SUPPORT MH17 TRUTH: MACHINE GUN-LIKE HOLES INDICATE SHELLING FROM A MILITARY AIRCRAFT. NO EVIDENCE OF A SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE ATTACK.
More
lies prevail with regard to MH17. Recent press reports quoting the
Dutch Safety Board’s October 2015 final report point to “a
surface-to-air missile [which] exploded near the left side of the
passenger plane bringing down the aircraft.”
Although the Dutch report concluded that the Russian-made BUK surface-to-air missile with a 9N314M warhead brought down the Boeing 777, it did not mention which side was responsible for firing the missile… (International Business Times, March 8, 2016
The
evidence presented in this Global Research article (below) first
published on July 31, 2014 contradicts the report of the
Dutch Safety Board and provides evidence:
The
evidence amply confirms that Malaysian Airlines MH17 was not brought
down by a surface to air missile. It was brought down by military
aircraft.
The
West continues to accuse Russia and the Donbass separatists of having
brought down the plane with a surface to air missile. IT’S A LIE.
The Dutch investigation has been twisted.
UPDATE,
August 7, 2016
Washington’s
agenda in liaison with the Kiev regimes is to blame Russia. In recent
developments (August 3, 2016), Ukraine president Poroshenko has
visited Malaysia for discussions with Prime Minister Razak Najib:
“Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said Malaysia will work with Ukraine to bring the perpetrators to justice. “We will do whatever we can to find the truth for the sake of families who lost their loved ones in this tragic incident. “We are waiting for the criminal investigation report, which is expected to be tabled by the year-end, followed by a meeting to decide on the next course of action,” said Najib.(New Straights Times, August 4, 2016)
The
evidence available in September 2014 –including a BBC report which
the BBC decided to suppress– refutes the official story.
As
we recall, the alleged role of Russia in bringing down the plane was
used as a justification to implement the economic sanctions regime
against Moscow. Although not explicitly mentioned by the Dutch
investigators, Moscow remains the “main suspect” in this twisted
and fraudulent investigation, which will no doubt be the object of a
new gush of media lies and distortions. Moscow has expressed its
disagreement.
“They are fundamentally wrong, the lack of logic there is beyond comparison… I had a feeling that the commission was cherry-picking the evidence to suit a theory they had chosen.” Deputy head of Russia’s federal air transport agency Oleg Storchevoi (quoted by the Associated Press
Meanwhile,
the Dutch investigators have decided to temporarily
withhold their final verdict:
“it soon should determine the exact launch site of the missile that brought down the plane, killing all 298 people on board.
But Fred Westerbeke, the prosecutor leading the international probe, warned Monday that completing the investigation would take much longer. He declined to name a possible finishing date.
After briefing relatives of victims on the investigation, Westerbeke pledged to complete the investigation “as quickly as possible, if only because of the frustration among the families.” (AP, March 7, 2016)
Since
July 2014, Global Research has compiled evidence and analysis which
refutes the official story.
Our
message to the families: The Dutch investigators are lying.
Numerous
authors and specialists have contributed to the MH17 dossier, which
is available on the Global Research website. Unequivocally this
dossier refutes the official story.
Revelations
of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of
Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile” By Peter
Haisenko,
July 30, 2014
Michel
Chossudovsky, September 2016
“SUPPORT MH17 TRUTH”: OSCE MONITORS IDENTIFY “SHRAPNEL AND MACHINE GUN-LIKE HOLES” INDICATING SHELLING. NO EVIDENCE OF A MISSILE ATTACK. SHOT DOWN BY A MILITARY AIRCRAFT
by
Michel Chossudovsky
Global
Research
July
31, 2014
According
to the report of German pilot and airlines expert Peter Haisenko, the
MH17 Boeing 777 was not brought down by a missile.
What
he observed from the available photos were perforations of the
cockpit:
The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. (Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile” Global Research, July 30, 2014)
Based on detailed analysis Peter Haisenko reached the conclusion that the MH17 was not downed by a missile attack:
This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion. The destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material
The
OSCE Mission
It
is worth noting that the initial statements by OSCE (OVSE, AP) observers (July
31) broadly confirm the findings of Peter Haisenko:
Monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe reported that shrapnel-like holes were found in two separate pieces of the fuselage of the ill-fated Malaysia Airlines aircraft that was believed to have been downed by a missile in eastern Ukraine.
Michael Bociurkiw of the OSCE group of monitors at his daily briefing described part of the plane’s fuselage dotted with “shrapnel-like, almost machine gun-like holes.” He said the damage was inspected by Malaysian aviation-security officials .(Wall Street Journal, July 31, 2014)
The
monitoring OSCE team has not found evidence of a missile fired from
the ground as conveyed by official White House statements. As we
recall, the US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power stated –pointing
a finger at Russia– that the Malaysian MH17 plane was “likely
downed by a surface-to-air missile operated from a separatist-held
location”:
The team of international investigators with the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are uncertain if the missile used was fired from the ground as US military experts have previously suggested, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported. (Malay Mail online, emphasis added)
The
initial OSCE findings tend to dispel the claim that a BUK missile
system brought down the plane.
Evidently,
inasmuch as the perforations are attributable to shelling, a shelling
operation conducted from the ground could not have brought down an
aircraft traveling above 30,000 feet.
Ukraine
Su-25 military aircraft within proximity of MH17
Peter
Haisenko’s study is corroborated by the Russian Ministry of Defense
which pointed to a Ukrainian Su-25 jet in the flight corridor of the
MH17, within proximity of the plane.
Ironically,
the presence of a military aircraft is also confirmed by a BBC
report conducted at the crash site on July 23.
All
the eyewitnesses interviewed by the BBC confirmed the presence
of a Ukrainian military aircraft flying within proximity of Malaysian
Airlines MH17 at the time that it was shot down:
Eyewitness #1: There were two explosions in the air. And this is how it broke apart. And [the fragments] blew apart like this, to the sides. And when …
Eyewitness #2: … And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it. Everybody saw it.
Eyewitness #1: Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.
Eyewitness #3: There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. They came from the sky. Then this plane made a sharp turn-around like this. It changed its trajectory and headed in that direction [indicating the direction with her hands].
BBC Report below
The
original BBC Video Report published by BBC Russian Service on July
23, 2014 has since been removed from the BBC archive.
In
a bitter irony, The BBC is censoring its own news productions.
This
is the BBC Report, still available on Youtube
It
has now been blocked [March 8, 2016] once more by the BBC. It is
called suppressing the evidence.
BELOW
SCREENSHOT OF BC TV REPORT ENTITLED “AND THERE WAS ANOTHER
AIRCRAFT” SUPPRESSED BY THE BBC
Media
Spin
The
media has reported that a surface to air missile was indeed fired and
exploded before reaching its target. It was not the missile
that brought down the plane, it was the shrapnel resulting from the
missile explosion (prior to reaching the plane) which punctured the
plane and then led to a loss of pressure.
According
to Ukraine’s National security spokesman Andriy Lysenko in a
contradictory statement, the MH17 aircraft “suffered
massive explosive decompression after being hit by a shrapnel
missile.”
(See IBT,
Australia)
The downed Malaysia Airlines jet in eastern Ukraine suffered an explosive loss of pressure after it was punctured by shrapnel from a missile.
They say the information came from the plane’s flight data recorders, which are being analysed by British experts.
However, it remains unclear who fired a missile, with pro-Russia rebels and Ukraine blaming each other.
Many of the 298 people killed on board flight MH17 were from the Netherlands.
Dutch investigators leading the inquiry into the crash have refused to comment on the Ukrainian claims.
The
shrapnel marks should be distinguished from the small entry and exit
holes “most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile”
fired from a military aircraft. These holes could not have been
caused by a missile explosion as hinted by the MSM.
While
the MSN is saying that the “shrapnel like holes” can be caused
by a missile (see BBC report above), the OSCE has confirmed the
existence of what it describes as “machine
gun like holes”, without however acknowledging that these cannot
be caused by a missile.
In
this regard, the GSh-302 firing gun operated by an Su-25 is able to
fire 3000 rpm which explains the numerous entry and exit holes.
According
to the findings
of Peter Haisenko:
If we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s cockpit segment (op cit)
The
accusations directed against Russia including the sanctions regime
imposed by Washington are based on a lie.
The
evidence does not support the official US narrative to the effect
that the MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile system operated by the
DPR militia.
What
next? More media disinformation, more lies?
See:
Revelations
of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of
Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile” By Peter
Haisenko,
July 30, 2014
The
original source of this article is Global Research
en: 'MH17 en 'overtuigende bewijzen', vooral die uit Oekraïne en de VS.....'
en: 'Moscow shared MH17 radar images, Dutch probe ignored evidence, Russia tells victims’ relatives'
en: 'MH17 herdenking in Oost-Oekraïne, amper aandacht in 'onafhankelijke' Nederlandse media........'
en: 'MH 17 schandaal.........'
en: 'Hubert Smeets met 5 km/u. finaal uit de bocht: feiten worden door RT niet met andere feiten bestreden, RT haalt ze alleen maar onderuit....... ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!'
en: 'MH17 drie jaar later, het is leugens en bedrog wat de klok slaat........'
en: 'MH17: JIT heeft plotseling bijna de hele BUK-raket.........' (klik ook op de links onder dat bericht)
Overigens wordt in dit bericht niet gesproken over een verdwenen autopsie rapport, een rapport over één van de piloten, die bijna letterlijk in tweeën werd geschoten met munitie, die alleen in MIG straaljagers wordt gebruikt.........
Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.
