Pepe
Escobar heeft op The Saker (door mij overgenomen van
Information Clearing House >> ICH) een artikel geschreven
waarin hij een juiste analyse maakt van hoe de VS zichzelf schaakmat
heeft gezet met de verbale agressie tegen China, ten eerste gedaan
door oorlogsmisdadiger en VS president Joe Biden en bij het overleg
tussen China en de VS in Anchorage (Alaska) waarbij elke diplomatieke
regel werd geschonden door de VS.....
Uiteraard
was deze uiterst domme agressie bedoeld om het volk van de VS en haar
NAVO-partners achter de VS vlag te scharen tegen China. Met grote
woorden over de Chinese behandeling van de Oeigoeren (zogenaamd een
genocide op dit volk, gebaseerd op onzin bewijzen) en de omgang van
China met Hongkong, Taiwan en de Zuid-Chinese Zee dacht de VS de
wedstrijd te hebben gewonnen, echter men rekende zich rijk zonder
rekening te houden met de uiterst intelligente Chinese diplomaat Yang
Jiechi, van de commissie voor buitenlandse zaken van de Chinese
Communistische Partij (CCP). Deze waste de oren van de aanwezige VS
diplomaten op uiterst kundige manier, door de VS te wijzen op de mensenechtenschendingen in eigen land en
de unilaterale en agressieve optreden in vele landen waarbij de VS de
instabiliteit veroorzaakt en de vrede geweld aandoet, terwijl China
zich grotendeels houdt aan internationale wetgeving en de VN respecteert als
organisatie die middels diplomatie problemen moet aanpakken. (en dan spreek ik niet over Tibet)
Yang
Jiechi stelde dat China de boel niet destabiliseert maar juist arme
landen helpt met de ontwikkeling van hun land en gezien de
werkelijkheid is daar geen speld tussen te krijgen, zo legt China op
grote schaal infrastructuur aan in een aantal Afrikaanse landen, een
zaak die het westen afdoet als neokolonialisme, een gotspe als je
ziet dat juist het westen onder leiding van de VS gebruik maakt van
corruptie en dictators om landen leeg te stelen en de boel daar te
manipuleren, als het moet zelfs door een staatsgreep te organiseren
en regisseren (voorbeelden te over)....
De
VS brengt overduidelijk dood en verderf over de wereld, echter dit
wordt verborgen door westerse politici en de reguliere westerse media
die de leugens herhalen van de CIA en NSA over de 'noodzaak' van
oorlogsvoering, zonder een resolutie van de VN...... In Irak
vermoordde de VS samen met haar NAVO-partners minstens 2 miljoen
mensen en sinds de illegale oorlog tegen Afghanistan, dit jaar 20
jaar oud (!!!), heeft de VS (met hulp van haar partners) in totaal 5
miljoen mensen vermoord......
Voorts
stelde Yang Jiechi in feite dat de VS zoals gezegd beter aan haar eigen
schendingen van mensenrechten kan werken, i.p.v. zich te bemoeien met
interne zaken van China. Misschien nog wel het meest vernederend voor
de 'Amerikanen' was een les diplomatie die Yang Jiechi de VS
diplomaten gaf, hier een citaat uit het hieronder opgenomen artikel:
“If you want to
deal with us properly, let’s have some mutual respect and do things
the right way”. But what stood out was a stinging, concise
diagnostic blending
history and politics:
The United States
is not qualified to talk to China in a condescending manner. The
Chinese people will not accept that. It must be based on mutual
respect to deal with China, and history will prove that those who
seek to strangle China will suffer in the end.
Lees
het artikel van Pepe Escobar waarin hij ook de bespreking van de
ministers van buitenlandse zaken van China en Rusland,
respectievelijk Wang Yi en Sergej Lavrov in Guilin beschrijft,
waar men o.a. sprak over verdere samenwerking en om het VS
betalingssysteem SWIFT en de petrodollar buitenspel te
plaatsen.... Iran maakt in feite ook deel uit van het bondgenootschap
dat door handelen van de VS tot stand is gekomen en dit land stelt dat de VS haar geen verdere
eisen kan opleggen, maar zich moet voegen bij de eerdere nucleaire
deal JCPOA (of P5+1 nucleaire deal) Dit zijn nog maar een paar van de zaken,
echter het is overduidelijk dat de VS deze drie landen in elkaars
armen heeft gedreven en dat de VS daar de wrange vruchten van zal
plukken, ofwel de VS heeft zichzelf geopolitiek schaakmat gezet.
Onder het bericht kan je klikken voor een 'Dutch vertaling' dit neemt wel enkele tientallen seconden tijd in beslag.
