad, the primary line of attack
employed against Gabbard by establishment propagandists in American
mainstream media.
Colbert:
Do you think the Iraq war was worth it?
Gabbard:
No.
Colbert:
Do you think that our involvement in Syria has been worth it?
Gabbard:
No.
Colbert:
Do you think that ISIS could have been defeated without our
involvement and without our support of the local troops there?
Gabbard:
There are two things we need to address in Syria. One is a regime
change war that was first launched by the United States in 2011,
covertly, led by the CIA. That is a regime change war that has
continued over the years, that has increased the suffering of the
Syrian people, and strengthened groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS,
because the CIA was using American taxpayer dollars to provide arms
and training and equipment to these terrorist groups to get them to
overthrow the government. So that is a regime change war that we
should not have been engaging.
Colbert:
So, but if it is someone like Bashar al-Assad, who gasses his own
people, or who engages in war crimes against his own people, should
the United States not be involved?
Gabbard:
The United States should not be intervening to overthrow these
dictators and these regimes that we don't like, like Assad, like
Saddam Hussein, like Gaddafi, and like Kim Jong Un. There are bad
people in the world, but history has shown us that every time the
United States goes in and topples these dictators we don't like,
trying to end up like the world's police, we end up increasing the
suffering of the people in these countries. We end up increasing the
loss of life, but American lives and the lives of people in these
countries. We end up undermining our own security, what to speak of
the trillions of dollars of taxpayer money that's spent on these wars
that we need to be using right here at home.
Like
I said, this is not a normal presidential candidate. How often do you
see a guest appear on a network late night talk show and talk about
the CIA arming terrorists in Syria and the fact that US military
interventionism is completely disastrous? It just doesn't happen. You
can understand, then, why empire propagandist Stephen Colbert spent
the rest of the interview informing
his TV audience that Tulsi Gabbard is dangerous and poisonous.
This was unwatchable. Colbert just went down the list of scripted Gabbard smears (Assad, David Duke) then sermonized about how US military intervention is a force for good in this world. All without telling a single joke. Late night "comedy" shows are propaganda for livestock.
Colbert:
You got some heat for meeting with Bashar al-Assad. Do you not
consider him a war criminal? Why did you meet with that man?
Gabbard:
In the pursuit of peace and security. If we are not willing to meet
with adversaries, potential adversaries, in the pursuit of peace and
security, the only alternative is more war. That's why I took that
meeting with Assad. In pursuit of peace and security.
Colbert:
Do you believe he is a war criminal? Do you believe he gassed his own
people or committed atrocities against his own people?
Gabbard:
Yes. Reports have shown that that's a fact.
Colbert:
So you believe the intelligence agencies on that. Because I head that
you did not necessarily believe those reports.
The
reason I call Colbert a propagandist and not simply a liberal empire
loyalist who happens to have been elevated by billionaire media is
because these are carefully constructed narratives that he is
reciting, and they weren't constructed by him.
Trying
to make it look to the audience as though Gabbard is in some way
loyal to Assad has been a high-priority agenda of the mainstream
media ever since she announced her presidential candidacy.
We
saw it in her
recent appearance on The
View,
where John McCain's sociopathic daughter called her an "Assad
apologist" and demanded that Gabbard call Assad an enemy of the
United States. We saw it in her recent CNN
town hall,
where a consultant who
worked on Obama's 2008 campaign was
presented as an ordinary audience member to help CNN's Dana Bash
paint Gabbard's skepticism of intelligence reports about an alleged
chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government as something that is
weird and suspicious, instead of the only sane position in a
post-Iraq invasion world. We saw it in her
appearance on
MSNBC's Morning
Joe last
month, where the entire panel piled on her in outrage that she
wouldn't call Assad an enemy of the United States. It's such a common
propaganda talking point that the New
York Times'
Bari Weiss famously made
a laughingstock of herself by
repeating it as self-evident truth on The
Joe Rogan Experience without
having the faintest clue what specific facts it was meant to refer
to, just because she'd heard establishment pundits saying it so much.
