Geen evolutie en ecolutie zonder revolutie!

Albert Einstein:

Twee dingen zijn oneindig: het universum en de menselijke domheid. Maar van het universum ben ik niet zeker.

maandag 17 oktober 2016

Obama dreigt Putin met nucleaire oorlog, ofwel WOIII, dat was wel een Nobelprijs waard!!

De VS denkt werkelijk een nucleaire oorlog te kunnen winnen, te zot voor woorden en een enorm verraad aan het grootste deel van de eigen bevolking, die net zo hard tot slachtoffer gebombardeerd zal worden als de door de VS bestookte tegenpartij (Rusland)........

Nadat de VS net als Groot-Brittannië een paar maanden geleden al heeft aangegeven, niet terug te deinzen, kernraketten in te zetten bij een (eerste) aanval. Uiteraard tegen Rusland, al werd dat er door beide terreurstaten niet bij vermeld........ Daarmee werd een eind gemaakt aan het tijdperk, dat de 'atoombom' (kernraket) een afschrikkingsmiddel en daarmee een defensief middel was, tegen de 'atoombommen' van de tegenpartij.........

Afgelopen zaterdag vond ik het volgende artikel op het blog van Stan van Houcke. Het betreft een interview met vicepresident Biden, dat gisteren werd uitgezonden op NBC. Volgens Biden zal Obama gepaste maatregelen nemen, mocht Trump op 3 november a.s. de presidentsverkiezingen winnen....... De gepaste maatregelen, waar Biden op doelt, kunnen volgens Eric Zuesse niets anders zijn, dan een nucleaire aanval inzetten tegen Rusland......

De regering Obama en de rest van de democratische partij, doen hun best Putin te beschuldigen van inmenging in de VS verkiezingen........ Zo zou Rusland zich al actief via computer hacks hebben bemoeid met de voorverkiezingen in de VS, aldus het bloeddorstig geteisem in Washington...... Alsof de verkiezingen in de VS eerlijke democratische verkiezingen zijn, waar niets op aan te merken is...... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Moet u nagaan: als er een 'land' op de wereld is, dat zich bemoeit met regeringen elders, is het de VS wel: als een land niet VS gunstig gestemd is, probeert de VS eerst middels een opstand, deze regering weg te krijgen voor een wel VS gunstig gestemde variant. Als dit niet lukt, begint de VS desnoods een illegale oorlog......

De laatste 15 jaar is de VS al 4 keer een illegale oorlog begonnen..... Of wacht even: eigenlijk 5, daar de oorlog die de door de VS geparachuteerde corrupte neonazi-vriend en juntaleider Porosjenko tegen de bevolking in het oosten van Oekraïne is begonnen, een voortvloeisel is uit het hiervoor genoemde scenario. De VS stak 4 miljard dollar in de opstand, die in Oekraïne tot de door de VS gewenste staatsgreep leidde...

Kortom: Obama sluit WOIII op basis van een leugen niet uit!

Lees en huiver:

President Obama Threatens President Putin with Nuclear War


Eric Zuesse

It’ll be at a time of our choosing,” says U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, on NBC’’s “Meet the Press,” to be aired on Sunday, October 16th.

Interviewer Chuck Todd had asked him, “Why would he [Obama] send a message out to Putin?” Biden pursed his lips, paused, and said, with a grim look on his face, “We sent him the message.” Of course that didn’t answer Todd’s question, which was “Why?” Biden and Todd both remained silent for another tense moment. Then, Biden picked up again: “We have the capacity to do it, and, uh,” and Todd interrupted him there with “He’ll know it?” Biden replied: “He’ll know it, and it’ll be at a time of our choosing, and under circumstances that have the greatest impact. Uh, the capacity to do, to fundamentally alter the election, is not what people think; and, uh, I tell you what: to the extent that they do [‘do’ presumably meaning: fundamentally alter the election], we will be proportionate in what we do. And, uh,” Todd again interrupted his interviewee, and said, “So, a message is going to be sent. Will the public know?” Biden replied, “Hope not.”

Of course, that “Hope not” could mean many things. It might mean: A blitz nuclear attack in line with our government’s belief that we now enjoy Nuclear Primacy (an idea that was first published by the Council on Foreign Relations in 2006, and which has never yet been renounced by the U.S. government, during the decade since). That would be very much a public response, which Biden would “hope not” to be ’necessary’. In other words: Biden might have meant, there: “I hope it won’t have to be that.” But, clearly, Biden isn’t wanting the public to understand anything, other than that President Obama has threatened President Putin, with something, and that it will be “proportionate,” and the excuse for it will be — if it will happen — that Putin had done something which Obama thinks caused Hillary Clinton to lose the election to Donald Trump.

Standing behind what Biden is saying there, is the belief that Putin does have in his possession some option that might “fundamentally alter the election.” This is clearly a threat that’s meant to deter Putin from doing something that Putin hasn’t yet done. Obama is telling Putin that either the winner will be the person he wants to be his successor, or else — or else what?

In other words: what Biden is saying, is that, if Trump wins this election, then there is going to be some sudden, unannounced, U.S. government response against Putin, and that only after it is over, will the U.S. government explain to the public why it did what it did.

But, of course, that assumes Americans will still be alive, even if Russians are not; and, so, if the “proportionate” response turns out to be a blitz nuclear attack against Russia, then anyone who is still alive will be wondering: what was it ‘proportionate’ to?

The United States is no longer — at least not in Syria — actually fighting the thing that Trump calls “extremist Islamic terrorism”: we are instead arming Al Qaeda in Syria to overthrow and replace Putin’s ally, Bashar al-Assad, there. All of the U.S. government’s talk against “ISIL” (the Sauds’ preferred acronym for “ISIS”) is mere distraction from the tens of thousands of other jihadist fighters from other jihadist groups that have also been imported by the U.S. and Saudi governments into Syria as Obama’s and the Sauds’ “boots on the ground” to overthrow Assad there. The leadership now for all of those jihadist groups (except for ISIS itself) is, in fact, Al Qaeda in Syria, which has gone under the name “al-Nusra.” Nusra is supplying the leadership now to all the jihadist factions that have been sent into Syria; Nusra is the only jihadist group that possesses the long experience and training in jihad and military matters, which is needed in order to be able to overthrow Assad. Al Qaeda is now America’s essential ally, at doing what the U.S. government most wants to do: overthrow and replace Assad. The U.S. is deadly serious about that intention, as can be seen here from the NBC News preview video of their interview with Biden, from which the above quotations are sourced. Looking at Biden’s face there, one can see that this is deadly serious. This isn’t about sexual aggression — either Donald Trump’s or Bill Clinton’s — it’s about the survival of civilization, or else nuclear war.

There have been many reports in the U.S. press saying that Obama has, ever since at least October 6th, been contemplating an all-out U.S. bombing campaign to bring down Assad. But that would mean war with Russia, which has been actively bombing Nusra and all the other jihadists in Syria. 

Hillary Clinton is urging a “no-fly zone” in Syria, so that we can do to Assad what we did to another ally of Moscow, Muammar Gaddafi. However, when that was done to Gaddafi, Putin stood aside and wasn’t supplying military assistance to Gaddafi, which would have enabled Gaddafi to wipe out the fundamentalist Muslims who were trying to overthrow him. Russia is involved actively, this time, to prevent happening in Syria what happened in Libya. A no-fly zone in Syria would thus mean U.S. war against Russia.

These are tense times. Any escalation that the U.S. can do against Russia, can be met by an escalation that Russia can do against the United States.

Consequently, whatever escalation Obama is now threatening against Putin, might be met by an escalation on the other side. Where will it stop, or would it even be able to stop?

Whatever escalation Obama might consider to be ‘proportionate’, could consequently end up ending the world as we know it — and not for the better. Hillary Clinton has threatened Putin with war; now Barack Obama has done likewise.

Whatever Biden’s assignment here actually was from Obama, one thing about it is clear: this President is determined that Hillary Clinton be his successor, and Obama will target anyone who gets in his way if he doesn’t win his way on this. And Obama wants the American public to know that this is how he feels about the matter. 

This Biden-interview is really intended, in that sense, to be a threat aimed at America’s voters, telling them, telling each one of us: Vote for Hillary Clinton, or else! He’s not telling us what that “or else!” is going to be — and maybe he himself has no accurate idea of how far it will ultimately cycle and go. Ultimately, whatever he thinks it would be, might not turn out to be the last step in this cycle of escalation — unless it’s going to go directly to a blitz attack against Russia.

Obama is thus coercing us, before he coerces Putin. He’s telling us: If we vote against Hillary Clinton — if she loses this election — then President Obama has something in mind that we won’t like — and he won’t wait until the next President is inaugurated on 20 January 2017 to do it, whatever ‘it’ might be. Obama here is threatenting not only Vladimir Putin, but the American people. Even if Obama truly believes that he alone possesses all the power, he does not, unless he possesses the power to terrorize America’s voters to elect Hillary Clinton, even if we otherwise would not.



Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten