Geen evolutie en ecolutie zonder revolutie!

Albert Einstein:

Twee dingen zijn oneindig: het universum en de menselijke domheid. Maar van het universum ben ik niet zeker.

donderdag 6 oktober 2016

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII........

Kwam gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke een lijst met oorlogen tegen, die de VS sinds WOII heeft gevoerd. Voor velen geen nieuws maar het is schokkend om alles nog eens op een rij te zien, een gruwelijk naslagwerk over de daden van de grootste terreur entiteit op aarde: de VS.......

US Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII


After the catastrophic attacks of September 11 2001 monumental sorrow and a feeling of desperate and understandable anger began to permeate the American psyche. A few people at that time attempted to promote a balanced perspective by pointing out that the United States had also been responsible for causing those same feelings in people in other nations, but they produced hardly a ripple. Although 

Americans understand in the abstract the wisdom of people around the world empathizing with the suffering of one another, such a reminder of wrongs committed by our nation got little hearing and was soon overshadowed by an accelerated “war on terrorism.”

But we must continue our efforts to develop understanding and compassion in the world. Hopefully, this article will assist in doing that by addressing the question “How many September 11ths has the United States caused in other nations since WWII?” This theme is developed in this report which contains an estimated numbers of such deaths in 37 nations as well as brief explanations of why the U.S. is considered culpable.

The causes of wars are complex. In some instances nations other than the U.S. may have been responsible for more deaths, but if the involvement of our nation appeared to have been a necessary cause of a war or conflict it was considered responsible for the deaths in it. In other words they probably would not have taken place if the U.S. had not used the heavy hand of its power. The military and economic power of the United States was crucial.

This study reveals that U.S. military forces were directly responsible for about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and the two Iraq Wars. The Korean War also includes Chinese deaths while the Vietnam War also includes fatalities in Cambodia and Laos.

The American public probably is not aware of these numbers and knows even less about the proxy wars for which the United States is also responsible. In the latter wars there were between nine and 14 million deaths in Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, East Timor, Guatemala, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sudan.

But the victims are not just from big nations or one part of the world. The remaining deaths were in smaller ones which constitute over half the total number of nations. Virtually all parts of the world have been the target of U.S. intervention.

The overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30 million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world.

To the families and friends of these victims it makes little difference whether the causes were U.S. military action, proxy military forces, the provision of U.S. military supplies or advisors, or other ways, such as economic pressures applied by our nation. They had to make decisions about other things such as finding lost loved ones, whether to become refugees, and how to survive.

And the pain and anger is spread even further. Some authorities estimate that there are as many as 10 wounded for each person who dies in wars. Their visible, continued suffering is a continuing reminder to their fellow countrymen.

It is essential that Americans learn more about this topic so that they can begin to understand the pain that others feel. Someone once observed that the Germans during WWII “chose not to know.” We cannot allow history to say this about our country. The question posed above was “How many September 11ths has the United States caused in other nations since WWII?” The answer is: possibly 10,000.

Comments on Gathering These Numbers

Generally speaking, the much smaller number of Americans who have died is not included in this study, not because they are not important, but because this report focuses on the impact of U.S. actions on its adversaries.

An accurate count of the number of deaths is not easy to achieve, and this collection of data was undertaken with full realization of this fact. These estimates will probably be revised later either upward or downward by the reader and the author. But undoubtedly the total will remain in the millions.

The difficulty of gathering reliable information is shown by two estimates in this context. For several years I heard statements on radio that three million Cambodians had been killed under the rule of the Khmer Rouge. However, in recent years the figure I heard was one million. Another example is that the number of persons estimated to have died in Iraq due to sanctions after the first U.S. Iraq War was over 1 million, but in more recent years, based on a more recent study, a lower estimate of around a half a million has emerged.

Often information about wars is revealed only much later when someone decides to speak out, when more secret information is revealed due to persistent efforts of a few, or after special congressional committees make reports

Both victorious and defeated nations may have their own reasons for underreporting the number of deaths. Further, in recent wars involving the United States it was not uncommon to hear statements like “we do not do body counts” and references to “collateral damage” as a euphemism for dead and wounded. Life is cheap for some, especially those who manipulate people on the battlefield as if it were a chessboard.

To say that it is difficult to get exact figures is not to say that we should not try. Effort was needed to arrive at the figures of 6six million Jews killed during WWI, but knowledge of that number now is widespread and it has fueled the determination to prevent future holocausts. That struggle continues.
The author can be contacted at jlucas511@woh.rr.com

37 VICTIM NATIONS

Afghanistan

The U.S. is responsible for between 1 and 1.8 million deaths during the war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan, by luring the Soviet Union into invading that nation. (1,2,3,4)
The Soviet Union had friendly relations its neighbor, Afghanistan, which had a secular government. The Soviets feared that if that government became fundamentalist this change could spill over into the Soviet Union.

In 1998, in an interview with the Parisian publication Le Novel Observateur, Zbigniew Brzezinski, adviser to President Carter, admitted that he had been responsible for instigating aid to the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan which caused the Soviets to invade. In his own words:

According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan on 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.” (5,1,6)

Brzezinski justified laying this trap, since he said it gave the Soviet Union its Vietnam and caused the breakup of the Soviet Union. “Regret what?” he said. “That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it?” (7)

The CIA spent 5 to 6 billion dollars on its operation in Afghanistan in order to bleed the Soviet Union. (1,2,3) When that 10-year war ended over a million people were dead and Afghan heroin had captured 60% of the U.S. market. (4)

The U.S. has been responsible directly for about 12,000 deaths in Afghanistan many of which resulted from bombing in retaliation for the attacks on U.S. property on September 11, 2001. Subsequently U.S. troops invaded that country. (4)

Angola

An indigenous armed struggle against Portuguese rule in Angola began in 1961. In 1977 an Angolan government was recognized by the U.N., although the U.S. was one of the few nations that opposed this action. In 1986 Uncle Sam approved material assistance to UNITA, a group that was trying to overthrow the government. Even today this struggle, which has involved many nations at times, continues.

U.S. intervention was justified to the U.S. public as a reaction to the intervention of 50,000 Cuban troops in Angola. However, according to Piero Gleijeses, a history professor at Johns Hopkins University the reverse was true. The Cuban intervention came as a result of a CIA – financed covert invasion via neighboring Zaire and a drive on the Angolan capital by the U.S. ally, South Africa1,2,3). (Three estimates of deaths range from 300,000 to 750,000 (4,5,6)

Argentina: See South America: Operation Condor

Bangladesh: See Pakistan

Bolivia

Hugo Banzer was the leader of a repressive regime in Bolivia in the 1970s. The U.S. had been disturbed when a previous leader nationalized the tin mines and distributed land to Indian peasants. Later that action to benefit the poor was reversed.

Banzer, who was trained at the U.S.-operated School of the Americas in Panama and later at Fort Hood, Texas, came back from exile frequently to confer with U.S. Air Force Major Robert Lundin. In 1971 he staged a successful coup with the help of the U.S. Air Force radio system. In the first years of his dictatorship he received twice as military assistance from the U.S. as in the previous dozen years together.

A few years later the Catholic Church denounced an army massacre of striking tin workers in 1975, Banzer, assisted by information provided by the CIA, was able to target and locate leftist priests and nuns. His anti-clergy strategy, known as the Banzer Plan, was adopted by nine other Latin American dictatorships in 1977. (2) He has been accused of being responsible for 400 deaths during his tenure. (1)
Also see: See South America: Operation Condor

Brazil: See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

U.S. bombing of Cambodia had already been underway for several years in secret under the Johnson and Nixon administrations, but when President Nixon openly began bombing in preparation for a land assault on Cambodia it caused major protests in the U.S. against the Vietnam War.

There is little awareness today of the scope of these bombings and the human suffering involved.
Immense damage was done to the villages and cities of Cambodia, causing refugees and internal displacement of the population. This unstable situation enabled the Khmer Rouge, a small political party led by Pol Pot, to assume power. Over the years we have repeatedly heard about the Khmer Rouge’s role in the deaths of millions in Cambodia without any acknowledgement being made this mass killing was made possible by the the U.S. bombing of that nation which destabilized it by death , injuries, hunger and dislocation of its people.

So the U.S. bears responsibility not only for the deaths from the bombings but also for those resulting from the activities of the Khmer Rouge – a total of about 2.5 million people. Even when Vietnam latrer invaded Cambodia in 1979 the CIA was still supporting the Khmer Rouge. (1,2,3)
Also see Vietnam

Chad

An estimated 40,000 people in Chad were killed and as many as 200,000 tortured by a government, headed by Hissen Habre who was brought to power in June, 1982 with the help of CIA money and arms. He remained in power for eight years. (1,2)

Human Rights Watch claimed that Habre was responsible for thousands of killings. In 2001, while living in Senegal, he was almost tried for crimes committed by him in Chad. However, a court there blocked these proceedings. Then human rights people decided to pursue the case in Belgium, because some of 

Habre’s torture victims lived there. The U.S., in June 2003, told Belgium that it risked losing its status as host to NATO’s headquarters if it allowed such a legal proceeding to happen. So the result was that the law that allowed victims to file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad was repealed. 

However, two months later a new law was passed which made special provision for the continuation of the case against Habre.


Chile

The CIA intervened in Chile’s 1958 and 1964 elections. In 1970 a socialist candidate, Salvador Allende, was elected president. The CIA wanted to incite a military coup to prevent his inauguration, but the Chilean army’s chief of staff, General Rene Schneider, opposed this action. The CIA then planned, along with some people in the Chilean military, to assassinate Schneider. This plot failed and Allende took office. President Nixon was not to be dissuaded and he ordered the CIA to create a coup climate: “Make the economy scream,” he said.
What followed were guerilla warfare, arson, bombing, sabotage and terror. ITT and other U.S. corporations with Chilean holdings sponsored demonstrations and strikes. Finally, on September 11, 1973 Allende died either by suicide or by assassination. At that time Henry Kissinger, U.S. Secretary of State, said the following regarding Chile: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist because of the irresponsibility of its own people.” (1)

During 17 years of terror under Allende’s successor, General Augusto Pinochet, an estimated 3,000 Chileans were killed and many others were tortured or “disappeared.” (2,3,4,5)
Also see South America: Operation Condor

China An estimated 900,000 Chinese died during the Korean War. For more information, See: Korea.

Colombia

One estimate is that 67,000 deaths have occurred from the 1960s to recent years due to support by the U.S. of Colombian state terrorism. (1)

According to a 1994 Amnesty International report, more than 20,000 people were killed for political reasons in Colombia since 1986, mainly by the military and its paramilitary allies. Amnesty alleged that “U.S.- supplied military equipment, ostensibly delivered for use against narcotics traffickers, was being used by the Colombian military to commit abuses in the name of “counter-insurgency.” (2) In 2002 another estimate was made that 3,500 people die each year in a U.S. funded civilian war in Colombia. (3)
In 1996 Human Rights Watch issued a report “Assassination Squads in Colombia” which revealed that 

CIA agents went to Colombia in 1991 to help the military to train undercover agents in anti-subversive activity. (4,5)

In recent years the U.S. government has provided assistance under Plan Colombia. The Colombian government has been charged with using most of the funds for destruction of crops and support of the paramilitary group.