This
is an organized smear by the mass media attempting to marry Gabbard
in the eyes of the public to a Middle Eastern leader whom the
propagandists have already sold as a child-murdering monster, and
Colbert is participating in it here just as much as the serious news
media talking heads are. It's been frustrating to watch Gabbard fold
to this smear campaign by
acting like it's an established fact that Assad "gases his own
people" and not the hotly contested empire-serving narrative she
knows it is.
Gabbard
is being targeted by this smear because she challenges US political
orthodoxy on military violence (the glue which holds the empire
together), so no amount of capitulation will keep them from trying to
prevent the public from trusting her words.
(de video in het volgende Twitterbericht kan ik niet overnemen, zie hiervoor het origineel)
The journalist interrogating Tulsi seems to believe that US forces in Syria are fighting Assad. Tulsi corrects her, says those troops were deployed there to fight ISIS. These people don’t even know what’s happening in the places they want the US to occupy
Tom Elliott
"I
don't know whether America should be the policemen of the world,"
Colbert said after
Gabard defended her position.
"It
is my opinion that we should not be," Gabbard replied, causing
Colbert to launch into a stuffy, embarrassing sermon on the virtues
of interventionism and US hegemony that would make Bill Kristol
blush.
"If
we are not, though, nature abhors a vacuum, and if we are not
involved in international conflicts, or trying to quell international
conflicts, certainly the Russians and the Chinese will fill that
vacuum. And we will step away from the world stage in a significant
way that might destabilize the world, because the United States,
however flawed, is a force for good in the world in my opinion. Would
you agree with that?"
Again,
this is a comedy show.
Gabbard
explained that in order to be a force for good in the world the
United States has to actually do good, which means not raining fire
upon every nation it dislikes all the time. Colbert
responded by
reading off his blue index card to repeat yet another tired
anti-Gabbard smear.
"You've
gotten some fans in the Trump supporter world: David Duke, Steve
Bannon, and, uh, Matt, uh, Gaetz, is that his name? Matt Gaetz? What
do you make of how much they like you?"
This
one is particularly vile, partly because Gabbard
has repeatedly and unequivocally
denounced David Duke, who has a long-established
and well-known history of
injecting himself into the drama of high-profile conversations in
order to maintain the illusion of relevance, and partly because it's
a completely irrelevant point that is brought up solely for the
purpose of marrying Tulsi Gabbard's name to a former Ku Klux Klan
leader. Colbert only brought
this up (and made Newsweek totally
squee)
because he wanted to assist in that marrying. The fact that there are
distasteful ideologies which also happen to oppose US interventionism
for their own reasons does not change the undeniable fact that US
military interventionism is consistently disastrous and never helpful
and robs the US public of resources that are rightfully theirs.
This
interview was easily Colbert's most blatant establishment rim job
I've ever seen, surpassing even the time he
corrected his own audience when
they cheered at James Comey's firing to explain to them that Comey is
a good guy now and they're meant to like him. Colbert's show is
blatant propaganda for human livestock, and the fact that this is
what American "comedy" shows look like now is nauseating.
When
Tulsi Gabbard first announced her candidacy I
predicted that
she'd have the narrative control engineers scrambling all over
themselves to kill her message, and it's been even more spectacular
than I imagined. I don't agree with everything she says and does, but
by damn this woman is shaking up the establishment narrative matrix
more than anybody else right now. She's certainly keeping it
interesting.
__________________________
Thanks
for reading! My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you
enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me
on Facebook,
following my antics on Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing
some of my sweet
merchandise, buying
my new book Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone,
or my previous book Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.
Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
Caitlin
Johnstone |
March 13, 2019 at 12:38 pm |
Tags: Colbert, Late
Show, MSM, Politics, propaganda, Tulsi
Gabbard |
Categories: Article, News |
URL: https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1AH
====================================Zie ook:
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten