Zoals gewoonlijk wordt er weer grof gelogen op de BBC als het om Jeremy Corbyn gaat....... Laura Kuenssberg van de BBC liegt er (niet erg vrolijk) op los. Corbyn zal en mag de verkiezingen niet winnen. Te zot voor woorden dat het zogenaamde deskundigen als Kees Boonman het laatste jaar niet is opgevallen, dat zelfs de 'onafhankelijke' BBC een lastercampagne voerde en voert tegen Corbyn, of hem op andere momenten eenvoudigweg doodzwijgt.
Een beter voorbeeld, als het optreden van Kuenssberg is er bijna niet te vinden, ontluisterend het gore lef waarmee deze oplichter haar leugens met een 'serieuze' rotkop op durft te lepelen.......... Kuenssberg durft zich journalist te noemen, zoals de BBC zich als 'onafhankelijk' durft te afficheren.........
Overigens staat er een kapitale fout in het artikel van the Canary, waar wordt beweert, dat de minister van Defensie in april jl. als eerste met de Britse doctrine rond kernwapens zou hebben gebroken en gezegd zou hebben dat GB niet zal aarzelen om als eerste naar het atoomwapen te grijpen........ Dit deed hare kwaadaardigheid en opperploert May al vrij kort nadat ze vorig jaar als premier aantrad, na het opstappen van Cameron...... May gaf e.e.a. te kennen in navolging van de VS (onder Obama!!)........
De pers besteedde hier amper of geen aandacht aan, pas toen Putin werd gevraagd wat daarvan te denken en deze antwoordde dat bij een nucleaire aanval op Rusland, hij niet zal twijfelen om dan terug te slaan, stond de reguliere westerse afhankelijke massamedia op de kop van verontwaardiging (over die 'volkomen normale' uitlating van Putin..).......
Hier het bericht van the Canary:
There’s something very wrong with Laura Kuenssberg’s response to Corbyn’s performance on BBC Question Time
Laura
Kuenssberg’s response to BBC Question
Time’s Leaders’ Debate was
extraordinary. Because she completely made up a story about the
debate in an apparent attempt to prove her point.
Her
point, of course, was to suggest Jeremy
Corbyn struggled in the debate. Whereas Theresa May’s performance
marked the start of her campaign’s recovery, after “a bumpy few
days”. But that point is as much fiction as the story she made up
to prove it.
Corbyn cracking?
Kuenssberg
reported that the audience “pressed” both leaders in their “areas
of vulnerability” on the Question
Time special
on 2 June. They pushed May on domestic issues. Particularly, on the
cuts in the NHS, social care, education and more.
In
contrast, Kuenssberg said, the audience confronted Corbyn on security
issues, like the use of nuclear weapons. The BBC’s Political
Editor said Corbyn’s “unwillingness to use weapons if Britain was
under attack” didn’t go down well with the audience. This
interpretation is, however, untrue. Corbyn did not say he wouldn’t
use nuclear weapons. He said there
would be “no first use” of them, meaning he wouldn’t start a
nuclear war. Also, he said, in
terms of a retaliatory attack, he would “decide in the
circumstances at the time”.
Kuenssberg
then concluded that
while May seemed more on the “front foot” in the programme,
Corbyn’s experience was less positive:
“In
contrast, Jeremy Corbyn who had been lapping up the political
attention, and setting much of the momentum, seemed almost irritated
by the end.”
The
“irritation” Kuenssberg speaks of didn’t exist. In fact, when
presenter David Dimbleby told Corbyn it was the end of his Q&A
session, he smiled and said:
“But
I’ve got so much more to say!”
Getting real
Importantly,
Corbyn’s refusal to use nuclear weapons in a first strike capacity
is something that should give us all more security. And this is shown
in what would happen in the event of a nuclear tit-for-tat war.
In
April, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon broke with UK convention
and said he
would not hesitate to fire nuclear weapons in a first strike. As a
minister who has also increased the
chances of a nuclear confrontation with Russia, The
Canary looked
into what would happen should Fallon act on his first strike rhetoric
and carry out a Trident nuclear strike on that country. Here’s
what we
found:
“There’s
limited information about Trident’s force. But commentators say
that today’s nuclear weapons are around seven to eight times more
powerful than
the atomic bomb the US used on Hiroshima in 1945. That bomb
killed 140,000 people.
And Trident can allegedly travel up to 7,500 miles.
So it could reach Russia and kill masses of civilians.
But
Russia… has 7,000 nuclear warheads; of which 4,500 are
either deployed or stockpiled. That’s around 33 times more warheads
than the UK has. And Russia’s weapons will be just as powerful, if
not more so. Take the Satan
2 missile as
an example. It can allegedly carry
up to a dozen warheads and level an area the size of the UK in one
hit. The UK has a population of around 65 million people.
And
if that sort of nuclear conflict kicked off, the US would surely join
the fray, with its 6,800 warheads. The US has just over 4,000 of
these deployed or stockpiled.
This
would be a global catastrophe.”
QT Winner?
The very real threat of a nuclear war commencing between the world’s larger nuclear powers, and the destruction that would bring, is why the audience gave one particular commentator the biggest applause of the night:
Kudos to the young woman who expressed surprise so many in #bbcqt audience are obsessed with genocide
(In het bericht op Twitter zat een video, die ik niet kon overnemen, zonder akkoord te gaan met privacy schendende regels van Twitter, het betreft een aantal beelden uit de video die u hieronder kunt afspelen (YouTube).]
The BBC‘s round-up of audience members who ‘stole the show’ listed this woman’s comment last. But that’s more a reflection on the BBC than the country at large. Because most people surely don’t want the catastrophe detailed here to play out. And now they have a politician standing for Prime Minster who’s determined to avoid a conflict that could see the UK lying at the bottom of the Atlantic ocean.
If that’s not an option people want, then we’re in a desperate place indeed.
Watch Corbyn’s full appearance here (een eerdere video is intussen 'verdwenen', vandaar het hele programma):
(For
British readers:) Get
Involved
– Get
out and vote on 8 June!
=========================Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels die u hieronder terug kan vinden