Cuba

In the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba on April 18, 1961 which ended after 3 days, 114 of the invading force were killed, 1,189 were taken prisoners and a few escaped to waiting U.S. ships. (1) The captured exiles were quickly tried, a few executed and the rest sentenced to thirty years in prison for treason. These exiles were released after 20 months in exchange for $53 million in food and medicine.

Some people estimate that the number of Cuban forces killed range from 2,000, to 4,000. Another estimate is that 1,800 Cuban forces were killed on an open highway by napalm. This appears to have been a precursor of the Highway of Death in Iraq in 1991 when U.S. forces mercilessly annihilated large numbers of Iraqis on a highway. (2)

Democratic Republic of Congo (formerly Zaire)

The beginning of massive violence was instigated in this country in 1879 by its colonizer King Leopold of Belgium. The Congo’s population was reduced by 10 million people over a period of 20 years which some have referred to as “Leopold’s Genocide.” (1) The U.S. has been responsible for about a third of t
hat many deaths in that nation in the more recent past. (2)

In 1960 the Congo became an independent state with Patrice Lumumba being its first prime minister. He was assassinated with the CIA being implicated, although some say that his murder was actually the responsibility of Belgium. (3) But nevertheless, the CIA was planning to kill him. (4) Before his assassination the CIA sent one of its scientists, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, to the Congo carrying “lethal biological material” intended for use in Lumumba’s assassination. This virus would have been able to produce a fatal disease indigenous to the Congo area of Africa and was transported in a diplomatic pouch.

Much of the time in recent years there has been a civil war within the Democratic Republic of Congo, fomented often by the U.S. and other nations, including neighboring nations. (5)
In April 1977, Newsday reported that the CIA was secretly supporting efforts to recruit several hundred mercenaries in the U.S. and Great Britain to serve alongside Zaire’s army. In that same year the U.S. provided $15 million of military supplies to the Zairian President Mobutu to fend off an invasion by a rival group operating in Angola. (6)

In May 1979, the U.S. sent several million dollars of aid to Mobutu who had been condemned 3 months earlier by the U.S. State Department for human rights violations. (7) During the Cold War the U.S. funneled over 300 million dollars in weapons into Zaire (8,9) $100 million in military training was provided to him. (2) In 2001 it was reported to a U.S. congressional committee that American companies, including one linked to former President George Bush Sr., were stoking the Congo for monetary gains. There is an international battle over resources in that country with over 125 companies and individuals being implicated. One of these substances is coltan, which is used in the manufacture of cell phones. (2)

Dominican Republic

In 1962, Juan Bosch became president of the Dominican Republic. He advocated such programs as land reform and public works programs. This did not bode well for his future relationship with the U.S., and after only 7 months in office, he was deposed by a CIA coup. In 1965 when a group was trying to reinstall him to his office President Johnson said, “This Bosch is no good.” Assistant Secretary of State Thomas Mann replied “He’s no good at all. If we don’t get a decent government in there, Mr. President, we get another Bosch. It’s just going to be another sinkhole.” Two days later a U.S. invasion started and 22,000 soldiers and marines entered the Dominican Republic and about 3,000 Dominicans died during the fighting. The cover excuse for doing this was that this was done to protect foreigners there. (1,2,3,4)


East Timor

In December 1975, Indonesia invaded East Timor. This incursion was launched the day after U.S. President Gerald Ford and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger had left Indonesia where they had given President Suharto permission to use American arms, which under U.S. law, could not be used for aggression. Daniel Moynihan, U.S. ambassador to the UN. said that the U.S. wanted “things to turn out as they did.” (1,2) The result was an estimated 200,000 dead out of a population of 700,000. (1,2)

Sixteen years later, on November 12, 1991, two hundred and seventeen East Timorese protesters in Dili, many of them children, marching from a memorial service, were gunned down by Indonesian Kopassus shock troops who were headed by U.S.- trained commanders Prabowo Subianto (son in law of General Suharto) and Kiki Syahnakri. Trucks were seen dumping bodies into the sea. (5)

El Salvador

The civil war from 1981 to1992 in El Salvador was financed by $6 billion in U.S. aid given to support the government in its efforts to crush a movement to bring social justice to the people in that nation of about 8 million people. (1)
During that time U.S. military advisers demonstrated methods of torture on teenage prisoners, according to an interview with a deserter from the Salvadoran army published in the New York Times. This former member of the Salvadoran National Guard testified that he was a member of a squad of twelve who found people who they were told were guerillas and tortured them. Part of the training he received was in torture at a U.S. location somewhere in Panama. (2)

About 900 villagers were massacred in the village of El Mozote in 1981. Ten of the twelve El Salvadoran government soldiers cited as participating in this act were graduates of the School of the Americas operated by the U.S. (2) They were only a small part of about 75,000 people killed during that civil war. (1)

According to a 1993 United Nations’ Truth Commission report, over 96 % of the human rights violations carried out during the war were committed by the Salvadoran army or the paramilitary deaths squads associated with the Salvadoran army. (3)

That commission linked graduates of the School of the Americas to many notorious killings. The New York Times and the Washington Post followed with scathing articles. In 1996, the White House Oversight Board issued a report that supported many of the charges against that school made by Rev. Roy Bourgeois, head of the School of the Americas Watch. That same year the Pentagon released formerly classified reports indicating that graduates were trained in killing, extortion, and physical abuse for interrogations, false imprisonment and other methods of control. (4)

Grenada

The CIA began to destabilize Grenada in 1979 after Maurice Bishop became president, partially because he refused to join the quarantine of Cuba. The campaign against him resulted in his overthrow and the invasion by the U.S. of Grenada on October 25, 1983, with about 277 people dying. (1,2) It was fallaciously charged that an airport was being built in Grenada that could be used to attack the U.S. and it was also erroneously claimed that the lives of American medical students on that island were in danger.

Guatemala

In 1951 Jacobo Arbenz was elected president of Guatemala. He appropriated some unused land operated by the United Fruit Company and compensated the company. (1,2) That company then started a campaign to paint Arbenz as a tool of an international conspiracy and hired about 300 mercenaries who sabotaged oil supplies and trains. (3) In 1954 a CIA-orchestrated coup put him out of office and he left the country. During the next 40 years various regimes killed thousands of people.
In 1999 the Washington Post reported that an Historical Clarification Commission concluded that over 200,000 people had been killed during the civil war and that there had been 42,000 individual human rights violations, 29,000 of them fatal, 92% of which were committed by the army. The commission further reported that the U.S. government and the CIA had pressured the Guatemalan government into suppressing the guerilla movement by ruthless means. (4,5)

According to the Commission between 1981 and 1983 the military government of Guatemala – financed and supported by the U.S. government – destroyed some four hundred Mayan villages in a campaign of genocide. (4)
One of the documents made available to the commission was a 1966 memo from a U.S. State Department official, which described how a “safe house” was set up in the palace for use by Guatemalan security agents and their U.S. contacts. This was the headquarters for the Guatemalan “dirty war” against leftist insurgents and suspected allies. (2)

Haiti

From 1957 to 1986 Haiti was ruled by Papa Doc Duvalier and later by his son. During that time their private terrorist force killed between 30,000 and 100,000 people. (1) Millions of dollars in CIA subsidies flowed into Haiti during that time, mainly to suppress popular movements, (2) although most American military aid to the country, according to William Blum, was covertly channeled through Israel.

Reportedly, governments after the second Duvalier reign were responsible for an even larger number of fatalities, and the influence on Haiti by the U.S., particularly through the CIA, has continued. The U.S. later forced out of the presidential office a black Catholic priest, Jean Bertrand Aristide, even though he was elected with 67% of the vote in the early 1990s. The wealthy white class in Haiti opposed him in this predominantly black nation, because of his social programs designed to help the poor and end corruption. (3) Later he returned to office, but that did not last long. He was forced by the U.S. to leave office and now lives in South Africa.

Honduras

In the 1980s the CIA supported Battalion 316 in Honduras, which kidnapped, tortured and killed hundreds of its citizens. Torture equipment and manuals were provided by CIA Argentinean personnel who worked with U.S. agents in the training of the Hondurans. Approximately 400 people lost their lives. (1,2) This is another instance of torture in the world sponsored by the U.S. (3)

Battalion 316 used shock and suffocation devices in interrogations in the 1980s. Prisoners often were kept naked and, when no longer useful, killed and buried in unmarked graves. Declassified documents and other sources show that the CIA and the U.S. Embassy knew of numerous crimes, including murder and torture, yet continued to support Battalion 316 and collaborate with its leaders.” (4)

Honduras was a staging ground in the early 1980s for the Contras who were trying to overthrow the socialist Sandinista government in Nicaragua. John D. Negroponte, currently Deputy Secretary of State, was our embassador when our military aid to Honduras rose from $4 million to $77.4 million per year. Negroponte denies having had any knowledge of these atrocities during his tenure. However, his predecessor in that position, Jack R. Binns, had reported in 1981 that he was deeply concerned at increasing evidence of officially sponsored/sanctioned assassinations. (5)

Hungary

In 1956 Hungary, a Soviet satellite nation, revolted against the Soviet Union. During the uprising broadcasts by the U.S. Radio Free Europe into Hungary sometimes took on an aggressive tone, encouraging the rebels to believe that Western support was imminent, and even giving tactical advice on how to fight the Soviets. Their hopes were raised then dashed by these broadcasts which cast an even darker shadow over the Hungarian tragedy.“ (1) The Hungarian and Soviet death toll was about 3,000 and the revolution was crushed. (2)

Indonesia

In 1965, in Indonesia, a coup replaced General Sukarno with General Suharto as leader. The U.S. played a role in that change of government. Robert Martens,a former officer in the U.S. embassy in Indonesia, described how U.S. diplomats and CIA officers provided up to 5,000 names to Indonesian Army death squads in 1965 and checked them off as they were killed or captured. Martens admitted that “I probably have a lot of blood on my hands, but that’s not all bad. There’s a time when you have to strike hard at a decisive moment.” (1,2,3) Estimates of the number of deaths range from 500,000 to 3 million. (4,5,6)
From 1993 to 1997 the U.S. provided Jakarta with almost $400 million in economic aid and sold tens of million of dollars of weaponry to that nation. U.S. Green Berets provided training for the Indonesia’s elite force which was responsible for many of atrocities in East Timor. (3)

Iran

Iran lost about 262,000 people in the war against Iraq from 1980 to 1988. (1) See Iraq for more information about that war.

On July 3, 1988 the U.S. Navy ship, the Vincennes, was operating withing Iranian waters providing military support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war. During a battle against Iranian gunboats it fired two missiles at an Iranian Airbus, which was on a routine civilian flight. All 290 civilian on board were killed. (2,3)

Iraq

A. The Iraq-Iran War lasted from 1980 to 1988 and during that time there were about 105,000 Iraqi deaths according to the Washington Post. (1,2)
According to Howard Teicher, a former National Security Council official, the U.S. provided the Iraqis with billions of dollars in credits and helped Iraq in other ways such as making sure that Iraq had military equipment including biological agents This surge of help for Iraq came as Iran seemed to be winning the war and was close to Basra. (1) The U.S. was not adverse to both countries weakening themselves as a result of the war, but it did not appear to want either side to win.

B: The U.S.-Iraq War and the Sanctions Against Iraq extended from 1990 to 2003.

Iraq invaded Kuwait on August 2, 1990 and the U.S. responded by demanding that Iraq withdraw, and four days later the U.N. levied international sanctions.
Iraq had reason to believe that the U.S. would not object to its invasion of Kuwait, since U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had told Saddam Hussein that the U.S. had no position on the dispute that his country had with Kuwait. So the green light was given, but it seemed to be more of a trap.

As a part of the public relations strategy to energize the American public into supporting an attack against Iraq the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. falsely testified before Congress that Iraqi troops were pulling the plugs on incubators in Iraqi hospitals. (1) This contributed to a war frenzy in the U.S.
The U.S. air assault started on January 17, 1991 and it lasted for 42 days. On February 23 President H.W. Bush ordered the U.S. ground assault to begin. The invasion took place with much needless killing of Iraqi military personnel. Only about 150 American military personnel died compared to about 200,000 Iraqis. Some of the Iraqis were mercilessly killed on the Highway of Death and about 400 tons of depleted uranium were left in that nation by the U.S. (2,3)

Other deaths later were from delayed deaths due to wounds, civilians killed, those killed by effects of damage of the Iraqi water treatment facilities and other aspects of its damaged infrastructure and by the sanctions.

In 1995 the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. reported that U.N sanctions against on Iraq had been responsible for the deaths of more than 560,000 children since 1990. (5)
Leslie Stahl on the TV Program 60 Minutes in 1996 mentioned to Madeleine Albright, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. “We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And – and you know, is the price worth it?” Albright replied “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price – we think is worth it.” (4)

In 1999 UNICEF reported that 5,000 children died each month as a result of the sanction and the War with the U.S. (6)

Richard Garfield later estimated that the more likely number of excess deaths among children under five years of age from 1990 through March 1998 to be 227,000 – double those of the previous decade. Garfield estimated that the numbers to be 350,000 through 2000 (based in part on result of another study). (7)

However, there are limitations to his study. His figures were not updated for the remaining three years of the sanctions. Also, two other somewhat vulnerable age groups were not studied: young children above the age of five and the elderly.

All of these reports were considerable indicators of massive numbers of deaths which the U.S. was aware of and which was a part of its strategy to cause enough pain and terror among Iraqis to cause them to revolt against their government.

C: Iraq-U.S. War started in 2003 and has not been concluded

Just as the end of the Cold War emboldened the U.S. to attack Iraq in 1991 so the attacks of September 11, 2001 laid the groundwork for the U.S. to launch the current war against Iraq. While in some other wars we learned much later about the lies that were used to deceive us, some of the deceptions that were used to get us into this war became known almost as soon as they were uttered. There were no weapons of mass destruction, we were not trying to promote democracy, we were not trying to save the Iraqi people from a dictator.

The total number of Iraqi deaths that are a result of our current Iraq against Iraq War is 654,000, of which 600,000 are attributed to acts of violence, according to Johns Hopkins researchers. (1,2)
Since these deaths are a result of the U.S. invasion, our leaders must accept responsibility for them.

Israeli-Palestinian War

About 100,000 to 200,000 Israelis and Palestinians, but mostly the latter, have been killed in the struggle between those two groups. The U.S. has been a strong supporter of Israel, providing billions of dollars in aid and supporting its possession of nuclear weapons. (1,2)

Korea, North and South

The Korean War started in 1950 when, according to the Truman administration, North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25th. However, since then another explanation has emerged which maintains that the attack by North Korea came during a time of many border incursions by both sides. South Korea initiated most of the border clashes with North Korea beginning in 1948. The North Korea government claimed that by 1949 the South Korean army committed 2,617 armed incursions. It was a myth that the Soviet Union ordered North Korea to attack South Korea. (1,2)

The U.S. started its attack before a U.N. resolution was passed supporting our nation’s intervention, and our military forces added to the mayhem in the war by introducing the use of napalm. (1)
During the war the bulk of the deaths were South Koreans, North Koreans and Chinese. Four sources give deaths counts ranging from 1.8 to 4.5 million. (3,4,5,6) Another source gives a total of 4 million but does not identify to which nation they belonged. (7)

John H. Kim, a U.S. Army veteran and the Chair of the Korea Committee of Veterans for Peace, stated in an article that during the Korean War “the U.S. Army, Air Force and Navy were directly involved in the killing of about three million civilians – both South and North Koreans – at many locations throughout Korea…It is reported that the U.S. dropped some 650,000 tons of bombs, including 43,000 tons of napalm bombs, during the Korean War.” It is presumed that this total does not include Chinese casualties.
Another source states a total of about 500,000 who were Koreans and presumably only military. (8,9)

Laos

From 1965 to 1973 during the Vietnam War the U.S. dropped over two million tons of bombs on Laos – more than was dropped in WWII by both sides. Over a quarter of the population became refugees. This was later called a “secret war,” since it occurred at the same time as the Vietnam War, but got little press. Hundreds of thousands were killed. Branfman make the only estimate that I am aware of , stating that hundreds of thousands died. This can be interpeted to mean that at least 200,000 died. (1,2,3)

U.S. military intervention in Laos actually began much earlier. A civil war started in the 1950s when the U.S. recruited a force of 40,000 Laotians to oppose the Pathet Lao, a leftist political party that ultimately took power in 1975.

Also See Vietnam

Nepal

Between 8,000 and 12,000 Nepalese have died since a civil war broke out in 1996. The death rate, according to Foreign Policy in Focus, sharply increased with the arrival of almost 8,400 American M-16 submachine guns (950 rpm) and U.S. advisers. Nepal is 85 percent rural and badly in need of land reform. Not surprisingly 42 % of its people live below the poverty level. (1,2)
In 2002, after another civil war erupted, President George W. Bush pushed a bill through Congress authorizing $20 million in military aid to the Nepalese government. (3)

Nicaragua

In 1981 the Sandinistas overthrew the Somoza government in Nicaragua, (1) and until 1990 about 25,000 Nicaraguans were killed in an armed struggle between the Sandinista government and Contra rebels who were formed from the remnants of Somoza’s national government. The use of assassination manuals by the Contras surfaced in 1984. (2,3)

The U.S. supported the victorious government regime by providing covert military aid to the Contras (anti-communist guerillas) starting in November, 1981. But when Congress discovered that the CIA had supervised acts of sabotage in Nicaragua without notifying Congress, it passed the Boland Amendment in 1983 which prohibited the CIA, Defense Department and any other government agency from providing any further covert military assistance. (4)

But ways were found to get around this prohibition. The National Security Council, which was not explicitly covered by the law, raised private and foreign funds for the Contras. In addition, arms were sold to Iran and the proceeds were diverted from those sales to the Contras engaged in the insurgency against the Sandinista government. (5) Finally, the Sandinistas were voted out of office in 1990 by voters who thought that a change in leadership would placate the U.S., which was causing misery to Nicaragua’s citizenry by it support of the Contras.

Pakistan

In 1971 West Pakistan, an authoritarian state supported by the U.S., brutally invaded East Pakistan. The war ended after India, whose economy was staggering after admitting about 10 million refugees, invaded East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and defeated the West Pakistani forces. (1)
Millions of people died during that brutal struggle, referred to by some as genocide committed by West Pakistan. That country had long been an ally of the U.S., starting with $411 million provided to establish its armed forces which spent 80% of its budget on its military. $15 million in arms flowed into W. Pakistan during the war. (2,3,4)
Three sources estimate that 3 million people died and (5,2,6) one source estimates 1.5 million. (3)

Panama

In December, 1989 U.S. troops invaded Panama, ostensibly to arrest Manuel Noriega, that nation’s president. This was an example of the U.S. view that it is the master of the world and can arrest anyone it wants to. For a number of years before that he had worked for the CIA, but fell out of favor partially because he was not an opponent of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. (1) It has been estimated that between 500 and 4,000 people died. (2,3,4)

Paraguay: See South America: Operation Condor

Philippines

The Philippines were under the control of the U.S. for over a hundred years. In about the last 50 to 60 years the U.S. has funded and otherwise helped various Philippine governments which sought to suppress the activities of groups working for the welfare of its people. In 1969 the Symington Committee in the U.S. Congress revealed how war material was sent there for a counter-insurgency campaign. U.S. Special Forces and Marines were active in some combat operations. The estimated number of persons that were executed and disappeared under President Fernando Marcos was over 100,000. (1,2)

South America: Operation Condor

This was a joint operation of 6 despotic South American governments (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay) to share information about their political opponents. An estimated 13,000 people were killed under this plan. (1)

It was established on November 25, 1975 in Chile by an act of the Interamerican Reunion on Military Intelligence. According to U.S. embassy political officer, John Tipton, the CIA and the Chilean Secret Police were working together, although the CIA did not set up the operation to make this collaboration work. Reportedly, it ended in 1983. (2)

On March 6, 2001 the New York Times reported the existence of a recently declassified State Department document revealing that the United States facilitated communications for Operation Condor. (3)

Sudan

Since 1955, when it gained its independence, Sudan has been involved most of the time in a civil war. Until about 2003 approximately 2 million people had been killed. It not known if the death toll in Darfur is part of that total.

Human rights groups have complained that U.S. policies have helped to prolong the Sudanese civil war by supporting efforts to overthrow the central government in Khartoum. In 1999 U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright met with the leader of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) who said that she offered him food supplies if he would reject a peace plan sponsored by Egypt and Libya.
In 1978 the vastness of Sudan’s oil reservers was discovered and within two years it became the sixth largest recipient of U.S, military aid. It’s reasonable to assume that if the U.S. aid a government to come to power it will feel obligated to give the U.S. part of the oil pie.

A British group, Christian Aid, has accused foreign oil companies of complicity in the depopulation of villages. These companies – not American – receive government protection and in turn allow the government use of its airstrips and roads.

In August 1998 the U.S. bombed Khartoum, Sudan with 75 cruise míssiles. Our government said that the target was a chemical weapons factory owned by Osama bin Laden. Actually, bin Laden was no longer the owner, and the plant had been the sole supplier of pharmaceutical supplies for that poor nation. As a result of the bombing tens of thousands may have died because of the lack of medicines to treat malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases. The U.S. settled a lawsuit filed by the factory’s owner. (1,2)

Uruguay: See South America: Operation Condor



Vietnam
In Vietnam, under an agreement several decades ago, there was supposed to be an election for a unified North and South Vietnam. The U.S. opposed this and supported the Diem government in South Vietnam. In August, 1964 the CIA and others helped fabricate a phony Vietnamese attack on a U.S. ship in the Gulf of Tonkin and this was used as a pretext for greater U.S. involvement in Vietnam. (1)

During that war an American assassination operation,called Operation Phoenix, terrorized the South 
Vietnamese people, and during the war American troops were responsible in 1968 for the mass slaughter of the people in the village of My Lai.

According to a Vietnamese government statement in 1995 the number of deaths of civilians and military personnel during the Vietnam War was 5.1 million. (2)

Since deaths in Cambodia and Laos were about 2.7 million (See Cambodia and Laos) the estimated total for the Vietnam War is 7.8 million.

The Virtual Truth Commission provides a total for the war of 5 million, (3) and Robert McNamara, former Secretary Defense, according to the New York Times Magazine says that the number of Vietnamese dead is 3.4 million. (4,5)

Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia was a socialist federation of several republics. Since it refused to be closely tied to the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it gained some suport from the U.S. But when the Soviet Union dissolved, Yugoslavia’s usefulness to the U.S. ended, and the U.S and Germany worked to convert its socialist economy to a capitalist one by a process primarily of dividing and conquering. There were ethnic and religious differences between various parts of Yugoslavia which were manipulated by the U.S. to cause several wars which resulted in the dissolution of that country.

From the early 1990s until now Yugoslavia split into several independent nations whose lowered income, along with CIA connivance, has made it a pawn in the hands of capitalist countries. (1) The dissolution of Yugoslavia was caused primarily by the U.S. (2)

Here are estimates of some, if not all, of the internal wars in Yugoslavia. All wars: 107,000; (3,4)
Bosnia and Krajina: 250,000; (5) Bosnia: 20,000 to 30,000; (5) Croatia: 15,000; (6) and
Kosovo: 500 to 5,000. (7)

NOTES

Afghanistan
1.Mark Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003), p.135.
4.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p.76
5.U.S Involvement in Afghanistan, Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in Afghanistan)
6.The CIA’s Intervention in Afghanistan, Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998, Posted at globalresearch.ca 15 October 2001, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html
7.William Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.5
Angola
1.Howard W. French “From Old Files, a New Story of the U.S. Role in the Angolan War” New York Times 3/31/02
2.Angolan Update, American Friends Service Committee FS, 11/1/99 flyer.
3.Norman Solomon, War Made Easy, (John Wiley & Sons, 2005) p. 82-83.
4.Lance Selfa, U.S. Imperialism, A Century of Slaughter, International Socialist Review Issue 7, Spring 1999 (as appears in Third world Traveler www. thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Century_Imperialism.html)
5. Jeffress Ramsay, Africa , (Dushkin/McGraw Hill Guilford Connecticut), 1997, p. 144-145.
6.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p.54.
Argentina : See South America: Operation Condor
Bolivia
2.Jerry Meldon, Return of Bolilvia’s Drug – Stained Dictator, Consortium,www.consortiumnews.com/archives/story40.html.

Brazil See South America: Operation Condor
Cambodia
1.Virtual Truth Commissiion http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/ .
2.David Model, President Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, and the Bombing of Cambodia excerpted from the book Lying for Empire How to Commit War Crimes With A Straight Face, Common Courage Press, 2005, paperhttp://thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Nixon_Cambodia_LFE.html.
3.Noam Chomsky, Chomsky on Cambodia under Pol Pot, etc.,http//zmag.org/forums/chomcambodforum.htm.

Chad
1.William Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 151-152 .
2.Richard Keeble, Crimes Against Humanity in Chad, Znet/Activism 12/4/06http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=11560&sectionID=1).

Chile
1.Parenti, Michael, The Sword and the Dollar (New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1989) p. 56.
2.William Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 142-143.
3.Moreorless: Heroes and Killers of the 20th Century, Augusto Pinochet Ugarte,
4.Associated Press,Pincohet on 91st Birthday, Takes Responsibility for Regimes’s Abuses, Dayton Daily News 11/26/06
5.Chalmers Johnson, Blowback, The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2000), p. 18.

China: See Korea

Colombia
1.Chronology of American State Terrorism, p.2
2.William Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 163.
3.Millions Killed by Imperialism Washington Post May 6, 2002)http://www.etext.org./Politics/MIM/rail/impkills.html
4.Gabriella Gamini, CIA Set Up Death Squads in Colombia Times Newspapers Limited, Dec. 5, 1996,www.edu/CommunicationsStudies/ben/news/cia/961205.death.html).
5.Virtual Truth Commission, 1991
Human Rights Watch Report: Colombia’s Killer Networks–The Military-Paramilitary Partnership).

Cuba
1.St. James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture – on Bay of Pigs Invasionhttp://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion.

Democratic Republic of Congo (Formerly Zaire)
1.F. Jeffress Ramsey, Africa (Guilford Connecticut, 1997), p. 85
2. Anup Shaw The Democratic Republic of Congo, 10/31/2003)http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/Africa/DRC.asp)
3.Kevin Whitelaw, A Killing in Congo, U. S. News and World Reporthttp://www.usnews.com/usnews/doubleissue/mysteries/patrice.htm
4.William Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p 158-159.
5.Ibid.,p. 260
6.Ibid.,p. 259
7.Ibid.,p.262
8.David Pickering, “World War in Africa, 6/26/02,www.9-11peace.org/bulletin.php3
9.William D. Hartung and Bridget Moix, Deadly Legacy; U.S. Arms to Africa and the Congo War, Arms Trade Resource Center, January , 2000www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/congo.htm

Dominican Republic
1.Norman Solomon, (untitled) Baltimore Sun April 26, 2005http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/history/2005/0426spincycle.htm
Intervention Spin Cycle
3.William Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p. 175.
4.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p.26-27.

East Timor
2.Matthew Jardine, Unraveling Indonesia, Nonviolent Activist, 1997)
4.William Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p. 197.
5.US trained butchers of Timor, The Guardian, London. Cited by The Drudge Report, September 19, 1999. http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/indon.htm

El Salvador
1.Robert T. Buckman, Latin America 2003, (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore 2003) p. 152-153.
2.William Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 54-55.
4.Virtual Truth Commissiion http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

Grenada
1.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p. 66-67.
2.Stephen Zunes, The U.S. Invasion of Grenada,http://wwwfpif.org/papers/grenada2003.html .

Guatemala
1.Virtual Truth Commissiion http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/
2.Ibid.
3.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p.2-13.
4.Robert T. Buckman, Latin America 2003 (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore 2003) p. 162.
5.Douglas Farah, Papers Show U.S. Role in Guatemalan Abuses, Washington Post Foreign Service, March 11, 1999, A 26

Haiti
2.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p 87.
3.William Blum, Haiti 1986-1994: Who Will Rid Me of This Turbulent Priest,http://www.doublestandards.org/blum8.html

Honduras
1.William Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 55.
2.Reports by Country: Honduras, Virtual Truth Commissionhttp://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/honduras.htm
3.James A. Lucas, Torture Gets The Silence Treatment, Countercurrents, July 26, 2004.
4.Gary Cohn and Ginger Thompson, Unearthed: Fatal Secrets, Baltimore Sun, reprint of a series that appeared June 11-18, 1995 in Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, School of Assassins, p. 46 Orbis Books 2001.
5.Michael Dobbs, Negroponte’s Time in Honduras at Issue, Washington Post, March 21, 2005

Hungary
1.Edited by Malcolm Byrne, The 1956 Hungarian Revoluiton: A history in Documents November 4, 2002http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB76/index2.htm

Indonesia
1.Virtual Truth Commission http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.
2.Editorial, Indonesia’s Killers, The Nation, March 30, 1998.
3.Matthew Jardine, Indonesia Unraveling, Non Violent Activist Sept–Oct, 1997 (Amnesty) 2/7/07.
4.Sison, Jose Maria, Reflections on the 1965 Massacre in Indonesia, p. 5.http://qc.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=5602;
5.Annie Pohlman, Women and the Indonesian Killings of 1965-1966: Gender Variables and Possible Direction for Research, p.4,http://coombs.anu.edu.au/SpecialProj/ASAA/biennial-conference/2004/Pohlman-A-ASAA.pdf
6.Peter Dale Scott, The United States and the Overthrow of Sukarno, 1965-1967, Pacific Affairs, 58, Summer 1985, pages 239-264.http://www.namebase.org/scott.
7.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p.30.

Iran
1.Geoff Simons, Iraq from Sumer to Saddam, 1996, St. Martins Press, NY p. 317.
3.BBC 1988: US Warship Shoots Down Iranian Airlinerhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/default.stm )

Iraq
Iran-Iraq War
1.Michael Dobbs, U.S. Had Key role in Iraq Buildup, Washington Post December 30, 2002, p A01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer
2.Global Security.Org , Iran Iraq War (1980-1980)globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm.

U.S. Iraq War and Sanctions
1.Ramsey Clark, The Fire This Time (New York, Thunder’s Mouth), 1994, p.31-32
2.Ibid., p. 52-54
3.Ibid., p. 43
4.Anthony Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, (South End Press Cambridge MA 2000). p. 175.
5.Food and Agricultural Organizaiton, The Children are Dying, 1995 World View Forum, Internationa Action Center, International Relief Association, p. 78
6.Anthony Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, South End Press Cambridge MA 2000. p. 61.
7.David Cortright, A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions December 3, 2001, The Nation.

U.S-Iraq War 2003-?
1.Jonathan Bor 654,000 Deaths Tied to Iraq War Baltimore Sun , October 11,2006

Israeli-Palestinian War
1.Post-1967 Palestinian & Israeli Deaths from Occupation & Violence May 16, 2006 http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2006/05/post-1967-palestinian-israeli-deaths.html)
2.Chronology of American State Terrorism

Korea
1.James I. Matray Revisiting Korea: Exposing Myths of the Forgotten War, Korean War Teachers Conference: The Korean War, February 9, 2001http://www.truman/library.org/Korea/matray1.htm
2.William Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p. 46
3.Kanako Tokuno, Chinese Winter Offensive in Korean War – the Debacle of American Strategy, ICE Case Studies Number 186, May, 2006http://www.american.edu/ted/ice/chosin.htm.
4.John G. Stroessinger, Why Nations go to War, (New York; St. Martin’s Press), p. 99)
5.Britannica Concise Encyclopedia, as reported in Answers.comhttp://www.answers.com/topic/Korean-war
6.Exploring the Environment: Korean Enigmawww.cet.edu/ete/modules/korea/kwar.html)
7.S. Brian Wilson, Who are the Real Terrorists? Virtual Truth Commissonhttp://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/
8.Korean War Casualty Statistics www.century china.com/history/krwarcost.html)
9.S. Brian Wilson, Documenting U.S. War Crimes in North Korea (Veterans for Peace Newsletter) Spring, 2002) http://www.veteransforpeace.org/

Laos
1.William Blum Rogue State (Maine, Common Cause Press) p. 136
3.Fred Branfman, War Crimes in Indochina and our Troubled National Soul

Nepal
1.Conn Hallinan, Nepal & the Bush Administration: Into Thin Air, February 3, 2004
2.Human Rights Watch, Nepal’s Civil War: the Conflict Resumes, March 2006 )
3.Wayne Madsen, Possible CIA Hand in the Murder of the Nepal Royal Family, India Independent Media Center, September 25, 2001http://india.indymedia.org/en/2002/09/2190.shtml.

Nicaragua
1.Virtual Truth Commissionhttp://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.
4.William Blum, Nicaragua 1981-1990 Destabilization in Slow Motion
5.Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Contra_Affair.

Pakistan
1.John G. Stoessinger, Why Nations Go to War, (New York: St. Martin’s Press), 1974 pp 157-172.
2.Asad Ismi, A U.S. – Financed Military Dictatorship, The CCPA Monitor, June 2002, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives http://www.policyaltematives.ca)www.ckln.fm/~asadismi/pakistan.html
3.Mark Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003), p.123, 124.
4.Arjum Niaz ,When America Look the Other Way by,
5.Leo Kuper, Genocide (Yale University Press, 1981), p. 79.
6.Bangladesh Liberation War , Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War#USA_and_USSR)

Panama
1.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’s Greatest Hits, (Odonian Press 1998) p. 83.
2.William Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.154.
3.U.S. Military Charged with Mass Murder, The Winds 9/96,www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/war/a102896b.html
4.Mark Zepezauer, CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1994), p.83.
Paraguay See South America: Operation Condor

Philippines
1.Romeo T. Capulong, A Century of Crimes Against the Filipino People, Presentation, Public Interest Law Center, World Tribunal for Iraq Trial in New York City on August 25,2004.http://www.peoplejudgebush.org/files/RomeoCapulong.pdf).
2.Roland B. Simbulan The CIA in Manila – Covert Operations and the CIA’s Hidden Hisotry in the Philippines Equipo Nizkor Information – Derechos, derechos.org/nizkor/filipinas/doc/cia.

South America: Operation Condor
1.John Dinges, Pulling Back the Veil on Condor, The Nation, July 24, 2000.
2.Virtual Truth Commission, Telling the Truth for a Better Americawww.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/condor.htm)

Sudan
1.Mark Zepezauer, Boomerang, (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003), p. 30, 32,34,36.
2.The Black Commentator, Africa Action The Tale of Two Genocides: The Failed US Response to Rwanda and Darfur, 11 August 2006http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091706X.shtml.

Uruguay See South America: Operation Condor

Vietnam
1.Mark Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine:Common Courage Press,1994), p 24
2.Casualties – US vs NVA/VC,http://www.rjsmith.com/kia_tbl.html.
3.Brian Wilson, Virtual Truth Commissionhttp://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/
4.Fred Branfman, U.S. War Crimes in Indochiona and our Duty to Truth August 26, 2004
5.David K Shipler, Robert McNamara and the Ghosts of Vietnamnytimes.com/library/world/asia/081097vietnam-mcnamara.html

Yugoslavia
1.Sara Flounders, Bosnia Tragedy:The Unknown Role of the Pentagon in NATO in the Balkans (New York: International Action Center) p. 47-75
2.James A. Lucas, Media Disinformation on the War in Yugoslavia: The Dayton Peace Accords Revisited, Global Research, September 7, 2005 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=
viewArticle&code=LUC20050907&articleId=899
4.George Kenney, The Bosnia Calculation: How Many Have Died? Not nearly as many as some would have you think., NY Times Magazine, April 23, 1995
5.Chronology of American State Terrorism
6.Croatian War of Independence, Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatian_War_of_Independence
7.Human Rights Watch, New Figures on Civilian Deaths in Kosovo War, (February 7, 2000) http://www.hrw.org/press/2000/02/nato207.htm.

Related Posts:




Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft. Helaas kan ik daar maar 140 tekens kwijt en kan dus niet eens alle landen opnemen, die hier werden genoemd (het label illegale oorlog' duidt op de illegale oorlog tegen Irak).

Na kritiek de tekst in de kop aangepast op 24 november 2016. (toegevoegd: sinds 'het einde van' WOII........)

Oranje en Agent Orange

Toch leuk dat telkens als je het woord 'oranje' hoort, of het nu om voetbal, het koningshuis, ING, of de brievenbussen gaat, je automatisch moet denken aan Agent Orange......

Met dit chemische middel beging de VS grote oorlogsmisdaden in Vietnam, tot op de dag kent het land een groot aantal slachtoffers van deze letterlijke kankerzooi....... Kijk en dat laatste past weer mooi bij de voornoemde instituties!

Zie ook de berichten onder de labels onder dit bericht, waarin het woord 'oranje' voorkomt.

Wiebes wast z'n handen in schuld en onschuld!! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

De wanpresterend VVD flapdrol op Financiën, Wiebes, moest zich vanmorgen in de Kamer verantwoorden voor de € 500.000,-- (!!!) 'die buiten zijn weten' werd ingezet voor de vertrekregeling van belastingmedewerkers.

Op BNR gaf 'verslaggever' Laurens Boven zijn zienswijze op deze zaak en zoals te verwachten bij BNR (in feite een Telegrof zender), nam Boven het op voor Wiebes, dit middels het aanvoeren van allerlei excuses voor het wanbeleid van deze incompetente klungel........

Wiebes zelf stelde, dat hij niet uit is op het bestraffen van de schuldige, nee hij was zelf verantwoordelijk....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Met zo'n uitlating kan je concluderen dat Wiebes alsnog zelf direct verantwoordelijk is voor deze gang van zaken en niet de ambtenaar die e.e.a. (na onderhoud met Wiebes) in gang heeft gezet!!

Kortom: Wiebes wast z'n handen wel op een heel bijzondere manier 'schoon!'

Eén ding is zeker: Wiebes heeft eens te meer bewezen, totaal incompetent te zijn voor zijn functie!!

Trouwens behoorlijk vreemd, dat op rigoureuze manier snijden in het personeelsbestand van de belastingdienst. Volgens Wiebes heeft dit alles met digitalisering te maken...... Medewerkers van de belastingdienst hebben de laatste tien jaar keer op keer gepleit voor het aanpakken van belastingontduikers. Medewerkers die ontdekten dat welgestelden grote bedragen aan belasting ontdoken, kregen bij herhaling van de leiding te horen, dat zij geen onderzoek mochten instellen naar deze belastingontduikers.

Onlangs bleek nog eens dat welgestelden zo'n 20 miljard euro (!!!) op jaarbasis aan belasting ontduiken...... Ondanks dat daar verder niet op werd ingezet door de top van de belastingdienst, worden er nog meer medewerkers ontslagen..... Terwijl de top van de belastingdienst, de medewerkers die geen onderzoek mochten doen, te verstaan hebben gegeven, dat er geen tijd en menskracht was, om enorme kapitalen te achterhalen...... Ik weet niet hoe u hierover denkt, maar wat mij betreft stinkt het geheel enorm naar gebruikelijke VVD misdadigheid!!

Dit alles, terwijl de laagste inkomens van hun al veel te lage inkomen maar liefst 36,5% belasting moeten betalen, voor hen bestaat de mogelijkheid tot belastingontduiking niet eens...... Met grote dank aan de PvdA, onthoudt dat als u in maart volgend jaar gaat stemmen!!

Zie ook: 'Wiebes wil vennootschapsbelasting verlagen, zodat nog meer misdadige buitenlandse bedrijven ons land zoeken.........'

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft.

Neelie Kroes opgehemeld door 'prins' Constantijn........ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Gisteren was kwezel Constantijn te gast op Radio1, dit i.h.k.v. zijn voorzitterschap ('ambassadeur' ha! ha!) van de StartupDelta. Hier stelde de kwast dat zijn voorganger Neelie 'neemt het niet zo nauw' Kroes, Nederland op nummer 4 van de wereldranglijst van 'startup landen' had gekregen.

Weet niet hoeveel landen daar aan deelnemen, maar het aantal landen, dat hier serieus mee bezig is, zal het aantal van 10 niet ver overschrijden.

Dan is nog de vraag: moet je daar wel trots op zijn? Hoeveel van die 'startup bedrijven' bestaan nu nog, m.a.w. hoeveel zijn er failliet gegaan op kosten van de belastingbetaler? En tot slot hoeveel belastinggeld aan subsidie is er intussen door het ondernemersputje gespoeld????

Fijn hè. dat carnavalprins Constantijn Kroes nog even een veer in de vieze corrupte lobbyreet stak??

Zie ook: 'Neelie Kroes valt alweer door de (corrupte) lobby mand.......'

       en: 'Paul Tang wil gedragsregels voor EU commissarissen aanpassen....... OEI!!'

       en: 'Neelie Kroes: "The how to get there summit........" ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

       en: 'Constantijn van Oranje en 'The How To Get There Summit...''

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Justitie faalt alweer: jaarlijks 70 doden door dronken automobilisten.........

Gisteren het bericht van de Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV), dat had uitgevogeld, dat er tussen de 90.000 en 150.000 zware drinkers in Nederland zijn. Zware drinkers die bezopen achter het stuur van een auto stappen....... Dit kost volgens de SWOV zo'n 70 doden op jaarbasis...... De kosten voor één verkeersdode zou rond de één miljoen euro liggen en voor een gewonde in het verkeer, rond de € 200.000,--........

Het grootste deel van deze zware drinkers is al eens tegen de lamp gelopen, een deel daarvan wordt zelfs betrapt, terwijl het rijbewijs voor een paar jaar is ingenomen.........

Onbegrijpelijk trouwens, dat er geen wet bestaat, waarmee na drie keer dronken achter het stuur, niet alleen het rijbewijs voorgoed wordt ingenomen, maar ook de auto verbeurd wordt verklaard....... Dat heeft uiteraard met autorijden te maken, de auto is geen heilige koe voor de gebruikers (hoewel?), maar toch vooral voor de overheid........

Het is ronduit misdadig, dat de wetgeving niet veel scherper is, daarmee kan je dan ook de opvolgende regeringen (m.n. het ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie) verantwoordelijk stellen voor een fiks deel van de verkeersdoden, die vallen door dronken chauffeurs..... Sterker nog: het is een enorme blunder dat Justitie niet zelf al op de hoogte was van deze feiten en daar al niet veel eerder actie op heeft ondernomen!! De zoveelste blunder van VVD opperhufters Opstelten en Teeven, plus hun opvolgers van der Steur en Dijkhoff.....

Buiten dat: diezelfde overheid is één op één verantwoordelijk voor de naar schatting 18.000 vroegtijdige doden (na veelal een akelige ziekte) die jaarlijks te betreuren zijn door de uitstoot van autoverkeer, waarbij ook nog een groot aantal kinderen jaarlijks long- en/of luchtwegklachten oploopt........ De hoofdverantwoordelijken (in het waardeloze afbraakkabinet Rutte 2) voor die moorden op termijn: hare VVD kwaadaardigheid Schultz van Haegen en haar sidekick PvdA trol en leeghoofd Dijksma.......

Laten we hopen dat het alcoholslot, de maatregel die eerder dit jaar buiten werking werd gesteld, op z'n minst weer snel wordt ingevoerd........

Voorts zouden de verantwoordelijke ministers en staatssecretarissen strafrechtelijk moeten worden vervolgd, vanwege moord op termijn (en ja, zowel de minister als de staatssecretaris zijn wat mij betreft verantwoordelijk voor deze achterlijke en smerige gang van zaken!)........

Zojuist op Radio1 een kort verslag van wat er in de Kamer is gezegd over deze zaak: Schultz van Haegen denkt na over een 'alcoholslot light' en andere alternatieven. Van der Steur is bezig met een onderzoek naar de 'alcohol enkelband', althans dat staat voor volgend jaar op de rol. Schultz van Haegen wil ook de auto-industrie polsen, waar zij voor lobbyt, en hen te vragen een soort van alcoholslot in te bouwen in nieuwe plofbakken.......

U ziet 't: 'het is Schultz van Haegen en van der Steur ernst', als het gaat om verkeersdoden en gewonden.........

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels die u onder dit bericht terugvindt.

Dijsselbloem vertelt eindelijk de waarheid: we zijn niet uit de crisis..........

De wanpresterende gesel van de Grieken, PvdA hufter Dijsselbloem, weet intussen niet meer wat hij wel en niet gezegd heeft. Gistermiddag op BNR na 17.00 u., hoorde ik de sufferd zeggen dat 'we' nog lang niet terug zijn op het niveau van voor de (banken-) crisis....... Daarmee herroept hij zijn eerdere leugens, en die van het onnozele nationale waterhoofd W.A. die tijdens de laatste troonrede o.a. met de woorden van Rutte stelde, dat 'we' uit de crisis zijn.........*

Met één ding zijn 'we' wel weer bijna terug op het niveau van voor die crisis: de huizenbubbel en daarmee de kredietverlening op de pof door de bankenmaffia..... Al is het dit keer met heel veel hypotheekgaranties, zodat wij, de belastingbetalers (ook die met een peperduur huurhuis) direct mogen opdraaien voor de verliezen, als het weer in het honderd loopt....

Oh, ik realiseer me dat we nog op een ander vlak terug zijn op het niveau van voor genoemde crisis: de banken die weer naar het niveau van 'too big to fail' zijn gegroeid door uitbreidingen in het buitenland....... 'Gelukkig' mogen wij, de belastingbetalers ook daarvoor opdraaien.... Of dacht u, dat Dijsselbloem of z'n opvolger banken failliet zal laten gaan en/of de aandeelhouders zal laten bloeden....?? ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Nee dus!!

Wat betreft de achterlijke bonussen, die smerige bankproducten opleverden, waardoor de crisis in 2008 begon, is er ook amper iets veranderd, weliswaar zijn de bonussen aan een maximum gebonden, maar om dat te ondergraven kreeg de top van die banken enorme loosverhogingen!! M.a.w. ook daar is praktisch niets veranderd.......

In omfloerste bewoordingen stelde Dijsselbloem dat kapitaalbuffers ervoor zullen zorgen, dat er nooit weer enorme kapitalen aan belastinggeld nodig zullen zijn om financiële instellingen te redden...... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! In 2008 en daarna was er een paar honderd miljard nodig om de financiële maffia op de been te houden........ Omdat er nu een buffer is aangelegd van 3% (een buffer die in veel gevallen nog lang niet op de volledige 3% staat), zal Dijsselbloem of diens opvolger nooit meer miljarden aan belastinggeld nodig hebben** voor de redding van het geteisem...... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Wat een oplichter!

Hufter Dijsselbloem moet weten, dat hij liegt dat het gedrukt staat, hij rekent er dan ook op, dat de volgende verdieping van de crisis pas na de verkiezingen zal plaatsvinden, zodat hij tot de verkiezingen het stemvee kan voorhouden, dat hij 't allemaal prachtig voor elkaar heeft wat betreft het aan banden leggen van de financiële maffia.......

Wat een smerige bedrieger!!!

* Zie: 'Willem Alexander ging akkoord met leugen van Rutte!'

** Ter verduidelijking: die 3% staat niet in verhouding tot de miljarden, die nodig waren voor de redding van de banken en verzekeringsmaatschappijen!

Zie ook: 'Jeroen Dijsselbloem: 'van mij zult u geen sorry horen', toch belooft hij weer dat iedereen erop vooruit gaat.....' (o.a. met lijst Rutte 2 'prestaties')

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

woensdag 5 oktober 2016

Schippers teleurgesteld over teveel zoutgebruik in levensmiddelen....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het RIVM maakte vandaag bekend, dat het gebruik van zout nog net zo groot is als 10 jaar geleden....... Dat had iedere imbeciel kunnen voorspellen, daar afspraken met de levensmiddelenindustrie totaal zinloos zijn...... Lullig dat je de opvolgende ministers van Volksgezondheid niet tot die imbecielen kan rekenen, VVD kwaadaardigheid Schippers is de laatste die dergelijke zinloze afspraken maakte......

Vrouwen gebruiken gemiddeld 7,4 gram zout per dag en mannen 9,7 gram per dag, terwijl de aanbevolen hoeveelheid 6 gram is. Overigens is die 6 gram volgens een aantal deskundigen alsnog te hoog........

Schippers is uit en te na gewaarschuwd door deskundigen dwingend het gebruik van zout (suiker en foute vetten) sterk terug te brengen. Dit daar overmatig gebruik van die stoffen leidt tot een groter beroep op de gezondheidszorg en daarmee de zorgkosten aanjaagt.......

Dat laatste was en is het stokpaardje van Schippers*, keer op keer heeft de hufter het over de uit de pan rijzende zorgkosten en dat dit teruggebracht moet worden....... Daaraan kan u meteen zien, dat ze een enorme oplichter is, iets dat je ook kan destilleren uit haar opmerkingen, dat ze de prijs van medicijnen 'enorm omlaag heeft gebracht...' ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Die prijs is amper omlaag gebracht, je kan hooguit stellen, dat er minder medicijnen worden voorgeschreven. Intussen blijft ze met haar wanbeleid de zorgkosten verder opjagen.......

Het gaat Schippers dan ook niet om uw gezondheid, maar om 'de gezondheid' van het bedrijf, dat u gevaarlijk voedsel verkoopt. Je kan zelfs stellen, dat Schippers de zorgkosten in het geheel niet omlaag wil brengen, daar dit nadelig is voor een groot aantal bedrijven en bepaald niet alleen bedrijven die levensmiddelen produceren! Voor de VVD (en een flink aantal andere partijen), is geld verdienen een heel stuk belangrijker dan uw gezondheid!

Oplichter Schippers, lid van misdadigers partij VVD, het lobby-orgaan voor het bedrijfsleven!

'Teleurgesteld.......' ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het Centraal Bureau Levensmiddelenhandel (CBL) stelde verrast te zijn door de uitkomsten van het RIVM onderzoek, hoewel het RIVM twee jaar gelden met bijna dezelfde uitkomst kwam...... Overigens ook andere organisaties stellen keer op keer hetzelfde, in augustus dit jaar kwam Gezondheidsnet met eenzelfde rapport, maar het CBL is 'verrast.....'

Men kan goed liegen bij het CBL, daar men botweg stelde dat het zoutgebruik in levensmiddelen, tussen 2011 en 2015, met 7% is teruggebracht...... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Vorig jaar bleek uit onderzoek, dat na het eerste gesprek daarover tussen de levensmiddelenindustrie en de overheid, het zoutgebruik iets afnam in levensmiddelen, maar dat dit van korte duur was.

Daar het geen verplichting was zout uit de producten te halen, deden een aantal levensmiddelenfabrikanten niet mee, waarna de bedrijven die wel meededen, teruggingen naar het oude niveau van zoutgebruik!! Volgens het CBL, ligt het niet verminderen van de zoutinname 'wellicht' aan het zelf zout strooien met zout........ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Het CBL strooit met leugens, wat een oplichters!!

* Ik zie haar al lopen, met een stokpaardje, doet ze eindelijk iets wat anderen niet schaadt.....

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

De VS maakt zich op voor oorlog tegen Rusland en daarmee voor WOIII........

Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten bracht vanmorgen een artikel waarin wordt gemeld dat de VS zich opmaakt voor oorlog tegen Rusland....... Voor de regelmatige lezer van alternatieve media en van dit blog geen verrassing, het grote verschil is, dat de regering van de VS nu openlijk spreekt over oorlogvoering tegen Rusland...... Daarmee wordt het verhaal in de reguliere afhankelijke media organen doorgeprikt, dat het een complottheorie is, te waarschuwen voor het gevaar dat het tot een oorlog met Rusland komt en daarmee WOIII een feit zal zijn.......  

Joseph Francis Dunford, marinier generaal en de joint chiefs of staff voorzitter, zei in een hoorzitting van het congres, dat een vliegverbod instellen in Syrië tot een oorlog met Syrië en Rusland zal leiden. Dunford stelde dat hij een dergelijke beslissing niet op zich kon nemen. Oorlogshitser John McCain drong er bij Dunford op aan zijn woorden te relativeren, zie begin van de volgende video:


Al een aantal dagen probeerde 'hardline' senator Graham Dunford te bewegen de afzetting van de Syrische president Assad als militair doel aan te wijzen. Graham wees Dunford erop, dat het de 'hardliners' er om gaat, te weten of Assad nog aan het bewind zal zijn, als Obama het Witte Huis verlaat. Dunford duidelijk vermoeid, verzocht of hij zich aan de politieke druk mocht onttrekken, zie:


De Washington Post berichtte dat de geheime diensten en delen van het Pentagon Obama willen bewegen, toestemming te geven militaire vliegvelden in Syrië te bombarderen. De kans daarop is uitermate klein, de Post stelde, dat daarom leden van het Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, de CIA en de generale staf een paar andere opties hebben 'gelanceerd'. Zoals het bestoken van de landingsbanen van de vliegvelden door/met vliegtuigen, kruisraketten en andere lange afstandswapens..... Dit zou met vliegtuigen van de VS coalitie en haar oorlogsschepen moeten worden uitgevoerd. Een andere mogelijkheid is levering van modern wapentuig aan internationale 'strijders' (lees; moorddadige terroristen).........

Daar het Witte Huis niets wenst te doen, zonder een resolutie van de VN Veiligheidsraad*, stellen de 'hardliners', dat de VS aanvallen zou kunnen doen, die niet terug te leiden zijn naar de VS (daar heeft de VS ruime ervaring mee, ook in Syrië!)....  Dit plan wordt gesteund door de CIA en de vice voorzitter van de generale staf generaal Paul Selva. Met andere woorden: de VS wil aanvallen uitvoeren, die niet terug te leiden zijn naar de eigen (terreur) legermacht en daarmee het eigen volk (en de rest van de wereld) te besodemieteren.........

Dat het de VS ernst is, blijkt wel uit het feit, dat de VS de belangrijkste NAVO leden consulteert met deze plannen. Vandaag vindt er in Berlijn een Syrië overleg plaats in het Duitse ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, tussen de directeuren van deze ministeries uit Groot-Brittannië, Frankrijk Italië en een VS delegatie. Volgens bronnen in de VS zal daar ook worden gesproken over het verzwaren van de sancties tegen Syrië en Rusland......

Onder de tegenstanders tegen verregaand ingrijpen in Syrië zou ook John Kerry zich bevinden, die nog niet de onderhandelingsteams uit Genève wil terugtrekken. Echter gezien zijn leugenachtige geroeptoeter over Ruslands rol in Syrië, zal die tegenstand niet lang aanhouden......

Der Flugzeugträger USS Dwight D. Eisenhower im Juni 2016 in der Straße von Gibraltar, auf seinem Weg ins Mittelmeer. (Foto: Michael R. Gendron/US Navy/dpa)
Der Flugzeugträger USS Dwight D. Eisenhower im Juni 2016 in der Straße von Gibraltar, auf seinem Weg ins Mittelmeer. (Foto: Michael R. Gendron/US Navy/dpa)

McCain vreest intussen het verlies van 'activa' in Syrië, waarmee hij de door de VS getrainde en bewapende terroristen bedoelt...... Dunford weigerde aanvankelijk te zeggen, dat de aanval op een hulpkonvooi en loodsen met hulpgoederen op 17 september jl., door de Russen en het Syrische leger werd gepleegd, waarna hij onder druk van senator Graham stelde dat 'het een mogelijkheid kan zijn......' Dit terwijl duidelijk is, dat dit konvooi door terreurgroepen op de grond werd aangevallen en niet werd gebombardeerd door de Russen en Syriërs.....

De Russische minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Lavrov, stelde dat de VS duidelijk niet de terroristen van al-Nusra (en andere terreurgroepen) wenst te bombarderen. De VS wil deze groepen gebruiken voor 'een plan B' om Assad af te zetten...... Zie de volgende video:


* Wat ik overigens zwaar betwijfel.....

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

ING moet wel 7.000 mensen ontslaan........ AUW!!!

Niet alleen gaat ING met toestemming van Dijsselbloem in tegen de afgesproken regel, dat de Nederlandse banken niet meer 'too big to fail' mogen worden, met een enorme expansie in het buitenland, maar de bank ontslaat ook nog eens een groot aantal mensen.......

In totaal 7.000 personeelsleden worden ontslagen, waarmee vooral de Nederlandse en Belgische werkgelegenheid worden getroffen....... In het 8.00 u. BNR nieuws van afgelopen maandag de vaststelling, dat ING niet anders kan, dit vanwege de digitalisering........ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Een smerige leugen, daar deze maatregel vooral wordt genomen voor de aandeelhouders!!

'ING moet herstructureren', zo luidde het devies afgelopen maandag in de reguliere media......

De neoliberale hufter van werkgevers lobby-orgaan De Unie, Castelein, durfde op te merken dat het nu eenmaal niet anders kan en 'dat we ons moeten voorbereiden op een zachte landing......' ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, die durft wel hè?? Met zijn inkomen kan iedereen 'een zachte landing maken', zelfs bij ontslag op staande voet...... Castelein sprak van 'Black Monday...' mooi hè, net of het hem getroffen heeft en dan toch nog even heel interessant laten horen, 'dat hij het Engels beheerst........'

Het was zo zot, dat de aandeelhouders van ING werden ingelicht voordat de werknemers op de hoogte werden gesteld...... Daarvoor had ING wel een smak geld over, in een peperdure ruimte op Schiphol, zodat ook de buitenlandse grote investeerders makkelijk en comfortabel aanwezig konden zijn.... Dat betekent overigens, dat de grote aandeelhouders al een paar weken geleden op de hoogte waren van de asociale plannen, immers je reist niet zomaar af naar Nederland........ Dit was dan ook de reden, dat de aandelen ING amper omhoog gingen, wat ze overigens gegarandeerd op een later tijdstip wel zullen doen, aandeelhouders zijn nu eenmaal blij, als er veel personeel de deur uit wordt geschopt..........

Ongelofelijk maar waar: FNV gaat geen actie voeren, nee, de bond gaat overleggen, om zo gedwongen ontslagen te voorkomen........ Van 'vakbond' De Unie hoeft u al helemaal niets te verwachten, zoals u hier boven kon lezen (en zoals dit altijd het geval is met De Unie), dezelfde 'tactiek' als FNV......

Gelukkig voor de Belgische ING medewerkers, gaan de echte vakbonden daar wel actie voeren..... Overigens werd gistermiddag bekend gemaakt, dat er in België nog meer ING banen verloren gaan.....

Ik geloof dat Dijsselbloem weer enigszins verontwaardigd heeft gedaan over de banken, maar wel laat hij de banken het recht, het persoonlijke (ha! ha!) IBAN-nummer als eigendom te houden......... Echt mensen, dat is een godgeklaagd schandaal, voor elkaar gekregen door de lobby van de banken, dezelfde banken die ons zoveel ellende hebben bezorgd na 2007............ Niet meer dan normaal, dat je een nummer, dat je leven lang van jouw blijft, mee kan nemen naar een andere bank en dat je zo figuren als Hamers voor schoftenbeleid kan straffen!!!!

Zie ook: 'Wiebes wil vennootschapsbelasting verlagen, zodat nog meer misdadige buitenlandse bedrijven ons land zoeken.........'

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Aleppo: ondanks duidelijk gemanipuleerde video met meisje van 8, loopt de reguliere pers ermee weg.......

Rens de Jong, BNR koekwaus en ondernemer (zoals BNR meldt, dus een zzp'er...) was gistermiddag, samen met een andere gast te horen in de show van BNR's bolle lachzak Hemmen (rond 12.50 u.).

Aan bod o.a. de video van een 8 jarig Syrisch meisje in Aleppo. Een duidelijk gemanipuleerde video, om zo het Syrisch leger en de Russen in een nog kwader daglicht te stellen. Dit meisje gebruikt een woordenschat, die niet past bij een 8 jarige, bovendien spreekt het meisje geen Engels en deed zij haar verhaal fonetisch......

Ondanks dat de Jong het laatste zelf ook vaststelde, vond hij dit een uitermate aangrijpende video, die de wanhoop van de bevolking goed weergeeft en zoals gebruikelijk: als het om een kind gaat, komt de boodschap zo nog veel sterker over........

Het is dat de situatie in Aleppo te triest voor woorden is, anders zou je je werkelijk doodlachen....... Volgens de Jong kijken wij door een rietje naar de strijd in Aleppo..... Niet zijn bedoeling, maar daar heeft hij een punt: 'we' (de reguliere westerse media) kijken door een rietje naar de werkelijkheid, terwijl er een enorm vergrootglas is gericht op alle anti-Syrische en Russische propaganda, die dan ook dag in dag uit wordt verkondigd in de reguliere (afhankelijke) media, zoals bij BNR.........

Er is meer dan voldoende bekend, om een heel ander beeld te schetsen, maar dat willen de westerse politici en reguliere media niet. Geen berichten met het feit, dat de bevolking van Aleppo de stad niet mag verlaten, een verbod ingesteld door de 'gematigde rebellen' (lees: psychopathische, moorddadige terreurgroepen)...... Op overtreding staat standrechtelijke executie, inclusief eventueel mee vluchtende vrouwen en kinderen.......

Daarover gesproken: men lult in de reguliere westerse media al helemaal niet, over het terreurbewind dat de 'gematigde' terreurgroepen op de Syrische bevolking in Aleppo uitoefenen middels de sharia wetgeving......

Voedsel, water, medische voorraden en brandstof gaan in hoofdzaak naar de 'gematigde' terreurgroepen, groepen die tot nu toe altijd de bevelen van de meesters in Riyad (Saoedi-Arabië) en het Pentagon volgen: houd je niet aan een gesloten wapenstilstanden, maar maak er juist gebruik van om je positie te versterken!!!

De bevolking uithongeren en geen toegang tot andere basisbehoeften als water geven, is een wapen in de handen van die terreurgroepen: de beelden van een bevolking in het nauw, een bevolking die honger lijdt en die het aan zo ongeveer alles ontbreekt, zorgt ervoor dat de stemming in het westen in hun voordeel is en blijft......*

De aanval op een hulpkonvooi een paar weken geleden, blijkt door een terreurgroep te zijn begaan en niet middels een Syrisch/Russisch bombardement, toch houden politici en media in het westen vol, dat het de Russen waren. Hetzelfde geldt voor alle gasaanvallen, na onderzoek allemaal toe te schrijven tot de 'gematigde' terreurgroepen.........

Nog 'een mooi voorbeeld' van smerige propaganda: vanmorgen op BBC World Service (radio, rond 9.17 u. CET) her bericht dat de laatste week 100 kinderen in Aleppo het slachtoffer zijn geworden van Syrische/Russische bombardementen....... De WHO (Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie) bracht dit bericht gisteren. Men liet bij de BBC kinderen uit Aleppo (althans dat moeten we aannemen) aan het woord, woorden in het Engels (vertaalt en) herhaalt door kinderen uit Groot-Brittannië....... Zo klinkt het nog gruwelijker en zet men de emotioneel gemaakte luisteraar op tegen de Russen en het Syrische bewind.......

*  Over dat beïnvloeden van de stemming: de westerse politici en reguliere westerse media doen net alsof de 'gematigde' rebellen (nogmaals : psychopathische moordenaars) geen schot lossen, geen raket of mortiergranaat afschieten, terwijl ze wel degelijk hun wapens richten op de bevolking van Aleppo, als ze stellingen van het Syrische leger beschieten........ Zoals deze terreurgroepen dit ook tijdens 'de wapenstilstand(en)' hebben gedaan....... De BBC maakte vanmorgen trouwens een kapitale fout, door de vertaling van de woorden die de moeder van een kind gaf, zij sprak over afgeschoten raketten, raketten die op de grond worden gebruikt....... (deze raketten van klein kaliber worden voornamelijk door de terreurgroepen gebruikt......) Ach geen mens die het opvalt.......

Zie ook: 'Rusland en Syrië worden o.a. door Frankrijk beschuldigt van terreur in Aleppo......... De vraag is wie de ware terroristen zijn.'

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Wiebes wil vennootschapsbelasting verlagen, zodat nog meer misdadige buitenlandse bedrijven ons land zoeken.........

Nederland belastingparadijs: het is de potsierlijke vol-idioot Wiebes nu geheel in de bol geslagen: i.p.v. het belasting ontduiken aan te pakken, wil hij het nog aanlokkelijker maken...... Wiebes wil de vennootschapsbelasting en daarmee de belasting op winst verder verlagen......

Onder VVD en PvdA 'kregen' de laagste inkomens een dikke belastingverhoging voor de kiezen, terwijl de belastingdienst en de minister geheime afspraken maakten met buitenlandse bedrijven, zodat ze in veel gevallen veel minder dan 20% betalen, even ter vergelijking: mensen die werkelijk geen cent meer kunnen missen, betalen nu meer dan 36% inkomstenbelasting en dat over een onbeschoft laag inkomen!!! Vergeet bij de volgende verkiezingen niet, dat de PvdA daar hoofdverantwoordelijkheid voor draagt!!

Dit alles zet ook nog eens extra vraagtekens bij de handelsmissies, waar het onnozele nationale waterhoofd W.A en zijn pampakoningin Maxima deelnemen. Immers gegarandeerd dat meereizende ministers en ambtenaren tijdens die missies afspraken maken met bedrijven, die zich in Nederland willen vestigen! Afspraken over een uitermate gunstig belastingtarief, zoals u begrijpt!! Uiteraard is het koningshuis daarvan op de hoogte!

Hoe men het ook wendt of keert, het is en blijft misdadig als bijvoorbeeld Griekse bedrijven hier de belasting in eigen land ontduiken, terwijl de gewone Griekse bevolking het vel over de oren wordt getrokken......*

Wiebes? Ach ja, lid van misdadigersbende VVD!!! Als iemand met macht dit soort dingen oppert, zou dat een reden moeten zijn, diens gangen eens strafrechtelijk te onderzoeken, van enig ethisch en moreel besef is duidelijk allang geen sprake meer!! Overigens geldt dit voor het gros van de VVD politici!

* Dat vel over de oren trekken, o.a. door de jaknikkende PvdA hufter en wanpresterend minister Dijsselbloem, 'de baas' van Wiebes....... Onlangs werd nog bekend gemaakt, dat het financiële beleid van Rutte 2 en dan m.n. het aanpakken van de crisis, een mislukt beleid is..... Een beleid dat Nederland onnodig lang in de crisis heeft gehouden (en houdt) en een beleid dat voor een groot aantal extra werklozen heeft gezorgd.....

Terwijl de banken en verzekeringsmaatschappijen zijn geholpen met een paar honderd miljard aan belastinggeld, breidt deze financiële maffia zich alweer ongeremd uit in het buitenland..... Door dat laatste zullen banken en verzekeringsmaatschappijen, straks weer 'too big to fail' blijken te zijn, ofwel te groot om failliet te laten gaan. De zogenaamde buffer die dit op moeten vangen is belachelijk laag, namelijk 3% (zelfs de 4% van Dijsselbloem was een achterlijk aantal procenten te laag!!). Kortom als het straks weer misgaat (volgens deskundigen onvermijdelijk), mag de belastingbetaler weer voor de verliezen opdraaien.........

Zie ook: 'ING moet wel 7.000 mensen ontslaan........ AUW!!!'

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt.

dinsdag 4 oktober 2016

MH17 rapport JIT klopt niet aldus o.a. prof. Michel Chossudovsky!!

In het volgende artikel op Global Research betoogt professor Michel Chossudovsky dat vlucht MH17 is neergehaald door een MIG straaljager. Lees dit artikel en zegt het voort. U vindt o.a. een link naar 100 berichten op Global Research over de ramp met MH17. Het artikel vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke en bevat o.a. een eerder artikel van Chossudovsky:

SUPPORT MH17 TRUTH: MACHINE GUN-LIKE HOLES INDICATE SHELLING FROM A MILITARY AIRCRAFT. NO EVIDENCE OF A SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE ATTACK.

More lies prevail with regard to MH17. Recent press reports quoting the Dutch Safety Board’s October 2015 final report point to “a surface-to-air missile [which] exploded near the left side of the passenger plane bringing down the aircraft.”
Although the Dutch report concluded that the Russian-made BUK surface-to-air missile with a 9N314M warhead brought down the Boeing 777, it did not mention which side was responsible for firing the missile…  (International Business Times, March 8, 2016
The evidence presented in this Global Research article (below) first published on July 31, 2014 contradicts the report of the Dutch Safety Board and provides evidence:  

The evidence amply confirms that Malaysian Airlines MH17 was not brought down by a surface to air missile. It was brought down by military aircraft. 

The West continues to accuse Russia and the Donbass separatists of having brought down the plane with a surface to air missile. IT’S A LIE. The Dutch investigation has been twisted. 

UPDATE, August 7, 2016

Washington’s agenda in liaison with the Kiev regimes is to blame Russia. In recent developments (August 3, 2016), Ukraine president Poroshenko has visited Malaysia for discussions with Prime Minister Razak Najib:
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said Malaysia will work with Ukraine to bring the perpetrators to justice. “We will do whatever we can to find the truth for the sake of families who lost their loved ones in this tragic incident. “We are waiting for the criminal investigation report, which is expected to be tabled by the year-end, followed by a meeting to decide on the next course of action,” said Najib.(New Straights Times, August 4, 2016)
The evidence available in September 2014 –including a BBC report which the BBC decided to suppress– refutes the official story. 

As we recall, the alleged role of Russia in bringing down the plane was used as a justification to implement the economic sanctions regime against Moscow. Although not explicitly mentioned by the Dutch investigators, Moscow remains the “main suspect” in this twisted and fraudulent investigation, which will no doubt be the object of a new gush of media lies and distortions. Moscow has expressed its disagreement. 
They are fundamentally wrong, the lack of logic there is beyond comparison… I had a feeling that the commission was cherry-picking the evidence to suit a theory they had chosen.” Deputy head of Russia’s federal air transport agency Oleg Storchevoi (quoted by the Associated Press
Meanwhile, the Dutch investigators have decided to temporarily withhold their final verdict:  
it soon should determine the exact launch site of the missile that brought down the plane, killing all 298 people on board.
But Fred Westerbeke, the prosecutor leading the international probe, warned Monday that completing the investigation would take much longer. He declined to name a possible finishing date.
After briefing relatives of victims on the investigation, Westerbeke pledged to complete the investigation “as quickly as possible, if only because of the frustration among the families.” (AP, March 7, 2016)
Since July 2014, Global Research has compiled evidence and analysis which refutes the official story. 

Our message to the families: The Dutch investigators are lying.
Numerous authors and specialists have contributed to the MH17 dossier, which is available on the Global Research website. Unequivocally this dossier refutes the official story. 





Michel Chossudovsky, September 2016

SUPPORT MH17 TRUTH”: OSCE MONITORS IDENTIFY “SHRAPNEL AND MACHINE GUN-LIKE HOLES” INDICATING SHELLING. NO EVIDENCE OF A MISSILE ATTACK. SHOT DOWN BY A MILITARY AIRCRAFT


by Michel Chossudovsky

Global Research

July 31, 2014 

According to the report of German pilot and airlines expert Peter Haisenko, the MH17 Boeing 777 was not brought down by a missile. 
What he observed from the available photos were perforations of the cockpit: 
 The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. (Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile” Global Research, July 30, 2014) 



Based on detailed analysis Peter Haisenko reached  the conclusion that the MH17 was not downed by a missile attack:
This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion. The destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material
The OSCE Mission
It is worth noting that the initial statements by OSCE (OVSE, AP) observers (July 31) broadly confirm the findings of Peter Haisenko:
Monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe reported that shrapnel-like holes were found in two separate pieces of the fuselage of the ill-fated Malaysia Airlines aircraft that was believed to have been downed by a missile in eastern Ukraine.
Michael Bociurkiw of the OSCE group of monitors at his daily briefing described part of the plane’s fuselage dotted with “shrapnel-like, almost machine gun-like holes.” He said the damage was inspected by Malaysian aviation-security officials .(Wall Street Journal, July 31, 2014)
The monitoring OSCE team has not found evidence of a missile fired from the ground as conveyed by official White House statements. As we recall, the US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power stated –pointing a finger at Russia– that the Malaysian MH17 plane was “likely downed by a surface-to-air missile operated from a separatist-held location”:
The team of international investigators with the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are uncertain if the missile used was fired from the ground as US military experts have previously suggested, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported. (Malay Mail online, emphasis added)
The initial OSCE findings tend to dispel the claim that a BUK missile system brought down the plane.
Evidently, inasmuch as the perforations are attributable to shelling, a shelling operation conducted from the ground could not have brought down an aircraft traveling above 30,000 feet.


Ukraine Su-25 military aircraft within proximity of MH17 


Peter Haisenko’s study is corroborated by the Russian Ministry of Defense which pointed to a Ukrainian Su-25 jet in the flight corridor of the MH17, within proximity of the plane.

Ironically, the presence of a military aircraft is also confirmed by a BBC  report conducted at the crash site on July 23.

All the eyewitnesses  interviewed by the BBC confirmed the presence of a Ukrainian military aircraft flying within proximity of Malaysian Airlines MH17 at the time that it was shot down: 
Eyewitness #1: There were two explosions in the air. And this is how it broke apart. And [the fragments] blew apart like this, to the sides. And when …
Eyewitness #2: … And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it. Everybody saw it.
Eyewitness #1: Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.
Eyewitness #3: There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. They came from the sky. Then this plane made a sharp turn-around like this. It changed its trajectory and headed in that direction [indicating the direction with her hands].
BBC Report below
The original BBC Video Report published by BBC Russian Service on July 23, 2014 has since been removed from the BBC archive.

In a bitter irony, The BBC is censoring its own news productions.

This is the BBC Report, still available on Youtube  
It has now been blocked [March 8, 2016] once more by the BBC. It is called suppressing the evidence.

BELOW SCREENSHOT OF BC TV REPORT ENTITLED “AND THERE WAS ANOTHER AIRCRAFT” SUPPRESSED BY THE BBC


Media Spin

The media has reported that a surface to air missile was indeed fired and exploded before reaching its target.  It was not the missile that brought down the plane, it was the shrapnel resulting from the missile explosion (prior to reaching the plane) which punctured the plane and then led to a loss of pressure.

According to Ukraine’s National security spokesman Andriy Lysenko in a contradictory statement, the MH17 aircraft “suffered massive explosive decompression after being hit by a shrapnel missile.”  (See IBT, Australia)

The downed Malaysia Airlines jet in eastern Ukraine suffered an explosive loss of pressure after it was punctured by shrapnel from a missile.
They say the information came from the plane’s flight data recorders, which are being analysed by British experts.
However, it remains unclear who fired a missile, with pro-Russia rebels and Ukraine blaming each other.
Many of the 298 people killed on board flight MH17 were from the Netherlands.
Dutch investigators leading the inquiry into the crash have refused to comment on the Ukrainian claims.
Machine Gun Like Holes”

The shrapnel marks should be distinguished from the small entry and exit holes “most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile” fired from a military aircraft. These holes could not have been caused by a missile explosion as hinted by the MSM.
While the MSN is saying that the “shrapnel like holes” can be caused by a missile (see BBC report above), the OSCE has confirmed the existence of what it describes as “machine gun like holes”, without however acknowledging that these cannot be caused by a missile.

In this regard, the GSh-302 firing gun operated by an Su-25 is able to fire 3000 rpm which explains the numerous entry and exit holes.
If we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s cockpit segment (op cit)

The accusations directed against Russia including the sanctions regime imposed by Washington are based on a lie.

The evidence does not support the official US narrative to the effect that the MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile system operated by the DPR militia.

What next? More media disinformation, more lies?
See:


The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2016


Zie ook: 'MH17, een aantal feiten die u niet te horen krijgt van de reguliere media, of de politiek, die vooral anti-Russische propaganda spuien, dag in dag uit......'

       en:  'MH17 en 'overtuigende bewijzen', vooral die uit Oekraïne en de VS.....'

       en: 'Ten Broeke wil radarbeelden MH17 ramp niet eens zien, dat zou het onderzoek maar schaden....'

       en: 'Moscow shared MH17 radar images, Dutch probe ignored evidence, Russia tells victims’ relatives'

       en: 'MH17 herdenking in Oost-Oekraïne, amper aandacht in 'onafhankelijke' Nederlandse media........'
 
      en: 'Sjoerd Sjoerdsma (D66) heeft bewijzen voor vuil spel van SP en Russen, presenteren kan hij ze niet.......' (over complottheorieën gesproken.....)

      en: 'MH 17 schandaal.........'

      en: 'Hubert Smeets met 5 km/u. finaal uit de bocht: feiten worden door RT niet met andere feiten bestreden, RT haalt ze alleen maar onderuit....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'

      en: 'MH17 drie jaar later, het is leugens en bedrog wat de klok slaat........'

      en: 'MH17: JIT heeft plotseling bijna de hele BUK-raket.........' (klik ook op de links onder dat bericht)
Overigens wordt in dit bericht niet gesproken over een verdwenen autopsie rapport, een rapport over één van de piloten, die bijna letterlijk in tweeën werd geschoten met munitie, die alleen in MIG straaljagers wordt gebruikt.........
Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.