Welcome
to shocked & awed 21st century geopolitics
With
a Russia-China-Iran triple bitch slap on the hegemon, we now have a
brand new geopolitical chessboard
By
Pepe Escobar
Minsters van buitenlandse zaken Rusland en China respectievelijk Sergej Lavrov en Wang Yi March 23, 2021
"Information
Clearing House"
- - "Asia
Times"
-
It took 18 years after Shock
and Awe unleashed on Iraq for the Hegemon to be mercilessly
shocked and awed by a virtually simultaneous, diplomatic Russia-China
one-two.
How this is a real
game-changing moment cannot be emphasized enough; 21st
century geopolitics will never be the same again.
Yet it was the Hegemon
who first crossed the diplomatic Rubicon. The handlers behind
hologram Joe “I’ll do whatever you want me to do, Nance” Biden
had whispered in his earpiece to brand Russian President Vladimir
Putin as a soulless “killer” in the middle of a softball
interview.
Not even at the height
of the Cold War the superpowers resorted to ad hominem attacks. The
result of such an astonishing blunder was to regiment virtually the
whole Russian population behind Putin – because that was perceived
as an attack against the Russian state.
Then came Putin’s
cool, calm, collected – and quite diplomatic – response, which
needs to be carefully pondered. These sharp as a dagger words are
arguably the
most devastatingly powerful five minutes in the history of
post-truth international relations.
In For
Leviathan, it’s so cold in Alaska, we forecasted what could
take place in the US-China 2+2 summit at a shabby hotel in Anchorage,
with cheap bowls of instant noodles thrown in as extra bonus.
China’s millennial
diplomatic protocol establishes that discussions start around common
ground – which are then extolled as being more important than
disagreements between negotiating parties. That’s at the heart of
the concept of “no loss of face”. Only afterwards the parties
discuss their differences.
Yet it was totally
predictable that a bunch of amateurish, tactless and clueless
Americans would smash those basic diplomatic rules to show “strength”
to their home crowd, distilling the proverbial litany on Taiwan, Hong
Kong, South China Sea, “genocide” of Uighurs.
Oh dear. There was not
a single State Dept. hack with minimal knowledge of East Asia to warn
the amateurs you don’t mess with the formidable head of the Foreign
Affairs Commission at the CCP’s Central Committee, Yang Jiechi,
with impunity.
Visibly startled, but
controlling his exasperation, Yang Jiechi struck
back. And the rhetorical shots were heard around the whole Global
South.
They had to include a
basic lesson in manners: “If you want to deal with us properly,
let’s have some mutual respect and do things the right way”. But
what stood out was a stinging, concise diagnostic blending
history and politics:
The United States
is not qualified to talk to China in a condescending manner. The
Chinese people will not accept that. It must be based on mutual
respect to deal with China, and history will prove that those who
seek to strangle China will suffer in the end.
And all that
translated in real time by young, attractive and ultra-skilled Zhang
Jing – who inevitably became an overnight superstar in China,
reaping an astonishing 400 million plus hits on Weibo.
The incompetence of
the “diplomatic” arm of the Biden-Harris administration beggars
belief. Using a basic Sun Tzu maneuver, Yang Jiechi turned the tables
and voiced the predominant sentiment of the overwhelming majority of
the planet. Stuff your unilateral “rules-based order”. We, the
nations of the world, privilege the UN charter and the primacy of
international law.
So this is what the
Russia-China one-two achieved almost instantaneously: from now on,
the Hegemon should be treated, all across the Global South with, at
best, disdain.
An inevitable
historical process
Pre-Alaska, the
Americans went on a charming offensive in Japan and South Korea for
“consultations”. That’s irrelevant. What matters is
post-Alaska, and the crucial Sergey
Lavrov-Wang Yi meeting of Foreign Ministers in Guilin.
Lavrov, always
unflappable, clarified in an interview
with Chinese media how the Russia-China strategic partnership
sees the current US diplomatic train wreck:
As a matter of
fact, they have largely lost the skill of classical diplomacy.
Diplomacy is about relations between people, the ability to listen to
each other, to hear one another and to strike a balance between
competing interests. These are exactly the values that Russia
and China are promoting in diplomacy.
The inevitable
consequence is that Russia-China must “consolidate our
independence: “The United States has declared limiting the advance
of technology in Russia and China as its goal. So, we must reduce our
exposure to sanctions by strengthening our technological independence
and switching to settlements in national and international currencies
other than the dollar. We need to move away from using
Western-controlled international payment systems.”
Russia-China have
clearly identified, as Lavrov pointed out, how the “Western
partners” are “promoting their ideology-driven agenda aimed at
preserving their dominance by holding back progress in other
countries. Their policies run counter to the objective international
developments and, as they used to say at some point, are on the wrong
side of history. The historical process will come into its own, no
matter what happens.”
As a stark
presentation of an inevitable “historical process”, it doesn’t
get more crystal clear than that. And predictably, it didn’t take
time for the “Western partners” to fall back into – what else –
their same old sanction bag of tricks.
Here we go again: a
US, UK, EU, Canada “alliance” sanctioning selected Chinese
officials because, in Blinken’s words, “the PRC [People’s
Republic of China] continues to commit genocide and crimes against
humanity in Xinjiang.”
The EU, UK, and Canada
didn’t have the guts to sanction a key player: Xinjiang party
chief Chen
Quanguo, who’s a Politburo member. The Chinese response would
have been – economically – devastating.
Still, Beijing
counterpunched with its own sanctions – targeting, crucially, the
German far-right evangelical nut posing as “scholar” who produced
the bulk of the completely
debunked “proof” of a million Uighurs held in concentration
camps.
Once again, the
“Western partners” are impermeable to logic. Adding to the
already appalling state of EU-Russia relations, Brussels chooses to
also antagonize China based on a single fake dossier, playing right
into the Hegemon’s not exactly secret Divide and Rule agenda.
Mission (nearly)
accomplished: Brussels diplomats tell me the EU Parliament is all but
set to refuse to ratify the China-EU trade deal painstakingly
negotiated by Merkel and Macron. The consequences will be immense.
So Blinken will have
reasons to be cheerful when he meets assorted eurocrats and NATO
bureaucrats this week, ahead of the NATO summit.
One has to applaud the
gall of the “Western partners”. It’s 18 years since Shock and
Awe – the start of the bombing, invasion and destruction of Iraq.
It’s 10 years since the start of the total destruction of Libya by
NATO and its GCC minions, with Obama-Biden “leading from behind”.
It’s 10 years since the start of the savage destruction of Syria by
proxy – complete with jihadis disguised as “moderate rebels”.
Yet now the “Western
partners” are so mortified by the plight of Muslims in Western
China.
At least there are
some cracks within the EU illusionist circus. Last week, the French
Armed Forces Joint Reflection Circle (CRI) – in fact an independent
think tank of former high officers – wrote a startling open letter
to cardboard NATO secretary-general Stoltenberg de facto accusing him
of behaving as an American stooge with the implementation of NATO
2030 plan. The French officers drew the correct conclusion: the
US/NATO combo is the main cause of appalling relations with Russia.
These Ides of
March
Meanwhile, sanctions
hysteria advance like a runaway train. Biden-Harris has already
threatened to impose extra sanctions on Chinese oil imports from
Iran. And there’s more in the pipeline – on manufacturing,
technology, 5G, supply chains, semiconductors.
And yet nobody is
trembling in their boots. Right on cue with Russia-China, Iran has
stepped up the game, with Ayatollah Khamenei issuing the guidelines
for Tehran’s return to the JCPOA.
1. The US regime is in
no position to make new demands or changes regarding the nuclear
deal.
2. The US is weaker
today than when the JCPOA was signed.
3. Iran is in a
stronger position now. If anyone can impose new demands it’s Iran
and not the US.
And with that we have
a Russia-China-Iran triple bitch slap on the Hegemon.
In our latest
conversation/interview, to be released soon in a video + transcript
package, Michael Hudson – arguably the world’s top economist –
hit the heart of the matter:
The fight against
China, the fear of China is that you can’t do to China, what you
did to Russia. America would love for there to be a Yeltsin figure in
China to say, let’s just give all of the railroads that you’ve
built, the high-speed rail, let’s give the wealth, let’s give all
the factories to individuals and let the individuals run everything
and, then we’ll lend them the money, or we’ll buy them out and
then we can control them financially. And China’s not letting that
happen. And Russia stopped that from happening. And the fury in the
West is that somehow, the American financial system is unable to take
over foreign resources, foreign agriculture. It is left only with
military means of grabbing them as we are seeing in the near East.
And you’re seeing in the Ukraine right now.
To be continued. As it
stands, we should all make sure that the Ides of March – the 2021
version – have already configured a brand new geopolitical
chessboard. The Russia-China Double Helix on high-speed rail has left
the station – and there’s no turning back.
Pepe
Escobar is correspondent-at-large at Asia
Times. His latest book is 2030.
Follow him on Facebook.-
Click
for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.
=====================================
Zie ook het commentaar op het bovenstaande ICH artikel onder het artikel op
ICH.
Voor meer berichten over de P5+1 nucleaire deal of de zaak rond de Oeigoeren, klik op het betreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.
